~ archived since 2018 ~

Married technology teacher, 39, who had sex with a girl, 17, while working at £15,000-a-year school is CLEARED of abusing his position because she was not even a pupil at his school. Ridiculous this case ever came to court. The CPS is trying to rewrite the law!

furchfur

November 24, 2017

143 upvotes

/r/MensRights

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Post Information

Title	Married technology teacher, 39, who had sex with a girl, 17, while working at £15,000-a-year school is CLEARED of abusing his position because she was not even a pupil at his school. Ridiculous this case ever came to court. The CPS is trying to rewrite the law!
Author	furchfur
Upvotes	143
Comments	61
Date	November 24, 2017 11:39 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7f6ygu/married_technology_teacher_39_who_had_sex_with_a/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/married-technology-teacher-39-who-had-sex-with-a.910521 https://theredarchive.com/post/910521

Comments

[–]JamesBCrazy 37 points38 points39 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]JohnKimble111 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]boringcarpets 38 points39 points40 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]desderon 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Jamoz330 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]boringcarpets 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 27 points28 points29 points 8 years ago (42 children) | Copy Link

[–]mikesteane 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]electricalnoise 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]mikesteane 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]PIG_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]desderon -4 points-3 points-2 points 8 years ago (34 children) | Copy Link

[–]raven982 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]ThatNinaGAL 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]revengeofthedirty47 -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]TheNextMilo 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Vanriel 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

[–]Wylanderuk 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]desderon 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

[–]Vanriel 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Legally, she may not be responsible, no. But morally? Yes she is.

Lets break this down.

He knew he was married. (kinda obvious but still)
She knew he was married.
They both consented to have sex despite knowing this.
Since both of them had prior knowledge of the circumstances, and both agreed to and participated in the act, both are as the judge said "shabby and immoral"

You say the world owes you no fidelity. This is true, it does not. But the same time, there is such a thing as Personal Responsibility. You made a choice, you deal with the consequences.

That woman made a choice to sleep with a married man. She WILLINGLY made a choice that led to sexual intercourse with a partner who was already married. She knew that in advance. Therefore she is equally responsible for those actions.

[–]mwobuddy 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ahhwell 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Vanriel 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]ahhwell 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Vanriel 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]ahhwell 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]desderon 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[–]Vanriel 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]baconit4eva -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]rocelot7 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]baconit4eva 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Vanriel 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]desderon -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Vanriel 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]desderon 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Urishima 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]mikesteane 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]electricalnoise 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]KingRobotPrince -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

The girl wasn't on trial so it would be fairly inappropriate/unnecessary for him to comment on her.

er... the man was no longer on trial when the judge made his comments — the judge had already dismissed the jury. And in any event, judges and juries are here to judge if someone broke the law or not, not their "moral" behaviour. When someone's trial is dismissed, or they are found not-guilty, the judges has no right to still "sit in judgement" of someone's moral behaviour.

for being shabby and immoral (which he definitely is)

Really? Who are you to pass judgement? Why should he not have sex with a 17 year old girl? What's wrong with that?

The girl was just a witness her behavior is not in question as it is not her trial.

Well, you seem happy to pass judgement on the man's "behaviour", even though he is not on trial! And just because someone is not "on trial" does not mean one cannot pass moral judgement on them — as you have so clearly illustrated. And she wasn't a "witness" — she had accused him of a very serious offence.

[–]mikesteane 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Neko404 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]presidentdoggo 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]mrwhibbley 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]derpylord143 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[–]ifihadasister 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]raven982 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]raven982 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]raven982 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]derpylord143 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Lumberingfeather 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]PIG_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link