So, apparently, this is an acceptable method of arguing with someone over reddit.

OThomson · 2012-02-02T01:12:10+00:00

I never get that kind of PM. Everyone gets hate mail except me.

I feel so left out :(

TheDongerNeedsFood · 2012-02-03T23:17:16+00:00

So she PMed you first, before you had ever PMed her, in order to prevent you from ever PMing her?

GavnLogic · 2012-02-02T03:36:45+00:00

lol It's funny because blocking a user doesn't prevent you from seeing their comments, just their PMs.

GavnLogic · 2012-02-02T08:07:21+00:00

I think there's one in particular who keeps having to make new accounts for getting banned. Seems like the same person... always going on about virgins and small dicks and stuff. Tells people to kill themselves, too.

Not exactly, uh, sane.

luciansolaris · 2012-02-02T02:28:54+00:00

Bwahahaha this thread is too funny!

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/p4hyp/why_does_a_woman_who_accuses_a_man_of_rape_get_to/c3n0e96

hardwarequestions · 2012-02-02T01:27:09+00:00

post her username so we can block her?

luciansolaris · 2012-02-02T01:52:56+00:00

A followup to http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/p4hyp/why_does_a_woman_who_accuses_a_man_of_rape_get_to/c3mzxxj:

I'm not sexist, I believe in the laws of gravity.

What is unsupported at an elevated level ought to drop to the first adequate support.

The laws of economics extend from a physical law known as the law of the conservation of energy, aka the second law of thermodynamics. Economy is a systemic approach to fulfilling the needs of the participants who are at the mercy of the second law. Failure to mitigate results in systemic breakdown of the participant (e.g. not eating results in an organism dying).

If you are linked to this comment as an example of some "woman hater" know this: what I state above is almost exactly what would happen in nature if government did not exist, and is therefore the lowest-cost process this system can operate by.

Government ought not be there to legislate away the consequences of failing to obey gravity, and government ought not transfer said consequences to other parties. Doing so creates systemic imbalances that will carry deeper consequences. Single motherhood has exploded because mothers do not go poor when they have children on their own. When you subsidize a behavior, you in essence "purchase" more of it!

luciansolaris · 2012-02-02T01:17:27+00:00

One thing that arguing with feminists has taught me: not every citizen should be allowed to vote.

I think voting should be outright denied to anyone receiving social safety-net benefits, such as welfare or socsec. These people are compromised voters, many willing to vote for anyone promising them a bigger monthly check.

If anything, I'd support a taxation system where you pay to vote. No pay taxes, no vote. Short-fall should be covered strictly by goods-import and resource-export tariffs. This will bring revenue down to chop away 80% of the executive while making voters, and foreigners wishing to sell into the US, pay for the national gov't.

As well, it would help if the national gov't is restricted from dictating to citizens directly, and only fulfills the duties given under Article 1 Section 8.

Title	So, apparently, this is an acceptable method of arguing with someone over reddit.
Author	Unconfidence
Upvotes	9
Comments	74
Date	February 2, 2012 12:49 AM UTC (14 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p6ydm/so_apparently_this_is_an_acceptable_method_of/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/so-apparently-this-is-an-acceptable-method-of.1028374 https://theredarchive.com/post/1028374

Comments