"When a woman beats a man, it should be classified as men's violence against women," The Gender Equality Authority writes this in a handbook on "violence, gender and prevention". #FEMINISM_IS_CHAUVINISM, female, anti-male, chauvinism.

Here the link:
https://kvartal-se.translate.goog/artiklar/jamstalldhetsmyndigheten-kvinnors-vald-mot-man-ar-en-del-av-mans-vald-mot-kvinnor/?_x_tr_sl=sv&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=sv&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Perhaps it's useful to recall the meaning of the word chauvinism. It is any group demanding privileges. Named after one of Napoleon's officers, who after returning from conquests in Egypt formed a group that demanded privileges in the law for military personnel. For 80-90 years the word Chauvinism detonated any group demanding privileges in the law, until the 1970s, when feminists attached the word "male" to the word "chauvinist" for the first time, and argued that there are male-chauvinists, that is, men who demand privileges in the law for men. Feminism became so powerful since then that the "male" was dropped and people started believing that chauvinism is somehow tied to "men" by nature - but this is only feminist propaganda, reaching another tremendous victory in shaping minds, in demonizing men, and in rewriting terms and history. Any group that demands privileges in laws and norms is chauvinistic and needs to be called chauvinist, this has nothing to do with the male sex in particular. And currently, feminism has become chauvinism - female chauvinism, female, anti-male chauvinism - demanding privileges in norms and in the law. And therefore criticizing feminism including being anti-feminist when feminism is chauvinism (female anti-male chauvinism), is not only not "hating women", but necessary if one supports equality in human value and in rights.