Did anyone follow "Patriarchy Hannah" on X?

For background, Hannah was the quintessential "trad-wife", religious, and someone conservative/trad wife spaces on X used commonly as an example for what a wife should be. Her account was anonymous. I did not follow her personally.... but she claimed to be a mother of 14 adopted children and was married to Tony. Her and Tony lived in "Tonytown", a town Tony bought, and she homeschooled their children... I constantly saw her content. She had a 25k+ following and was very influential in her spaces, giving marriage and motherly advice often. Promoting submission to their husbands and such and often judging those who did not. She charged people for membership fees and accepted gifts from people after she adopted new children. People eventually started to question her authenticity though, noticing she would never show her face or Facetime with those she gave her number to.

This morning I learned that there was an exposé which revealed Hannah is not really Hannah at all... Her name is Jessica, she is 37, she has no kids and is not married. She lives at home with her parents and on Brett Cooper's podcast, Brett's guest commented that she used to or is still involved in the porn industry.

I am simply perplexed, intrigued and disturbed over the whole situation. Does anyone think that this will impact or lessen the trad-wife lifestyle? I think it sparks a conversation surrounding and concerning why people were so drawn to Hannah... when often, her life seemed too good to be true, in a way. Do RPW have opinions on why someone would live one way in real life... but create this ideal perfect traditional and submissive woman online? Does that speak to the true internal feminine need for a man we respect and submit to, considering she obviously found peace in pretending to be a woman that did so?

Thoughts?