Louis C.K. admits to asking a woman to watch him masturbate and she says yes. Young Turks is appalled, stating he used his position of power inappropriately. If this is the case, essentially any consensual sex as a person with "power" is "sexual misconduct". THE FUCK KINDA CRAZY PILLS ARE THEY ON?!
Its funny when guys recognise that our culture is a gynocentric hellhole run by female supremacists but when the subject of those Muslims come up, who have far more sensible policies regarding women, feel the need to defend the honour of the matriarchy.
This is the number one cognitive dissonance of right-wing supporters of men's rights.
They are still just one step evolved beyond the white knight that says 'milady' all day long.
The cognitive dissonance of the feminist is defending right-wingers, IF THEY ARE FOREIGN RIGHTWINGERS.
The cognitive dissonance of rightwingers (in the west) is admitting we have no culture only a tyrannical matriarchy, right up until the subject of the mooslims comes up, then its all rah rah rah we must defend the matriarchy against the mooslim hordes. Uh why bruh. Why defend the very thing we are railing against one minute ago that you just admitted was a hell hole.
I don't know if you're referring to me, but you're way off point if you are.
My thought was sparked by you mentioning muslim apologist. So it isn't specifically about you, more of a shower thought, unless you are one of those rightwingers who valiantly defend the matriarchy against the foreign horde that is waiting to despoil her honor that is... lol
the issue is that it's too much
THIS RIGHT NOW is too much, for us.
you roll things back a bit
I'm 'okay' with women having equal rights, but not extra rights and getting to keep all their old privileges as well. It has to be one or the other, not both.
Strangely enough I'm too preoccupied with worrying about my own rights to be concerned with the remote possibility of a some swinging pendulum effecting women's rights in the remote and unlikely future.
If this is the case, essentially any consensual sex as a person with "power" is "sexual misconduct".
Jesus, that is a fucking ignorant assessment of that position and implies that they think a president of a country can't fuck his own wife. Clearly what matters is the power DIFFERENCE between two people.
Not really. If she decides to leave him or even speak badly of him in public, it hurts him immensely. Depending on their personalities, she may even have him effectively at ransom for his entire presidency. Even if she is not so cunning, she has his ear every night and has a massive amount of influence.
But, my point is that THIS is the discussion we should be having. I'm not personally concerned with power differences, but I want to represent that argument as well as I can. That's steel manning, and that's what I'm saying should be our standard rather than the misrepresentation in the title.
[–][deleted] 47 points48 points49 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]kartu3 22 points23 points24 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]SubwaySandwichGuy 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GoodRedd 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PIG_CUNT 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PIG_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]kartu3 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rocelot7 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]JoelMahon 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PIG_CUNT 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThirdTurnip 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]greeb666 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PIG_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]iainmf 32 points33 points34 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TracyMorganFreeman 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PIG_CUNT 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThirdTurnip -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]CaptSnap 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]PIG_CUNT 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 30 points31 points32 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]nisutapasion 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]PIG_CUNT 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SWShredder 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]someonewriting 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LabTech41 7 points8 points9 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[+]adulterescent1 points [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link
Its funny when guys recognise that our culture is a gynocentric hellhole run by female supremacists but when the subject of those Muslims come up, who have far more sensible policies regarding women, feel the need to defend the honour of the matriarchy.
This is the number one cognitive dissonance of right-wing supporters of men's rights.
They are still just one step evolved beyond the white knight that says 'milady' all day long.
[–]Mens-Advocate 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LabTech41 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]adulterescent1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
The cognitive dissonance of the feminist is defending right-wingers, IF THEY ARE FOREIGN RIGHTWINGERS.
The cognitive dissonance of rightwingers (in the west) is admitting we have no culture only a tyrannical matriarchy, right up until the subject of the mooslims comes up, then its all rah rah rah we must defend the matriarchy against the mooslim hordes. Uh why bruh. Why defend the very thing we are railing against one minute ago that you just admitted was a hell hole.
My thought was sparked by you mentioning muslim apologist. So it isn't specifically about you, more of a shower thought, unless you are one of those rightwingers who valiantly defend the matriarchy against the foreign horde that is waiting to despoil her honor that is... lol
THIS RIGHT NOW is too much, for us.
I'm 'okay' with women having equal rights, but not extra rights and getting to keep all their old privileges as well. It has to be one or the other, not both.
[–]LabTech41 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]alclarkey 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]adulterescent1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Strangely enough I'm too preoccupied with worrying about my own rights to be concerned with the remote possibility of a some swinging pendulum effecting women's rights in the remote and unlikely future.
[–]alclarkey 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]LabTech41 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]alclarkey 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThePigmanAgain 10 points11 points12 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mens-Advocate 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]nisutapasion 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]GhostofB1 points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
That's a disgusting accusation to make against someone based on no evidence, you're an absolute fucking cunt and should be ashamed of yourself.
[–]ThePigmanAgain 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]GhostofB1 points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
And you stand by it. Thanks for removing any doubt about YOUR worth.
[–]ThePigmanAgain 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]GhostofB1 points [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
The fact that this is funny to you is incredibly telling.
[–]ThePigmanAgain 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]theothermod -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]theothermod 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fortspucking 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tiberiusjack1 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]tiberiusjack1 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ifihadasister 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]GhostofB1 points [recovered] (8 children) | Copy Link
Jesus, that is a fucking ignorant assessment of that position and implies that they think a president of a country can't fuck his own wife. Clearly what matters is the power DIFFERENCE between two people.
[–]Mens-Advocate 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]superhobo666 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Vandechoz 2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]GhostofB1 points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
Not really. If she decides to leave him or even speak badly of him in public, it hurts him immensely. Depending on their personalities, she may even have him effectively at ransom for his entire presidency. Even if she is not so cunning, she has his ear every night and has a massive amount of influence.
But, my point is that THIS is the discussion we should be having. I'm not personally concerned with power differences, but I want to represent that argument as well as I can. That's steel manning, and that's what I'm saying should be our standard rather than the misrepresentation in the title.
[–]Vandechoz 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]KanataCitizen 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mens-Advocate 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ALTSuzzxingcoh -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link