I shared almost the same post in purple pill sub, and many men (both red and purple pill) jump in to defend this hypocritical behaviour.

The post was:

“I have encountered a good number of western men who aren’t virgins, yet they prefer virginity, and these men are necessarily not religious either. Please note that these men prefer absolute virgins, ones who never had sex with any man, at any point in their life. They are of opinion that most men actually prefer absolute virgins, but have to accept non-virgin women because that’s what available. I’ll repeat that their issue is not even with the women having supposedly extensive sexual history. Just having one past sexual encounter is a deal breaker.

These men are part of the problem. They engage in premarital sex, support cohabitation, yet demand women to be traditional? If a society has most of its men losing virginity before marriage, then the very logical outcome is that most of its women would also be non-virgin. If they have bone to pick with promiscuity or “high body count” that would be one thing, but straight up demanding or preferring a virgin, that too, when you aren’t one to begin with, doesn’t add up. Most western men have multiple sexual partners over lifetime, so “muh sex is harder for men” ain’t going to justify virgin hunting.”

The most common rebuttal was them denying that it’s hypocritical, and giving examples of how people choose someone different from them, which is beyond ridiculous. “I’m a man, but I choose to be with a woman which is not hypocritical.” Smh. As a hetro male, you are naturally inclined to choose women. Could the same be said about your “preference” for virgin partner when you aren’t a virgin? Others gave examples of height. Height and sex aren’t the same. Height is rooted in genetics, and short men don’t want to be with tall women, either. Most women are naturally shorter than men. This isn’t the case with virginity. Is common sense this uncommon or what?