Woman defrauds and exploits men for a week of slave labor; journalist justifies it: "The mother of two was going through a divorce and needed the cash."

MRMRising · 2013-09-10T15:55:03+00:00

The mother of two was going through a divorce and needed the cash.

Then get off your ass and work the land yourself!

Steavee · 2013-09-10T16:31:51+00:00

That wasn't the journalist "defending" the woman. That was making sure to include a fragment of her side for a bit of balance. In journalistic voice.

2013-09-10T15:20:35+00:00

"Financial Domination" is big with the pretend domme sit-on-my-ass class of women.

StarsDie · 2013-09-10T16:03:14+00:00

As shitty as it is... Imagining dudes in gimp masks mowing lawns and chopping wood is actually pretty humorous.

MockingDead · 2013-09-10T15:42:00+00:00

I am being financially dominated by Wall Street and a shitty degree. Can I get sympathy, money and slaves?

Viredae · 2013-09-10T20:20:29+00:00

"defrauds" - maybe, this is pretty plausible depending on how and when they paid her

"slave labor" - not at all. Is OP / the author not familiar with the horrors of actual slavery?

blueoak9 · 2013-09-10T19:51:33+00:00

"The mother of two was going through a divorce and needed the cash. "

What is anyone like that, a slave master in fact and not just normal and innocent BDSM role play, doing around children unsupervised, and how in the fuck did she get custody?

2013-09-10T20:39:38+00:00

Now this is sexual exploitation, as opposed to the claims concerning performers in pornography.

Fogwa · 2013-09-10T14:50:54+00:00

deleted ^{^{^What}} ^{^{^is}} ^{^{^this?}}

lidsville76 · 2013-09-10T21:53:05+00:00

The title is a bit misleading. It says the journo justified it, but in reality, he/she was just writing that she was a single mother with cash flow issues, most likely sourced from the dominatrix. That doesn't mean what the lady did was acceptable.

Number357 · 2013-09-11T02:30:49+00:00

The journalist wasn't justifying it, the journalist was just stating the motives. I've seen similar language in things like robbery, scams, drug dealing, etc. "John Smith robbed a liquor store. He needed money to pay his rent." It's not justifying it, just explaining why they did it.

Tusse · 2013-09-11T13:41:17+00:00

So, all that happen was that she copied whatever happened in the famous, 1987 film 'Personal Service'

That's not 'fraud' or 'exploitation' at all, plenty of customers pay professional dominas to be allowed to clean their house, work their garden etc, and sexual gratification often is not part of the deal either (most dominas do not have sex with clients btw).

But thanks for the great laugh, I'm more amazed that in a country where 'kinky sex' is mainstream since 2 decades such blissful innocence exists and that they managed to last an entire week before complaining :-D

(not a mensrights issue, prostitution is legal (and taxed) in Germany and so, the local trading standards office is the correct place to complain to if there are 'quality problems'.)

5th_Law_of_Robotics · 2013-09-11T16:07:57+00:00

I don't have much sympathy for the guys. They should have known better. But the journalist should be ashamed for adding that line. Completely unnecessary.

/and is there anything being a mother with kids doesn't justify?

JaydenPope · 2013-09-10T22:26:45+00:00

I don't know the laws in Austria but here you could sue the living fuck outta her for a stunt like that.

AlexReynard · 2013-09-10T23:11:24+00:00

Why didn't the guys just gang up and force-milk her? Maybe put a bell around her neck, feed her some hay.

Probably stop short at actually getting out the rotisserie.

Comments