TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Food Cart Lady At Women's March Denies Service To Man... Because He's A Man

TheAndredal

January 25, 2019
232 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-01-22/food-cart-lady-womens-march-denies-service-man-because-hes-man?fbclid=IwAR2m6Nvrs2RcS0ZoOOKL2tsxgPuqqJKzxDukvwpZu-U0Oz9Gs8lzNXDgMYc
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Food Cart Lady At Women's March Denies Service To Man... Because He's A Man
Author

TheAndredal

Upvotes 232
Comments 32
Date January 25, 2019 10:47 AM UTC
(7 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ajnv7f/food_cart_lady_at_womens_march_denies_service_to/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/food-cart-lady-at-womens-march-denies-service-to.1182183
https://theredarchive.com/post/1182183
Top posts by TheAndredal

Father arrested for not paying child support, because he was a hostage for 5 months

6299 upvotes
September 19, 2018
/r/MensRights

Male Privilege Summary

6038 upvotes
July 4, 2017
/r/MensRights

No, not that kind of equality

5946 upvotes
April 6, 2020
/r/MensRights

Media has no issues shaming men publically

5887 upvotes
May 1, 2020
/r/MensRights

Because you claimed it's about equality

5706 upvotes
October 5, 2019
/r/MensRights

This mindset actually angers me

5530 upvotes
February 20, 2020
/r/MensRights

You can never appease feminists

4851 upvotes
May 20, 2019
/r/MensRights

Great words shared by Janice Flamengo about men

4844 upvotes
November 4, 2019
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]tenchineuro 51 points52 points53 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Food Cart Lady At Women's March Denies Service To Man... Because He's A Man

That is against federal law, and probably state law also, depending on where this happened.

[–]14b755fe39 77 points78 points79 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

On every post you see on this subreddit you have to ask

How would society react if the roles were reversed?

[–]JotunR 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/menkampf

[–]mr_j_12 36 points37 points38 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

There is a cafe in Melbourne Australia that charges a mens tax, because, wage gap. Im not even kidding.

[–]TheAndredal[S] 18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

isn't that illegal?

[–]mr_j_12 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Youd assume so. But given that domestic violence against men doesnt exist in Australia, probably not. "domestic violence is when a man hurts a women....... "

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It is voluntary.

[–]valenin 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

YANAL.

[–]BlueOrange22 26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Which group would deny food to people based on their gender?

A. The Men's Rights Movement.

or

B. Intersectional feminism.

MRAs wouldn’t do that.

This cannot be said to be a "fringe" or "conspiracy" opinion, this happened. And what happens when this starts occurring in grocery stores and hospitals and social security offices? How bad might this get?

[–][deleted] 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Although initially rage inducing, I think we need the context of what happened first to see what led to this scenario. For all we know, the guy was being a dick.

I say we wait until more context is given before outright condemnation. If it turns out to be an act of misandry, then full condemnation can be done. Right now, I’m on the “concerned, but needs more info” level.

Edit: the guy could’ve been being a dick* sorry

[–]superduperdudertudor 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

agreed. at no point is it explicitly stated it's because he's a man. All we see is an argument/public freak out. No clue what led to the man being refused service. I give the recent Covington Catholic case that judgement cannot be provided without full knowledge of the events which occured.

[–]The_Great_Sarcasmo 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not saying these people aren't crazy but he's definitely trolling her so I kind of doubt it's just because he's a man.

Anyway it was still a huge opportunity missed. He could have just identified as a woman. Problem solved.

[–]Standard_Rules_Apply 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Did you take the time to watch the video?

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Yes, I’m talking about the lead up to it. We don’t know what happened prior. I’m not saying the food truck people weren’t wrong, I’m just holding judgement until full video or context is given. That’s all.

[–]Standard_Rules_Apply -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

We don't need the life story of him or her.

If it is unlawful to refuse service based on gender then she is in the wrong.

Do you agree?

[–]Kvasirona 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It is hard to disagree. If someone refuses to serve you due to your bad behavior then that is their prerogative. If they refuse to serve you due to your gender then that is discrimination.

[–]Standard_Rules_Apply -3 points-2 points-1 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Is it ok to hide the real reason (gender) behind the outward reason (behavior)?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

As we don't have any context to how this situation started it would be wrong to assume it's only because of his gender that he's being denied service.

I don't have the whole story so I'm not going to pass judgement.

[–]Santaball 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People will bend themselves into all kinds of pretzels to not call a spade a spade.

[–]Standard_Rules_Apply -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As you wish.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree, don’t get me wrong. I just would like to know the full story before I judge morally you know?

[–]skipbillington 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ho Lee Shit

This is crazy.

[–]Imnotmrabut 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How do you get a food vendor licence pulled in Portland?

[–]ShylockSimmonz 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I believe any business should be allowed deny service to any customer. My main issue is if you reverse the genders I know there would be an outrage and that's bull.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

.....

[–]SirYouAreIncorrect 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

and it has been held that it is a protected by freedom of expression.

No really no, it is protected by freedom of association. I should be free to associate, or not associate with anyone I choose for any reason I choose

ut it comes back down to if I can deny service based on gender i.e. sex, and in one case sexuality, then can I not also deny service due to race or religion.

yes that is correct

If I deny service, why then can I not deny employment for the same reason if it is a private company and I am the owner since it goes against my beliefs,

you should be able to.

Which really comes down to what I believe is our biggest problem in our society, at least here in the U.S., blurring of lines between protecting the majority of peoples rights vs protecting every individuals rights,

This is where we separate Authoritarians from Libertarians. I believe there are only INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS the collective is made up in INDIVIDUALS, and only the INDIVIDUAL matters, not the collective

I reject the "good of the majority" rhetoric, I reject the idea of "need of the many out weigh the rights of the few"

I reject collectivism in any form, the principle of a collective right its reason for existing, its lawfulness is based on individual right, and common force that protects this collective right cannot logically have any other purpose or any other mission than to protect individual rights

The idea that the government can and should protect society from everything because all these different individuals and groups feel victimized

You have that ass backwards, putting "marginalize groups" aka a collective over that of an individual is what leads to oppression

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

.......

[–]SirYouAreIncorrect 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Can you Paragraph??? Walls of text are hard to read....

The supreme court ruled recently in a case of a baker who denied service to a same sex couple due to his religious beliefs, overturning a prior court ruling that went against the baker, to be in favor of the baker because it falls under freedom of expression

No they actually did not rule on the freedom of expression issue at all, their ruling was around the process and how the Local Government seemly singled out this vendor for increased enforcement beyond what was normal. aka selective prosecution

SCOTUS explicitly did not address the 1st amendment issues of the case, even though many conservative outlets reported they did.

Further that case as absolutely nothing to do with my point, the first amendment issues of the case is about the baker doing an expressive act (i.e making a decorated cake) not simply out right refusing service because a couple is gay, that would be freedom of association, the act of baking a decorated cake is the expressive act for which the court case was about

I can not even begin to read the rest of your comment, I suggest you read it over and try to actually make something coherent, with paragraph';s if you would like the continue to conversation.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He's at least as big an asshole as she is, so they can both go fuck themselves. And what the fuck is he dressed like that for? It's like he was going to a comic book convention and couldn't decide whether to go as The Joker or The Riddler!

[–]CatManDontDo 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The Jiddler?

[–]johndeer89 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is this guy anyone special? Or was she denying all men?

[–]Y33TtheB8 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel ZERO sympathy of any kind for him , he's getting what he signed up for by joining them.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter