This just in, rampant degeneracy and feminism has produced more out of wedlock babies than WWI and II.

Infinitewisdom1984 · 2018-08-18T20:35:31+00:00

Yep. Overall birthrate is down, the nuclear family is basically destroyed, and out-of-wedlock births aka single mother households are increasing and soon to be the majority if not already. In a generation or two, every child will be raised by a single mommy with daddy government footing the bill.

DangZagnut · 2018-08-18T20:38:45+00:00

Frankly, I don't really care all that much, I'm more concerned with an out-of-control welfare state supporting and encouraging poor parenting choices.

zetva94 · 2018-08-19T03:55:53+00:00

It’s a shame that most of the children born in this situation will be without a decent influence, or a family to raise them for the entirety of their youth. This graph really put things into perspective for me. While I can’t say I was ever particularly educated on this exact topic, I would never have imagined that the problem would be this out of hand

Ultramegasaurus · 2018-08-19T11:14:22+00:00

Some idiots always say that unbridled female hypergamy is good for the species and the gene pool, but it's such a load of horseshit. There is absolutely nothing desirable about bastard kids born to miserable single mothers who are dependent on handouts.

Apart from that, this insane amount of hypergamy causes genetic trash women to freely breed too. In fact they have the most children. Meanwhile genetically fit women are so insanely hypergamous that they often remain childless due to not finding a man they're satisfied with.

d4ng3rz0n3 · 2018-08-18T22:13:45+00:00

Holy shit.

humidtexan · 2018-08-19T04:45:34+00:00

The 60s are the key time period where this shit starts to take root.

Just so everyone is clear, the hippies did nothing but lay around, do a lot of drugs and participate in a bunch of degeneracy. The feminism we know today was born in the 60s and was passed on by the parents from the 60s to the children today.

The 3rd wave feminist are probably mostly the children of hippies.

GoDuke2018 · 2018-08-19T20:18:19+00:00

The only way we working class men can fight back against the war on men is to not marry, stay out of ltr, and do nit impregnate these sjw feminists.

2018-08-19T21:47:34+00:00

Good, fuck marriage, having kids in or out of wedlock won't save you from getting fucked over anyway, it's always been a bad deal, even back in the 50's.

strongandhappy · 2018-08-18T22:09:28+00:00

Any thoughts on why the trend is leveling off? The curve before 2010 is insane.

2018-08-19T23:04:17+00:00

In the USA, We need to bring back mandatory STD and blood testing as a requirement for marriage. These were dropped somewhere around the 1970s. What a mistake that was.

2018-08-19T22:08:48+00:00

[deleted]

cleats4u · 2018-08-19T21:42:54+00:00

I think that is going to dip largely unless pimp daddy governments let in more foreigners to replenish the population with it's whores. We are talking about England and basically Europe in this graph. The only reason it hasn't happened in America is because of the first amendment, freedom of speech. And just when rich Liberals thought they had bought up all the media (propaganda machines) in America the fucking internet came a long and destroyed it for them. Now they are trying to figure ways of limiting speech on that platform too starting with little obscure laws like social media bullying. Europe is basically fucked though, that is for sure.

stawek · 2018-08-19T11:02:28+00:00

Interesting is the time between WW2 peek and the rise of single motherhood 20 years later. Looks like the WW2 single mothers produced the daughters that started the trend once they were adults themselves.

Hiromant · 2018-08-19T12:35:49+00:00

Fewer men getting married is not a bad thing.

bitcoin-optimist · 2018-08-20T00:19:04+00:00

To do some due diligence I looked up the numbers on ons.gov.uk (spreadsheet) and did a plot myself.

>> Link to Scatter Plot on Google Sheets <<

Kind of hard to believe this is real.

ONS tried to explain why this is happening in bullet 6 by writing,

Two-thirds of babies born outside marriage or civil partnership had parents who live together

The percentage of live births outside marriage or civil partnership increased in 2017 to 48.1% from 47.6% in 2016. Many of the babies born outside of marriage or civil partnership had parents who live together. Since 1998, over 60% of all births registered outside marriage or civil partnership each year have been to a cohabiting couple; in 2017 the figure was 67.3%. This is consistent with increases in the number of couples cohabiting rather than entering into marriage or civil partnership (Families and Households provides further information).

However in bullet 4 of "Families and Households: 2017" it's noted,

In 2017 there were 19.0 million families in the UK; this increased by 15% from 16.6 million in 1996, a rise similar to the growth in the UK population during this 20-year period.

There were 12.9 million married or civil partner couple families in the UK in 2017. This remains the most common type of family. The second largest family type was the cohabiting couple family at 3.3 million families, followed by 2.8 million lone parent families.

Not sure how we get nearly 1/2 of all live births as being a function of cohabitation when it only represents 17% of the population (67.8% married @12.9m; 17.3% cohabitation @3.3m; 14.7% lone parent @2.8m).

Basically it would mean this:

total births in millions (𝐭𝐛) = .679 //679 thousand total families in millions (𝐭𝐟_𝐧 or 𝐟) = 19 //19 million families total families percent (𝐭𝐟_𝐩) = (.678*f + .173f + .147f) //.678+.173+.147 = 0.998 or ~1 married fams (𝐟_𝐦) = .678f //12.882 mil. married fams cohabit fams (𝐟_𝐜) = .173f //3.287 mil. cohabiting fams lone parent fams (𝐟_𝐥) = .147f //2.793 mil. lone families live births outside partnership (𝐥𝐛_𝐨𝐩) = .481 //.481*tb = 326,599 children live births civilian partnership (𝐥𝐛_𝐢𝐩) = .519 //.519*tb = 352,401 children birth rate of cohab vs lone (𝐛𝐫_𝐜𝐯𝐥) = 2/3 = .666... //lb_op*(2/3) = .320667tb = 217,732 children babies every married fam (𝐛𝐫_𝐢𝐩) = (1 - lb_op)*tb / f_m // 2.736 babies per 100 married families babies every unmarried fam (𝐛𝐫_𝐨𝐦) = lb_op*tb / (f_c + f_l) // 5.371 babies per 100 unmarried families babies every cohabit fam (𝐛𝐫_𝐜) = (lb_op*tb / (f_c + f_l)) * br_cvl // 3.581 babies per 100 cohabiting families babies every lone parent fam (𝐛𝐫_𝐥) = br_om - br_c // implies ~1.789 babies per 100 lone parent families // note: lone parent families 𝒂𝒍𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒚 have 1 child or more

If true this means unwed couples are having almost 2 times as many kids as married UK families.

The real terrifying stat here is that lone parent families are increasing year over year (married or cohabiting families BECOMING lone parent families). Think about that, 2.793 million lone parent families already living with children when the married population is only having children at a rate of 2.7% per year.

In the United States it's 4.24 births per 100 unmarried women. That means in Britain unmarried women are having babies at a 126% greater rate as compared to unmarried US women.

Also for comparison 39.8% of all live births in the US are to unmarried women compared to the 48.1% reported by ONS in London.

Something's really not right here.

Saigunx · 2018-08-20T00:34:43+00:00

Chart says this is in England and Wales. Is there one for US?

Bariwhite · 2018-08-19T15:37:45+00:00

"Wedlock" isn't locking anything down bro.

Unless you mean her ability to rinse you of 50% of your shit.

You don't need to be committed to an outdated institution to have kids

mgtow_guy · 2018-08-20T04:09:35+00:00

Out of wedlock babies used to be a matter of shame.

Now it's: "You go guuurrrrl!!!"

If it wasn't for state support and women taking up pretty much all admin jobs they'd have to hand over the babies for adoption like in the olden days.

rationed_male · 2018-08-20T14:12:29+00:00

The worst thing about single parents who fucked chads is the decrease in intelligence of society that will result.

Wymmen are generally of average intelligence but chads often are of below average intelligence.

So instead of breeding with a highly intelligent 'beta' ie normal male, which would increase averqge intelligence and life capability of their offspring, they are making society more stupid.

Single parenting by females as a choice should be socially unacceptable

2018-08-20T16:16:25+00:00

I'd like to know what the globalists plan to accomplish with this trend... Punishing men and rewarding women...to see how much of a reaming men will take until they revolt? Basically liberals and progressives reward criminals and the irresponsible and punish the law abiding and people who actually build and maintain society.

2018-08-20T22:54:38+00:00

It's just like the drug war. If it wasn't so damned profitable people wouldn't be doing it. Getting knocked up and suing the father for child support and alimony is like hitting the middle class instant jackpot.

bfte · 2018-08-19T23:05:51+00:00

To quote Toby from the news room...

"Who cares?..."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uc1vrO6iL0U&t=4m7s

maeveko · 2018-08-20T05:41:32+00:00

Blame the welfare system for having the government as the dad

vega-mgtow · 2018-08-20T02:47:55+00:00

British bastards.

NotMyWomen · 2018-08-20T03:31:23+00:00

Feminism is degeneracy.

2018-08-20T13:28:58+00:00

IIRC in 2016, 50% of births were on medicaid.

Atton_Risk · 2018-08-20T17:08:19+00:00

The death of a society hopefully this destroys the UK.

JackBurtonBr · 2018-08-21T02:32:18+00:00

It makes bitcoin charts looks like kindergarten.

RedPillMissionary · 2018-08-21T16:39:32+00:00

Welfare did this.

2018-08-21T17:23:07+00:00

Graduated HS 1979. In HS there were a couple of girls who got pregnant, it was a scandal. An older girl in my neighborhood got pregnant around 76, it was a scandal. That chart coincides with my own personal observations that in the early 80's women were getting pregnant on purpose and if they didn't trap the guy into marrying them, they saw no shame in it. Also started to see the trend of women expecting men to just accept some other mans kid comes with her. I can't even begin to tell you how often I would be chastised because I was always very vocal that I wanted nothing to do with single mothers. I would say to these women, I don't want kids of my own! What the hell makes you think I want to raise some other guys kid? It appears it is only continuing to get worse.

SirYouAreIncorrect · 2018-08-19T02:43:39+00:00

Funny how people see different things...

I see that graph as a massive success, Less and Less men are falling victim to the trap that is marriage, sure they may still get hit with child support, but that is better than divorce rape with a side of child support.

Hopefully the men are fighting for custody of their children or are otherwise engaged in their child's life

For me seeing 100% of children born out of wedlock would be a success. The Institution of government marriage needs to die

User-31f64a4e · 2018-08-20T16:53:58+00:00

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_revolution

Drawrtist123 · 2018-08-20T21:28:49+00:00

Another thing to ask is - How are so many women have wedlock babies while the men are all out at war? The war starts, men are shipped away to fight - and all the women get pregnant, on the other side though, the women could easily say "This is my husbands baby" so I wonder what the real numbers are? Even then it wasn't even 10% and now we have almost 50%... We die for women thinking that will make them live for us. Wrong. Don't bother with a one sided transaction. I'll take my own life before I give it to someone else for nothing in return.

NotMyWomen · 2018-08-21T03:55:52+00:00

You ever just look at historical graphs tracking sociological facts and just fucking lol all day?

Just roflcopter right off your chair?

It’s like going to www.usdebtclock.org every week.

L.o.l.

silver-in-a-cloud · 2018-08-21T04:58:07+00:00

this should be posted along with the source in /rdataisbeutiful ... it might open some other eyes too ...because we mgtowers already know these numbers :((

2018-08-21T05:24:14+00:00

[deleted]

CiceroVoltaire · 2018-08-21T13:17:36+00:00

I see two options in the future: 1) the return of hard patriarchy or 2) the death of western/modern civilization.

2018-08-21T14:01:32+00:00

From a cultural stand point, slut shaming works.

stringedbeams · 2018-08-21T15:11:05+00:00

it took off when all this "free love" degeneracy of the "sexual revolution" got popular, promoting fornication

Matt-ayo · 2018-08-20T01:47:22+00:00

At least we're so busy with the latent issues this causes that no one has time for a new World War.... err, maybe its just false attribution, like the title so boldly risks.

hellrete · 2018-08-20T10:52:33+00:00

After reading and rereading some comments, if not all, the question remains: who is Chad? The guy with a erection that is fluffing all these mothers. Is just not 1 guy, it must have a demographic. Most educated people have restrained themselves. So what happened? Cuz women are fluffing like no tomorrow and it shows no sign of slowing. Or am I to believe all were fluffed without consent? And kept the offspring?

TheOnlyThing-Sufjan · 2018-08-20T14:41:33+00:00

To be fair its life births outside marriage in england and wales, meaning that a percentage (dont know which percentage) of these births might be babies born to two parents which are in a commited relationship but do not which to ge married, or still gonna get married, or are engaged. This ofcourse a mere band aid on the wound since indeed alot of childeren are born to single mothers and we all know that single mothers do not raise the best childeren in general.

2018-08-20T18:07:51+00:00

Gents, we can't control what our womenfolk do, but we can put a rubber on it...

BansheeBomb · 2018-08-21T11:29:42+00:00

thanks civil rights

2018-08-21T16:01:58+00:00

LOL.

2018-08-21T17:35:10+00:00

[removed]

kmagaro · 2018-08-22T00:17:42+00:00

I can't tell if this is joke or not, what's wrong with babies out of wedlock? Marriage is just a label anyways.

TotesMessenger · 2018-09-08T04:41:37+00:00

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

[/r/theredpillstories] Effects of sex positivity over the last 40 years

^{If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads.} ^(Info ^/ ^Contact)

This just in, rampant degeneracy and feminism has produced more out of wedlock babies than WWI and II.

Comments

QFT

Title	This just in, rampant degeneracy and feminism has produced more out of wedlock babies than WWI and II.
Author	xXx420VTECxXx
Upvotes	444
Comments	116
Date	August 18, 2018 8:30 PM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/98ep46/this_just_in_rampant_degeneracy_and_feminism_has/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/this-just-in-rampant-degeneracy-and-feminism-has.507532 https://theredarchive.com/post/507532