If I read comments of men in red pill communities, to me it seems like there are a lot of contradictions in the red pill ideology:

  1. Accusing women who say they don't need men, of lying or fooling themselves, while also wanting to restrict women's rights (such as rights to vote or to have a career or to choose who they marry). If every woman in the current society really needs a husband, there is no need to restrict women's rights in order to bind them to husbands.
  2. Wanting to restrict women's rights to achieve that women need men as husbands and don't ever leave them, while also complaining that women only love men for what they provide and not for who they are.
  3. Believing that women are brainwashed by feminism, while also being angry at them and not trying to convince them by having respectful conversations and giving reasonable arguments but only by blaming them and calling them evil. If someone is really brainwashed, getting angry at them and demonizing them is a really bad strategy to show that the other person is wrong and brainwashed. And setting up communities to talk about them (instead of with them!) and fantasize about taking their rights isn't going to convince any brainwashed person.
  4. Believing feminism has brainwashed women, while also wanting men to control women. So brainwashing/controlling others isn't bad, it only matters that people are brainwashed/controlled with the "right" ideas?
  5. Believing that they don't have a woman because feminism brainwashed women, while also believing it is because of "female nature". If "female nature" is real, why would feminism need to brainwash women?
  6. Believing that if a woman gets her heart broken by a man, it is always because she went for the wrong man, a "top x percenter", while also being jealous about the top x percenters. It seems like a lot of red pilled men (not all) would do exactly the same as the top x percenters if they got the opportunity. So how is a "lower value man" always a safe choice on the long term? Simply because a man hasn't gotten the opportunity to sleep around, it doesn't mean that he would make a trustworthy husband.
  7. Saying women should be housewives, while also being proud that everything in the world is build by men and that women didn't contribute anything and that women should be grateful to men, who are of course superior because of this "fact". Why would any woman want to be your housewife if you don't appreciate housewives and think that they don't contribute anything?
  8. Thinking that they know the true nature of women, because they have had relationships with women or dated with women (or heard stories of other men's bad experiences), and hetero women don't know female nature because they don't date women, while also thinking that they know how men are because they are men and women aren't. So now what makes that you know how a entire sex is (if that were even possible)? Being a member of that sex, or having dated/relations with a member of that sex? In any case, with that reasoning women know just as much about the other sex. So no reason to take women's experiences or views on this subject less seriously.
  9. Whining about how "feminism" and the current "society" generalizes all men, and say that men are bad, while generalizing women and saying women are bad. (By the way, where are all those so-called feminists who say that all men are bad and who constantly talk about how bad "male nature" is? Where are all those the communities of women that fantasize about taking men's rights away?)
  10. Believing that the goal of women's lives should be marriage and having children, while not thinking or talking about the meaning of life in general. If the only goal of life is reproduction, then in the end, life is still pointless. And if red pill is right and all women have a "female nature" that is really that bad and manipulative and loveless, why should they reproduce at all?
  11. Thinking that they have truly taken the "red pill" (in the original meaning of the movie), while only focusing on 1 aspect of life, and ignoring all other aspects. Why only thinking in terms of men and women? There are so many different cultures and different religions and philosophies of life. People have different degrees of wealth, intelligence and education. There are people with diseases, disabilities or traumas. People have different personalities, talents, interests and life experiences . There is so much more in the world than sex. And moreover, how does the so-called "red pill" movement know the real truth about women and relationships? Has some God told them? Someone from outside this world? As far as I know, they only hear that "truth" of other people in the same world as everyone else. Having a bad experience with someone of the other sex does by no means elevate you above this world to see and understand all the mysteries of life. To call such an ideology "red pill" is actually pure hubris, in my opinion.

Any remarks, additions, objections or explanations about those (by my perceived as) contradictions?