Feminist murders husband

[–]Puzzleheaded-Heat174 112 points113 points114 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Practical-Rip6471 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThawteWills 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]squishybats 47 points48 points49 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]TraditionalPudding30 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Deadass-Boi 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]squishybats 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Radiant_Original6968 64 points65 points66 points 4 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

[–]Futureman999 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

[–]westwoo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (13 children) | Copy Link

[–]Futureman999 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Community property and no fault divorce meant a man would spend his whole life working and supporting a wife and kids. Even if the wife occasionally worked part-time or for short periods, in most marriages it would be for low pay so the husband was still responsible for earning almost all the family income. But women spend most of the money, so what does the poor powerless little troll who lives in the house do? Bring in income, silly! Also perform assigned chores around the house of course.

Then of course since the fruits of that lifetime of labor, the house, any savings and pensions, are all half hers, it starts making divorce look like a solid business decision to her. Cash and prizes, and no annoying lower 90% tier non-chad underfoot in her house!

What's the alternative? Glad you asked. Coverture marriage.

At Common Law, coverture was the protection and control of a woman by her husband that gave rise to various rights and obligations. Upon marriage, a Husband and Wife were said to have acquired unity of person that resulted in the husband having numerous rights over the property of his wife and in the wife being deprived of her power to enter into contracts or to bring lawsuits as an independent person. These restrictions were abolished by various statutes.

Sound sexist to you? It is, but the complete opposite: Making men work their whole lives, then hand over 50%+ to a non-working or barely working wife, doesn't work either.

What's the egalitarian alternative? First paper abortion for men. Then legally binding shared parenting agreements if the father gives his consent to become a parent.

But as long as we equate gimme gimme gimme feminism with equality, we will never get there.

/rrr/FemaleDatingStrategy is really about women doing endless anonymous chad hookups on tinder, then when they're pushing 40 and the chads are drying up, lassoing some poor working stiff into marriage, who if all has gone according to plan, has never had sex even though he's in his 40s (therefore income is higher than a random bartender chad) so he's desperate enough to fall for it.

It's the best of all possible worlds for women! (which they call "equality")

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]westwoo -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]CurvyKitten81 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]westwoo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know, so it's better to focus on Texas vs other states. Texas is still the worst (hence must be the most feminist according to this guy's theory) so literally any other one can be picked for comparison

We can also do this with births as well. Say, the extremely egalitarian feminist cesspit Iceland with strong independent fisherwomen and whatnot has 1.7 birth per woman, while the good old traditional Japan has just 1.3, and the increasingly conservative and Christian Hungary and Russia have 1.5

The disgustingly woke modern Israel with their army filled with women has a whopping 3 births per woman, while the based patriarchal UAE where women are precious fragile gems to be left at home under covers has 1.4

It's almost like this is a complex issue with many factors and the simplistic takes blaming feminism for everything are merely examples of a completely delusional partisanship and a skewed worldview based on some particular local pet conflicts in some particular society

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]westwoo -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]westwoo 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]youropinionsaredumb 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]SaintLogic 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]bigez526 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]boundarychimps 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Final_Collection_515 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Dilate_now 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Potato-with-guns 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Windinthewillows2024 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ThermiteMillie[🍰] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]spook7886 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Jabronskyi 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Soulful_Sadist 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]EngineeringDry6717 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Made-of-magic- 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Yowazzuplol 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Emperor_Quintana 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]lecajun1 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]RabbitSmoking-A-Pipe 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Unlucky_Desk_5468 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]RunInRunOn 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 -51 points-50 points-49 points 4 years ago (88 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheUltraSaiyan 51 points52 points53 points 4 years ago (86 children) | Copy Link

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 -42 points-41 points-40 points 4 years ago (85 children) | Copy Link

[–]akihonj 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago (48 children) | Copy Link

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 -16 points-15 points-14 points 4 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Puzzleheaded-Heat174 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Feminsts believe in gender equality yet.....

in 2005 goodren shymen proposed a man tax for the man of sweeden, in 2010 feminist in Israel protested to rewrite rape laws so women couldn't be charged with rape they succeeded and now women who rape unconsenting adults and boys aren't charged with rape and instead are charged with lesser crimes, in 2013 Indian feminists pushed the government to rewrite rape laws so now women in India who rape men aren't punished, in 2014 Jessica Velentai (who is a feminist) published and article in the gaurdian advercating for men to be paid less then women, in 2015 York university was planning to hold an international men's day conference to shine a light on men's issues it was cancelled after feminists protested against it holly backster (who is a feminist) also wrote a condescending article on the independent "enlightening" readers why we don't need an international men's day, not to mention that feminists spread lies and misinformation about domestic abuse against men and rape against men this is also ignoring all the hateful things feminist leaders like Clementine Ford and Anita sarkeezen have said this is ignoring the all men are rapists argument that feminists often use and this is ignoring the #killallmen that is trending all over tik tok

You can claim that feminism is about equality but actions speak louder than words

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 -5 points-4 points-3 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Puzzleheaded-Heat174 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Puzzleheaded-Heat174 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]akihonj 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link

[–]Raspu5in 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Raspu5in 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]akihonj 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

equal opportunity

Already exists in the west, in fact girls have more opportunities than boys, so as far as a feminist goes you're pretty pathetic in meeting that first requirement.

However to cover your own hypocrisy you'll rely on the tired old adage of personal choice, so explain why it's personal choice when it benefits women but not when it benefits men.

boys and girls are being raised without pointlessly gendering toys, colors and sports

Tried that, explain to the women who are losing out to top spots in sports because men decided they'll do better as women, also have you ever tried to raise a child, they'll tell you what they like, colours are nice to kid but things that interest them are inherent to their gender, if you're into forcing children to play with certain toys because of your ideology then you're an abuser of children.

"boys will be boys" will no longer an excuse for men to harrasse and rape people

Was never ever an excuse, you paid too much attention to the Gillette advertising, nobody anywhere had ever said a man raping or abusing a woman is a boy being a boy. Sadly though what you're also lacking here is clear understanding that boys typically play in far rougher ways than girls, if you're actually serious about boys playing their games with girls then I sincerely hope you're ok with more girls going to the ER.

Instead though what you're going to argue is to teach boys to play girls games like girls, again proving that you're willing to abuse children in order for your ideology, and there is a large and growing body of evidence that says when you stop boys playing like boys you stunt their growth and inevitably they suffer with emotional issues and increased depression, so in truth then your best argument amounts to knowingly resulting in the massive increase in deaths of young men.

boys and girls have to be taught about consent and sex-ed CORRECTLY

Agree there

more women in position of power

Why, isn't equality about the best person for the job regardless of gender, why then should more women be in positions of power, also ha e you actually looked at the results of countries where more women are in positions of power, Iceland is a country where women are in power, very much so, they are a dying country as the men are leaving, Norway suffered the same issue and their government is reliant on prostitutes, in the sense that they sent letters to the men who left that country if they move back and marry a woman from there they'll be given benefits for life.

female-dominated jobs like teachers, nurses etc need to be recognized more

Why, are you saying that the markets are wrong, what's your justification for that, the markets pay what they pay..

You've also fallen into your own trap here, why have more women in positions of power but allow for female dominated roles, surely if equality is what you seek there should be no roles dominated by either sex. Equality of outcomes but only when it suits.

redefine the meaning of masculinity and promoting healthy masculity

Masculinity isn't healthy not is it unhealthy, your issue is that you want to feminise men to such an extent that men are not any different to women and thereby totally unattractive to women, suggest you start here with women themselves because even feminists themselves admit they love themselves some benevolent sexism when it suits. They also admit that masculinity is only toxic when they are not the direct beneficiary of said masculinity. The bigger issue you face then is feminising men results in women being raped in braid daylight within arm's reach of at least six other men who do nothing to stop it and when asked why their response is, she's a strong independent woman who don't need no man. In fact then the idea of the world you want to create becomes one much more dangerous and colder towards women but you have neither the intellectual capacity nor the muscles to deal with I and as usual you will go to the default of blaming all men.

women around the world have the same rights as men

Within the west, let's see if you can name one western country where laws are not equal to or in favour of women, if so what is the specific law.

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Tried that, explain to the women who are losing out to top spots in sports because men decided they'll do better as women

i meant stereotypes about what sports is fit for men or women

but things that interest them are inherent to their gender, if you're into forcing children to play with certain toys because of your ideology then you're an abuser of children.

The boys like blue and girls like pink only existed because we gendering colors, THEY ARE FUCKING COLORS and we teach them which color is "suitaible" for them at such young age, isn't it a bit weird

Why, isn't equality about the best person for the job regardless of gender

Yes, but im not talking about that, im talking about the fact that most women are still in the constant sense of doubt when it comes to taking risk and make big decisions, which is why feminism is needed, to change that mindset of a large amount of women who thinks they cannot succeed as leaders or bussinesswomen.

Masculinity isn't healthy not is it unhealthy

I said "toxic masculinity" not "masculinity is toxic".

your issue is that you want to feminise men to such an extent that men are not any different to women and thereby totally unattractive to women, suggest you start here with women themselves because even feminists themselves admit they love themselves some benevolent sexism when it suits. They also admit that masculinity is only toxic when they are not the direct beneficiary of said masculinity. The bigger issue you face then is feminising men results in women being raped in braid daylight within arm's reach of at least six other men who do nothing to stop it and when asked why their response is, she's a strong independent woman who don't need no man. In fact then the idea of the world you want to create becomes one much more dangerous and colder towards women but you have neither the intellectual capacity nor the muscles to deal with I and as usual you will go to the default of blaming all men.

where did you even get that?

Within the west, let's see if you can name one western country where laws are not equal to or in favour of women, if so what is the specific law.

the west is okay now, but around the world in general?? NO

[–]akihonj 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

i meant stereotypes about what sports is fit for men or women

Nobody ever says that, if they do you're listening to the wrong people, change your friends would be my suggestion here.

The boys like blue and girls like pink only existed because we gendering colors, THEY ARE FUCKING COLORS and we teach them which color is "suitaible" for them at such young age, isn't it a bit weird

Boys like blue because they have been shown over and over again to favour darker primary colours, while girls favour more nuanced colours, perhaps you're not aware but women can actually see about 2000 variations of colours between red and white, pink and almost all shades of while boys generally see red white or pink and don't determine between different shades, colouring toys does not enhance the toy, however because the toy is coloured in a certain way it becomes more attractive to the child, so girls generally prefer to play with horses and colouring them pink means they are more likely to want that toy and the competition.

It was tried years ago in the UK to colour a gun pink and girls didn't like it because it was a gun as that held no interest for them and boys didn't like it because it was pink and they preferred black for guns.

Your issue here is that you want to abuse children by forcing their underdeveloped brains to enjoy something they inherently don't, they don't because their brains aren't developed enough to appreciate nuance. If you had children you'd understand that.

Yes, but im not talking about that, im talking about the fact that most women are still in the constant sense of doubt when it comes to taking risk and make big decisions, which is why feminism is needed, to change that mindset of a large amount of women who thinks they cannot succeed as leaders or bussinesswomen

So you mean women dealing with imposter syndrome, guess what, men have that too. You're also talking directly through your arse here, within the fortune 500 companies about 150 are run by women CEOs around the world women are the fastest growing group of small business owners, you say about taking a risk, that's super entertaining when the science shows that these women who run companies generally tend to take fewer risks and are generally more conservative in their business deals. Are you seriously telling all of us that these strong powerful company running women who have taken risks their entire lives and worked damned hard to get to the top beating men and other women to get there, taking risks, big risks every day with their careers are now afraid to take a risk while they are the head of companies worth millions or billions of dollars. Reality doesn't work that way, stop taking your limited experience and applying it to all women.

I said "toxic masculinity" not "masculinity is toxic".

Define it, define it in a way that doesn't directly benefit one woman at the expense of another. Give it a definition, any term used should be able to be defined. I have already defined it for you, toxic masculinity is a boogeyman created by feminists as a catch all phrase to blame men when things don't go their way, eg refuse to open a door, he's toxic, open the door and he's still toxic because it's all pure perception, open that same door for the feminist and be attractive to her and she's going to love that good masculinity, be the ugly dude and he's a toxic creep trying to be controlling.

the west is okay now, but around the world in general?? NO

So can't even name one law, the west is ok now. No it isn't, far from it in fact, the western countries themselves are heavily skewed towards the benefit of women, here's a few facts for you

Domestic violence and abuse, a 30 year multi country multi culture study recently published said that domestic abuse and violence is mostly initiated by women, in fact lesbian relationships have the highest rates of domestic abuse, violence and sexual abuse for all relationship types.

3/4 of men are homeless 3/4 of cancer deaths are men 60% of graduates are women 80% of custody cases are awarded to women Divorce is initiated mostly by women the more marriages she's had the higher the initiation rates. Largest amount of spousal support goes to the ex wife. Women control 80% of household spending In most cities women earn more on average than men, so now we really do have a gender pay gap forming.

Where's your desire for equality now

[+]Sensitive-Ad-2623 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]akihonj 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Explorer_Of_Infinity 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThumpingBump 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 -17 points-16 points-15 points 4 years ago (33 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThumpingBump 25 points26 points27 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Radiant_Original6968 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

[–]Radiant_Original6968 17 points18 points19 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Radiant_Original6968 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

[+]Virtual_Macaroon4088 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

[–]Radiant_Original6968 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago* (18 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThumpingBump 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Potato-with-guns 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Alright here we go again with the no true Scotsman

I think Karen Straughan said it best:

"So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists".

That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusional self deception.

Listen, if you want to call yourself a feminist, I don't care. I've been investigating feminism for more than 9 years now, and people like you used to piss me off, because to my mind all you were doing was providing cover and ballast for the powerful political and academic feminists you claim are just jerks. And believe me, they ARE jerks. If you knew half of what I know about the things they've done under the banner of feminism, maybe you'd stop calling yourself one.

But I want you to know. You don't matter. You're not the director of the Feminist Majority Foundation and editor of Ms. Magazine, Katherine Spillar, who said of domestic violence: "Well, that's just a clean-up word for wife-beating," and went on to add that regarding male victims of dating violence, "we know it's not girls beating up boys, it's boys beating up girls."

You're not Jan Reimer, former mayor of Edmonton and long-time head of Alberta's Network of Women's Shelters, who just a few years ago refused to appear on a TV program discussing male victims of domestic violence, because for her to even show up and discuss it would lend legitimacy to the idea that they exist.

You're not Mary P Koss, who describes male victims of female rapists in her academic papers as being not rape victims because they were "ambivalent about their sexual desires" (if you don't know what that means, it's that they actually wanted it), and then went on to define them out of the definition of rape in the CDC's research because it's inappropriate to consider what happened to them rape.

You're not the National Organization for Women, and its associated legal foundations, who lobbied to replace the gender neutral federal Family Violence Prevention and Services Act of 1984 with the obscenely gendered Violence Against Women Act of 1994. The passing of that law cut male victims out of support services and legal assistance in more than 60 passages, just because they were male.

You're not the Florida chapter of the NOW, who successfully lobbied to have Governor Rick Scott veto not one, but two alimony reform bills in the last ten years, bills that had passed both houses with overwhelming bipartisan support, and were supported by more than 70% of the electorate.

You're not the feminist group in Maryland who convinced every female member of the House on both sides of the aisle to walk off the floor when a shared parenting bill came up for a vote, meaning the quorum could not be met and the bill died then and there.

You're not the feminists in Canada agitating to remove sexual assault from the normal criminal courts, into quasi-criminal courts of equity where the burden of proof would be lowered, the defendant could be compelled to testify, discovery would go both ways, and defendants would not be entitled to a public defender.

You're not Professor Elizabeth Sheehy, who wrote a book advocating that women not only have the right to murder their husbands without fear of prosecution if they make a claim of abuse, but that they have the moral responsibility to murder their husbands.

You're not the feminist legal scholars and advocates who successfully changed rape laws such that a woman's history of making multiple false allegations of rape can be excluded from evidence at trial because it's "part of her sexual history."

You're not the feminists who splattered the media with the false claim that putting your penis in a passed-out woman's mouth is "not a crime" in Oklahoma, because the prosecutor was incompetent and charged the defendant under an inappropriate statute (forcible sodomy) and the higher court refused to expand the definition of that statute beyond its intended scope when there was already a perfectly good one (sexual battery) already there. You're not the idiot feminists lying to the public and potentially putting women in Oklahoma at risk by telling potential offenders there's a "legal" way to rape them.

And you're none of the hundreds or thousands of feminist scholars, writers, thinkers, researchers, teachers and philosophers who constructed and propagate the body of bunkum theories upon which all of these atrocities are based.

You're the true feminist. Some random person on the internet."

[–]Yowazzuplol 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Title	Feminist murders husband
Author	External-Hedgehog810
Upvotes	592
Comments	85
Date	April 12, 2022 6:02 AM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/AntiFeminists
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/u1rqan/feminist_murders_husband/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/AntiFeminists/feminist-murders-husband.1110260 https://theredarchive.com/post/1110260

Comments