~ archived since 2018 ~

How does the false flag sperm-jack poster sleep at night?

funnyfaceking · 2012-04-08T12:15:57+00:00

Before: http://i.imgur.com/QdsSI.jpg After: http://i.imgur.com/2M847.png Source EDIT: I got this in my inbox: http://i.imgur.com/G3ic8.png Likely Story...

funnyfaceking

April 8, 2012

52 upvotes

/r/MensRights

Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	How does the false flag sperm-jack poster sleep at night?
Author	funnyfaceking
Upvotes	52
Comments	71
Date	April 8, 2012 12:15 PM UTC (14 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/rz569/how_does_the_false_flag_spermjack_poster_sleep_at/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/how-does-the-false-flag-sperm-jack-poster-sleep-at.1024451 https://theredarchive.com/post/1024451

Comments

[–][deleted] 52 points53 points54 points 14 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 12 points13 points14 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ineedhelpnow1234 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Lucaribro 14 points15 points16 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Liverotto 32 points33 points34 points 14 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 14 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]grensley 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Kerdek 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Liverotto 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Alanna 8 points9 points10 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]C0CKPUNCHER 11 points12 points13 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]PeterArching 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]rightsbot 5 points6 points7 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]TalesAbound 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]Celda 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]TalesAbound 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]matt_512 5 points6 points7 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Celda 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ineedhelpnow1234 -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]funnyfaceking[S] 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]CriticalThinker007 3 points4 points5 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Based upon this person's behavior I am convinced that if they are typing, they are lying.

Their excuse doesn't even make any sense.

They claim to have deleted the second comment because they thought it said something "inflammatory", but left up the first comment because it was "particularly vile"?

This is stupidity of the highest order.

If this person was purging "inflammatory" comments from their blog, what would be the purpose of leaving the "particularly vile" post there, wouldn't that one be deleted as well?

I managed to read the majority of the posts on that site before they were deleted and what I can tell you is that the posts which are gone are in fact more sedate and reasonable than the ones that remain.

The ones that are gone are those which did not agree with this person and were not able to be twisted toward the narrative they are trying to present.

[–]RavensAreAwesome 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]mra4ever -1 points0 points1 point 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]gattofila 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Psuffix -5 points-4 points-3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 14 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TalesAbound 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]JockeVXO 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheMagicUpvoteFairy 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]JockeVXO 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheMagicUpvoteFairy 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]JockeVXO 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheMagicUpvoteFairy 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Psuffix 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Alanna 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ExistentialEnso 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]aetheralloy 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]TalesAbound 14 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

The sad thing is that the latter category is very small, numerically, in comparison to the more extremist parts of the spectrum.

[–]ExistentialEnso 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 14 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TheGentlemanZombie 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago* (24 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 14 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]manboobz -4 points-3 points-2 points 14 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

I suggest you go read the thread on MB; Toy Soldier has completely misrepresented what went on. The MB challenged a male rape survivor for arguing that his abuser should have gotten a much shorter sentence than she in fact did. (Yes, you read that right. The MB commenters thought she should have gotten the stiff sentence she in fact did get.) There were a few who challenged aspects of his story, because he is someone who has lied about numerous things in the past. But no one made light of his abuse.

There are numerous regular commenters on MB who not only care deeply about helping abused men and boys, but actually volunteer or work to help them. Many of those commenting on MB, male and female, have been themselves abused, and they do not minimize abuse, no matter who the victim is.

I understand that Toy Soldier was himself abused, and feels very passionately about the cause of abused men and boys, as well he should, but he is deeply dishonest in dealing with people he disagrees with.

I realize none of you will actually go to look at the original thread on MB, and will simply accept his version as true, bu tI felt I had to say that nonetheless.

Later, after an antifeminist troll on MB viciously attacked a male rape surivivor (who happens to be a feminist) Toy Soldier wrote a snotty post portraying it as a case of "some of the Manboobzers [getting] a taste of their own vile." He did not even see the most vile comments that were posted by this person; I deleted them. (And offered to show him screenshots later.)

But somehow TS has convinced himself that the fact that some MB commenters disagreed on a few things with one male survivor is equivalent to someone viciously attacking another male survivor in an attempt to trigger him.

http://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2012/03/10/monkey-see-monkey-do/

[–]Lucaribro 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]manboobz 0 points1 point2 points 14 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 14 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]manboobz -2 points-1 points0 points 14 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]funnyfaceking[S] 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]funnyfaceking1 point 14 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 14 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]manboobz -4 points-3 points-2 points 14 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 14 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]manboobz -3 points-2 points-1 points 14 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 14 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted]2 points 14 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]altmehere 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Psuffix -3 points-2 points-1 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]funnyfaceking[S] 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]manboobz -7 points-6 points-5 points 14 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That critique is misleading and dishonest. If you're going to read it, I suggest you read my actual debate posts first.

http://manboobz.blogspot.com/p/not-so-great-debate-on-domestic.html

And this as a followup:

http://manboobz.blogspot.com/2010/11/further-reading-domestic-violence.html

As I say in the original debate post:

The point of all this is not to deny that men suffer from DV. They do, and though a much smaller percentage of men suffer from serious abuse than women, the suffering they endure is every bit as real. Men don't have to suffer half of all serious abuse for their suffering to count; there is no need to exaggerate to make the point that we as a society need to take abuse directed at men more seriously.

The question is what is to be done about it. And it is here that the Men's Rights movement in general, and you in particular, Paul, have failed completely, in many ways making the problem even worse. The solution to DV against men is not to publish articles with titles like "When is it OK to Punch Your Wife," filled with explicit fantasies of male retribution against women. [EL] The solution to female violence is not more male violence.

[–]funnyfaceking[S] 4 points5 points6 points 14 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 14 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

That critique isn't misleading and dishonest, it just applies the views of the wider DV research community on feminist abuse data abuse and manipulation, to your repetition of that data abuse and manipulation.

You're so arrogant and dishonest presuming to lecture groups that for a long time have supported inclusive services and the honest data, from a position that doggedly maintains dishonest radical feminist positions on DV and discriminatory DV services and even though you are there in print using established and known feminist methods of covering up abuse.

You're really painting yourselves into a corner with your lies and dishonesty.

They do, and though a much smaller percentage of men suffer from serious abuse than women

Citations you abuse minimizing person?

The latest CDC data says that of the small % of physical DV that at the serious end, women are x2 as likely to be injured, while other data contradicts that data and finds that there are few differences in the rate, while the CDC says in another study on frequency of DV, that women are significantly more likely to get physical in the first place, that women become violent first 70% of the time and that male on female dv is the least common form, and that that a womans own DV is the strongest predictor of her getting injured by DV.

And neither your radical feminist positions taken from dishonest blogs like FF101, or what the real research is actually saying justifies the type discriminatory services, laws and a billion dollars a year going to radical feminists that you advocate for, instead of it going to DV experts that tell the truth, use the good data and would work towards actually fixing the problems instead of sweeping them under the carpet, spreading misandrist lies, lining the coffers of radical feminist groups and working off 2nd wave radical feminist, ideological nonsense - all the while supported by people like you.

[–]altmehere 1 point2 points3 points 14 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Comments

Rules of Western Feminist Society