The Woman Who Thinks Reducing the Male Population by 90 Percent Will Solve Everything

Tao_of_clean_data · 2021-04-10T09:55:38+00:00

And so go the arguments of any psychopath who only sees people as things to be manipulated and managed. I can imagine Hitler having similar "rational discussions" with references to people who are experts or highly knowledgeable in support of the idea that everything would be great if it weren't for those pesky Jews and other detrimental portions of the population.

This woman is dangerous. I hope someone responsible is keeping an eye on her.

Maxwell1138 · 2021-04-10T09:59:42+00:00

An Archive Version

I've never actually read an interview with her before. I suppose its my own fault for being surprised. But its shocking how clearly she has absolutely no value for males as a gender. She quite literally thinks they have no purpose in society. The stark reality of her viewpoint is haunting to look at when its laid out in the interview like that. I suppose I wanted her to be more foaming at the mouth insane, rather cold logic calculation insane.

For anyone not wanting to wade through it, she thinks that 'genetically superior' men should be removed society for 'breeding purposes'. And every other man allowed to die. Then control future birth and breeding through advanced genetic engineering and chromosome manipulation. Oh and sometimes physical labour.

SYNONYM_CRUNCH · 2021-04-10T12:07:19+00:00

Wow, what a blast from the past. Still can't believe people took her seriously enough to give her what she wanted - attention.

DownvoteMe2021 · 2021-04-10T10:04:38+00:00

This is the type of rhetoric that causes a correction in the reverse, where society reverts to, as many feminists would call "draconian patriarchy", and society rejects hundreds of years of equality.

benderXX · 2021-04-10T14:50:39+00:00

This is the real face of feminism. She is only saying out loud what is the end game. Control through violence.

Equality begins with person responsibility. Ask a feminist what women are responsible for and watch their heads explode.

Criket · 2021-04-10T13:01:59+00:00

Women gonna fight each other to death for men and loose all of their right. They will be obligated to share, be obedient and to be second, third or fourth spouses. Women highly dislike physical, dangerous and stressful job, this will not change.

After WWI and WWII because of the lost of many men, women rights felt at their lowest and men had the most choices of partners. Ressources where so low for women that you can have virtually any of them in your bed in exchange of pantyhose.

maxyamongus · 2021-04-10T12:08:23+00:00

This feels like a certain evil mustache mans plan for the world.....

2021-04-10T14:09:41+00:00

Literally the world would die in a matter of months.

python1982 · 2021-04-10T19:25:40+00:00

Electricians- mostly men Water/sewge - men Garbage collection- men Fire/police - men Pilots - men Doctors- men Farmers - men Truck drivers- men

You're talking about industries that are 85+ percent male working for 100 percent of the population. Take away 90 percent of the population , you'd die off fairly quick as you daily needs diminish. Women can't just pick up a manual and run things efficient in the time that happens.

Rolaid-Tommassi · 2021-04-10T09:55:10+00:00

I think I saw her on a documentary called "Crazy cat-ladies"

2021-04-10T12:43:35+00:00

Then feminists start telling us these kind of extremist people are not real feminist. That's by THEIR definition of feminism. Look how that worked out for the definition incel.

incisive_shadow55 · 2021-04-10T14:17:45+00:00

Hahahahaha wow... this just reached a whole new level of crazy

Multiman2000 · 2021-04-10T14:39:48+00:00

She said her plan will eliminate "male disposability" by increasing the relative reproductive value of men.

I put that phrase in quotes because I believe the MRM coined it. I'm curious as to why a self identified feminist would use the term in such a manifesto.

Perhaps she's a troll...

neveragoodtime · 2021-04-10T15:28:55+00:00

In Real Life version of “Thanos was right.” I imagine she thought he was the good guy and was surprised when he lost to the girl power Avengers.

2021-04-10T18:13:23+00:00

Why are these kinds of people given a platform? Not that I support censorship but these idiots ideas spread from one to another like fire.

re_animatorA5158 · 2021-04-10T11:02:49+00:00

It would be awful to live with so many women around. And I am one of them.

pacsatonifil · 2021-04-10T14:18:03+00:00

The world itself would come to a stop.

Soft_Feature6386 · 2021-04-10T21:03:45+00:00

White women have more rights than any other group, and are the most valued group in society -- but some have defined themselves as some sort of "minority group" which is constantly persecuted by "the patriarchy". The Femitheist is a product of this belief system, and carries it through to its starkest and logical conclusion. She expresses in a more extreme form beliefs that are reasonably widespread -- for example, the need for the positive, state-sponsored empowerment of women. This is even one aspect of neoliberalism.

Jotnarsheir · 2021-04-11T01:35:22+00:00

As much as I hate the "no true Scotsman" fallacy, (assuming she's not just trolling) then this women is not a feminist. She's not even a radical feminist, she's a eugenicist. This is everything I hate about fascism flipped to gender instead of race. It as if she read Huxley's Brave New world and didn't realize it was a parody.

dorkahontas86 · 2021-04-10T15:47:34+00:00

Least she would see more readily how shitty women can be too. The ratio of more women only will leave more proof we are equally as capable of doing all the same horrible things she assumes only men do. As a woman I really hope no one is dumb enough to have children with this lady. Also chin up guys, there us ladies out here that are routing for you and against this stupid movement that is unnecessary.

whoopshowdoifix · 2021-04-10T15:56:56+00:00

Bruh she’s legit advocating for anti-male eugenics and ghettos for men....

2021-04-10T20:01:10+00:00

Lol, where'd she go?

dukunt · 2021-04-10T20:34:18+00:00

She supports the idea that women would rather be in a harem to an emperor than have 1 good man all her self.

Francis_Dollar_Hide · 2021-04-10T21:44:28+00:00

"It will be utopian because it will be a world almost without conflict"
Delusional.

https://www.economist.com/europe/2017/06/01/who-gets-into-more-wars-kings-or-queens

Tmomp · 2021-04-11T00:19:02+00:00

She's Dr. Strangelove.

2021-04-11T01:51:07+00:00

So. Crazy has a face.

2021-04-11T02:31:25+00:00

“Men would be made more valuable, and their quality of life would be dramatically improved. They would have a subsidised existence if you will, akin to going on an all-expenses paid vacation that lasts from birth to death.” Oh, you mean like the lives of most of the western women that claim to be oppressed.

Greedyfr00b · 2021-04-11T03:39:02+00:00

So she wants to make us slaves (and just CALL it something else) or just put in zoos for women to go to and do whatever they want with us... Wow what a psychopath.. she needs to be watched VERY closely, and if she tries anything, thrown in jail for a very long time

Agirlformensright · 2021-04-11T05:51:45+00:00

What the fuck!?

RoryTate · 2021-04-11T17:16:42+00:00

It's an interesting observation that this lines up perfectly with online dating site data that shows women in general think 90% of men are below average when judged by attractiveness. Start believing what they are actually telling you.

logsdon36 · 2021-04-10T15:29:45+00:00

all technological progress would end...but who cares.

who is going to design this whole high tech society. definitely not the woman who wrote this paper lmao

pappo4ever · 2021-04-10T11:09:02+00:00

She's not a crazy woman, she only says what all women think.

Women naturally act as if only the top 10% of men exists and the rest is invisible, in the same way that women just vanish from our view when their reach 35 or 40 year old.

So they naturally don't believe the other 90% of men should exist. This is not cultural, this is a powerful instinct. To counter this instinct, most religions created the marriage institution and banned polygamy thousands of years ago. This forced women to consider all men, and not to share only the top 10% that is their natural behavior.

Now that religion is retreating, women instinct of sharing the top 10% men and discarding the rest is returning, with all the pain and loneliness that this terrible thing causes to men and woman alike.

Nobleone11 · 2021-04-11T00:01:01+00:00

And she's STILL revered in certain circles instead of enduring complete career ruination.

2021-04-10T17:18:07+00:00

[permanently deleted]

PacoBongers · 2021-04-10T18:23:41+00:00

I love this episode of Rick & Morty

Banake · 2021-04-10T21:03:11+00:00

Didn't she declared that this was some type of parody? I mean, she had that defunt website with Ann Sterzinger and Rachel Haywire. And she wrote this (I don't have a source because I belive that she closed all her sites, but I still have the e-mail from the time) some years after:

The Empathy Gap in Domestic Violence

Posted: 03 Dec 2015 04:31 PM PST

I have been a victim of domestic abuse in more than one relationship during the past few years, undergoing not only physical violence, but also prolonged emotional abuse, financial control, alienation from friends and family, and more. There are few people today who would find themselves unable to empathize with me in such scenarios, and even fewer who could openly express their indifference toward my suffering without unforgiving public rebuke and shaming. The same cannot be said for male victims of domestic violence.

In the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada, the percentages of male victims of domestic violence are roughly 40% [1:2], 50% [3], and 12%** [4], respectively. Even now, despite all of the activism, resources, and political attention directed toward women’s issues, victimized women may still struggle not only with recognizing the severity of their circumstances and escaping an abusive partner, but additionally with finding the help that they desperately need. Men, unfortunately, have it as bad if not worse in this regard.

Not only do men lack the same level of awareness for their issues, socially and politically, but they furthermore tend to have less social support and helpful resources than women, including shelters, which are a significant element of this. Similarly to women in certain cases, though, men may not perceive what they are experiencing as abuse, or they might simply not know how to escape their abuser. But unlike women due to differences in how they are perceived in society, they may also fear reporting due to stigma associated with male victimhood (being weak for allowing a woman to beat or control them, et cetera). At the same time, their abuse in the daily discourse over sex issues is regularly undercut or ignored, and reference to it is too frequently met with enmity, apathy, or contempt.

A public figure of any variety, but particularly a political figure, willing to state that my abuse did not or does not matter, or even the abuse of any other woman or women overall, would receive such a hostile response that it might very well snuff out their career and social life indefinitely. Yet there are still a number of individuals, occasionally fairly high-profile folk [5], who undermine, deny, mock, or react with great animosity toward any effort at initiating a dialogue over domestic violence perpetrated against men. (I have had the misfortune of encountering several in my time online.) But I am not asking for an apology on behalf of men from these kinds of people, or for anyone to lose their job as someone might lose their job for remarking that female domestic violence victims are unimportant, because it is not my place to make such requests.

As I noted above, people like me, and women at large, are not the ones under attack in this respect. There exists a general concern in our culture for my health and safety, and acknowledgement of my worth as a human being. Though escaping abuse is always difficult, I at least have myriad places that I can turn to for assistance. As a woman, I am not the one who would be beaten by a violent partner only to have numerous individuals online and elsewhere supposedly fighting for human rights and fairness erase, degrade, and disparage me; belittle my bruises, joke about drinking my tears, shut down every discussion possible of my pain, act with intense anger at the mention of my victimhood. That fate is reserved for men, especially where domestic violence victimization is concerned, and without correcting this problem, we can never achieve any manner of genuine “equality” in our society.

I do not, however, wish to merely preach to the choir here. I do not want only my anti-feminist friends to read this, reinforce their perspectives, and repeat what they already think about men mattering to me in response. I would not disagree with them expressing concern for every victim no matter their sex, but they are not the target audience. I know that feminists follow me on nearly all, if not all, of my profiles. I converse with some of them, and others are my good friends. I am aware that they recognize that this piece is indirectly about people that they might know or even typically agree with, and I am aware that they could feel attacked by this post, but that is not the chief purpose.

If you are one of those types of individuals alluded to above, either someone that I call friend or the other sort that I identified as a part of the problem, my primary reason for writing this is not to attack you. I am attempting to lift the veil of gendered politics and appeal to any sense that you have of common humanity and justice—right and wrong, fair and unfair—whatever you prefer to call it. Even if I may disagree with you on several of your social theories and refuse to adopt the label of “feminist,” I am not asking you to upend your entire worldviews, I am not asking you to abandon all of your beliefs about patriarchal structures in society, and I am not asking you to forget about women. My plea in this piece is to your empathy and decency. I am asking you to take the simple step of expressing compassion for victims of violence who also happen to be male. If you already do, then this is not for you.

For those to whom such empathy does not come naturally or easily, I would like you to consider that suffering is not a competition, or at least need not and should not be. We must understand that this is a shared human struggle which can be best faced solely when we work together and care for everyone equally no matter how they were born. Women and men in abusive relationships most often can comprehend the pain and misery of living every day or every other day for weeks, months, or years under such conditions. I am sure that many would likely wish for others in comparable situations to be freed of their suffering and helped with moving past it just as they would desire to be now, or were in the past. It should not take beating empathy into us for more of us to have a little basic human compassion and recognize that all victims are worthy of consideration and assistance regardless of sex.

There is a sense of frustration that I feel over the probable futility of writing this post, but it is outweighed by the horror that creeps over me each time I imagine what it would be like to be beaten or live in an abusive home for an extended period only to face individuals who claim to be fighting for equality mocking me, disregarding my experiences, or trying to stifle all discussions of circumstances akin to mine. The very idea of it is sickening, and yet it occurs every day to men as acceptance of the practice in modern debates on gender problems increases.

Let us care about all human beings. Endeavor to listen and strive to understand. Allow folk to share their stories and work toward greater resources to help more victims of wrongful and cruel acts and maltreatment. Refusing to do so is not only counterproductive, but detrimental to advocacy for women and men alike, the discourse over sex issues as a whole, and social liaisons between women and men in general. We can do better than this.

Author: Krista Milburn [@Femitheist]

(Continues)

Successful_Warthog58 · 2021-04-10T21:13:33+00:00

But who would get of their fat arses and do all the grafting?

Hallbard · 2021-04-11T12:59:25+00:00

Soooo, basically like "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley. God I hate that book.

MensEquality · 2021-04-15T14:57:38+00:00

This mindset can only exist when the male population represents a degraded segment of society to begin with.

Banake · 2021-10-30T18:37:13+00:00

I don't know if this is worth anything, but she also worked on a website called Trigger Warning with Elizabeth Hobson. (Yes, I belive that it is the same Hobson who wrote on, among other places, A Voice for Men and Woke Father.)

Title	The Woman Who Thinks Reducing the Male Population by 90 Percent Will Solve Everything
Author	HarpreetASingh
Upvotes	165
Comments	85
Date	April 10, 2021 9:46 AM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mo1qw3/the_woman_who_thinks_reducing_the_male_population/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/the-woman-who-thinks-reducing-the-male-population.1189219 https://theredarchive.com/post/1189219

Comments