TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Legally topless women. I believe pushing towards true equality is an MRA objective - but how long until heads explode.

AnotherDAM

February 23, 2017
21 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://kdvr.com/2017/02/22/federal-judge-fort-collins-cant-enforce-ban-on-women-going-topless/?boobies&utm_source=fark&utm_medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Legally topless women. I believe pushing towards true equality is an MRA objective - but how long until heads explode.
Author

AnotherDAM

Upvotes 21
Comments 34
Date February 23, 2017 4:58 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5vrj8o/legally_topless_women_i_believe_pushing_towards/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/legally-topless-women-i-believe-pushing-towards.931346
https://theredarchive.com/post/931346
Red Pill terms in post
MRA
Top posts by AnotherDAM

The Red Pill - support upcoming venues - Seattle was a quiet success!

83 upvotes
January 13, 2017
/r/MensRights

Hero cop FIRED for begging his peers to stand up for the Constitution

60 upvotes
May 12, 2020
/r/MensRights

The Red Pill Seattle needs to sell 34 more tickets in 2 days - help make it happen

58 upvotes
December 31, 2016
/r/MensRights

Snark Humor - Shouldn't this sign read 'Teach your children not to steal'?

56 upvotes
March 22, 2017
/r/MensRights

Humor with a mountain of truth - how to actually communicate with feminists

42 upvotes
July 7, 2017
/r/MensRights

Mike Rowe (of Dirty Jobs) handles an attempted shaming with both grace and firmness.

40 upvotes
January 30, 2019
/r/MensRights

Selective Service Board - double discrimination - any woman can be a board member, a man must have already registered.

39 upvotes
June 8, 2017
/r/MensRights

Mike Rowe strongly advocating for Men's Health (prostate exam)

39 upvotes
October 15, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]AnotherDAM[S] 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I like to think of myself as a rationalist (materialist in the historic/philosophic sense of the word) and have thought women should be allowed to be topless anywhere a man would be.

As I grow older I know that this will be abused. Women will want to be allowed to be topless while concurrently insisting that any perceived objectification is sexist.

Could we use this ruling to defend men who are routinely shamed, and even assaulted and battered, by topless women who use "male gaze" as an excuse for their actions?

[–]omegaphallic 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree any whining about guys leering or whistling when she has her tits out is absurd and not to be taken seriously.

[–]insickness 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women should be allowed topless anywhere a man is. Ogling has never been illegal, clothed or unclothed. If they made it illegal, I would fight it. Worrying about what could be made illegal is futile. There are a million things that could be made illegal.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree. Let women be top less. I don't care.

However, I do care that when a topless woman feels like a guy is staring at her it becomes a crime.

And we all know it will come to that.

That is also the only reason I am against combined restrooms. It's always men's rooms that become uniform and women still have their own space. So that opens the door for women to claim that a man sexual lyrics harassed her and men have no place to go piss in peace without the risk of being accused of some dumb shit.

All this just reeks of more ways that "women are oppressed" and men need to be controlled by cops.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wear plastered on yoga pants so all three pieces are showing. If women complain, say " I thought we were equal".

[–]AnotherDAM[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Or go with Bush:

Read my lips!
/s

[–]Vandechoz 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Here's a problem that was brought to my attention a while ago: by what logic can you legalize topless women as an equality issue without also allowing the same for teenage girls? You can't. And there are not a lot of people that think it is at all OK for adults to freely ogle topless teenagers. Female breasts are either a special case of sexual flesh, or they aren't.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Quite. Note your point will be met with silence by certain posters here.

[–]Vandechoz 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can hardly blame them, though. Taking even a rational stance in favor of something like that is taboo as hell.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I for one welcome the titty release.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I was about to put this. Basically, they're opening up the door for so called child porn since its legal to take pictures of people in public.

[–]andejoh 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I disagree because it would no longer be classified as porn. That's part of what is meant by de-sexualizing the breast. There is no contradiction.

The question is more along the lines of someone grabbing a woman's breast. Would that still be sexual assault?

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes because it hurts a womans feelings on the personal and sexuality level.

[–]deathdragon5858 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A lot that is classified as child porn is not actually porn in a lot of places. Hell, some places even drawn art is treated the same as some video of a toddler getting raped.

[–]AnotherDAM[S] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

And there are not a lot of people that think it is at all OK for adults to freely ogle topless teenagers.

Source? Or are you just femsplaining?

[–]Vandechoz 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't think it's really much of a controversial claim, so I don't feel I need to support it with any statistics. If you would like to cite something saying otherwise, I'm open to seeing it.

[–]AnotherDAM[S] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You have a bright future in the Department of Double Speak sister.

YOU have literally zero idea of how many people feel it is "ok" for adults to ogle topless teenagers. You completely gloss over the fact that there are a hundred million adult females in the US alone who certainly ogle topless males already. I know -- that doesn't matter -- even thought this point alone destroys your premise.

But, that notwithstanding YOU made a specious claim without citation, but then fall back on the laziest of "well, EVERYBODY knows that is true".

You might win in the school of feminist discourse, but in actual rhetoric you would be failing, and not well at that either.

[–]Vandechoz 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll admit it's lazy. Do you think I'm wrong, though? It seems a fair enough claim based on the fact that it is currently very illegal.

Also, why are you so riled up about this?

[–]Katastic_Voyage 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Women should be allowed to be topless.

Breasts are nurturing for babies and villification of breasts is villification of motherhood.

Fuck that burka shit.

Whatever you are, be proud of it. Got a dick and balls? Be proud of your God (or "random dice") given role in this world. Have a pair of ovaries? Wear them proudly and be the best damn woman you can be and don't let anyone make you feel ashamed for the biology you were given.

Also, 99% of men who want women to "cover up" are just grand standing for their girlfriend/wife. Honestly, who hasn't been in a relationship and had your SO go, "She looks so trashy." and you saw this gorgeous chick but said, "Yeah, she's totally a slut."

It's just so much easier to just say that than deal with most women's insecurity--because she's asking you, "Would you leave me and bang her instead?" and the answer is clearly, "No." But women don't communicate with straight language. (Which is news to nobody married, but completely foreign to many of the younger audience on Reddit.)

And as for the OP thinking it will be abused. Abused how? Be specific. Because anywhere a man can be topless (the park, the beach) seems pretty fair. And anywhere a man shouldn't be topless (a business meeting), seems equally fair.

I'm not pro-mens rights just so I can take some away from women. Everyone needs to get the damn laws off of other people's bodies. Regardless of gender. If you want to whistle, you whistle. It doesn't matter if other people don't like whistling. You want to whip out a titty and feed your baby? It doesn't matter if other people don't like titties.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Typical idealistic ridiculousness.

[–]YuenHsiaoTieng 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm on their side here, but their argument is ridiculous. Sorry, breasts are sex objects. I will continue to objectify them as such unapologetically.

[+]Aprilisse points 9 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

If breasts are not seen as sexual parts of the body then they can be shown in public like any other non-sexual body part. But this would also mean it is not sexual assault to touch them, just like a man cannot claim sexual assault for a woman touching his chest.

[–]insickness 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A man can claim sexual assault if a woman touches his chest against his will. Granted, a court may not impose as much of a penalty, but the court should.

[–]Rethgil 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So when it suits them, feminism suddenly wants to be blind to the differences between men and women. But when they want bags carried, trash collected, or someone to stand up for them in a club....

[–]AnotherDAM[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That does seem to be the MO.

[–]omegaphallic 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm totally okay with it Ontario has legally topless woman and its been fine. This is a none issue.

[–]rg57 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Guys, I have to tell you, our chests are JUST as attractive as female boobies. (More, if you ask me...) And our nipples are just as sexual as female nipples.

Once more women USE their freedom, it will become a lot less novel or distracting.

[–]mikesteane 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ha ha! These feminists don't seem to realise that most women's power derives from covering themselves up and restricting their sexuality. Making a show of themselves is not empowering, it is giving away power that, once upon a time they were able to wield very effectively.

[–]-redditardation- 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

While I have absolutely no issue with women being topless if they choose to be. I generally am very friendly to the notion of people being nude and think that society at large has a very prude and puritan stance on such issues.

I think that comparing female breasts to male breasts is a false equivalence. Female breasts are actively involved in reproduction. Male breasts aren't (beyond of course using chest muscles for motion but women also do this).

I think a better comparison would be testicles (not that there seems to be a good analogue for a comparison). They are also involved in reproduction but usually aren't the primary sex organ people focus on but nonetheless make regularly contact with and play with.

I do understand that from the biological standpoint this isn't the case and the testes do actually have a direct female analogue in the ovaries but this seems to be about the visual as opposed to the reproductive function.

[+]bosh-head points 9 years ago* [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

I think we need to put people under brain-imaging scans and see how gay men react to a shirtless guy vs how straight men react to a shirtless girl. As a gay man I find a shirtless guy to be quite an attractive sight, but I don't know how it compares to straight men seeing shirtless women.

[–]likes_to_read 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

That depends entirely on the woman's physique.

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What? You mean not EVERY man eye rapes every woman whenever he can?!

/s

[–]ThirdTurnip 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As a gay man I find a shirtless guy to be quite an attractive sight...

If they're in decent shape, definitely. And a lot of guys are.

While there's been plenty that has sucked about being gay, guys walking around shirtless has not been one of them. Especially if you include TV it's non-stop eye candy.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who cares if heads explode? Everything that offers anyone any freedom will be abused by someone. That's just kind of a law of nature. When you leave out a tray of free cookies (unsupervised) and put up a sign that says "Please Share, Take One", there will always be at least one person that doesn't honour that.

This is about giving the freedom to everyone and being vigilant about those who don't respect it.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter