Consistency in Ethical Stance:

Gender Equality: If we oppose FGM on the grounds of bodily autonomy, consent, and the right to bodily integrity, it is consistent to apply similar ethical standards to male circumcision. Both practices involve non-consensual bodily alterations and raise significant ethical issues.

Human Rights: Upholding human rights means protecting individuals from non-consensual bodily modifications, regardless of gender. Both boys and girls have the right to bodily integrity and should be protected from practices that violate this right.

Conclusion:

From an ethical standpoint, non-consensual circumcision, whether of boys or girls, raises significant concerns. While the cultural and religious context is important, the principle of bodily autonomy and the right to make informed decisions about one's own body should take precedence. For a practice to be considered rightful and genuine within a religion, it should respect individual rights and adapt to contemporary ethical standards, ensuring that all individuals have the autonomy to make informed choices about their bodies.