https://youtube.com/shorts/blTJO2NELiI?is=LgPHdZ1qj0U3Mz3A

Ana Psychology and many other feminists love going on about boy mom's. But would also be the same type of feminists to encourage the same behavior from girl dad's though.

This is definitely misandry. Because society thinks anything type of affection towards boys is bad. While till this day it is still considered normal for the fathers to be overprotective of their daughters sometimes, until it's not convenient for women anymore.

For example, when it's convenient for women. It's perfectly acceptable for a dad to pull some alpha male BS with his gun to scare off his daughter boyfriend or prom date. This trope is so popular in media, even kids media. Where the dad character usually has to take his daughter boyfriend into a lock room, to have a serious talk about the boyfriend's intentions with his daughter.

Flip the genders, all of a sudden feminists like Ana would be calling the overprotective mom a crazy pick me who views her son girlfriend as competition. This is where the internalize misogyny think pieces comes in. While feminists like Ana would also praise fathers for being overprotective of their daughters. Because in society, we are taught that only girls deserve protection.

It so crazy too. There could be a video about a mom cooking for her 12 year old son. And the whole comment would be about how the patriarchy spoils men and infantiles men (who the irony here). But on the flip though , a father can talk about how he will pressed any man who dates his grown-ass 26 year old daughter. And this somehow considered fine.

Because in Ana mindset. It's internalize misogyny for the mother to want to protect her son from gold diggers. But yet Ana and feminist like her also thinks it's perfectly fine for the father to assume all boys are rapists though. Since internalize misandry don't exist (/s).

And also there is some cognitive dissonance here too. Again because when this behavior doesn't benefit women. All of a sudden the dad behavior is considered too controlling (I.E. the situation with the Rapper TI). And when the behavior does benefit women. The behavior is considered "positive masculinity".

I think the cognitive dissonance comes from which gender the father is pressing the most. The more energy that is targeted at the boyfriend, it's considered fine in society. It's considered controlling when the daughter is being targeted.

But this double standards has many layers though. It's also a perfect example of male gender role paradox. Since toxic masculinity can be considered "positive masculinity" in a different context when it's convenient.

A mother warning her son about manipulative partners may be labeled "controlling" or a "boy mom."

A father warning his daughter about manipulative partners may be described as "protective."

That asymmetry can reflect traditional gender norms: men are expected to be protectors, while boys are often expected to be independent and less in need of protection.