Feminism is Good for Human Evolution

Atlas_B_Shruggin · 2015-07-19T21:22:07+00:00

In recent history, patriarchy, through the institution of marriage, restricted alpha men to one woman only. This made it so every man could mate. But this is unnatural and it stifles evolution.

And caused the unnatural thing we call "advanced technological civilization"

this is why camille paglia famously said "if civilization had been left up to women, we'd all still be living in grass huts"

QED

ToshiroOzuwara · 2015-07-19T21:27:33+00:00

Nothing man does is unnatural. Man is from nature. What he does is as natural as an ant hill or a beaver dam.

HappilySingleWoman · 2015-07-19T21:18:52+00:00

The thing is that it causes some problems on a social level (a lot of men get excluded from the dating pool), so even if you're right (I'm not saying you are) , it will take some time for humans to adapt to these changes.

runitonce007 · 2015-07-19T22:09:52+00:00

Darwinism is survival of the fittest. Not survival of the most attractive.

This is great until all non-alpha (in an attractive sense) males gradually cotton onto the fact that they're being used, overlooked, & settled for. A large portion of such men remaining unmarried is a disaster for society, which is why society has begun to introduce laws where a woman can still bleed a man dry in court regardless of marital status.

scrantonic1ty · 2015-07-19T21:37:51+00:00

Civilisation operates outside of darwinian imperatives. It is artificial, and it is built on the backs of the exploited lower classes (beta males). Thing is, they only accept exploitation if you throw them a treat every now and then, pat them on the head and tell them they're a good boy. That's where the wife comes in.

The betas have a breaking point. The danger comes when a disenfranchised alpha sociopath organises them, they violently overthrow the Government and dust off the guillotines.

smokingmonkey420 · 2015-07-20T00:43:51+00:00

Alphas today are not necessarily what we would consider "quality sperm." Many so called Alphas are as dumb as a bag of rocks but get by on good looks and aggressiveness. Others just don't give a fuck and are literal sociopaths.

On the other hand, you have Isaac Newton who literally died as a virgin and created Calculus all on his own. Nikola Tesla worked day and night to create his inventions. Bill Gates was likely the epitome of a beta until he created Microsoft and became one of the most powerful people on the face of the earth.

So the answer is a big resounding NO. What is considered Alpha today is not what's good for our evolution because our survival depends on the intellect of our people, not its aggressiveness, charm or good looks.

Maybe what's good for evolution is to do away with sluts who cause nothing but chaos amongst men. Maybe men should be focused on finding "quality eggs."

OlBastard · 2015-07-20T00:51:26+00:00

You can drink all the alpha semen you want in a technologically regressed and chaotic society. Oh, wait, you won't, because you'd likely be raped and perhaps killed or taken to another harem.

Xemnas81 · 2015-07-19T21:28:03+00:00

Oh what a hilarious troll. Yes we should completely eradicate betas from the gene pool to increase the genetic potential of the human race. I'd invoke Godwin's Law but I know you want me to do that.

wazzup987 · 2015-07-19T22:13:17+00:00

probability of troll: troll² out of troll

Assuming not a troll, Even rp say the alphas are bad for society and while usefull in prehistory as far as modern society is concerned should be a genetic dead as pure alphas are really bad for society.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kkAauZJp5A

wtknight · 2015-07-19T22:39:26+00:00

Using Red Pill terminology, I don't think most feminists are picking alpha men to have sex with. Most are picking betas because they can have more power in those relationships. Even if a feminist is very sex positive and also having sex with Alpha Chad, she is likely demanding that he use protection or using some form of birth control during these trists. She is having her kids with the Beta, though.

h887b2 · 2015-07-19T22:50:54+00:00

I'm not a red pill supporter at all, but I have to disagree with this. If you look at the impact of women entering the work force on who has children, you find that more educated women have fewer children because they put off having children to advance their career. For example, according to the census, among women past child bearing age, those with advanced degrees are more than twice as likely to be childless as those who never finished high school, with the childless rate going up at every increment of education (source).

And the "alpha" men having children aren't necessarily the fittest. The red pill men are trying to have as much sex as possible, not as many children as possible. With the widespread availability of contraception, they opt to separate the two, and you usually hear them arguing against marriage. The only ones having children are the ones not planning ahead, or the "betas" who want to settle down and have children.

AmericanHistoryAFBB · 2015-07-19T23:17:12+00:00

It's probably doing some good for the casual sex, hook up market, but at what cost? Light you said, it's fighting long term monogamy. To me, thats a problem. The problem with feminism is that it's now harder to get girls to commit to you than ever before.

meehan666 · 2015-07-20T00:08:10+00:00

So BP, tell me again how feminism isn't about screwing over the average "low value" man?

Title	Feminism is Good for Human Evolution
Author	femidarwin
Upvotes	4
Comments	77
Date	July 19, 2015 9:15 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3dvf6d/feminism_is_good_for_human_evolution/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/feminism-is-good-for-human-evolution.280900 https://theredarchive.com/post/280900

Comments