TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Heres why we have to treat Women like Children: They Can't be held Responsible for their own actions

AmericanHistoryAFBB

July 11, 2015
1 upvotes
/r/PurplePillDebate
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Heres why we have to treat Women like Children: They Can't be held Responsible for their own actions
Author

AmericanHistoryAFBB

Upvotes 1
Comments 126
Date July 11, 2015 11:23 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3cylgb/heres_why_we_have_to_treat_women_like_children/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/heres-why-we-have-to-treat-women-like-children.281096
https://theredarchive.com/post/281096
Top posts by AmericanHistoryAFBB

How to Flirt with Women: Flirting 101

1048 upvotes
September 5, 2016
/r/TheRedPill

Flirting 102

581 upvotes
September 7, 2016
/r/TheRedPill

Society doesn't give a shit about you. When you realize this, women are drawn to you like insects are drawn to light

539 upvotes
February 21, 2017
/r/TheRedPill

The Long List of Female Privileges

475 upvotes
February 23, 2017
/r/TheRedPill

Problems with the Ultra Asshole

368 upvotes
December 11, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Pulling Pussy off the Pedestal: 3 Common Excuses that keep it up there

273 upvotes
September 19, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

21 ways to take pussy off the pedestal

249 upvotes
December 17, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Flirting 103

226 upvotes
September 19, 2016
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]lurfly 5 points5 points5 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

If a man and a woman are both drunk, and they have sex...only the woman can claim rape.

The person who did not consent can claim rape, man or woman. The fact that this thread was posted proves there is still a problem. But the comments prove that many people do not believe that women can claim rape just because they were drunk. I think lots of BPers feel this way.

If the man goes and does the same thing, people will laugh at him and tell him he got lucky.

This needs to fucking change. I think an important step is to move away from the idea that men are obsessed with sex. Recently watched this video. It was a comment reply to the thread with the poster you linked. Men can get raped and men do get raped.

But to Blue Pill minded people? A woman can't rape a man. Women can't be held responsible for their own actions.

I can't speak for all of BP but I highly doubt this is the general opinion.

[–]alcockell6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Ideological feminist lawyers like Cath MacKinnon and Cath Comins have twisted laws over time to give women the upper hand, twisting itmso that the sexes become a caste system.

Takes a certain kind of evil to declare that an innocent man can learn from a false rape accusation. When for a good guy rape would be unthinkable.

[–]lurfly 3 points3 points3 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Its extremely upsetting that false rape accusations are a problem. Coming from someone who was not taken seriously in a similar situation, it disgusts me. I can't believe there are people out there who make real claims from real victims seem less credible. Rape should be taken seriously.

[–]alcockell1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Yup - and the "yes means yes - women always believed" bias rather than first responders INITIALLY believe - but then fully investigate...

It essentially boils down to legalised hearsay and perjury - for women. Can can't be defended against.

Fuck Ezra Klein for making it that much more difficult...

[–]lurfly 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I do think yes means yes is a very good policy that helps men and women actually. And I do think full investigations are important... but rape will usually come down to a he said she said. Which is why false accusations are hurting the real victims so much. My case was he said she said... and they believed what he said =/

[–]alcockell1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

What is scary is there is currently no legal defence or backstop so the guy can independently prove consent (or the girl).

Christina Hoff-Sommers and her cohort are trying to push for one to be added...

The law itself is less of an issue - but depends what confirmation and othe rbiases are put on it for how it plays out in reality.

[–]lurfly 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I don't even know how you could defend against it. And clearly don't know how you can prove it happened either. Its a really shit situation all around. Someone needs to invent an infallible lie detector! lol

[–]alcockell0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Quite. When California originally put it in - lawyers looked through it and asked "how the hell can you mount a defence"? "Fucked if I know" was the general consensus. Gonna have to wait until some case law builds up.

[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (59 children) | Copy Link

But to Blue Pill minded people? A woman can't rape a man. Women can't be held responsible for their own actions.

I've never claimed that nor do I think that.

So, give me one reason why men shouldn't treat women like children?

Because I'm not a child and do in fact take responsibility for my own actions. Why are you punishing all women for what some do and say?

[–]trpobservereats ass1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Why are you punishing all women for what some do and say?

Because it happens a lot, which makes you either an outlier or a liar.

[–]TheChemist158Non-Feminist Blue Pill Woman-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Again, this is a very, very big leap into what most consider unethical government policies. You are moving from "innocent until proven guilty" to "guilty by default". As I said, I have never done anything that warrant my freedoms stripped from me. In fact, many women have not. What GLO thinks deserves a restriction of freedom is horribly oppressive and is an authoritarian government, but aside from that he is also suggesting that we just assume that all women are guilty of this, even the ones that aren't. Even the ones that have done nothing wrong. Even the ones who are born into his system that never got the chance. Do you see how this is completely polar to the modern ideas of justice?

[–]trpobservereats ass0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Again, this is a very, very big leap into what most consider unethical government policies

I am an anarchist, so I'm not exactly big on laws. However, your argument about minorities being hurt by laws applying to the majority is the situation that exists in every democracy to varying degrees. When drugs are made illegal those who were using a drug for medicinal uses get punished even though they shouldn't. Age of consent laws restrict your freedom just for being a teenager (and they also cannot vote), even if you are more mature and responsible than most of your peers. On a more broad scale, most laws take something from you without giving you a chance just for being a human born in that area. I would argue all of that is unjust, but we are propagandized into believing it is either just or is simply the only viable solution.

an authoritarian government

Looking at history, it actually wouldn't be considered authoritarian by most of its citizens. Women adapt quite quickly to the systems men build around them. This government would just be a heavily patriarchal one.

But fundamentally, if there ever comes a time where a culture wants to put in place such a society (I hope we do better and find a third, more peaceful option), one thing I do know is that women wont be part of the debate at that point. It wouldn't be a matter of talking them into it or out of it, simply imposing it as the new standard and moving on.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (30 children) | Copy Link

Because the largest pr owoman ideology is lobbing to treat women like children and women by and large are mute or all for it. So stand up to feminism and be and adult or accept that rp generalizations are correct. personally i fight feminism because i know women are adult and feminism tainting the well and infantilzizing women.

[–]Osricthebastard2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (29 children) | Copy Link

Infantilizing women is the precise opposite of feminist ideology.

All feminists want to do is make sure the playing field is as equal as possible on either side of the gender dichotomy. That's the real feminists anyway. Not the post-soc 101 college freshman nutbags who've offloaded their own personal issues onto an ideology that they don't even understand.

The radicals in the feminist fold who are subverting the feminist mission into a misandrist crusade are as representative of feminism as the KKK is of conservative ideology.

Or maybe a better analogy would be saying they're as representative of feminism as soviet communism is of atheism.

I agree with one poster on here who said you sound childish. The inability to rationalize the individual's actions away from the group they (claim to) belong to is a hallmark of immaturity.

Wise/intelligent/fair people recognize that a shitty person is just a shitty individual, not a shitty group.

[–]ERockEfreedom1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The inability to rationalize the individual's actions away from the group they (claim to) belong to is a hallmark of immaturity. Wise/intelligent/fair people recognize that a shitty person is just a shitty individual, not a shitty group.

Well said.

[–]jdgaltRed Pill Man2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Your definition of feminist doesn't fit the ones that really exist. Log onto HuffPo or Jezebel sometime, and meet the real thing.

[–]Osricthebastard-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry what I meant was "cool story bro".

Don't feed the trolls. Don't argue with stupid. Pick the one you like.

[–]Osricthebastard-3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have met the real thing and it was pretty reasonable. Why do you get to decide that the real thing is the group you don't like? Sounds like you have an agenda.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The inability to rationalize the individual's actions away from the group they (claim to) belong to is a hallmark of immaturity.

The stubborn belief that, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, all humans are equal, unique snowflakes that don't share any common attributes is a hallmark of immaturity. I mean, we literally brainwash our children with this because they're too stupid to know any better. Doesn't get more immature than that.

Most people never grow up from this brainwashing because they're either too stupid or too comfortable in the just universe fallacy, or both.

Wise/intelligent/fair people recognize that a shitty person is just a shitty individual, not a shitty group.

Hahaha, so when a feminist does a "good" thing they are a feminist, but when a feminist does a "bad" thing they are not a feminist, just a vile pretender "subverting the feminist mission into a misandrist crusade".

What a convenient train of thought! I wonder, do you apply the same kind of logic to other groups? Like TRP, are they really just good guys with few bad apples?

[–]Osricthebastard-5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

What a convenient train of thought! I wonder, do you apply the same kind of logic to other groups? Like TRP, are they really just good guys with few bad apples?

Every group has it's weight, from one side of the scale to the other. Good and bad attributes find their way to the scale and the judgement of the group is left up to which side of the scale weighs more.

Feminists have largely been a good influence on society. Their nutters haven't done much to diminish the good they've accomplished in a century. Women can actually vote thanks to suffrage. It's not okay for a husband to rape his wife, thanks to feminism. Spousal abuse is pretty severely frowned upon now, thanks to feminism.

TRP are largely sociopaths and misogynists and at bare minimum some really insecure people who've become severely twisted inside.

So no, TRP ISN'T just a bunch of really good guys with a few bad apples. They're by and large mostly bad apples with a few people who are slightly less bad depending on how far down TRP rabbit hole they've been willing to dive.

The stubborn belief that, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, all humans are equal, unique snowflakes that don't share any common attributes is a hallmark of immaturity. I mean, we literally brainwash our children with this because they're too stupid to know any better. Doesn't get more immature than that.

Barring some significant physical or psychological handicap all human beings are born equal. Then a variety of factors will shape whether or not they sink or rise in the human ladder.

Which has absolutely nothing to do with them being born women or men and I'm not sure what you're even trying to argue with this vitriol. Unless you're saying that the fallacy we've been brainwashed to believe in (dramatic much?) is that women are somehow born less than men by virtue of being women?

So what's it going to be? Are you going to surprise me by getting to the point or are you just going to out yourself as sub-human misogynistic garbage? I have no problem with the idea that all human beings aren't equal but you're going to have to work pretty hard to convince me that arguing that entire groups of people are substandard to other groups of people doesn't make you the worst kind of human being.

I mean I believe that a human being, black or white, man or woman, should really just be judged on their own merits regardless of their physical characteristics, neither put on a pedestal nor discriminated against. But I guess that makes me brainwashed. ;)

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Feminists have largely been a good influence on society. Women can actually vote thanks to suffrage. It's not okay for a husband to rape his wife, thanks to feminism. Spousal abuse is pretty severely frowned upon now, thanks to feminism.

None of these benefit society. Only women.

Barring some significant physical or psychological handicap all human beings are born equal.

Oh, nevermind, shoulda read your entire post before bothering to reply. Obviously talking to you is a waste of time.

[–]Osricthebastard-3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

None of these benefit society. Only women.

So I guess women don't get to be a part of society.

Oh, nevermind, shoulda read your entire post before bothering to reply. Obviously talking to you is a waste of time.

My bad. I don't believe in oppressing entire population groups but fuck me right?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

No True Scotsman!

[–]Osricthebastard-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

You don't even understand what that phrase means.

When we're dealing with a fringe radical group as part of a subset of a larger group it is a perfectly valid argument.

Unless you really are arguing that communists represent the atheist agenda perfectly. Who knows maybe you are that stupid.

And for the record No True Scotsman! specifically refers to a situation where I'm excluding you personally from a group as a means of invalidating your opinion as a member of that group. It doesn't apply to defining the borders of a group.

It would only apply if you were representing as a feminist and I said "well you're not a real feminist because x, y, z so your opinion doesn't count".

Radfems are definitely feminists. They just don't get to lay whole claim to feminist ideology. And considering how minimal their numbers are (despite how vocal and loud they can get) they really can't even lay claim to a significant portion of feminist ideology.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

lol, none of what you said is correct. that is what happens when you start believing absurdities.

[–]Osricthebastard2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Oh you sure told me.

"I'm right and you're wrong".

Good going. You're willing to fall on logical fallacies when it suits you then hypocritically commit the most infantile example of one. You're a stellar example of human progress. A real credit to the gene pool.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Your statements were simply wrong. Believing absurdities is clearly an obstacle for you.

[–]Osricthebastard-2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Like I said, you lost. History already looks at you as the absurdity. So I think it's best if you just fucking get over it already. This is getting majorly pathetic on your part.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

People taking pity on you doesn't make you a woman.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

I thought the personal was political or so Gloria steinem and bell hooks tell me. And you can't argue feminism is for treating women like adults, not when every time a feminist say women need 'empowerment' it followed by the antecedent statement 'therefore government/corporations/men need to do some thing' or proposing policies like in the UK that women can't even go to prison because that wouldn't be very fun for female criminals. Seriously both the lib dems and the green party were pushing that legislation.

But no feminism is totally about holding women accountable. Or how about chairman poa. She is a shit human who is an even worse ceo and shat on the community that makes this site money. But no she wasn't fired for doing a shitty job she was fired because of my soggy knees. Or this poster campaign and affirmative consent laws which you know damn well most men won't file charge namely because feminist changed the laws and legal definition of rape to exclude male victims of female rapists. They did the same thing with dv. In fact feminists are so opposed to holding women accountable that they threw lesbian victims of dv out with female to male victims of dv and do every thing they can to suppress the research. (2007 maurray struas).

You movement is toxic and as much as you would like to paint the radicals are a small minority they are the only ones that matters. Are you in government advocating for advocating for equal funding of male victims of dv? How about rape? How about due process or the family courts? No? didn't think so. But you know who is? Radical fucking feminists. They are in universities pumping out bad research in government lobbing for sexist laws or fighting people who are trying to make the laws equal. They are in media perpetuating myths like the wage gap. And they are in unelected positions in government destroying men's lives through the family courts. Why? Becuase fuck equality women are special snow flakes that need protection over and above what men get and if you dare question that we have some women in the third world we drag out to justify our existence in the first world. mean while we will hire women for 66p to make shirts that make us feel special. No feminism is corrupt and morally bankrupt movement at the top and filled in with rubes at the middle and bottom with a few at the fringes which are loud enough to make useful scape goats.

http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.pdf

[–]Osricthebastard-3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yeah cool story bro.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

nice rebuttal

[–]Osricthebastard-5 points-4 points-3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You're making a whole lot of exaggerated claims with no basis in actual reality. You're an alarmist. There's nothing to rebutt.

Feminists don't want any of those absurd things you mentioned. But trying to point that out to you is futile because you'll find one example of a one crazy hag and use that to dismiss hundreds of perfectly reasonable people's contributions to equality.

Your bias is evident and you have no interest in listening to reason.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

https://i.imgur.com/cIiJ1Sy.jpg

i guess some random person with no affiliation to any organization just made this out of the blue

same hear i guess

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://assets.vancitybuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/dont-be-that-guy-8.jpg%253F1f48cf&imgrefurl=http://www.vancitybuzz.com/2013/07/vancouver-police-launch-dont-be-that-guy-campaign/&h=2750&w=2125&tbnid=P0g-i9dZ8xYkjM:&zoom=1&docid=vi9OeKqN2SGC-M&ei=gW-iVd38BoL3-AGDtYGADw&tbm=isch&ved=0CDUQMygDMAM

i guess it was jsut acouple mysandrist with no political ties what so ever.

oh and i guess all those women saying kill all men arent feminist either

and most certainly mary koss isnt; feminist and she the one who defined men out of rape

and i guess all those feminists organization that are fighting against adressing male victims of IPV aren't feminsit either

and i guess NOW the largest feminist organization who fights against share parrenting laws isn't feminist

nor is leaf which want to make it legal for women to kill men whom they are in relationships with out having to prove DV let alone having to prove they had no other recourse

or the lib dems and the green party which are lobbing to abolish womens prison because women are apparently subject to different laws than men which dictate women can do no wrong.

how about all those feminist demanding quotas?

but no they aren't real feminists

real feminist are the feminist you like, that sit will with your moral compass

all those other institutional feminist aren't really feminists

gotta love feminist teacher bias

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/eliminating-feminist-teacher-bias-erases-boys-falling-grades-study-finds

but dont believe me and my straight white maleness let a lesbian rap at you for a time

http://thespectacularspider-girl.tumblr.com/post/90076896614/addictedtoapen-thespectacularspider-girl

oh did i forget to mention a lot lesbians love us MRAs?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo5VRoHVbs8

http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.pdf

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Of course, you're right as rain. But I hear crickets...

Chirp Chirp

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

his response was hear and he pretend like like i didnt provide sources

https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/3cylgb/heres_why_we_have_to_treat_women_like_children/ct0zt4m?context=3

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Because apparently women don't deserve to be individuals .

[–]GayLubeOilTrue Red Pill5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

No unfortunately they don't. Women were a lot better of in the 1950's when they were managed by men. Now they are strong independent obease and fucked up on prescription medication.

[–]AerobusThe Red Pill is Truth2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you think women were better in the 1950s you're wrong. The image of the perfect housewife who lovingly cooked dinner and didn't act like a bitch for her husband wasn't the norm. Only upper-middle class white families had that, and even then starting from the 1920s onwards women started acting more entitled and spoiled.

Simply put, your idea is right, but the time period is not correct. Women were a lot better in the 1700s, where if they didn't submit to being managed by men, they'd have to go out on the frontier and farm and hunt and actually survive which took too much effort and scared them into submission.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (21 children) | Copy Link

Women were a lot better of in the 1950's when they were managed by men

I take it you didn't pay much attention to the history class and World War II?

Now they are strong independent obease and fucked up on prescription medication.

Seriously. What is with lawyers and being able to spell? I usually let the average TRPer slide (unless it's your/you're) but I really have a hard time believing you have a bachelors degree let alone are studying to be a lawyer with stuff like "obease".

Edit: It's not an accident either: https://archive.is/bf5jd You've spelled it 'obease' at least 3 times on the first page of posts alone.

Ill hold onto it like an obease lesbian holds on excess bodyfat.

Do you ever take a cursory glance at lesbians and how obease they are?

Now they are strong independent obease and fucked up on prescription medication.

The Red Pill is interested in getting shit done and debating with maladjusted obease feminists accomplishes nothing.

There is a positive correlation between how feminist a country is and how obease its women are.

Eliot Rodger Subscribed to PUAHate.com a site run by Obease Man Bitch Feminist David Futerelle

What about ObeasePeopleDislike, or RoundHumansScorn, NonChubsterPreference or OverweightConcern how about AdiposeNonRecommend or SkinnyInclination?

Watch Oprah sometime and you will see a room of obease filth clamoring for shit merchandize.

Dr Helen Smith, author of Why Men Are Boycotting Obease Americunts And The American Dream.

The person who posted this is obease.

Obese.

O-b-e-s-e.

There is no A. You'd think someone certified as a personal trainer would know how to spell it.

[–]max_peenorCertified TRP Shitlord1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

There is no A. You'd think someone certified as a personal trainer would know how to spell it.

Wooo! We get to make fun of ESL people now? Awesome. It'll make living in California a lot more fun.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Wooo! We get to make fun of ESL people now?

If those ESL people are in law school, to be lawyers, personal trainers and can't spell obese? Yes. By all means.

If they're every day ESL people I usually cut them a some slack.

I've also not seen ESL people make homophone mistakes. I've asked a few of them and in their heads they're completely separate thoughts so your/you're and their/they're/there are usually mistakes from English primary language.

[–]max_peenorCertified TRP Shitlord1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Everyday ESL? So we have some sort of ESL chart where I can choose who to make fun of?

I've also not seen ESL people make homophone mistakes.

SO, you speak russian?

You are a fountain of tolerance.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Everyday ESL? So we have some sort of ESL chart where I can choose who to make fun of?

If someone is going into a field or claims to be an expert in a field and they spell something from that field wrong, they are fair game.

SO, you speak russian?

What does speaking Russian have to do with making English homophone mistakes?

[–]max_peenorCertified TRP Shitlord1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If someone is going into a field or claims to be an expert in a field and they spell something from that field wrong, they are fair game.

Did he claim to be an expert in English?

What does speaking Russian have to do with making English homophone mistakes?

I suspected as much.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Did he claim to be an expert in English?

He claim to be an expert in fitness. 'Obese' is a fitness word.

[–][deleted] -1 points-1 points-1 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points2 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]GayLubeOilTrue Red Pill4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I love this obsession with my degree. My university didnt offer a kinesiology program however I have a minor in Biology. However I hold numerous certifications including ACSM and ACE. The majority of my course work is in law and public policy.

I also want to reiterate how much of a mad fucking beta you are. You are quite upset and I as well as many other members of the Red Pill find this fact hilarious.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

My university didnt offer a kinesiology program however I have a minor in Biology.

A minor in biology? And that has what to do with kinesiology?

However I hold numerous certifications including ACSM and ACE.

Oh those, the "Cisco Certificates" of the gym world.

I also want to reiterate how much of a mad fucking beta you are.

Not mad in the least. Entertained by a 22 year old that doesn't see the impending wall around the corner. It'll be like a slow motion train wreck playing out in real time.

You are quite upset

Not in the least. Entertained and bored, maybe.

I as well as many other members of the Red Pill find this fact hilarious.

As hilarious as the world finds your T-shirt designs? I hope you didn't pay more than tree fiddy for them.

[–]GayLubeOilTrue Red Pill6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Your publicizing shirts as we speak. Thank you.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

publicising

Dude, you really need to get a dictionary.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points2 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I personally baited him into a rage posting photos of himself on the Internet for our viewing pleasure.

Oh you did? Did you forget which account you were signed in under?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can you also learn the difference between your and you're? I know you're from some shithole village in Siberia but please learn 6th grade grammar.

[–]GayLubeOilTrue Red Pill5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sounds like your mad

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you forgetting which account you signed in with before responding?

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Children are treated pretty well in society.

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. So I see no problems treating women the same way we treat children.

[–]tooshsmooch5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

you'd have no problems being treated like one yourself?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Treated like an actual child or treated like how TRP advocates treating women?

[–]tooshsmooch2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

an actual child. given that's what you see no problems with women being treated as.

edit: apologies, you didn't state that. more a question for americanhistoryafbb

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well, before I started treating women like children, THEY were treating me like a child. So I think I'll continue what I'm doing seeing as it gets more panties wet than before.

[–]tooshsmooch0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Soooo.. that's a no? Kinda dodged my question there buddy.... I didn't ask about hydrating undergarments.

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, I don't like it.

But then again, sexual strategy is amoral.

[–]tooshsmooch0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

if you genuinely had no fucks to give regarding the rightness or wrongness of your sexual strategy, you would have no inclination to justify it on the internet with posts like this one.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

How does treating women like children help men who are raped or got falsely accused of rape? Are you saying that women should be excused when they falsely accuse a man ?

[–]AerobusThe Red Pill is Truth2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are tradeoffs.

Right now, women get all the benefits of being treated as children (don't need to take responsibility for their actions), and all the benefits of being an adult (can vote, can work a job, etc.)

You call yourself an egalitarian MRA, so it shouldn't be too hard to see that there are two types of equality.

The first is where women are treated as adults, and are given all the privileges of being an adult and all the responsibilites. This is what I think a lot of egalitarians such as yourself would be in support of.

This means that if a woman falsely accuses someone of rape, she goes to prison for that. Female average prison sentence lengths are not shorter than male average prison sentence lengths. We pay women equal money for equal hours worked, but at the same time expect the same quality of work from them. We are able to fire women that cry and cause drama instead of getting work done without the threat of being sued by feminist organizations. We give them the right to vote, and the right to work a job, and a right to hold public office, but we hold them to the same standards as males in these fields, and if they are incompetent, we are able to fire them or hold a recall without being labeled as sexist or misogynistic.

The second option, which I actually favor, is treating them like children.

This means that if they falsely accuse someone of rape, you take them seriously, no questions asked. Note: As an MRA this hurts, but it's worth it in the end if the entirety of this model is instated. If someone is being mean to them, you protect them, by way of laws, and the father when she is unmarried, and by way of the husband when she is married.

But treating women like children means you don't get all these luxurious in society that you have now. No right to work. No right to vote. You can't hold public office. You can't earn any money because child labor is illegal. You're not allowed to be unaccompanied without your male guardian (father or husband, brother is sometimes allowed) after hours. You can't go to bars (children can't drink, and I think we've all seen how many poor decisions inebriated women make). You can't get an abortion, because such a decision is not befitting of a child to make.

So these are the two options. Treat them as adults, give them the privileges and responsibilities of being an adult, or treat them as a child, giving them the privileges of a child but taking away the privileges of an adult. Most true egalitarians should have no problem with the first scenario, while most women, including yourself I believe, would find the second scenario horrific.

The problem is most feminists don't want equality. They want female superiority. While the first scenario I described illustrates true equality, that scenario in of itself means that women will have less benefits than they do now, because they would end up giving up female superiority.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

because at least men know the playing field they are on, instead of assuming women are adult and can consent when drunk men will know better because feminism thinks women are children and now men will know women are children.

[–]Eulabeia3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I find it amusing how many people are fooled by this. Drunk sex isn't rape just because a poster said so.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's enough to get many men kicked out of University

[–]PrimePussyOverRancidRP4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It's not foolery when a mattress carrier regrets drunk sex and takes you to court for rape.

Not to mention your reputation is now permanently shit smeared since some people still believe the mattress carrier.

[–]Eulabeia1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

She didn't, she just reported it the school and she still lost.

Drunk sex is not a crime in any real court of law.

[–]despisedlove2Reality Pill Tradcon RP2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And the school:

a) did not kick her out for trying to ruin a man's life; b) allowed her to parley her felonious behaviour as an art project, instead of treating it for what it was - sexual harassment at school directed at a man she failed to get kicked out.

[–]jdgaltRed Pill Man0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She did tell the police also (though a long time after the event). The police took one look and decided not to pursue it. They were right.

[–]skippingelephant1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You don't have sex before marriage or the modern equivalent of a LTR unless it is with a prostitute because then it can get messy very quickly. That is why women who sleep around are called whores.

[–]thereddespair1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

so the only thing behind the claim is the rape matter.

for one, not every woman has been fake raped and made a fake rape charge or claim.

i can understand if you treat one who HAS done so.

honestly? men are no different or excluded. they can act as children themselves. look at all the man children out there. if being responsible is the trait in question, men are by default? owning up to faults, mistakes and not being good enough? just look at all the delusional bullshit men spout.

if i am to truly think exactly in the same mechanics as a trp guy, i wonder what i can say about men.

men, think they are so much the shit. so much arrogance of how wonderful, strong and smart they are. lol

funny are the people who think all battles should be fought under their terms, under their styles and strengths alone.

i want to pity men for how women are turning things around in their favor. but then i see, you were weak to have been unable to stop it. and such you deserved it. you can cry like oh women are like children coz they can get away with it. no, the ones in the front worked together to get that special perk using mens weakness and using their strength, applying pressure.

those who can take, take. those who cannot, whine and cry like children.

[–]Osricthebastard2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (36 children) | Copy Link

Two wrongs don't make a right bro. That there's some discord in the balance of the law isn't an excuse for shitty behavior on your part.

So, give me one reason why men shouldn't treat women like children?

Because women aren't children, they're people. Rather than treat them like children we as a society should try to change the way we treat women AND men.

[–][deleted] 7 points7 points7 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Osricthebastard0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

You're a paragon of reason.

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points2 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points0 points0 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points2 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Tell that to feminist becuase clearly feminists and red pill agree on this issue

[–]Osricthebastard-2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

No they don't stop drinking the kool-aid and bother to learn a thing or two.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

what kool aid, ask any one hear i am anti red pill. but when i look what feminist say and do it clear they think women are children.

[–]Osricthebastard-3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

What you're doing is the equivalent of saying all black people are criminals because you got mugged by a black person once. You've got to be better than that. A few nutters don't make or break all the good feminism has done. You simply cannot dismiss an entire movement because of the personal problems of a few women.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

are black criminals in power? no they aren't they are minority of community and are a out come of dis empowerment due to economic concerns.

A few nutters don't make or break all the good feminism has done. You simply cannot dismiss an entire movement because of the personal problems of a few women.

had you read my post further up in this thread instead of snarking at it like and srs drone you see what my point is.

YOU DON'T MATTER. you know who matter the chair of LEAF, the CHAIR of NOW, feminist lobbyist, feminist academics pumping out bad research, feminist politicians, feminist in the media, feminist in government.

quiet frankly you could be saying kill all men and all that other misandrist bullshit, i dont care about you you are irrelevant in the supreme. you know who is relevant? the feminist i described above, they matter you dont. they hate men by their words and by their actions. are they as loud as your most retarded SJW? no but they are of the same mind. and thats the problem. you say equality i say fuck you look at your betters. you whistle and walk away.

[–]Osricthebastard-2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago* (18 children) | Copy Link

you say equality i say fuck you look at your betters. you whistle and walk away.

You've provided one picture on the internet that may or may not even be real and another picture that isn't even saying anything unreasonable at all. A handful of political scenarios that I'm pretty sure you've dramatically misinterpreted or even made up (I seriously doubt anyone is trying to shut down women's prisons but okay man whatever you say) and a handful of personal internet stories that may or may not be total Bullshit. You're not even capable of seeing through the Bullshit because you've got your head too far up your own confirmation bias. You ignore everything good about feminists to villify a tiny vocal minority and you go out of your way plumbing the very depths of the earth to find examples of the evil woman emasculating you. This is less about you being oppressed and more about your own insecurity. Even "those in power" you talk about aren't examples of people with any real political influence. They just get a lot of attention from the media because they say crazy things. They're the same as the westboro baptiste church and they have about as much ability to effect public policy. Its like you're foaming at the mouth about a problem that doesn't even exist.

But that last sentence? That's the part that completely invalidates anything you have to say on the topic. This isn't even about keeping the rad fems from committing injustice against men. For you this is all about keeping women subservient. You're fucking disgusting.

And I love the part where you seem to lapse into assuming that I'm a woman. Check my username stupid.

It also does wonders for your credibility in a debate to bother spelling and punctuating correctly. You seriously out yourself as incredibly uneducated and ignorant or very young when you don't bother to do that.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago* (17 children) | Copy Link

(I seriously doubt anyone is trying to shut down women's prisons but okay man whatever you say)

i posit for you indulgence

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2006/aug/02/closedownwomensprisons

http://theconversation.com/the-case-for-closing-down-womens-prisons-33000

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-politics/10015766/Isnt-it-time-to-abolish-most-womens-prisons.html

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/report-proposes-closing-womens-prisons-2293495.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/06/we-should-stop-putting-women-in-jail-for-anything/

NO FEMALE PRIVILEGED HERE

LOOK UP ELIZABETH SHEEHLY a MEMBER OF LEAF. She is open advocating for making so prosecuting women who MURDER their spouse is near impossible to prosecute.

AND NOW HAS BEEN FIGHTING EQUAL PARENTING for 40 FUCKING YEARS

You're fucking disgusting. And I love the part where you seem to lapse into assuming that I'm a woman. Check my username stupid. you say equality i say fuck you look at your betters. you whistle and walk away.

you mean this sentence when i am clearly and obviously referring to your feminist betters that unlike you, matter? you know the ones in political office and government. you know the ones with power not the one whining on the internet. or does context not matter when you want to prove a point.

Also I never referred to you as a woman in fact i had no knowledge of your sex or gender but that is very telling about you and your beliefs.

For you this is all about keeping women subservient.

LOL you should meet my exes. the only way they would be subservient is with a healthy does tranquilizers and even then i am not to certain that would do the trick.

[–]Osricthebastard-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

So your answer to my assertion that radfems are a fringe group with barely any presence outside of the internet is to post a bunch of Clickbait opinion pieces written by nobodies and mention a radical feminist group with no real political influence? You're really only making my point for me.

I never once said radical feminists don't exist. That you've so avidly argued that they do really only reinforces the point that you yourself are a radical nutter with nothing better to do than foam at the mouth about problems that don't really exist.

I asserted that radfems are a fringe group and they very much are. You can post a million links and silly YouTube videos but those don't account for hard facts or statistics which you completely lack. You're making a mountain out of a molehill and furthermore exacerbating the issue by giving radfems a platform to argue on. The best approach would be to give them no attention but the louder you yell at them the louder they'll yell back and pretty soon you'll have provided them with the spotlight they want. Good job.

LOL you should meet my exes. the only way they would be subservient is with a healthy does tranquilizers and even then i am not to certain that would do the trick.

Its always telling to me that people like you eventually out yourself as having bad experiences with women. I don't know what kind of women you pick up but I've never had these kinds of problems. When everyone else is doing fine but the common denominator in your shitty relationships is you then you're the problem. As they say, women seem wicked when you're unwanted.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Its always telling to me that people like you eventually out yourself as having bad experiences with women.

who said they were bad? i did i just said the last thing any one would call them are subservaint

I don't know what kind of women you pick up but I've never had these kinds of problems.

wait i though i was supposed to be the mysginistic shit lord that like subservient women. strange the person who is accusing me of liking subservient women is claim he has never had a problem with find nice docile women. funny its almost like i want women to challenge me as equals or something......

When everyone else is doing fine but the common denominator in your shitty relationships is you then you're the problem.

my relationships are just fine thank you very much,

As they say, women seem wicked when you're unwanted.

so your projecting right?

listen let me tall you some thing that everyone in this sub could tell

I'm poly kinky switch, believe me i have more experience with women than the average poster in this sub. i mercilessly mock RP because they have no fucking clue.

So your answer to my assertion that radfems are a fringe group with barely any presence outside of the internet is to post a bunch of Clickbait opinion pieces written by nobodies and mention a radical feminist group with no real political influence? You're really only making my point for me.

also the Lib dem and Green party who are behind that prison fuck up aren't nobodies. also i linked you good sources. like 5 of them.

I never once said radical feminists don't exist. That you've so avidly argued that they do really only reinforces the point that you yourself are a radical nutter with nothing better to do than foam at the mouth about problems that don't really exist.

I said they are the only ones that matter because they are in the institutions writing policy, producing ideologically drive research.

http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.pdf

http://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm

or mary koss

https://soundcloud.com/889-wers/male-rape

deliberately concealed male victims of rape and influenced how policy is written and how data is collected and categorized. also responsible for the fallacious 1 in whatever flavor it is this week rape stat methodology. really read through the methodology it has more holes than Swiss cheese and blatant playing with the number included.

you wont hear about that because feminists own the press and the narrative. So when i say the radicals are the only ones who matter i can say it with some authority. so when i say some thing like know who your (feminist) betters are i mean it.

also since you seem like a we hunted the mammoths user

http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/peter-andrew-nolanc-a-danger-to-self-and-others/

written in may 2014

http://wehuntedthemammoth.com/2015/01/02/peter-andrew-nolanc-warns-women-who-comment-on-his-facebook-ripoff-site-that-he-just-might-kill-them-for-it/

written in jan 2 2015

tell me the difference be tween them

literally to people that hate each other agree peter nolan is deranged.

we call out and marginalize our radicals, feminists don't they push them in to background position of power.

[–]Osricthebastard-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

https://www.google.com/search?q=elizabeth+sheeley&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8#q=elizabeth+sheehly

So if you google Elizabeth sheehly you find nothing but articles on the front page results criticizing and even outright ridiculing her. Is it just me or does it kind of seem like radical feminists are just a fringe group that nobody takes seriously except to make a media spectacle out of?

A quick wiki of LEAF turns up a marginal number of controversial activities, many of which you're certainly welcome to disagree with but none of which are necessarily radical in any manner.

That's the fuck of it. Realizing I'm arguing with someone just as loony as any rad-fem. Someone who cannot see the forest through the trees and perceives any slight marginal threat as a nuclear war-head barreling down on him. You're not just wrong. You're absurd.

[–]alcockell1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Back in the 80s - Sheehy et al were the movers and shakers. they were also part of Steinem's camp who pushed out the Sommers camp.

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Key word there is: Should. Until society and feminism stops treating women like children, why should I?

But yeah, let me know when society changes.

[–]ERockEfreedom5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

BECAUSE YOU'RE PART OF SOCIETY. You're a part of the problem dude, you have to help fix it.

[–]Osricthebastard3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Until society and feminism stops treating women like children, why should I?

Because

Until society

YOU are society.

Which means change starts with you. YOU should treat women as adult human beings because you want things to change, not throw your hands up to the status quo to suit your own thinly veiled misogynistic agenda.

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't matter enough to change anything, though. I'm just a guy. It would be people in positions of power who can make change happen. I think feminism as a movement tried, but failed.

[–]Osricthebastard-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's still trying so it's a bit early to say it failed.

I don't matter enough to change anything, though.

Except change is a numbers game. Those in power won't make any moves to change unless there's a significant population of people who've already done so themselves. Or do you not understand that is how democracy works?

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Becuase you shouldn't be whute knight scum?

[–]17b29a2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

the only obvious conclusion I can see is that you shouldn't fuck drunk girls, no idea what you're babbling about

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Well, I will continue to fuck drunk girls because she's capable of making her own decisions thank you very much.

[–]17b29a-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

what are you even talking about LOL

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Drunk girls have a brain, if they don't wanna fuck me, they'll let me know

[–]17b29a-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

who cares if they let you know, doesn't let you escape rape charges

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

doesn't let her escape rape charges

FTFY

[–]17b29a-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

is there a point you're trying to get to, hun?

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was raped hun. I'm struggling to deal with it, but I was raped by a fatty when I was drunk. And I can't do shit about it because I'd be laughed out of the court house

[–]wombatinaburrowfeminist marsupial1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Apparently men are not held responsible for their behaviour, either. http://m.smh.com.au/business/workplace-relations/employee-who-abused-bosses-was-unfairly-dismissed-20150630-gi1kic.html

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hmm...is this an Australian thing? In America that would probably turn out different.

I do love Australia though, been wanting to visit the down under for a long time.

[–]wombatinaburrowfeminist marsupial-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, australian.

[–]Magnaphoria0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think women who oppose today's feminism should be clumped with all the crazies. Why do we have to pay (be treated like toddlers) for what american women do? Im eastern european and reading stuff like this and AWALT makes it hard to take the TRP seriously barring the generic advice (like get fit) of course

[–]itsalreadybeenthrown0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It would be pretty weird for all my employees to suddenly be working for a child.

[–]cvcv1991-2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

only the woman can claim rape because men and women are different. Men fuck and we get fucked, so even if both of us are drunk, the penis person is the one being active.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's silly to say that women can't rape men under certain circumstances .

[–]jdgaltRed Pill Man0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just because you've never had woman-on-top sex doesn't mean it never happens.

[–]wazzup987Blue pill, you can beat me black & blue for it later[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right and large portion of that is men letting women run rough shod.

wether they be judge or dude bros a lot mens problems come from women not being held to account and a large part of the problem is men not holding women to account and giving women what they say they want EQUAL TREATMENT.

But if men actually start doing that the amount of fucking bitching feminism will do about hostile sexism because women are being held to the same standard as men will be emense.

feminism need to be taken out into the country knelt down of over ditch and shot and left to rot like every other neo fascist moralizing ideology.

HEY RP ANTI FEMINIST ENOUGH FOR YOU? OR IS THIS MRA JUST TRYING TO MAKE NICE WITH THE FEMINIST SCUM?

[–]mrgoditselfProffesor Jigsaw0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

My nose is tingling... What is this.... I smell hate and pretty strong one.

Chill dude, you sound childish yourself from your post. You are not trying to debate and talk rationally , you are just venting your frustration and anger. Not sure if you are a new member or what, but would be glad if you removed your red pill flair.

We all know this shit happens everyday, just laugh and move on. Redpill is about adapting to our society to all the blue pill majority, sjw, feminists and so on, not being annoying and whining about it. Original poster wanted to share for fun and show with a a little amount of review, you are not.

Edit: did a small check-up on his profile. I was right, clearly new and not even red, fella has a lot of work to do on himself, before bashing women.

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I've been on TRP since November 2014, but I made a new account specifically to post to TRP. And this is not a bitter post, it was meant as a discussion.

I don't hate women, I understand women.

[–]mrgoditselfProffesor Jigsaw0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

1) Imagine you are bitter and angry, how would you write your post about this stuff here? - to me it looks pretty accurate to a angry speech.

2) You ask a lot of basic questions (from your post history), not only in PPD, but also in asktrp- not sure, how you do not know those things- that's why i considered you are not red

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I still have more to learn, I'm not denying that part. But I know more than the clueless Blue Pillers here do, gotta give me that much credit.

[–]ERockEfreedom0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I was right, clearly new and not even red, fella has a lot of work to do on himself, before bashing women.

Cool. TRP sucks

[–][deleted] 2 points2 points2 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ERockEfreedom1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

None of my shit or life is perfect, but at least I don't teach lies about how women are immature, all the same, and suck.

I believe in the power of empathy. It's strong, and it's wonderful. If everyone could develop it, the world would be a much better place.

[–]AmericanHistoryAFBBI'm Back[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good luck with that.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter