I agree in principle but at the same time there needs to be some level of protection for potentially vulnerable parties, regardless of gender. I’m not talking to this extent but at least to be able to survive in a relationship where something had to be given up to make it work.
On this occasion I fully agree but sweeping generalisations are never helpful
That’s fair Spousal maintenance needs to exist but should be limited to very particularly circumstances and only when one party couldn’t live without it, particularly when sacrifices have been made
[–]Exitbuddy1 73 points74 points75 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]stevecapw 36 points37 points38 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RingosTurdFace 9 points10 points11 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]valenin 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SharqPhinFtw 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]i_mann 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Exitbuddy1 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PyroTheAlpha 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RepentandFlee80 38 points39 points40 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]destarolat 12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]destarolat 47 points48 points49 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ukiyuh 21 points22 points23 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Not_a_Thumb 17 points18 points19 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SirYouAreIncorrect 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]malemedicine 11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dudemcdonald 16 points17 points18 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]dudemcdonald 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]valenin 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SirYouAreIncorrect 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThirdPersonRecording 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]FeaRdXcisionZ1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Sounds like a euphemism
[–]ThirdPersonRecording 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]je97 6 points7 points8 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]FeaRdXcisionZ1 points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
I agree in principle but at the same time there needs to be some level of protection for potentially vulnerable parties, regardless of gender. I’m not talking to this extent but at least to be able to survive in a relationship where something had to be given up to make it work.
On this occasion I fully agree but sweeping generalisations are never helpful
[–]valenin 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]je97 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]FeaRdXcisionZ1 points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
That’s fair Spousal maintenance needs to exist but should be limited to very particularly circumstances and only when one party couldn’t live without it, particularly when sacrifices have been made
[–]je97 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]GltyUntlPrvnInncnt 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]endmymisery42 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Jani3D 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TracyMorganFreeman 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Tmomp 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Kryto-Kun 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]yourmumsworstshag 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]SlickAwesome 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mackdude15 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Elijah7170 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pioustarcraft 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TrinityMa 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Isair81 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DeadeyeLan 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PyroTheAlpha 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pattyboiIII 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thwip62 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link