QUESTION: Is there any validity behind the idea that women are wiser or the morally-superior sex?

mhandanna · 2020-07-07T10:47:15+00:00

In a nut shell, gamma bias solves this:

https://malepsychology.org.uk/2018/12/04/why-are-there-so-many-disagreements-about-gender-issues-its-usually-down-to-gamma-bias/

Plus feminsm has killed science and any pieces showing men are good:

https://quillette.com/2018/09/07/academic-activists-send-a-published-paper-down-the-memory-hole/

Look it up, but the prison stats are highly misleading, as women dont go to jail or are even arrested. I have seen different articles say different numbers but something like if men were treated the same as women there wuld be 6x less men in prison.

But the whol crime thing is absurd line to go down... if men "do all the crime" they also invent everything, explore everything (countries, islands, oceans, deserts, mountains, space etc), made all the moral changes e.g. democracy, human rights, childrens rights

Or more related, its virtually only men who are heroes who risk their lives to save others. Carnegie hero study showed 9/10 have a go heroes juming in to rivers, burning buildings are men... as well as fierefighters, milatry, bomb squad, coast guard, mountain rescue etc

NAWALT_VADER · 2020-07-07T15:47:09+00:00

"Is there any validity behind the idea that women are wiser or the morally-superior sex?"

No. None.

"Is there evidence against the 'Women are moraly superior sex who do no wrong' in past and present?"

Yes. You need merely point to any single one of the very many women in history who have done anything that is worse than the very best man to provide the evidence against this notion that "women do no wrong" or are "morally superior".

Anyone who pushes such ideas is just a misandrist and an androphobe.

Blauwpetje · 2020-07-07T14:30:13+00:00

Men are what women selected them to be. 2 In 99% of humanity's past, being strong and willing to fight was simply necessary. There is no greater 'wisdom' as such in character traits that come handy in a society that has become affluent and peaceful largely thanks to inventions and politics of men. 3. Being competitive makes men sometimes do violent things, at other times do brave, inventive and useful things. 4. Violent men are a small minority and other men shouldn't be blamed for it, the same as any group shouldn't be blamed for what some of them did.

OkLetterhead9 · 2020-07-07T10:32:01+00:00

Revealed: Revenge porn mainly being carried out by women

source : https://archive.is/Vmrdo

DIES-_-IRAE · 2020-07-07T12:47:17+00:00

Moronic-Simpleton · 2020-07-07T14:37:32+00:00

I think it’s a mix of different things, though the difference in violence has probably been exaggerated by feminists too.

For example, this article explains the difference between the sexes when it comes to mental illnesses, and how men are more likely to externalize their emotions, which will often come out violently.

Also, in poor neighborhoods, women have the "opportunity" to result to sex work or to get married to a man who can provide for her. Men are expected to be the providers and to take care of themselves, and they rarely result to sex work because, well, supply and demand. I think that might be a reason why men in poverty are more likely to mug someone or join a gang than women. This is just an example of socialization I thought of.

Selfdisciplinedlife · 2020-07-07T13:47:05+00:00

but how do you tackle the idea that "women are less inclined to crime/social ills than men"?

The answer to this question is so obvious it never ceases to amaze me that this is ever an issue and that misandrists would ever use these sorts of statistics in an attempt to praise women and denigrate men. Why do women commit fewer violent crimes? Because they are much weaker and more cowardly than men. It’s just that simple. Women are much less likely to engage in violence because they know that if they tried they would most likely end up beaten to a pulp. Cowardly weak men commit very few violent crimes, not because they are morally superior but because they are weak and cowardly. Where women do commit violent crimes it’s overwhelmingly against people too weak and helpless to defend themselves, namely children and the elderly. A great majority of child and elder physical abuse is committed by women, not men. The weak and cowardly prey on those much weaker/helpless than themselves. Women are NOT more noble or virtuous than men. Weakness and cowardice are not virtuous or noble.

If you have any doubts about this, just look for robberies, rapes and murders committed by dwarfs/midgets (I apologize if midget is a derogatory term). You’ll find a few references to a hoax about a “midget gang” in Ireland (oh please) and a story about a female porn star (Bridget the midget) who stabbed her boyfriend. Then look at pictures/videos of guys doing hard time in prison. Big, huge, muscular men with more muscle than brains.

Bottom line: men commit 95% of violent crimes for the same reason that men do 95% of all the dangerous and physically demanding jobs: because we’re just braver and stronger.

a-man-from-earth · 2020-07-09T23:58:27+00:00

Besides the already mentioned skewed statistics, men may commit more crimes, but they also risk their lives more for the good of society, as fire-fighters, police officers, security guards, builders, power line workers, and a host of other physically dangerous jobs.

2020-12-15T20:14:54+00:00

Just thinking about a "superior sex" is immoral

Queasy-Lavishness334 · 2024-05-15T15:53:22+00:00

Title	QUESTION: Is there any validity behind the idea that women are wiser or the morally-superior sex?
Author	Strikester101
Upvotes	6
Comments	17
Date	July 7, 2020 9:50 AM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/hmrls2/question_is_there_any_validity_behind_the_idea/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/question-is-there-any-validity-behind-the-idea.1063173 https://theredarchive.com/post/1063173

Comments