Summary: TL;DR - Beta males are the ultimate disposable creatures. No one cares if they live or die, and no one cares about their needs.

Check out his latest blog entry (I read it every morning, over my tea, because I find its a great way to start the day):

*Note: I'm not using an archive link, because I assume we want to give Scott page views, but just in case, I'll include both. Use whichever you want *

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/133406477506/global-gender-war

And

https://archive.is/4GGNP

Alright, key parts of the post:

Lonely boys tend to be suicidal when the odds of future female companionship are low.

Lonely boys and lonely men tend to be that way. I don't think its coincidence the suicide epidemic amongst men tends to cluster around the betas. It is deeply unpopular in western culture to talk about the plight of young boys.

I don’t recall anyone complaining about leaving millions of innocent adult males to horrible suffering. In this country, any solution to a problem that involves killing millions of adult men is automatically on the table.

Male disposibility. Any idea that involves killing even a small number of women is horrible, any idea that involves killing a large number of men is on the table. Now, let me end with the kicker to Adam's post (the entire thing is worth reading). This is the part that truly makes me stop and think:

You want a linguistic kill shot to end DAESH recruiting? I don’t have the details worked out, but perhaps something along the lines of…

If you kill infidels, you will be rewarded with virgins in heaven. But if you kill your own leaders today – the ones holding the leash on our balls – you can have access to women tomorrow. And tomorrow is sooner.

By openly saying this, Adams is treading very dangerous territory, perhaps more than he realizes. What he just referenced is the "beta uprising" that gets so much hate as being a breeding ground for "toxic masculinity". That is the essence of beta uprising: stand up, kill the alphas and take the women for themselves. The chans have been posting this stuff for years.

Problem is, society is dependent on beta men. If they ever wake up, en masse, the entire fabric of the planet will change. Alphas lead and take care of business and make money, but without the betas, there's nothing for the Alphas to build on. An alpha male football player has no value without lots of beta males to cheer him on and pay money to witness his athletic talents. Women ride the CC in their youth, without the betas there at the end after she hits the wall, there's nothing for her to "fall back on" when the time comes to "settle down". If Betas refused to accept sloppy seconds, the world would be forced to make a choice. Betas never will, because they need female validation/affection as much as they need oxygen, but if they ever did, it would be epic.

Aside - I really believe this was the origins of marriage (i.e. why it was invented). If your Alpha, the harem model is great for you. If you're female, the harem model is also great (you get the best genes for your offspring, even if you have to share). It sucks for the betas. So why would society want to give the betas anything? Because if Betas don't have anything invested, they won't work, and if they don't work, you can't build an advanced society (which requires their labor).

Lessons learned:

1) the world is dependent on betas in order to keep the earth turning.

2) female companionship is the lure that society uses to keep betas in line.

3) if you don't want this fate, due something about it!