TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

After his girlfriend attacked him with car keys and damaged his car french footballer Lucas Hernandez stopped her by grabing her by the waist. He is facing 7 months in prison for domestic abuse. His girlfriend is facing 6 months for the same crime and property damage

kacperp

February 7, 2017
1316 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.marca.com/futbol/atletico/2017/02/07/589900f1e5fdea8e148b456f.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title After his girlfriend attacked him with car keys and damaged his car french footballer Lucas Hernandez stopped her by grabing her by the waist. He is facing 7 months in prison for domestic abuse. His girlfriend is facing 6 months for the same crime and property damage
Author

kacperp

Upvotes 1316
Comments 79
Date February 7, 2017 8:11 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5sk7ub/after_his_girlfriend_attacked_him_with_car_keys/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/after-his-girlfriend-attacked-him-with-car-keys.932517
https://theredarchive.com/post/932517

Comments

[–]acearmv8 174 points175 points176 points 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Spanish laws on violence are ridiculous. They have basically banned self defense. When someone attacks you violently, if you do not want to break the law, what you should do is call the police and try to get out or if you can not just take it. Which is completely unrealistic because in a lot of violent situations you do not even get the chance to call the police.

Note that they have not directly banned self defense but they have made it extremely hard to prove it was self defense. You are not attacking anyone, someone starts hitting you, then you push him away and run, you both will be charged with assault.

Its absolutely ridiculous.

The only silver leaning is they do not send you to prison for a first sentence of less than two years.

[–]mwobuddy 90 points91 points92 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Spanish laws on violence are ridiculous. They have basically banned self defense. When someone attacks you violently, if you do not want to break the law, what you should do is call the police and try to get out or if you can not just take it. Which is completely unrealistic because in a lot of violent situations you do not even get the chance to call the police.

Its really no different than playground school rules here; if you get bullied, don't fight back because then you're in trouble too.

[–]by_myself 56 points57 points58 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yup, that left some emotional scars. Especially when the smaller kids learned that they could pick on me and have a lookout for a teacher nearby. When the time was right the little kids would start a fight, and I'd get caught defending myself. Since I was bigger (fat), the teachers would just assume I was the aggressor and I'd get in trouble while the other kids would get away with what they did.

This might sound extreme, but when there's a school shooting I always stop and ask myself if the shooter was badly bullied and just couldn't take it any more.

[–]420N1CKN4M3 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Were there cases of school shootings where bullying wasn't one of the major reasons for it happening in first place?

typing this felt weird :/

[–]by_myself 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When I see it come up on the news they seem to dance around that issue.

[–]SupraEA 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

The difference is that when you tell your teacher, you both do not get punished. I know I know there are always exceptions, but this is the general truth.

[–]Jander97 41 points42 points43 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Due to rampant zero tolerance rules, very often both are punished. Boy A says Boy B hit first, Boy B says Boy A hit first, they both get in trouble, regardless of who actually started the fight.

[–]tehwankingwalruses 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Which leads to a situation where, if you are going to be punished anyway you may as well try to defend yourself and do some damage.

[–]Jander97 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well there's a chance at least if you don't fight back to go unpunished, but I certainly wouldn't advocate that letting yourself get beat up is a good solution.

Except I guess maybe in spain where getting beat up might be preferable to a criminal conviction with the potential of over half a year of incarceration.

[–]locks_are_paranoid 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

if you don't fight back to go unpunished

I once read about a case where a student was attacked, and security camera footage showed that the victim never fought back. But both the bully and the victim were suspended for the same amount of time.

[–]Jander97 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well I did say "a chance at least"

I would like believe what you say wouldn't happen in the case of clearly proven evidence, but it doesn't surprise me at all that it did.

[–]tehwankingwalruses 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In my high school a kid got jumped by 4 black guys. All 5 were suspended. He served his suspension in the hospital while the 4 guys spent theirs at home.

[–]rocelot7 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Than you start doing damage to the mouth so you're the only one controlling the narrative.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The teachers even admire and punish less the 'stronger fighter.'

[–]locks_are_paranoid 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When I was in middle school, kids would bully me at recess. When I told a teacher aide, she would send both me and the kid who was bullying me to the office. I was being punished for telling the teacher aide that I was being bullied.

[–]420weedscopes 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like they need some good ol 'merican stand your ground laws. In certain states you can kill somebody for that shit perfectly legally.

[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll add that to the growing list of countries (and U.S. states) to never visit.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Its not just Spanish. A friend of mine has some kind of not guilty but still on his record thing meaning you're actually guilty thing (?) for grabbing his ex-wife by the arm when she was going to grab a knife. He can't even get a job at HD now.

Edit: Country grammar and ex.

[–]mwobuddy 86 points87 points88 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

7 months of your life stripped away. She committed violence twice, first by her own hand and then by invoking the government to steal that much of his life away. Its why false imprisonment is a crime as well. It is violence. Prison is violence because it deprives a person of part but not all of their life, as if they'd been murdered.

if 7 months is so little, surely people would be willing to prove it by choosing to be imprisoned that long.

[–]rocaralonso 32 points33 points34 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

In Spain, you don't go to prison with a sentence of 6/7 months. You stay in probation and/or get a judicial fee, and you're free during the sentence time, unless you commit another crime. Judges only send people to prison above 2 years and 1 day sentences.

By the way, our Ley Integral Contra la Violencia de Género (Law Against Gender Violence) is an absolute disaster. If a woman acusses a man of gender violence, he is process using this law, and his life is destroyed, because he is, almost, guilty, until he proves that he is innocent. But, if a man acusses a woman, a man acusses another man (gays), or a woman acusses another woman (lesbians) the law doesn't apply, and they face the Penal Code, that it's more fair to both parts.

Now, after years of abuses, the Law achieved that when a woman acusses her partner of gender violence, neither the police or the judges believes she. This case is a perfect example, because 3, 2 years ago, was unthinkable that a judge acusses both members of a couple that had have a fight.

[–]mwobuddy 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That is good to know, but it would be immediate jail time in US or UK or Canada.

It still levies the threat of that sentence if he gets attacked by another woman and defends himself.

[–]LancerFIN 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think many European countries have it like that. In Finland less than two year prison sentences are nearly always just probation.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can't speak for other countries but the UK is happy to hand out short sentences when deemed 'necessary'. Ched Evans got a five year sentence for his 'rape', in which he has now proven he is not guilty, yet the other day I read a story where a mother disposed of her stillborn baby by throwing it off of a bridge onto a busy road and got probation due to emotional stress.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In Spain, you don't go to prison with a sentence of 6/7 months. You stay in probation and/or get a judicial fee, and you're free during the sentence time, unless you commit another crime. Judges only send people to prison above 2 years and 1 day sentences.

Sounds like it would disproportionately affect poor people even more.

[+]ql3 points 9 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

While I agree with your general sentiment, words have meaning. None of those things you describe as violence are actually violence. And "as if they'd been murdered" is just silly histrionics. And I think you meant bearing false witness rather than false imprisonment, because false imprisonment did not happen anywhere in this case.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

You are quite histrionic.

As if they'd been murdered is the comparison to complete deprivation of life, which was spelled out by me in that sentence. Imprisonment is only partial deprivation of life. This case is false witness, but it would lead to false imprisonment. If you locked someone in your basement against their will, that would be false imprisonment, and that is violence done to them, since you deprive them of their freedom and thus of some of their life. They can never get it back.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps I can lead you to water with an analogy. What if, just for instance, someone made a poison that did not harm you directly. Suppose it is some compound that simply shaves off the telomeres, attacking them directly, leading to advanced aging.

What if I introduce it into your food in such an amount that it costs you 5 years of life. You don't even notice. No pain, no symptoms, nothing to tell you that you had been poisoned and your life had been shortened.

Would you think this is not violence because you are not experiencing direct, immediate harm?

Violence isn't just pain. I can slap you, and it is violence, but how much have you lost of your life? Barely anything. On the other hand, to lock you in a room you cant escape and disrupt/destroy your 'free life', forcing you to have to rebuild it and with the penalties of being an ex-convict (lack of job hiring), would not be violence? Even though I deprived you of far more than what I deprived you of by a mere slap of the face? You judge that physical assault as more violent than time spent locked in some place you can't escape, and the destruction to your life that it causes?

If it were me, I'd accept corporal punishment; 50 lashes compared to being locked away for months or years.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This is despicable, self-defense doesn't deserve punishment. Redefining violence is wrong though, just wrong.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Mmhmm. And what do you think violence is?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Physical harm

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And how do you define physical harm?

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would you define violence as injury, for instance? Would you define the shortening of someone's lifespan as injury? If prison isn't violence, why is it a supposed deterrent or punishment?

[–]NetPotionNr9 41 points42 points43 points 9 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link

Welcome to Europe where perpetrator feelings mean more than victims. It is literally the epicenter of the mental illness that is ripping through America now.

[–]myrpou 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Why are people upvoting this absolute bullshit?

[–]NetPotionNr9 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Because it's quite accurate in so many different ways. I saw the rise of the fanatic Chavist type enviro radicals in Europe that were all about feelings and fantasies and delusions that have driven European politics and actions for decades now to the brink of utter destruction and deconstruction of European culture and society. The same nonsense that is spreading through the USA today, has its origins in Europe, which, ironically is really just a metastasis of the hippie mental illness of post WWII America.

What, do you think that when by 2050 for the first time in all of history, the ethnically native people of a European country will become a minority in their own country that will be bullshit? Do you think that foreigners with foreign ideologies and foreign values and foreign allegiances will somehow carry on the traditions and customs of the ethnic society for which a country is named? Do you think that will lead to peace and tranquility when the points of conflict and friction are increased?

What the Liberal mentally ill (especially the European Liberal that is really a far more sick mind than even an American Liberal even as they race towards the abyss there too) mind doesn't quite get is that all research shows that increasing "diversity" generates nothing but conflict. If you have a zoo, do you think putting all animals in one enclosure leads to more or less conflict and issues? If you even just put them in separate habitats next to each other, do you think there is more or less conflict and problems when you have dissimilar species next to each other or even predators next to prey? Europe and it's mentally ill Liberals are the prey, Arabs, Africans, and Central Asians are the predators that will now achieve what they hadn't been able to achieve for themselves for 1400 years they've been trying to invade and overtake Europe as the mentally ill throw open the gates to the barbarians.

[–]gaahead 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Maybe fuck off to a country where girls will sleep with you

[–]Ultramegasaurus 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Are you honestly saying that American women are not treated more lenient by police and judges?!

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It looks like he said the opposite.

[–]NetPotionNr9 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No. It seems you are saying that. I am rather sure that he would not have gone to prison for domestic abuse for grabbing her in self-defense, as it seems that is the case. We still do have the right to self-defense in the USA in most cases.

You do not go to prison in the USA for defending yourself even if you smash someone's head in if warranted. It is based on the principle that the person initiating the illegal act carries the responsibility for all and any outcomes, hence why, e.g., a perpetrator can be charged with the death of innocent bystanders shot by police or anyone killed by accident caused related to the commission of a crime.

Do you remember that case of the German girl that was being raped and then faced assault charges for pepper spraying the muzzie "refugee" assailant? That is clear indication of abject, unfettered insanity and that kind of thing generally would not happen in the USA.

[–]DownWithDuplicity 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Google Joe Mixon. He's been barred from the NFL combine for punching a woman who had pushed him and then struck at his head first. He already served his sentence(which was bullshit) and he already was suspended for a year from playing football in college(again bullshit). Now the NFL is heaping extrajudicial punishment on him for a "crime" he committed as a 19-year-old fresh out of high school over two years ago. No, America hates men too.

[–]Throwabanana69 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Rubbish. The only ones pushing the femcentric pussy pass narrative are the tradcons, a type of which no one excels more at than the americans

[–]NetPotionNr9 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

So you are saying there's no such thing as a "pussy pass"?

So you think a man would get away with destroying his own society and culture by conjuring all savages from Africa and the Middle East to flood into the civilized world with impunity? You think that you can equally, openly criticize women, let alone physically defend yourself against a woman that attacks you or makes self-defense necessary?

It's not that Americans excel at being "tradcons", it's that true Americans are still sane, have self-respect, dignity, and pride in themselves and their achievements, and are not afraid to be proud of what they accomplished and created, and are not interested in simply giving the fruits of their labor away for nothing to others who not only have no respect for it or them, don't deserve it, and when they are given something they then violently demand that they continue getting it and more of it.

[–]Throwabanana69 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Barf. You voted Drumpf into power so you certainly are giving nothing away. Drumpf must be your version of Ghandi MLK ethics. Keep conjuring up antisemitic racist imagery, maybe one day ur grandsons will have to be emigrants themselves, you opportunistic clown.

[–]NetPotionNr9 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Lol you people are so delusionally insane. I used to be critical of Israeli and Jewish actions. I have never been more supportive of Israel and Jews than now and we have a President that has Jewish family. Please do tell me more about how I'm antisemitic.

You toddlers can't even comprehend what you are doing in your blinding tantrum. YOU people are why there even is a President Trump. YOU people created and elected him and you have no way of even comprehending it.

[–]Throwabanana69 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Ofc ur a fan of the jews u rightardian fuckwit. U love the jews when theyr inside their own country but we both know you'd be with hitler and the pogroms. Plus theres the whole rapture thing going for u loony evangelical honkeys.

[–]NetPotionNr9 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

LOL It's amazing how much you types are so amazingly good at being wrong. You should really make a career out of consulting people on what would be the the wrong things to do, simply by making suggestions on what they should do. It comes so effortless to you types. Quite impressive.

[–]Throwabanana69 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Omg i just saw the light... The rightards are a bunch of immaculate snowflakes that emerge conscience clean mega ajax clean from the ravages of history. Thanku for making me see the light netplonker.

[–]NetPotionNr9 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So much impotent rage. Why?

[–]Throwabanana69 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cuz ur mom is fugly

[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

You are so full of shit.

Generally what we try to do in Europe is not look at feelings at all, from none of the parties.

We don't punish out of revenge, we punish to reduce the chance of it happening again and to rehabilitate so they are not a burden because of prison cost.

We won't make it commercial labor camps like America does.

[–]JwPATX 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Feelings may not be the right word, but I've definitely read plenty of stories over the years of ppl getting in trouble for hurting home invaders and cops getting suspended for doing the right thing. "We can't blame the home invader for invading a home, they need to eat too," or some such nonsense.

[–]myrpou 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Please provide an example.

[–]JwPATX 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

here you go

Charged for stabbing a burglar with his own knife during a burglary.

[–]myrpou 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

According to the BBC, UK law holds that homeowners should not be prosecuted if they use “reasonable force” to protect themselves against intruders. Justice Secretary Ken Clarke explained: “If an old lady finds she’s got an 18 year old burgling her house and she picks up a kitchen knife and sticks it in him she has not committed a criminal offence and we will make that clear.”

The police arrested Vincent Cooke, however The Daily Mail reports that he has been released on bail until mid-October.

Metro notes that this is the third such incident in recent months. In both previous cases, the homeowners were released without being charged.

Makes it sound pretty reasonable. This thread is full of insane scaremongering just because there are conditions on self defence, who in their right mind could think there shouldn't be?

[–]JwPATX 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm fairly in my right mind, and I can't imagine how you're not entitled to defend yourself by any means necessary against an armed assailant in your own home. "You used too much force," is insane considering the speed with which these things happen. There was obviously a struggle if he got the burglar's knife. As the actual victim in this kind of situation, you have no way of knowing how far the burglar is willing to go, and it's also insane for some magistrate to be able to dictate how much force was necessary when the only party that's left is the one who had the misfortune of being assaulted in the first place.

[–]myrpou 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You obviously don't understand how the law works, it's not made for this specific scenario.

[+][deleted] -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I find it hard to believe that is a systematic problem.

If you catch a burglar, and than proceed to stomp on his face while he is handcuffed you deserve to be suspended/ fired/ possible jail time.

To just give you a scenario for the reason why police that catch burglars are sometimes suspended.

Cop's don't tend to get in trouble for nothing, they generally have good legal representation.

[–]JwPATX 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Well, the cop one I had in mind specifically was one that happened Britain over the summer. One officer approaching a suspect's car, suspect tries to run him down, 2nd officer puts his cruiser in the path of the criminal/saves his partner's life, then gets suspended for making such a dangerous move without the proper training. Not really in the same vain I guess, but it's just kind of counter-productive to work like that.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

I admit that situation seems pretty shitty.

I still don't see it being the norm though.

For example here in the Netherlands, a few years back the police blocked of a highway to stop someone who did not pay at the gas station.

This caused a traffic jam which included car's from ordinary civilians, the thief drove straight in the back of a car killing innocent civilians.

So is this the fault of the thief or does the police also have responsibility in this situation?

Yes the thief stole gas, and evaded police, that is bad.

But is it worth it to catch a gas thief using such drastic measures?

There were other options, to follow this person, so in this case I would think suspension is in order, even if they didn't do anything wrong directly, they should reevaluate their priorities, yes you want to catch the bad guy, but the broader picture is more important.

What I am trying to say is that these things can be very complicated and are not always cut and dry.

[–]Incident-Pit 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Given that the percentage certainty of being caught is the biggest factor in deterring crime... Probably. You think a high speed police chase for god knows how many miles would have been safer?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

We have helicopters, unmarked car's and a shitload of highway camera's.

If the chase becomes dangerous you let those things take over, you are not going to cause a traffic jam and use civilians as a shield, If need be you let them go, no life is worth a tank of gas.

[–]JwPATX 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm with you. It's just a different way of looking at it. I'm pretty confident that if cops didn't chase gas thieves here, gas theft would skyrocket. Most ppl in the US are just good/law-abiding, but there is a significant portion of the population waiting for a corner to cut.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They should chase thieves, but there are boundaries, you can give up the direct chase when it becomes to dangerous and just track them from the air, unless he is a suicide terrorist or something.

You don't need a spectacular police chase to bring them to justice.

Just as people should abide by not cutting corners, so should the police.

[–]Trail_of_Jeers -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If you catch a burglar, and than proceed to stomp on his face while he is handcuffed you deserve to be suspended/ fired/ possible jail time.

because criminals deserve sympathy /s

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It has nothing to do with sympathy, it has to do with justice and that is not for a policeman to decide.

The police is not the judge nor the executioner.

[–]Trail_of_Jeers 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then let us hope it's the cop who catches said burglar, and not I.

[–]NetPotionNr9 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I know quite well what goes on in Europe. You absolutely do not take into account not only victims' rights to live free of terror from the perpetrator walking the same streets as they do because some feeble minded bleeding heart Liberal was convinced because Muhammad told him "It's a miracle, I'm reformed" he is let out of prison before the victim can even get past waking up in terror every night.

I also know how many many crimes of assault and vandalism are not even reported, let alone penalized at all because most of the la la land Socialist societies have figured out that just not having enough police resources to even capture, let alone prosecute low level crimes is a good way to act like crimes don't happen. You know very well if you life in Europe that Muzzies and others are constantly a threat of starting shit and assaulting people.

We don't punish out of revenge, my European propaganda infested friend, we imprison people because we hold the right of civilized and peaceful people far higher than the rights of perpetrators and uncivilized people. Our prisons are quite efficient and cost effective actually per person. I can assure you that European prisons are far more expensive per inmate on a daily rate if you normalized and internalized all the costs.

No, I guess you won't make it commercial labor camps ... which don't exist here either ... you ingrate European we had to save you from. We also have not turned out prisons into madrassahs either where our prisons are overwhelmingly full of muzzies and you keep on importing more. We have prisons chocked full of people that ON AVERAGE are far worse of a human being than the worst European inmate. Maybe we should start a program to ship our prisoners to Europe for wonderful, glorious, drum circle sessions of hugging and therapy, where you can then let them out a few months later and they start setting up drug factories, gangs so violent and anti-social you won't even be able to comprehend it. But then again. You will have that soon enough as you are importing muzzies and their food soldiers ISIS and doing so on the tax payer's dime.

We're going to have to take over parts of Europen when we save your retarded asses from your own doing again for the 3rd time though. You fools.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Your reasoning is very simplistic.

It doesn't take religious "reform" to convince us that someone is ready to be reintroduced to society it is way more complicated than that.

Muzzies? are you fucking alright?

So civilized of you. /s

Yes we care for people who are fleeing the war that ISIS has brought upon them (we are not all happy about that one) but I think it is good, yes Isis wil try to infiltrate along with the good ones, but if we don't try to help the good people and weed out the bad than where are we as humans? How could we justify the help we had in ww2 if we are not prepared to do the same for others?

The reason why ww2 happened was not taking in people, more the opposite, but to complicated to go into right now.

Yes there will be bumps in the road, but in no way is isis capable to throw us in total despair, unless we rip our self apart from within by dividing our society to much.

You do have commercial run prison's where labor is performed, it is a fact.

We also take criminals of the street, but instead of just dumping them there we actively rehabilitate them, we have less repeat offenders.

Yes there are relatively more muslim offenders, atleast in my country, we imported workers from Muslim countries to work for cheap several decades ago and the newest generation of these people are causing some problems, but this will die out as generations go on, just look at the history of your own country relating to immigrant, like Italiaans and the Irish and so on.

[–]Throwabanana69 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You morons and ur alex jones cum fox news tropes. Why dont u all shack up with mia farrow and preach about the devil in the arctic

[–]NetPotionNr9 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What are you talking about? You are not at all self-aware, are you? I guess you're just one of those ignorant Europeans that doesn't realize what a propaganda bubble you are in or the fact that the German government in particular after WWII and the EU now were precisely devised to give the impression that they were democratic, when in fact they are just illusions to allow the elite to rule and control basically with impunity. European governments were precisely set up to abstract the will and the interest of the people while still giving the false impression that it was "fair" and "democratic". Just look around you, there are levels of abstraction upon levels of abstraction in the government. You are never able to choose or have representation through anything but the establishment that you are presented on a platter.

If you mention Alex Jones and Fox News tropes, you clearly watch more of both.

You simply don't understand what is going on in the USA, as you can't, while not even understanding what is going on in Europe right in front of you behind the nice curtain your establishment keeps you blinded with. I know European culture, society, politics, and government quite well.

[–]thrway_1000 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://archive.is/8P5Hk

[–]samutlgfx 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Justice is a bullshit

[+]ThePigmanAgain points 9 years ago [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

Nigger gotta learn -- you don't fight back against Whitey.

[–]sillymod 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You really need to use /s when you are being sarcastic.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

If people are too dumb to get it, that's not my problem.

[–]sillymod -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

When we have rules about racism, that is your problem.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That wasn't racism. And we have rules about racism now?

[–]sillymod 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Have since before I was a mod.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Outrageous. How the hell are all us alt-right deplorables supposed to speak our mind if you lefty bastards keep infringing on our right to free speech?

Heh, heh...

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter