The lack of sexual equality between men and women proves gender equality is a fantasy

Mrs_Drgree · 2020-07-04T10:08:05+00:00

No woe is me.

c_dolly · 2020-07-04T04:32:33+00:00

Your whole post relies on a false claim :

Women are low T, low sex drive.

Women have a mix of hormones that determine sex drive, not just testosterone. It might be lower than men in general but it's not "low". Women desire sex for the sake of pleasure too.

proving they don’t really care about equality that might inconvenience women.

Caring about equality =/= having sex with unwanted men. There is no reason why every man and women out there should be paired up and there is no reason to make sure every human is provided with sex.

LittyKitsune · 2020-07-04T06:45:50+00:00

Also, it’s why women don’t give a shit about male sexlessness. As they are in the more powerful sexual gatekeeper role, they consider sexually unsuccessful men invisible and unworthy of affection, proving they don’t really care about equality that might inconvenience women.

Having sex with someone you do not want to have sex with (for whatever reason) is not a minor "inconvenience."

I'm deadset on saving sex for marriage. I'm sure my future Catholic hubby would love to hear that I dropped that and achieved a triple digit n count by furthering the cause of sex equality.

I have had incls outright tell me that they're not talking about women like *me. Almost like this is entirely about guilt tripping high-n women for having sex with men who aren't them instead of equality.

VeXedZenith · 2020-07-04T05:59:27+00:00

[deleted]

OXOzymandias · 2020-07-04T09:31:54+00:00

Human slavery=/=gender equality

Sultmaker_9000 · 2020-07-04T05:20:52+00:00

Just like politics, people confuse and conflate equality of opportunity with equality of outcomes.

pooppeebuttmcnuggets · 2020-07-04T05:47:16+00:00

[deleted]

AxeLond · 2020-07-04T09:33:10+00:00

I think I get how people want gender equality to work now. I'm gonna ignore like 90% of this post and just post this quote from the recent Supreme court ruling on the Civil Rights Act.

In Los Angeles Dept. of Water and Power, an employer required women to make larger pension fund contributions than men. The employer sought to justify its disparate treatment on the ground that women tend to live longer than men, and thus are likely to receive more from the pension fund over time. By everyone’s admission, the employer was not guilty of animosity against women instead, it relied on what appeared to be a statistically accurate statement about life expectancy. Even so, the Court recognized, a rule that appears evenhanded at the group level can prove discriminatory at the level of individuals. True, women as a class may live longer than men as a class. But the statute’s focus on the individual is unambiguous,” and any individual woman might make the larger pension contributions and still die as early as a man. Likewise, the Court dismissed as irrelevant the employer’s insistence that its actions were motivated by a wish to achieve classwide equality between the sexes: An employer’s intentional discrimination on the basis of sex is no more permissible when it is prompted by some further intention (or motivation), even one as prosaic as seeking to account for actuarial tables. The employer violated Title VII because, when its policy worked exactly as planned, it could not “pass the simple test” asking whether an individual female employee would have been treated the same regardless of her sex.

Of course there's differences between the genders, you've laid out the differences, but what do you want to do about them?

The answer we want as a society is to just ignore the differences and have 1 set of rule that applies equally to everyone. Even if 1 gender is heavily favored under that rule, you still just apply the rule equally to every individual.

If you have a job that requires a very physically strong person because there's actually a lot of heavy lifting in the job, which the person needs to be able to do. Then you can have a tests which requires the person to deadlift 200 lb in order to get the job. That's fine.

You would be eliminating the bottom 20% of male lifters, but the bottom 80% of female lifters. The amount of people actually eligible for that job would be 4:1 male to female, but that's is the type of gender equality we want. Saying "Only men can apply for this job", is discrimination and not equal.

Mrs_Drgree · 2020-07-04T04:38:41+00:00

[removed]

AutoModerator · 2020-07-04T04:10:26+00:00

Attention!

You can post off topic/jokes/puns as a comment to this Automoderator message.
For "CMV" and "Question for X" Threads: Parent comments that aren't from the target group will be removed, along with their child replies.
If you want to agree with OP instead of challenging their view or if the question is not targeted at you, post it as an answer to this comment.
OP you can choose your own flair according to these guidelines., just press Flair under your post!

Thanks for your cooperation and enjoy the discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Expensive-Guitar3609 · 2020-07-04T07:07:26+00:00

[removed]

Title	The lack of sexual equality between men and women proves gender equality is a fantasy
Author	TazeThemAll
Upvotes	6
Comments	113
Date	July 4, 2020 4:10 AM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/PurplePillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/hkx52t/the_lack_of_sexual_equality_between_men_and_women/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/PurplePillDebate/the-lack-of-sexual-equality-between-men-and-women.703123 https://theredarchive.com/post/703123

Comments