Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–]123herpderpblah 21 points22 points23 points (1 child) | Copy Link
I lived for two years in Cree and Inuit communities working for a non-profit, teaching music in the schools. In the Cree community there were only 2 or 3 male teachers between the elementary and high schools. Some of the female teachers would drink in the evenings and joke about how the guys were surely perverts.
The teachers had a certain number of extra-curricular hours that they have to use. The women got together and made a huge leadership program called "Diamond Girls", they plastered posters all over the high school, and all their effort was only for the girls, no boys allowed. This is in an Indigenous community! The boys there are amongst the most at-risk in our entire society. And they're being excluded from incredibly important opportunities for self-development in their teen years, years that they are not going to get back. All this paid for by public funds.
Meanwhile, one of the male teachers who had an all-boys grade 6 class was trying to organize an outing with some of the men from the village to go out on the land and learn traditional skills. Some of the same women running "Diamond Girls" were actively getting in the way and trying to prevent it from happening. I saw this with my own eyes. In Indigenous communities!
It happens all over, huge elaborate after-school mentorship programs that exclude boys. They target the most at-risk schools and leave out half the students. It's awful, it should be against the law.
[–]MozartFan5left-wing male advocate 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
That's messed up.
[–]LENuetralObserver 28 points29 points30 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[1] https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/p-4.2/page-1.html
[–]yuendeming1994 -3 points-2 points-1 points (6 children) | Copy Link
Just want to defend 6., the higher insurance charges for males is seems based on statistical evidence of their tendency to be more reckless drivers. Insurance companies often rely on statistical analysis and their rationale is making profit but not the political correctness.
And, what is MGM?
[–]LENuetralObserver 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
That's why I mentioned no other protected class can be charged differently. There are cases where other demographics/groups have differences in there recklessness. Yet it is only men, not a different race, creed, nationality, religion etc that is charged differently. Just Men.
MGM=Male Genital Mutilation.
[–]yuendeming1994 -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
That's bad.
But i still don't understand what wrong with MGM that shown male disadvantage. i'm not from western culture.
[–]LENuetralObserver 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Male genital mutilation takes away the bodily autonomy of the infant male. Circumcision, the more common form of MGM can be accessed when the individual is of age and is able to consent without pressure from there parents. But any form of MGM or circumcision performed on anyone under the age of consent is a violation of ones bodily autonomy. Only medically necessary procedures on the genitalia of boys should be allowed before a fair age of consent.
You do not own your child and do not have the moral or ethical right to alter there body to the extent that circumcision would.
[–]ULFS_MAAAAAX 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
As far as I'm aware in western culture FGM is illegal, but despite all health risks proven wrong MGM is still done despite the potential consequences to it. Part of it is "my body my choice" consent which is enough of a reason imo, but there's also times it's botched and a man grows up with a large issue over his parents cosmetic choice...
[–]Bing9999999Chilling 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
I could do statistical analysis that shows women are more likely to take time off work, and use that to justify paying them less.
I could use statistical analysis to show women have a greater burden on the healthcare system, and use that to justify charging them higher taxes to cover the cost.
Or we could stop profiling people based on things that can't change.
[–]yuendeming1994 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
I personally prefer to provide subsidies based on physiological differences, such as disabilities, since being any gender is based on luck but not choice. However, some feminists overly promote the idea that there are no physiological differences between men and women that could lead to performance differences. They demand equal outcomes instead based on this belief. This appears to them as schizophrenia.
[–]SuspicousEggSmell 13 points14 points15 points (1 child) | Copy Link
the majority of the missing and murdered Indigenous population is men, ranging from 70-86% of those missing and murdered. Despite this, all attempts and suggestions for an inquiry into them have been shut down, specifically because they are men. Meanwhile the inquiry for missing and murdered women and girls said the victimization rates are grounds for genocide (that claim was controversial but it stands to reason that if it’s genocide when it’s women and girls, it’s also genocide when it’s men and boys, yet those claiming genocide do not see both equally. This is particularly bad given Indigenous men are known to be at particular risk for police violence, with horrific crimes like the starlight tours being done against them)
[–]Unusual_Implement_87left-wing male advocate 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
This is the first time I heard about this stat for indigenous men. Usually you only hear about missing women and it made me assume the number was larger for women which is why they would always talk about it.
[–]Real-Degree-8493 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
A legal one is Bill C 51 which was a respond to Jian Ghomeshi being acquitted of charges of sexual assault rightfully so when his accusers where caught conspiring and lying under oath. Bill C 51 forces the defence to reveal private information, emails, text messages, other electronic records in their possession allowing the plaintiff to sculp their accusations with foreknowledge of what the defence knows. While there is nothing inherently sexed in the bill culture dictates it will predominately used against men unfairly depriving them of a defence.
[–]MozartFan5left-wing male advocate 8 points9 points10 points (3 children) | Copy Link
Family law.
[–]EffectiveWriting986[S] 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
How so? I'm curious to hear.
[–]MozartFan5left-wing male advocate 10 points11 points12 points (1 child) | Copy Link
I read somewhere that the Canadian Centre for Men and Families was trying to change a nationwide Canadian law thay gave automatic preference to mothers over fathers in child custody decisions (and I think authorization for medical decisions for the child as well). A member of the Conservative Party tried to change to treat fathers equally but the politician was ridiculed by liberals and self-described feminists. I forgot the details but you can do some research about it. Also, at least in British Columbia there is only funding for domestic violence shelters that serve women from the government and absolutely no funding for domestic violence shelters that serve men. I read a story about a Canadian man who was abused by his wife (I think his children were also abused by his wife). He advocated for shelters for men and their their children escaping domestic violence. He raised some money but later lost enough funding. He sadly committed suicide after being ridiculed for years for his advocacy to help men who are victims of domestic violence. British Columbia comes up with the most ignorant and stupid reasons to try to justify not providing funding for domestic violence shelters for men. There is clearly a need for them. I read a story about an immigrant father and his daughters being refused entrance into a domestic violence shelter trying to escape his abusive wife. He finally found shelter thanks to the Canadian Centre for Men and Families. Check out the Canadian Centre for Men and Families. They are a great group that advocates for the equality of men and boys in Canada! I have donated money to them.
[–]EffectiveWriting986[S] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Thanks for the info.
Earl Silverman his name was. Rest in peace to him.
Oh that sounds great! I'll check them out sometime soon. Its good that Canada is getting somewhere regarding mensrights.
[–]Dashing2026 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
In my opinion it's cultural rather than legal, but other commentors can chime in.
https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/zDmN7fBDld
[–]Ok_Front_7814 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
Viagra is not covered under any provincial or private insurance.
[–]DevelopmentLeft5056 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
😆 what a question...
[–]yuendeming19941 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Seeking jobs for long time, and many job explicitly said they only intend to hire woman. I'm not sure whether they would dare to do the opposite.
And with the literally better qualifications and experiences, woman literally given more opportunity.
It seems the experience is sufficient to me that men are more disadvantage in canada.
[–]OrderOk13791 point [recovered] | Copy Link
Well I always thought men and women were equal because that's how I was raised. That's how society treated me growing up. Until I had a child. Then I was met with nothing but road blocks
I couldn't enter the hospital when my daughter had to get stitches. The treated me like I wasn't supposed to be there, they only let her in when her mom came to the lobby and got me.
I couldn't register my daughter for school. They said they needed the mothers signature.
Couldn't apply for benefits without the mothers signature.
Was ID'd several times picking up my child from daycare even though I go there every week.
Was stopped and interrogated in the halls of my child's school when I went to pick her up.
CRA denied me benefits, even when I had a court order they still found a way to shut it down
My first daughter, the nurse went to to the mother with are was born and advised her not to put me in the birth certificate just incase we broke up, then I wouldn't have any rights. I found this strange that she didn't do the opposite and came up to me to tell me to make sure I sign the birth certificate so that I do have rights
The list goes on
Even legal aid denied me spite having the same credentials as my ex.
The system doesn't want men to have rights because the benefits to being a father with full custody is like living for free in the government's eyes.