Warlock's Law

2015-04-04T15:54:32+00:00

[permanently deleted]

csehszlovakze · 2015-04-04T14:31:38+00:00

If this goes global MGTOW will be so widespread the whole western society will collapse before they can realize what's happened. As Sweden is already at the edge I hope they'll integrate this, then we'll just watch the fireworks.

ForgeAndTemper · 2015-04-04T16:22:58+00:00

If things continue to get worse the only solution will be to wear a gopro or some shit everywhere. But really with enough descent into tyranny you can be accused of anything. Genuinely worrying. They could make it law that men must donate sperm for IVF, now there will be no population problems, the alpha male and sex generally could be removed forever. There would have to be a pretty big collapse to reverse this. Anyone else excited for the future of humanity?

NeoreactionSafe · 2015-04-04T13:41:37+00:00

Women exist in a spectrum.

For 0 we rate a woman with full narcissism. This woman cannot imagine a world outside of herself. Many modern women are this way.

For 10 we rate a woman with perfect Charm. This woman's existence revolves around studying her superior male partner.

Any interaction with women must be based on her position in this spectrum. The closer to 0 you get the more unpredictable a woman's narcissistic swings will become.

Do not trust a woman until she has demonstrated a consistent pattern of Charm and obedience.

A Beta male has no idea that women are supposed to Charm them because they flip things upside down and attempt to themselves Charm the narcissistic princess. Big mistake.

One must know hierarchy and recognize obedience.

Fear the narcissistic princess.

RealRational · 2015-04-05T05:38:08+00:00

Holy shit deciphering that was a mind fuck, are you a lawyer and/or a politician?

I've translated what you wrote for parts 5 and 6, to make it understandable. I've also added and changed some things that make it slightly more expansive, and accurate.

The Risk of withdrawn female consent can never be destroyed.

The higher the female thinks the males SMV is the less likely it is that she'll withdraw consent. The more likely it is that the females reputation will be damaged, by public knowledge of her sexual relationship with the male, the more likely it is that the female will withdraw consent.

(but I don't really like this, it's not based on odds. It would be more accurate to say "The greater decline the female perceives her reputation to sustain from public knowledge, of her sexual relationship with the male, the more likely it is that she will withdraw consent".)

The more the female wants to acquire commitment from the male, before the act, the more likely it is she will be offended by male's "failure" to provide that commitment. If she perceives that "offense" to be great enough she may then choose to have a vendetta against you, after the act.

Also more likely to make her choose a vendetta against you is the amount of resources and attention she can receive. She would gain these things, through vendetta, by talking shit about you, libel/slander, which she has no fear of doing because she knows courts don't hold women accountable for their actions. She won't be convicted of libel or slander no matter how absurd the lies.

6. If any male shows skepticism regarding the females claims that will be seen as a confession of misogyny, of hating all women. The male will also be seen as victim blaming.

If any male expects justice, or to be treated fairly, or even considered as a person at all they will be seen as misogynistic, victim blaming bastards who deserve to have their penis cut off.

I mean holy shit batman, talk about your king of run on sentences and sporadic thought structure. Those points jumped all over the place. Very succinct, I grant you. But at the cost of comprehensibility.

redpillbanana · 2015-04-04T16:35:49+00:00

Where the female can derive no positive emotions from the sexual act, no such consent has taken place.

Positive emotions include the joy of receiving money.

truthiesttruth · 2015-04-04T16:49:40+00:00

Focusing on this type of "rp material" will more than likely just end up turning you into a meek faggot...

Yes its good to know that you operate in an environment where women have some judicial privileges, but focusing on negativity is not going to attract you plates, they dont like whiners, I used to be one, dont be one.

Instead of focusing on how cunty some women can be, focus on how to identify and avoid these cunts/situations and just let some bp shmuck deal with said cunt. Of course its going to be harder than just complaining, but nobody ever said trp is easy... just dont forget your abundance mentality!

j0hnan0n · 2015-04-04T17:13:06+00:00

Makes sense.

My only question is: why is it named after a guy who has magic powers, rather than a woman with magic? If the woman can work magic, wouldn't it be a "Witches Law" ?

Just saying...

tmnt88 · 2015-04-04T17:40:04+00:00

can we refer to this as whorelocks law?

NorthMike · 2015-04-04T17:48:21+00:00

Sounds about right. But as you all know, facts make you a chauvinist, so if you want to fit into society, you must learn to disregard facts and replace them with a sense of obedient subservience. Its a brilliant way to break men down before building them back as desired. The function this has to the ruling classes is obvious, but not apparent. Its like lubricant in the machine that is society. The slow and incremental progress towards Oligarchic Totalitarianism requires blind obedience to its ideology by all fighting age males. Loyalty between each other must be broken before the state can claim that need as its own and legislate obedience to its cause. This, and other battles between minority groups in society directly contribute by breaking down trust between citizens. This will continue until the average citizen trusts government and rulers more then they trust family members. Seems far fetched, but that is what's coming, and eventually those who do not go along will just be labelled terrorists and taken away. Our civilization is the factory, and we are all the cheaply mass produced products.

popthatpill · 2015-04-04T14:49:03+00:00

This is more like a corollary than a law, but nitpicking aside, very interesting.

thatguylikeaaronhall · 2015-04-04T18:28:10+00:00

I guess I'm going to spend the rest of my life hating women...

BlaiseDB · 2015-04-04T19:02:07+00:00

Sadly, we are going there. MGTOW is the result.

Asoka11111 · 2015-04-04T14:23:14+00:00

Sidebar material? I'm asking because I'm not sure.

SlickThroatButter · 2015-04-04T15:17:59+00:00

This is just a variant of Briffault's Law.

bama79rolltide · 2015-04-04T15:48:34+00:00

I'm surprised that blue states haven't passed Warlock's Law as gospel. It is essentially the blueprint for new "rape culture" laws in Western culture.

1,2 and 5 were my favorite reads.

favours_of_the_moon · 2015-04-04T23:31:06+00:00

That's true, until you get the "confirmatory text" from her the next day. After that, consent cannot be retroactively revoked.

oldredder · 2015-04-05T01:40:00+00:00

Where the female can derive no positive emotions from the sexual act, no such consent has taken place.

No word of a lie upon reading this I had the most evil and guttural laugh.

Ehcadroj · 2015-04-05T01:43:42+00:00

Well, from the male's perspective, if I'm reading this right, is that in this scenario all sex is rape-sex.

TRPtophan · 2015-04-05T00:18:41+00:00

5) The risk of withdrawn consent by the female can never be destroyed, with the odds inversely proportional to the female's perception of the male's SMV and directly proportional to the odds of the female's reputation declining after her sexual indiscretions with the male fall into the spotlight, the female's desire for commitment from the male before the act and possible vendetta after failing to acquire commitment from said male after the act, and the amount of resources or attention that can be derived by the female at the male's expense via libel, slander, and/or litigation without consequence.

One of the very few times I've seen "and/or" used appropriately. Normally you should say either "and" or "or," unless you are being purposefully vague (or you're just a beta), which is certainly the case where female "logic" is concerned.

Warlock's Law

Want to see 4,5, and 6? Read the rest on my blog...

Comments

Title	Warlock's Law
Author	dr_warlock
Upvotes	140
Comments	71
Date	April 4, 2015 1:06 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/31ezjy/warlocks_law/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/warlocks-law.30984 https://theredarchive.com/post/30984