TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

If all occupations over 90% female went on strike vs if all occupations over 90% male went on strike. Discuss.

Rothandle

May 9, 2021
87 upvotes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
https://careersmart.org.uk/occupations/equality/which-jobs-do-men-and-women-do-occupational-breakdown-gender
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title If all occupations over 90% female went on strike vs if all occupations over 90% male went on strike. Discuss.
Author

Rothandle

Upvotes 87
Comments 43
Date May 9, 2021 5:39 PM UTC
(5 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/n8j7f5/if_all_occupations_over_90_female_went_on_strike/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/if-all-occupations-over-90-female-went-on-strike.1061374
https://theredarchive.com/post/1061374

Comments

[–]TEL-CFC_boi 90 points91 points92 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Women are all about equal numbers in the workplace...right up until those workplaces stop being cushy office jobs and start being oil rigs and ice-road trucking

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate[M] 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This comment was reported as a rule 6 violation. But the statement is supported by the facts.

[–][deleted] 73 points74 points75 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The list:

Occupations over 90% female in the UK are: 1. Nursery Nurses and Assistants 2. Legal Secretaries 3. Medical Secretaries 4 Personal Assistants 5. Child-Minders 6. School Secretaries 7. Teaching Assistants 8. And Housekeepers

Occupations over 95% male in the UK are: 1.Vehicle Mechanics, Techs, and Electricians 2. Carpenters and Joiners 3. Welding 4. Electricians 5. Metal working 6. Plumbers 7. Mobile machine drivers and operators 8. Large goods vehicle drivers 9. Fork-lift drivers 10. Elementary construction work 11. Floorers and wall tilers 12. Glaziers and window fabs and fitters 13. Electronics tech. 14. Construction and Building n.e.c. 15. Electrical and electronic trades n.e.c. 16. Design and Development engineers 17. Paper and Wood machine operators 18. Taxi drivers and chauffeurs 19. Train and tram drivers 20. Telecom engineers 21. Painters 22. Skilled metal, electrical and electronics trades supervisors

(I stopped at 95% because it was getting unweildy. You get the idea.)

So, A, how does anyone believe the world would be a better place without us? We literally keep the lights on and the roof from falling. Get the food delivered.

And, B, how do working men as a class tap the vast underutilized bargaining power we have because we literally keep the lights on and the roof from falling and the food on the shelves?

[–]Vusys 24 points25 points26 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fixed formatting:

The list:

Occupations over 90% female in the UK are: 1. Nursery Nurses and Assistants
2. Legal Secretaries
3. Medical Secretaries
4 Personal Assistants
5. Child-Minders
6. School Secretaries
7. Teaching Assistants
8. And Housekeepers

Occupations over 95% male in the UK are: 1. Vehicle Mechanics, Techs, and Electricians
2. Carpenters and Joiners
3. Welding
4. Electricians
5. Metal working
6. Plumbers
7. Mobile machine drivers and operators
8. Large goods vehicle drivers
9. Fork-lift drivers
10. Elementary construction work
11. Floorers and wall tilers
12. Glaziers and window fabs and fitters
13. Electronics tech.
14. Construction and Building n.e.c.
15. Electrical and electronic trades n.e.c.
16. Design and Development engineers
17. Paper and Wood machine operators
18. Taxi drivers and chauffeurs
19. Train and tram drivers
20. Telecom engineers
21. Painters
22. Skilled metal, electrical and electronics trades supervisors

(I stopped at 95% because it was getting unweildy. You get the idea.)

So, A, how does anyone believe the world would be a better place without us? We literally keep the lights on and the roof from falling. Get the food delivered.

And, B, how do working men as a class tap the vast underutilized bargaining power we have because we literally keep the lights on and the roof from falling and the food on the shelves?

[–]metalnotorious 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You surely can make a point that world think of us as disposable and all those tropes who call men are trash or kill all men are wrong because we literally support the human life . But I think and your opinion can be different on this we should not make this as men vs women we won't be able to achieve anything with that. Feminist do it and we hate them for this very reason. Don't become the people who you hate

[–]pooinetopantelonimoo 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

how do men tap the... Bargaining power we have

Strikes seem an obvious answer, but the more pragmatic question is how do you get all men to agree something is worth striking over and organise it.

Is it possible to form an all male union?

[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is it possible to form an all male union?

Even if it were, is that something we should want?

[–]Archeopteryx3745 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reminds me of that Swedish documentary, how was it called? Where even in the most "progressive" societies women still chose to do those jobs and did not enter construction, transportation or menial jobs at the same rates.

Keeping men docile and gaslighted means controlling the most important sectors of the working class. It's no wonder feminism is pushed by the elites. A fracture in the proletariat means less power to contest real opression.

[–]Vista_Seagrape 38 points39 points40 points 5 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

I've thought about this. Imagine:

  • the majority if garbage collectors. Garbage would pile up. Filth, smell, disease.

  • the majority of truck drivers. After 3 days, grocery stores have no food and people stop eating.

  • the majority of plumbers. Pipes burst? Your house floods.

  • the majority of construction workers and manual laborers. No new cars or buildings.

  • majority of police. Imagine if criminals know they will almost certainly get away with any crime, even murder

I could go on, but I really don't think I have to.

But really, let's not make it a comparison. Women's strikes are wrong because they imply men do less, and women aren't fairly compensated, neither of which is true. Society clearly favors women and gives preferential treatment in law and welfare. No one denies that women don't contribute, but we resent the idea that men are the "lazy gender who get more then we deserve."

[–]DanteLivra 26 points27 points28 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

There are quotas for more police women because it is a prestigious job.

Altought a lot of feminists have called for lowering the standards when recruting women.

Because somehow criminals will be more compliant if the police officer chasing them is a woman. /s

[–]Svennboii 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Altought a lot of feminists have called for lowering the standards when recruting women.

Is that why "I thought it was my taser" had a job?

[–]DanteLivra 11 points12 points13 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nobody will know 🤷‍♂️

But you are a misogynist for pointing it out, sweety💅

[–]excess_inquisitivity 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because somehow criminals will be more compliant if the police officer chasing them is a woman. /s

Eventually, they will begin to incur punishment surcharges for the "hate crime" of refusing to comply with a female law enforcer.

[–]SpareDesigner1 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There are actually some things for which female police officers are very useful. You need one to search a female detainee, for one thing. They’re also often used in interviews, particularly high-stakes interviews, to unsettle the suspect if they’re male, and to try and see if a soft approach from a female will help to break him down.

Beyond that though, yeah, it’s absurd to believe that a running man won’t just overpower a female officer most of the time.

[–]DanteLivra 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I get what you mean, I'm not against women getting in the police, I'm against lowering the standards of recruitement for a particular group on the basis of "fairness".

[–]lorarc 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let's not forget police doesn't only deal with violent crime. They more often deal with accidents and domestic abuse.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why not make it a comparison? Too rude? In the face of "kill all men" rhetoric being pushed into neutral spaces, "hey. Check out our social utility in comparison to women's" appearing in pro-male spaces is too rude? Idk how you expect to advocate for men if you're unwilling to compare men and women in a way that's rude to women.

[–]Langland88 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

majority of police. Imagine if criminals know they will almost certainly get away with any crime, even murder

That one would probably be applauded by some Far-left groups right now such as the BLM movement here in the US which has also gain much support from the feminist movement as well.

[–]Atilla942left-wing male advocate 18 points19 points20 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Why do feminists need to play this gender war? Both men and women do important jobs. Some of the jobs women do would tear the health sector apart if they were all to take a day off and same goes for men. There would total chaos in different ways.

[–][deleted] 21 points22 points23 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Even "male advocates" down-play men. Ya know what would close a hospital just as hard as a lack of nurses? A lack of electricity. Only one of those things would also close every other facility in society.

[+]skellious -9 points-8 points-7 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

A mental health crisis would also cause a lack of electricity. people-focused jobs are important.

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The percentage of people seeing a therapist vs the percentage of people driving cars. It's not even comparable.

[–]skellious -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess it depends on your friendship group. most of my friends, including me, have had therapy at some point in our lives.

[–]SylV3520 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Lool there's a male mental health crisis now but the electricity still runs gtfo with that

[–]skellious 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

its almost like our society forces men to ignore their problems and just keep pushing themselves until they break and shoot someone, themself or otherwise.

[–]skellious 16 points17 points18 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the male jobs went on strike: Everything would break. If the female jobs went on strike: Everyone would break.

We need both, all of them are important jobs, and to my mind it doesn't matter so much whether jobs are male or female dominated, unless you start taking actions to artificially alter the ratios.

[–]DistrictAccurate 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm gonna say it: does it actually matter?

Of course I know some who voice their gendercidal tendencies about getting rid of men. But like... do we need an argument against that? Will they become capable of feeling empathetic towards men once a man tells them that men are needed? Are those actually arguments where our time and effort are well spent?

I feel a much more compelling approach would be that claiming men not to be needed unless evidence is provided is a manifestation of men's perceived lack of value to the point of being revoked the right to live until you can prove that you are a valuable tool to use for others advancement - thereby displaying that it is not just men being considered to be strong and so on that is backfiring as benovelent sexism, but men being misandristically expected to posess up to superhuman abilities to the point that others will consider getting rid of them if they do not - and it shows, as men literally die to the jobs and mental stress placed on them.

Men receive less empathy as victims compared to women. Is it a result of the patriarchial belief that men will become invincible if you just pretend for long enough - the only way it could be part of a benefit to men, or is it a result of the deeply rooted misandristic belief that if the man wasn't able to defend himself and cope with the resulting injuries, impairment and trauma in silence, he was nobody valuable and convenient enough to feel empathetic towards and if a man wasn't able to provide and is now homeless, that he is nobody worth protecting and feeding, as he prooved to be incapable of competing in the very abilities, the very reason his gender was kept alive for?

[–]metalnotorious 19 points20 points21 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Can't we all just agree that both men and women are required and if either one of them went on strike . It would be as if the world has stopped moving. I thought the main purpose of this group was to be better than feminist. They are putting men vs women. We just want equal rights. Don't derail the conversations here.

[–]Billy-Batdorf 14 points15 points16 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You're lying to reduce male importance, something that is denied to us by feminist propaganda and capitalist reality. You cannot achieve equality by lying about our relative differences and starting places, that would effectively be a handout of more feminist privileges.

[–]metalnotorious 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

No I am saying both women and men have a role to play in the society. Women on average are care givers nourishing whereas men are protectors. I think both roles are required now it depends when we require it. For example if you want to report a theft male dominated role would be required. If an elderly couple want a house help female dominated role would be required. It is more condition based

[–]Billy-Batdorf 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is 'moving the goalpost'. We weren't discussing parents or non-occupational roles.

[–]metalnotorious 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh yeah sorry. Corrected that

[–]skellious 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree, all these jobs are important to maintaining our present society. Many of those women-dominated jobs involve looking after people working in the male-dominated jobs. they support those jobs and if they stopped doing it it would become far harder to do those jobs.

[–]The-Author 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Was going to say something like this myself. I mean I get why OP posted this (because men as a gender are being portrayed in an increasingly negative light in the west) but I don't think this is productive.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You don't think it's productive to male advocacy to point out our role and utility in society?

[–]The-Author 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm honestly not sure. I mean yes, pointing out that men do a lot of good in society and contribute a lot is helpful for arguing for social change in how men are treated.

But at the same time it kinda feels like its feeding into this whole gender culture war situation that's going on. Where instead of acknowledging that both sides have problems that deserved to be worked on we instead argue which has it worse or which deserves it more.

How do you see it as being productive?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We could. We'd have to ignore literal reality, but we could do that.

[–]Strikester101 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"A world without men would make women feel safe"

A world without men would lead to more disasters that would compromise women's safety far more than previously.

I love how feminist fantasy fiction only conclusionof world wothout men is "no violence". Even though violence can arise from a myriad of reasons.

[–]SonOfHibernia 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Society would completely grind to halt overnight without men working. If women stopped it would hold up certain industries immediately, restaurants, school, but hospitals and medical care would also be in trouble if women walked off

[–]cakeandcokeleft-wing male advocate 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But but I need my younique

[–]Ody_ssey 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Instant collapse if men go to strike. All outside uncomfortable jobs are done by men. No country can afford that.

[–]IntelligentEbb4837 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If male dominated jobs all went on strike, the country would collapse. I cannot say the same for female dominated jobs.

[–]Impossible_Cat_9796 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If women stopped working the child care and food prep and cleaning crisies would be bad enough to rival the infrastructure collapse and end to shipping we would see if men stopped working. She didn't spend 3 hours making dinner because she is lazy or stupid or painfully inefficient. It really does take 3 hours to make a healthy dinner for a large family. The cost savings from making the food from scratch was well over the value she could have provided doing paid labor.

While roughly equal numbers of men and women participate in the workforce, they are not equal participants. Men do much more in the paid labor force and women are much more engaged in the unpaid labor aspects of the workforce. This unpaid labor isn't just valuable, but mission critical.

This kind of "men provide more value" kind of post is really no different in form or function from the "The Wage Gap" posts seen in feminist forums.

If women stopped working the child care and food prep and cleaning crisies would be bad enough to rival the infrastructure collapse and end to shipping we would see if men stopped working. She didn't spend 3 hours making dinner because she is lazy or stupid or painfully inefficent. It really does take 3 hours to make a healthy dinner for a large family. The cost savings from making the food from scratch was well over the value she could have provided doing paid labor.

This kind of labor shortage in food prep couldn't be fixed with some flippant "just get some door dash".

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter