TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

UK: Rape cases should be tried in specialist courts, says report. OP: Looks like a hidden agenda to do a way with jury trials for rape allegations.

furchfur

February 25, 2022
150 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60496001
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title UK: Rape cases should be tried in specialist courts, says report. OP: Looks like a hidden agenda to do a way with jury trials for rape allegations.
Author

furchfur

Upvotes 150
Comments 42
Date February 25, 2022 9:50 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/t1091d/uk_rape_cases_should_be_tried_in_specialist/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/uk-rape-cases-should-be-tried-in-specialist-courts.1103037
https://theredarchive.com/post/1103037
Top posts by furchfur

UK: Innocent student wrongly accused of rape calls for anonymity for sex assault defendants until they are found guilty.

17408 upvotes
December 18, 2017
/r/MensRights

Thousands of dads are left in shock as DIY paternity tests soar. Up to 30,000 tests are being performed every year, says Alphabiolabs. In the UK about 750,000 babies are born every year. Feminists want the test to be illegal without the written consent of the mother.

4746 upvotes
January 13, 2019
/r/MensRights

Male rape survivors tell of their battle to have their voices heard after being told ‘men are the attackers, women are the victims’

4394 upvotes
April 14, 2017
/r/MensRights

16yo female 'prodigy' developer's app was actually written by a male programmer.

4210 upvotes
February 6, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Mother-of-two, 40, falsely branded a neighbour a sex offender because he 'made too much noise building a guinea pig hutch in his garden'. It seems for many women if they do not get their way they make a false sex allegation knowing a man is not protected by the law.

3937 upvotes
March 4, 2019
/r/MensRights

Female British YouTube vlogger accuses Dublin hotel of bullying her after it refused her request to stay there for free and posted their scathing response saying she 'lacked dignity' online

3871 upvotes
January 18, 2018
/r/PussyPassDenied

Nearly 500 men and boys are freed from 'house of torture' Islamic boarding school where they were chained up, raped by staff and starved 'in the name of teaching them the Koran' in Nigeria. OP: We will see how much media coverage this gets.

3825 upvotes
September 27, 2019
/r/MensRights

Teenager, 18, who lied that ex-boyfriend drugged and raped her after he refused to rekindle their romance is convicted of wasting police time

3747 upvotes
May 29, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]TheEthnicityOfASpoon 49 points50 points51 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Government spokesman:

“…focusing on the alleged suspects rather than complainants' credibility”

Translation: #beleiveallwomen

OP is exactly correct, this is the first step towards removing jury trials, and replacing them with “specially trained rape judges”. And who will do that training? Well, we know the answer to that, it will be hard-line radical feminists, and the result will be all men will be presumed guilty, unless they can prove their innocence.

[–]TheEthnicityOfASpoon 29 points30 points31 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can read the report here. Note there are many sections:

https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmicfrs/publication-html/a-joint-thematic-inspection-of-the-police-and-crown-prosecution-services-response-to-rape-phase-one/#police-decisions-to-take-no-further-action

You can see that a huge percentage of the cases do not proceed because the “complainant“ will not give any evidence, and does not want the case to go any further.

This particular section is very revealing. Note that they do not consider that one of the reasons that the “victim“ does not “support the case“, is because it’s a false allegation, and they made the whole thing up.

Once reality dawns for the false accuser, they withdraw their support. For many of these false accusers, they have already achieved their objective: A man has been arrested, intimately searched, DNA and other samples have been taken, and he has been in jail for days, weeks or months. He has most likely lost his job, and will be ostracised from his friends, family and society. Perhaps his wife has left him, and his children have been taken into care. He will forever have a serious police record, and his name will be smeared across the Internet, television, newspapers and the media.

Of course, no one will ever know her name, as even if she withdraw support for the case, she will have lifelong anonymity.

When the victim doesn’t support the case (Outcome 16)

In more than a third of the cases we reviewed (120 cases), the victim didn’t support the investigation from the outset. There are many understandable, and complicated, reasons why victims may not support police action. These include:

fear of the criminal justice system;

the need to move on;

negative effect on mental health and well-being;

and lack of support from family, friends or employers.

[–]aknabi 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The system will be considered “working” only when 99%+ of accused men are convicted.

[–]furchfur[S] 34 points35 points36 points 4 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

3144 cases went to trial and 1109 resulted in a conviction. There must be an awful lot of false allegations. Dubious evidence etc. No mention of this though.

[–]TheEthnicityOfASpoon 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. And the “problem“ that the radical feminists perceive, is that English juries refuse to simply believe a woman’s testimony over a man’s. The majority of English rape cases, are simply “she said/he said“, swimming in large amounts of alcohol.

Beware. This is the thin end, of a very thick wedge.

[–]erik-the-first 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Why are you being downvoted for speaking the obvious truth? Women lie and report rapes without evidence. In both cases ruining someone's life and women should be held accountable.

[+]Frozen_Hipp0 -28 points-27 points-26 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Because lack of conviction doesn't equate to no rape occurring. And if we're being honest, most of those cases a rape did occur.

I agree that the number of false allegations is downplayed and poorly recorded but for sensitivity sake, let's not act as if false allegations are that prevalent.

[–]furchfur[S] 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Just as easy to say that in most of those cases a rape did NOT occur.

Given that it has been tested in court and the police have looked for evidence to prove the case I would say the most likely position is that the rape did not occur.

[+]Frozen_Hipp0 -18 points-17 points-16 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Do you have any background/experience in law or rather with rape cases? Those are one of the hardest cases to convict. Hell you can ask the professionals themselves and they'll tell you that lack of conviction =/= didn't happen. Do you by any chance even know a rape victim?

It is just as easy to say the converse. Does it make the converse right? Frankly no.

[–]furchfur[S] 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Rape allegations are the easiest to make and a good way for a female to get revenge on a relationship gone wrong.

1) Anonymity

2)Money from the state for even making the allegation. Victims compensation fund.

3) You can drop the case at any time.

4) Are not forced to provide evidence. So easy to make a quick allegation and then withdraw it to get revenge.

[–]tenchineuro 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And if we're being honest, most of those cases a rape did occur.

Source?

[–]erik-the-first 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

False allegations are the majority. You don't need proof to see that claim as it's obvious when you look at the victim complex most women have. Many of the reported rapes are situations like Harvey weinstein where they consented at the time and then decided later it was rape.

[+]Rob__T -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

False allegations are the majority. You don't need proof to see that claim

100% wrong. The burden of proof is on you, and you don't get to hand wave that away. Citation fucking needed, and your attitude sucks. I am 100% on board for more stringent handling of rape claims. What you just said is absolutely disgusting and nowhere near close to reasonable. Everyone here should be appaled.

[+]Frozen_Hipp0 -15 points-14 points-13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I joined this sub because I truly believed men needed activists for their rights as women do. I've heard a lot of shit about this sub just hating women and being misogynistic etc etc. I defended. Today I can tell you that I wasted my time.

I don't even want to engage further. False allegations are the majority? Fuck I'm quite disappointed by the ignorance but whatever.

[–]Acrobatic_Sport_7664 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

'By definition', rape can not be proved to have occurred. This does not mean it did not, but, it does not mean it did. On balance, it probably means it didn't.

[–]killcat -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Explain?

[–]UnfurtletDawn 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We just simply don't know.

This is the same stupidity as 2-10% are proven to be false. That means 90-98% are true. It's so stupid to go by these.

It can be consensual sex and then ehm well I have a boyfriend so let's say it was rape so I won't appear to be... And these cases are there.

You have to prove that 1. Sex occured 2. It was nonconsent

We don't know if rape occured or not. It might be better to focus on victims to give them proper help.

[–]TheSnesLord 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

most of those cases a rape did occur.

How do you know this? Are you an expert in this field? Are you using a crystal ball?

[–]killcat 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Bullshit. There is evidence of women making up shit just becasue a guy pisses them off, no one know how many accusation are false, but the best estimates is 8-10% are PROVABLY false.

[–]DropBonkle 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In UK in 2020 59000 rape cases were reported to police which led to only
2000 prosecution and only 1000 convictions. From 59000 there were only
2000 prosecutions because simply there was no rape there. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48095118

[–]Angryasfk 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Clear in the language used is that the complainant is “the victim” and the accused must therefore be guilty. Believe all women is clearly behind this.

Also how are these “specialist courts” supposed to be different to normal criminal courts? Clearly they are looking to have a panel of judges. But if you believe all women, why even bother with a trial?

[–]Kindly-Town 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Special court likely won't have jury and there will be a female judge so that the accuser can feel free to speak.

[–]Angryasfk 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I wonder if cross examination will be allowed?

[–]killcat 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Probably not.

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Of course. It’s “believe all women” isn’t it. I guess the court is really to determine the sentence since guilt is already known. I wonder if they’ll recall Mark Pearson? Clearly he “got away with it” since they didn’t have this “special court”!

[–]Kindly-Town 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's another way of denying due process to men without making common man to be aware about dangers of false accusations.

[–]qianxiaonai 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Special courts? With special prisons? They can swear on the Communist Manifesto, replace statues of justice with Lyssa, and use temperature sensors to ensure women only enter if they're about to menstruate. Women also prefer fiction to non-fiction. So accordingly, evidence will be presented in the form of a glossy gossip magazine. There'll be free period products and a grand library of victimology literature for the legal cannon.

[–]qianxiaonai 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Judges will be able to order retroactive abortion on male perpetrators by tying to artillery. Typical sentences will include taxes on unrelated men to pay for the female victims cash flow draining asset purchases.

[–]Kuato2012 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Meh, it's been done.

[–]YourPillsAintWorkin 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The phrase "special courts" should always cause concern.

[–]ABeeBox 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"End Rape Culture!"

End False Allegation Culture for the sake of ruining men's lives! I don't want to veer their protest to my protest but if people continue to participate on False sexual assault allegations, then its gonna go the same way as the boy who cried wolf. There will be stricter rules applied in courts and real victims may be turned away.

[–]erik-the-first 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Reporting a rape should be a rough process. It will weed out false allegations. By dragging out rape cases and making victims relive their victimization for months at a time, they will be more likely to just quit and less men will go to jail. With the number of women that lie about rape, it's better to make reporting inconvenient and difficult until women stop trying to play the system.

[–]OctaviaPinfold 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This sounds like an attempt at making a legalized kangaroo court.

[–]CryingMadGirl 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I bet it’s only male on female rape cases

[–]DropBonkle 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I think the "rape epidemic" is an attempt of a minority of women to shift the balance of power even more and make men feel guilty for something that is extremely rare. Of course they have manage to reinterpret what rape is. Rape was having sex by non consensual violence and today the definition have changed. In 2020 in UK 59000 rape cases were reported to police and only 2000 were prosecuted. Of those 2000 there was a conviction in only 1000. That means that at least 90% of the rapes reported are false accusations https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48095118

[–]Huffers1010 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That means that at least 90% of the rapes reported are false accusations

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-48095118

Careful; that's certainly not (or at least overwhemingly likely not to be) true. There's a difference, and a big one, between "not provably true" and "definitely false", especially given that court systems in most jurisdictions are designed to convict people only when we're really very, very sure about the facts. Since most people have sex in private, this is important, because this is exactly why rape, in the commonest circumstances, is so difficult to prosecute.

What's crucial is that this exact same reason is why it's very hard to prove anyone made a false allegation of rape. The criminal justice system, in cases like these, very often has to throw up its metaphorical hands and reach the conclusion "I dunno, " in which case everyone walks away with no action taken (except for the guy, whose reputation will be in tatters regardless).

What very often happens is that the people who decide to bring these cases to court will decide not to because they know they don't have enough evidence for a conviction. It has very little to do with anyone's credibility or whether anyone feels strongly about the situation, personally believes the complainant or the defendant, or whether it happened or not. What matters is that it is provable, not that it is true.

That does mean that a lot of cases will end with nobody feeling vindicated.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Your comment was automatically removed because we do not allow links to that subreddit.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]Huffers1010 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I notice that article earlier and was perturbed by it.

The fundamental, unsolvable problem here is that anyone who accuses someone else of a crime is going to have to be cross-examined. If the situation is that a rape victim is being closely questioned about incredibly personal and unpleasant matters by someone representing the perpetrator, then I have no doubt that's awful beyond belief, but I don't really see a solution to criminal justice that doesn't involve that to at least some extent.

[–]Zappaa1142 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As if any other violent crime isn’t re traumatizing to the victims. This is just a special case because it’s a crime that primarily happens to women. My friend was murdered and the case still hasn’t gone to trial in over a year. It’s been traumatizing for his mother the whole way through. She still can’t rest easy knowing the guy who killed her son will be in prison. That’s even with literal surveillance video evidence of the murder. Unfortunately this is the cost of living in a free society with a blind justice system. Stop fucking trying to compromise this in the name of female victim hood.

[–]DostoevskyTuring 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Such a double edged sword there.

[+]Intergalacticio -9 points-8 points-7 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Idk, I feel like the specialist courts might be a reasonable alternative to standard courts for rape and rape allegation civil procedure. As it would allow lawyers to specialise and develop stronger arguments and defences for the people they’re representing. But I am skeptical as to which side this specialised court would favour. I’d imagine rape defence cases to be one of the hardest if it the hardest defence cases to win with rapes social stigma. I would hope that any judges in this new specialised court hold an equal weighting of scrutiny between the perceived aggressor and the perceived victim. With an equal weighting of gaol time for real and false rape allegations as the lie is just as much a heinous crime as the crime itself. Since cases of this nature are near guaranteed to resolve with one if not two ruined lives, it would be best if people could walk out with no ruined lives.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter