TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

If you got pregnant and your boyfriend/husband wanted you to get an abortion, would you do it?

[deleted]

December 9, 2016
5 upvotes
/r/RedPillWomen
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title If you got pregnant and your boyfriend/husband wanted you to get an abortion, would you do it?
Author

[deleted]

Upvotes 5
Comments 65
Date December 9, 2016 9:08 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/RedPillWomen
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/RedPillWomen/comments/5hcu2r/if_you_got_pregnant_and_your_boyfriendhusband/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/RedPillWomen/if-you-got-pregnant-and-your-boyfriendhusband.86710
https://theredarchive.com/post/86710

Comments

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points30 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

No. I'd leave him.

The real problem with this question, however, is a lack of communication among couples. This shouldn't be up in the air for a committed couple, if they're having sex. You should know if he would want you to get an abortion and if you're in disagreement about that, you're gambling on someone who has different core values, because those relationships usually fail.

[–]4Sken3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No. I'd leave him.

But it's his kid too; what's the morality of making off with someone's genetic material without their permission?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Higher than the morality of murder.

The point is moot. I would never have a sexual relationship with someone who disagreed with me on this matter. I have pro choice friends. I respect them. I'm also never going to be in that position with them.

[–]JackGetsItEndorsed Contributor2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Lack of communication happens is good relationships as well.

[–]CaliBlossoms3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lack of communication about such a major life choice can end badly for even an otherwise good relationship though.

[–]Mentathiel12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No. That being said, you shouldn't sleep with someone you disagree about this on.

[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I would not be dating or married to someone who believed abortion was a choice. I am pro-life in the most strict sense.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Fair enough.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

what about rape

[–]jenthenance0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why do you think it's justifiable in cases of rape? Not to trivialize rape or be hostile, I can't imagine anything worse than rape except MAYBE slow torture, maybe not. Anyways, I never thought to ask and I'm honestly curious.

[–]4Sken3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Death is much worse than rape.

Because you die.

[–]r3mememember11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

If you got to the stage where you are in a disagreement about an abortion, it's a failure to properly vet the guy. You need to take some responsibility for that. Furthermore, it's a failure to take proper precautions on BOTH sides - not just his. Both need to take responsibility

Lastly, for argument's sake, let's imagine you accept both these and decide to parent the child alone. You are now among the thousands of single moms out there. Dating is now much more difficult. Your SMV is much lower and the quality of a man you can get is drastically lower. That's an undisputable fact. This fact doesn't care about you being "morally right" in your decision to keep the child, you are now going to have a drastically harder (and potentially lonelier) life. Your kid will have a more difficult time, have less opportunities and chances for success than kids with both parents. Congratulations, you've failed the red pill.

"fuck that terrible guy, dump him and raise the kid on your own. you go girl!" is feminist advice.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A lot of people are very, very good liars who hide their true beliefs. A man could say "I'm against abortion, I'll help you raise any child we have together" all day long but completely flip once the woman gets pregnant.

True, most unwanted pregnancies could have been prevented in the first place with better education and care but pregnancy can happen even if you take every precaution. Condoms can slip off during sex.

I agree that single motherhood is almost always a terrible life choice and should be avoided whenever possible.

[–]r3mememember4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps I'm being a little harsh, you're right sometimes you can just be unlucky.

If you want to keep the baby and your partner doesn't, I still think the best choice is to abort, but then you should probably also end the relationship as well without a VERY Good reason to stay.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

I think this is one of those fundamental discussions everyone should have with their SO before the fact (in this case, before any pregnancies happen.) I personally would abort at this time, but I know it would be emotionally difficult to do so.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I absolutely agree that all people should have this discussion before having sex. I don't understand why people don't.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's no doubt a difficult discussion to have, and people will no doubt change their plans once shit hits the fan. But I don't see it being possible to stay with someone that has a different view on abortion from the get-go.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No.

[–]rainyweathergirl2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know a girl personally who got pregnant when she was 21 and the father was 18. At first the father was really unhappy about it, and said that if she didn't abort he would leave. They had been together for about a year. They are still together several years later, and the young man in question really loves being a father and he works a job to support his family. It could turn out that this is the case, but then it might not. An abortion is something I couldn't go through with either way.

[–]HappyLollie2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm pro-choice so it depends on the couple I think and how long they've been together, I don't believe in bringing in a child into a unstable household, either your ready or not and there's no shame in admitting your not and deciding that bringing another life into the world isn't the right thing to do right now.

Me and my SO had to have one early into our relationship, we had only been dating for less than 2 months, I was 19 and had no interest in being a mother at that point but the biggest reason for not keeping it was the fact we haven't been together for long enough to establish whether we'd make it long term, I grew up within a nuclear household with both my mother and father present and that's how I'd like to bring up my own children too, I still believe it was the right decision and so does my SO. Although if it were to happen again we'd both definitely keep, we've been together 4 years and we're in better financial position now.

I would be in a totally different position however if it was my husband saying this however, when your married or in a LTR it's different children are a monument to the commitment you've made to each other unless you've got a ton of kids already and know this one would be a massive strain maybe (but people generally don't have 5 or 6 kids like they did in my grandparents day so this would be a rare occurrence I think) or if the child would be born with an incurable disability those are the only circumstances there would be a valid case for an abortion within a marriage for me personally.

[–]brittnicole102 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a hot topic!

From reading the comments, it really seems to depend on the woman's stance on abortion. If you are pro-choice, then you may be more willing to listen to him and making your decision accordingly. However, if you are pro-life, abortion is out of the question. You cover your bases, letting him know from the beginning an abortion will never be an option, and he decides if the risk is worth it.

As for myself personally, I would keep the child. Yes, being a single mother isn't ideal, but motherhood is something that is important to me. My mother has a friend that when she was younger, got pregnant and the guy told her to abort it. She did as he said, hoping that they would stay together and have children when they were ready. Now she's 45, never been married, never had any children. The two things she wanted most in life she never got.

I'd rather risk being a single mom, than never having a child. Not very red pill, but many single mothers my age (25) have met good, hardworking men that want to be a father and help raise their child from a previous relationship. I believe you can always find your captain regardless of your situation.

[–]ElfFey6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

No.

Something I noticed by 25 was that all of my friends who had abortions didn't end up staying with those partners. No offense. But what kind of man aborts his own child?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Did they want to keep it and were willing to raise the kid without help from the father?

They don't view it as a child (especially if it's still in the first trimester) or they're not ready for a kid or they never want kids.

[–]ElfFey6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

they did not want to keep it or they would not have aborted it

i think it's interesting you ask if they're willing to raise the kid without the father. it's already difficult to raise a kid. In our society, young people are very selfish, and it is even harder. It is a very strange world where a father can just walk off with no consequences. It is even stranger when a young woman can have an elective abortion. We normalized it but it isn't normal at all.

Sorry but this is just my opinion. I'm talking from a broad level, social perspective. In practice I think you should be compassionate towards any woman who made that decision. You don't know how she got to that point.

[–]LedZeppelin16024 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It is a very strange world where a father can just walk off with no consequences.

Men have no legal rights to do this. If he conceives a child then he's stuck with whatever choice the woman makes so if he wants the child and she doesn't he has no say end loses the child, if he doesn't want the child and she does then he's forced to pay child support for 18 years.

She however can abort, give the child up for adoption (with the father having no rights to object) or legally abandon the child.

So women have far more freedom to walk away from a pregnancy or child with no consequences compared to men

[–]ElfFey0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah and that isn't right either. It isn't right for men not to have a say in it; we could reframe OP's question to "if you wanted an abortion but your man didn't would you still get one?"

That's another reason I say it jumped the shark as a women's issue; men's say in it wasn't counted, and this is a problem both because a woman can sue him for child support of a kid he didn't want and because she can abort a kid he did want.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Well then, isn't it better that they are't struggling single mothers raising kids without the fathers help? Relationships end all the time, abortion or no abortion. Women shouldn't have kids because they think that having kids will force the father to stay with them or if they aren't willing to raise it.

Anyway, it's not uncommon for women to abort wanted pregnancies. They might already have kids, they're not ready for kids at that stage in life but do want them in the future, medical reasons or they abort to please the wishes of the father.

Men have always walked away without consequences unless they were married.

I don't judge women for having abortions.

[–]ElfFey6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

No. No one said you should get pregnant trying to force the father to stay with you, that's ridiculous. My point is that the kind of man who, upon finding out his partner is pregnant with his child, urges her to get an abortion--is not father material. He is putting his needs above that of his child.

And in our society, what is his need, really? What possible want does the average American, who lives better than the majority of people on Earth, need to fulfill. The same is said for the woman. I'm sorry but if a guy asks you to get an abortion, he isn't thinking about you. He is thinking about himself.

Combined with the fact that access to birth control is a given in this country. You have a society of extreme entitlement.

[–]LedZeppelin16022 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My point is that the kind of man who, upon finding out his partner is pregnant with his child, urges her to get an abortion--is not father material. He is putting his needs above that of his child.

Pretty much exactly what abortion is when not medically necessary or due to rape. It's the people's wish to undue a mistake they made so as to preserve their lifestyles, it's by this definition selfish

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because he doesn't want to have kids. No one is obligated to have kids they don't want, even if they are financially stable and live in a first world country.

Obviously he isn't father material if he wants a pregnancy he caused aborted.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

We aren't obligated to have children because we live in a first-world country. That kind of mindset is how we get families of six on welfare. You're placing a lot of emphasis on the fact that Americans have privilege and entitlement, and thus should do X, Y, and Z. I completely disagree with that sentiment. That places far too much moral judgement on the individual who simply wants to exercise their own agency. And while a man that wants to abort might not be father material right now, doesn't mean he can't be in the future.

[–]ElfFey1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

We aren't going to agree on this so there's little point in arguing it. I wouldn't have an abortion and you would. I've also thankfully never been in that position, so what do I know? That said, I agree strongly with your other comment that every couple needs to have this conversation before the issue comes up. I think everyone has to make their own decision.

I take issue with the fact that abortion is normalized in our society. I do not agree that this is an issue of agency over your body--it is agency over another body that is inside of yours. I bring up privilege and entitlement precisely because that's what it is. At no other point in history has a woman been able to abort her child out of convenience. The fact that I am encouraged to be educated and childless when I could have several children and be on welfare is an affront to western society. There are social, biological, and cultural ramifications of abortion that we do not consider because it's taboo to talk about them.

It is interesting to me because we basically have a society that says abortion ok > no conversation about declining fertility or stable ltrs > women get old > fertility treatments (if you can afford.)

Anyway I do believe every woman had the right to choose for themselves but I think as a woman's issue it jumped the shark a long time ago.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

At no other point in history has a woman been able to abort her child out of convenience. The fact that I am encouraged to be educated and childless when I could have several children and be on welfare is an affront to western society. There are social, biological, and cultural ramifications of abortion that we do not consider because it's taboo to talk about them.

Women have been aborting their pregnancies with herbal methods for thousands of years.

I have no idea what you are talking about in the last sentence because abortion is heavily stigmatized and condemned even in Western countries where abortion is legal.

[–]ElfFey0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Can't quote on mobile but your first sentence is true, I will concede that to you.

Your second sentence. I am in California. There is absolutely no stigma here to having an abortion. None.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Your second sentence. I am in California. There is absolutely no stigma here to having an abortion. None.

Do women openly talk about their abortions in California? Aren't abortion clinics protested and being systematically shut down across the US?

[–]jenthenance1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know it's kind of late to butt in, but I thought I'd contribute another way to see it besides just political.

This is about being RP, right? Despite my pro-life beliefs, it's not very alpha of him to have sex with you, knowing fully well that pregnancy is always a possibility (and if he doesn't know you can still get pregnant no matter how hard you both try... well maybe he should learn a little more about contraceptives and human reproduction), only to end up getting you pregnant, and then decide to call it quits because it "wasn't what he expected" or "it's too hard" or "it's too inconvenient". Men are made to deal with challenges, right? I understand why a boyfriend wouldn't feel very obligated (although, again, if we're subscribing to the evolutionary biology philosophy, a "real man"'s ultimate goal is to "spread his seed"), but if it's a husband, I just don't see how an RP man could do this and justify it.

Tl;dr: I don't think it's very alpha of the man, but either way, I'm with MsSadie

[–]tylertgbh1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shouldn't this be a discussion with a pre-determined conclusion before the pregnancy happens?

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago* (14 children) | Copy Link

I look at the lake

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

So you shoot the straggler.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

He went to home

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps the Captain is no Captain at all, if he can't steer his ship in dicey waters and indeed she does need a new Captain. Regardless, the biggest issue is that the Captain and First Mate haven't previously agreed on a plan to address any potential stragglers.

[–]ElfFey11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah can I just add that technically he put that straggler on the boat.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

You are going to home

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, your metaphors are ridiculous, so I'm throwing them out. You're making a lot of assumptions about this scenario, but I'd say that's fair since there is no context. It really just comes down to whether or not abortion is murder and for me, it is. If I got pregnant at 41, long after my fiance and I had decided we didn't want children, I would have the baby, because the alternative is killing it and that's selfish. It's not a straggler to me. It's a human life, but my fiance and I are in agreement, because we're not idiots and realize you can't just hope that never comes up if you don't agree. In your scenario, where the man has stated that he doesn't want kids, then yes, if she stayed, knowing this was his choice, it's sort of on her if she decides to have the baby. If they're just two morons who've never discussed this, then I'd say the responsibility is equal.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

You are choosing a dvd for tonight

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Eye roll. That's inherent in any discussion on abortion. You agreed that the answer was to "shoot" the straggler. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings, by pointing out what that means. I'm out.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

You go to concert

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I thought you were done.

[–]FrankDrakman1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

guy here. I personally don't want to be in a relationship where I'm the captain and my gf is the first mate. We have our own little relationship format - we call it "Church of Us" - and there is no "Leader". I'm not above her, and she's not above me. Luckily, we're well past 50, so this question is hypothetical, but even if she did get pregnant, we wouldn't kill it; there are thousands of families in North America who would be delighted to adopt a healthy baby (my brother adopted two). So, why submit to murder when there's an equally acceptable way to give the straggler life without sinking the boat?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I looked at the stars

[–]theScarlettWomanModerator | Scarlett[M] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not above her, and she's not above me

This sentence suggests that you think this sub believes men are better than women. We do not. Men and women have equally important, complementary roles in the relationship.

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you male or female?

[–]CaliBlossoms3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yes, because that's what I would do anyway. I've committed to being childfree, and I've accepted the responsibility I have to ensure I enter a relationship only if a man and I are compatible in that way. I will not lead on a man who is undecided or definitely wanted kids and make him think that there's a chance I'll change my mind. If he wants to have children, he should be with someone who also does. My ideal captain is one who does his part to ensure conception does not happen in the first place and agrees that abortion is what's best for both of us should our contraception fail.

[–]FrankDrakman2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Don't understand why every one accepts the "abort or single mom" dilemma. What's wrong with having the child, and putting it up for adoption? If you're not a drug user, and the baby doesn't have severe medical issues, it will be adopted almost immediately.

[–]Waterboo23 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Being pregnant for 9 months and going through all the emotional and physical ups ands downs, only to give away your child, is EXTREMELY difficult. There have been psych studies on abortion and adoption, and women reported feeling low levels of emotional stress from aborting the embryo early in pregnancy. growing the baby and ultimately giving their baby away is a lot more traumatic than abortion for many women. Not to mention, pregnancy can change your body in many ways, and permanently. Not all women are ready for that. I am conservative in some of my political beliefs but I strongly believe that women should have the right to choose what they want to do with their body.

[–]CaliBlossoms0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This has nothing to do with that "abort or single mom" dilemma. I don't want a child whether I'm in a relationship with the father or not. Pregnancy and childbirth are expensive and I have no desire to experience the negative physical and mental health effects. Abortions obviously have their own negative effects as well, which is why I'm not careless about birth control.

[–]--cunt0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The cost and time of doctors appointments throughout the entire pregnancy? The hormonal emotional mess that my fiancé will have to deal with? I'm not a drinker, but avoiding alcohol on holidays, taking special care to avoid any kind of harmful foods or anything for a little shit machine that neither of us want anything to do with? Why would I wreck my vagina and body, go through pregnancy and childbirth, be a disgusting fat emotional mess for almost a year instead of just getting rid of it in the first place? Neither of us want to deal with that hell. "Oh because it's the right thing to do, pro life," sorry I'm not wrecking my body and our peace and quiet.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I 100% agree.

[–]lackadaisicalily0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It would depend on his reasoning. But probably not.

[–]SuperSlavisWifeEndorsed Contributor0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Too many variables. If Jon wanted me to have an abortion, he would have a reason. It's his child too and that reason would need to be debated before we decided.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It depends. If it was my boyfriend I would get an abortion as we would not be financially able to care for a child, have time, be living together, etc.

If it was my husband (which wouldn't happen because I would only marry someone who wants children with me) I would probably abort and then divorce him and marry a man who wants to have children with me. Or assuming he had legitimate reasons for wanting the abortion I would listen to what they are and judge whether it's fair (i.e. He lost his job, can't afford to pay rent if one of us doesn't work, etc). Then I would probably get the abortion because he has the best interest of the family at heart.

[–]SpectralCadence0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't believe in engaging in premarital sex so this problem is mostly non-existent, but even when married, my answer is no - and this would be very clearly detailed in the prenuptial agreement as well. This is a very good question - my best friend's mum got pregnant and her dad made her get an abortion although she was alright with having another child, he only wanted one :(

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In a heartbeat. I only get involved with men of similar values and in my current LTR we are absolutely in agreement about this. It wouldn't even be a discussion, just a "Hey, out birth control failed, let's go get this taken care of."

[–]Nyquil-Junkie-1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Before any crew gets on my boat, I as the captain require all fertile crew members to have IUDs before boarding the ship. All aboard! Next stop the island of Planned parenthood, where the crew will disembark for the required upgrade.

Then we shall have smooth drama free sailing.

(see how easy this is?)

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd get the abortion and leave him.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter