TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

I am Chad Thundercock.

CarlJungler

April 27, 2015
23 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Archived from /r/TheRedPill

r/TheRedPill is a subreddit for discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title I am Chad Thundercock.
Author

CarlJungler

Upvotes 23
Comments 67
Date April 27, 2015 4:33 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/341nn8/i_am_chad_thundercock/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/i-am-chad-thundercock.31903
https://theredarchive.com/post/31903
Red Pill terms in post
Chadthe red pill
Top posts by CarlJungler

Enough is enough.

84 upvotes
May 29, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

[Field Report] The Workplace: Breeding Ground for Hypergamy

73 upvotes
April 28, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Advice for when you meet "The Unicorn"

37 upvotes
August 18, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

AWALT. But the truth is - they can't really help it.

32 upvotes
November 30, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Technology has helped unplug us. Use social media to its full potential.

32 upvotes
June 16, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

How would you argue against this statement? - "Men and women don't have distinctly different brains, rather, the circumstances inherent in being born a certain sex cause each to optimize their sexual strategy for the greatest personal benefit."

14 upvotes
May 19, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

The Roosh Straw Man and the Arguments He Failed to Make

12 upvotes
April 29, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

The Fauxnicorn and the Natural Evolution of Sexual Strategy

8 upvotes
August 22, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]moodyprism 53 points54 points55 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

You are not Chad Thundercock. Correct me if I'm wrong but I'll explain why. The term Chad Thundercock denotes a very specific type of person in the same way that blue piller and AFC do. A Chad Thundercock is simply born a Chad Thundercock. By virtue of their birth and upbringing they simply dominate the game without ever having to really run into themselves and question their believes. You will NEVER find a Chad Thundercock on TRP. Chad Thundercocks lack the self reflection and introspection necessary to understand anything TRP teaches. Chad Thundercocks are too busy beating the pussy up and being alpha to ever have for one moment considered a different mode of existence or picked up a philosophy book. That is the essence of a Chad Thundercock.

[–]Scizzler8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree for the most part. CT would never even know what trp is.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm with you. Chad Thundercock is generally a negative term here for someone who is born with all of the alpha sexual traits and none of the intelligence or, as you say, introspection to know any other way. He's the idiot with the stupid car and hoodie banging a different girl every week. He's the frat bro who isn't actually going places, he's just fucking lots and lots of sorority girls and getting drunk and that's about it in college.

Chad is a dumbass who hit the genetic lottery on SMV (both looks AND behavior/mindset) but doesn't know why, doesn't care why, will never know why.

He's the stand-in character for a non-RP (this is key) guy who fucks any chick he wants. He might actually spout blue-pill bullshit if anyone ever asked his opinions about society and male/female relationships, but only because he's supposed to and he really doesn't give a shit about it anyway. No one would ever ask because no one thinks Chad gives a fuck or even has enough brain cells TO give a fuck.

[–]rpquest 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

My understanding of the notion is different. As far as I can see it, CT's are labelled on people who fucks bad bitches left and right, whose presence makes for wet pussy, who usually has got some jacked-up body, and is a loud-mouthed steroid-fueled idiot. Now a TRP Man is someone who can spin plates, is charismatic, who lifts and takes care of his physique, and can assert his dominance if needed be or has a dominant presence by default.

The difference between Chad and TRP Dude is virtually nothing, except that the former is described with a pang of passive-aggressive tone that probably comes from envy, and is usually described as the third party to a story.

One might talk about how Chad Thundercock is nothing but a brainless jackass, but more often than not, these are quick judgments that people so readily hand over as a defense mechanism but is only based on what one saw of him, because after all, if one already thinks of them so negatively, would he or she even take the time to get to hang out with him and as a side effect, get know him better? Who knows? Maybe Chad is actually a party hard, work harder dude who keeps all his efforts at 10,000% when nobody is looking (Law 30 of 48 Laws of Power/Sprezzatura), thus, a blinded person only sees the party hard side of him.

[–]FinallyRed1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In theory I think he's right. I think any party hard, work harder type is qualitatively different from the overall pool of CT naturals by his capacity for reflection, regardless of his origins. You certainly don't need TRP for self-reflection, but I would wager those types are avid readers or had very solid role models growing up. In any case CT can be applied to either as there is no way of knowing from an outside perspective.

[–]CarlJungler[S] 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, you're totally right in the strict sense of CT. The title is hyperbole - I'm specifically latching onto the phenomenon of how in any guy's life, the "Chad Thundercock" is the rival male with a higher level SMV. CT is always a threat to any man's LTR. That's what bothered and excited me most during the process.

[–]Transmigratory1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That is the essence of a Chad Thundercock.

A "natural" is a way of putting it.

[–]49ered0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

what if they were CT up to the age of 21 and then when they finished college, things got different and they got here?

Well that's my story at least.

[–]LUClEN0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You contradict yourself when you say

A Chad Thundercock is simply born a Chad Thundercock.

and then follow it up with

By virtue of their birth and upbringing

Their upbringing follows their birth, so if it plays a role in character development then people are not born Chad Thundercocks

[–]MuzakNinja 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You ever hear the story about Chad getting his nuts blown off when he gets caught with an unstable man's woman?

... Maybe that part comes next. Seriously, TRP is not an excuse to be an immoral POS.

[–]crimson-hound 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My hobbies (I’m an artist and a writer) led to a fruitful career in advertising – all of you who hate on the creative disciplines in college can eat my dick because I make more than most of my friends who studied Finance.

If you EXCEL at your discipline over your competition though. I'm a design student myself, and it's pretty normal for students here who know their craft/disicpline well to land gigs making 80k a year working jobs that most adults would consider "play". It's awesome :)

Sure 80k isn't millionaire status, but it's damn comfortable and opens up a lot of freedom and opportunity if you're a single guy in his mid 20s to mid 30s with no kids.

[–]coffee_and_lumber1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Designer here. I was at my performance review shooting the shit with my boss and we were talking about some of our sundry client issues. I said "well, no matter what we deal with, this sure beats having a real, grownup job." He laughed and agreed.

[–]Squeezymypenisy7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

I think my favorite part was "all of you who make fun of creative arts in college can eat a dick." Keep doing you bro. Good read.

[–]xxzulu24xx 22 points23 points24 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I have to disagree with that part. I am majoring in an Engineering discipline. I will be a Professional Engineer when I graduate.

But I also play guitar, write my own music, and speak 3 languages (and learning number 4).

There is no excuse for not being creative and cultured, but there is also no excuse for getting a useless degree. It won't keep you from being sucessful, but having some sort of training is a great back-up plan.

To be clear, I'm not saying that all STEM degrees are good, or that only STEM degrees are good. But do something like Accounting, and not Philosophy or some bullshit unless you know you pretty certainly that you're getting into professional school or have ties to entry level positions. It's a no brainer.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Don't take Women's Studies or Gender Studies under any circumstances... unless you know you got the pussy pass working for you and can get a job as a barrista a starbucks with it.

[–]Squeezymypenisy3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't agree or disagree, I thought it was funny.

[–]crimson-hound 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

there is also no excuse for getting a useless degree

Any degree can be useless, it's all what the student makes of their education that counts.

A fine art student can bullshit their way through their degree, just as an engineering students can just score the minimum standard for passing each course and have little to no drive to seek out employment.

When you look at art and design created by people who are making a GOOD LIVING off of it, they're not just people who did it as a hobby on the side while they learned a skill or something. There's a HUGE application of theoretical concepts dealing with color, communication, etc etc that students spend years learning in lectures and studio that you really can't get outside of that environment.

There are plenty of art and design students who bullshit their way through courses just like any other major. You can take a pile of horse shit and dump it in the center of a room and call it "art" but is anyone going to buy it?

Not to mention, a lot of the "success" in the art world comes from networking with other artists and designers, who you'll most likely meet at your school or through internships and other opportunities your school provides for you. You have to always be pushing yourself and looking at the best person in the room's work and aiming to top that. It's a real wolves' den.. I wouldn't advise anyone to make a crack into the creative careers unless they have a real natural talent for it because it's HIGHLY competitive.

[–]CarlJungler[S] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I understand your line of thinking, and it makes a lot of sense. It's very utilitarian.

Education can serve the purpose of preparing you to do a job. Education can also serve the purpose of training your mental processes. I majored with 3 degrees in 4 years, and while my Advertising degree got me in the door of my first agency, my Fine Arts degree set me up for success once I secured my first job.

[–]mirepoix 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I also work in advertising (and do ok at it) and I also went to art school. I really don't see the two as having anything to do with one another, and I certainly would never use a phrase like "my fine arts degree set me for success" lol.

Advertising is not art. I am a bit taken aback by anyone who claims to know or care anything for true art who also considers advertising to have any spark of true creativity to it.

I see art schools (and I went to a top NYC one) as overpriced daycare centers and diploma factories. I think anyone lucky enough to land on their feet working in advertising after making such a poor decision as attending a fine arts school is just making the most of a bad situation.

Glad things went well for you though, and if you enjoy your work that's great. But let's not go crazy conflating art with ads.

[–]CarlJungler[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The part of my art degree that was really valuable is the requirement that you can think critically and abstractly about whatever's put in front of you.

Some people think art critique sessions are bullshit, but I thrived in them. My art and the ads I produce couldn't possibly be more different, but the ability to look critically at what's in front of me (be it ad or art) and verbalize what's working and not working is a skill that differentiates me in meetings now.

If you ask one of your non-art friends to evaluate a design, ad or piece of art, they have no idea where to start. But in broad strokes, I completely agree with you - less than 1/4 of my graduating art class at a prestigious Chicago school had honed that skill by the time they finished their degrees.

[–]BudapestPUA 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Software engineer here.

You can eat dick with your abstract thinking. It's garbage.

[–]200mgtestc -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can major in whatever you want, choose whatever career you want and make whatever you want. You just have to want it, and work at it, hard enough.

The best person in any field makes a lot of money

[–]CarlJungler[S] 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Ha thanks. I see a lot of the "Go STEM or don't go to college" talk pervade most of Reddit. I'm glad I never got that advice when I was in school because I would never have excelled.

[–][deleted] 6 points6 points6 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]CarlJungler[S] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, that's ridiculous - art history is one of the least creative classes I took in my art degree (I ended up going after 3 majors in 4 years of college, one being Fine Arts). The "problem" of facing a blank canvas and trying to "solve" that visual problem is a truly creative exercise.

I actually work in ad creative/strategy. In such a female dominated field, I find that decisiveness and analytical thinking really differentiate me, which is why I've been able to progress much more quickly than average.

[–]isthatyourdaughter3 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Someone told me the only reason to attend art history is that it's loaded with manic pixie dream girl types. But by the time word spreads about "where the chicks go", it's usually too late. I imagine Art History is a sausage fest by now.

[–]_eskimo_brothers_1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Another positive thing about being a creative is there is always going to be an element of sales within creative strategy. You will learn far more about body language, power talk, and psychology with a client if you're selling something or helping them sell something to others. Sure, straight sales jobs will be even more so, but flexing the creative mind at other times is a nice break from straight salesmanship.

I'm in related fields.

[–]crimson-hound 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

in order to satisfy the "creativity requirements" I had to take art history instead of something like drawing.

The reason for this is because it's important to know a lot of things in art history for your foundational knowledge on how to draw.

If I never looked over Michaelangelo drawings, and analyzed the way he used line to emphasize depth, I wouldn't be as good at figure drawing.

If I never looked at Caravaggio's work.. I would have never understood chiaroscuro (dramatic lighting) and how it can be used to emphasize mood in a piece.

DaVinci's "Vitruvian Man" shows us the anatomically correct (debatable) human in it's form and sets the standard blueprint for anatomical measurements.

The Renaissance gave birth to linear perspective in drawing and painting (Drawings and paintings before the renaissance didn't employ linear perspective, so they look kind of warped, flat, or out of perspective; see Lamentation of Christ by Mantegna.. This painting does not employ linear perspective because it wasn't developed as a tool yet.)

I totally get what you're saying in that you would rather be working in the studio than sitting in a lecture, I'm the same way. But analyzing the old masters and adopting/applying their techniques will help you develop a keen eye and become a better artist down the road, making it quicker and easier for you to develop accurate illustrations.

[–][deleted] 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]crimson-hound 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Well that's what you would've got out of your course if you didn't BS all your work the night before it was due. Scores and grades don't mean shit in the art world, it's all about your portfolio and the work you produce.

Obviously liberal arts courses are BS-abe.. More than calculus or say a chemistry class, but all you're really doing is wasting time for yourself (the student) by not putting in any effort into something that you paid for and participated in for a whole semester. Instead, you decided to take the easy route instead of actually putting in effort. I've got A's in history courses off of BSing half-assed research papers, but when I'm competing up against a history buff who actually puts time and effort into their work, I'm going to come in second place there.

Sure you still got your "perfect score" but that kind of attitude does not last in this field (or any field) because you're going to be competing with people who actually put REAL time and effort into that stuff rather than bullshitting it.

Why do you think we hear about so many art majors whining about their "useless degree"? Because they thought studying art was an easy way out of having to take the "hard classes".

[–]datasstoofat0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

WORK YOUR FUCKING ASS OFF - or don't go to college - should be what people say. Any degree can get you a career if you are the leader in the field.

[–]Zachar1a1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

We collectively eat your dick, OP.

[–]TekkomanKingz1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The main part about Chad T which you should take away is he is an opportunistic carnivore. The last 5 points in the post can only be taken advantage of by Chad. Other guys can try but the success rate will be very low generally.

By Becoming Chad your success rate with these endeavors can be as high as 50% depending on the crowd/venue you've got to work with.

[–]CarlJungler[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

When you start to see that "Chad" is a relative thing, the implications of TRP are really frightening for those in LTRs.

Every man faces a Chad. Chad is just the guy who is a rung or two above you in SMV. Even celebrities face "Chad" with their SOs as they rise to and fall from fame.

[–]1cover200 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I haven't. I really can't recall that this happened to me.

Now someone will say it did and I just didn't know it. And what can I say, if they're right I don't know it. But I don't think it's right.

[–]1cover201 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why can't you be a Chad looking for an unattached girl? If Chad is finding that there are no desirable unattached girls, that's a useful datapoint.

Or maybe the Chad type is more attractive to women already in a relationship. Just a thought, no idea why or what it would mean if that is true.

[–]Maaahoney 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

God damn it's post like this that remind me even TRP is full of nerds.

[–]CarlJungler[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Punctuation is hard, it's okay.

[–][deleted] 3 points3 points3 points 11 years ago | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]_eskimo_brothers_3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Use the force young padawan. Use those feelings of hate."

Your past is gone, and will never be known by others unless you tell them. Don't harp on it, your story isn't terribly different from many here. What you do with the rest of your life is up to you, fast track your life into the direction of being a man. You shouldn't feel regret on a daily basis, there are guys who have lived the AFC lifestyle and they just found TRP at the age of 50+. You have plenty of time to turn your life around, but nobody is going to do it for you.

[–]CarlJungler[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I personally think there's a bit of overemphasis on the excessive sexuality portion of TRP. It makes sense since so many of us come from sexually unsuccessful backgrounds, but when you're aware of the huge gap in the way people are treated based on their SMV, you're still set up for success.

[–]George_l_rockwell-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

How short are you? I know a guy who's 5'3, and he actually gets a lot of short girl pussy because he has a really nice face, is extremely smart, and has a lot of hobbies that include things like exercise. No, he's not going to fuck some blonde, Taylor Swift looking girl, but he can grab short girls with no problem at all.

[–]VanityKing2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I'm along a similar road as you, and honestly it feels amazing.
I had a lot of friends in HS because I would always put others before myself.
Somehow, I was led to believe that women liked men who were completely selfless and cared about others before himself.
I think all of us know how much bullshit that lie really is.
In college now and I get a new number or two every week, which is actually more than I expect since I'm in a quasi-monk mode while I'm trying to finish up the last of my bodybuilding routine for the summer.
Don't let the newfound power overcome you gents, there will be a lot of times where you may be tempted to do things that you should not be doing (like actively looking for girls already in a relationship like OP did).
I still feel a little bad about using my roommates bed to bang his date while he went into town to buy her booze, but hey Alpha fucks Beta Bux.

[–]abdada0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

I think we might know each other. Did you work in social services in the southeast for a year?

Great story. Top notch truth from start to finish. The 12 hour rule is 100% correct. Even the 1.2 hour rule. Or the 12 minute rule.

[–]CarlJungler[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Thanks man - and no, unfortunately, I live in the midwest. I suppose my story isn't very unique - I imagine many of the people on this sub especially have undergone (or are undergoing) similar experiences.

[–]abdada2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Chicago guy here.

Most of my posse of male orbiters are Dorkus Hamplanet and I tell them to go keto then leangains and pour their blood and guts into it.

You know what? Fuck you for being tall and allowing yourself to get fat. Fuck the parents and teachers and friends who supported it.

If you ever should meet your past self, punch him in the balls for me. What a waste it would be if you stayed that way.

It is my opinion that the women of the world need the services of the CTs and the DHs both.

[–]CarlJungler[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I'm in Chicago as well. Hamplanets abound.

[–]abdada3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Three genders in Chicago are Male, Female and Mayo.

66% or more are mayo.

[–]Anonymous_Arab 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Haha Chicago bro #3 chiming in. Ask me how many patients I've seen in the hospital that could've had better lives if they were less round

[–]abdada1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

Hospitals lately are just taxpayer sponsored waiting rooms for piano box coffins.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

They're less supported by taxpayers than you would imagine. Even with the nonprofits, most of the funding comes from wildly overcharging those who can pay in order to compensate for those who can't.

[–]abdada0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yup I'm familiar with the over bill situation.

I pay cash on the barrel prenegotiated rates at most clinics. Cheaper than insurance copay sometimes.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Cheaper than insurance co-pay? Jesus. The whole thing is a scam of such epic proportions I literally can't wrap my mind around it.

[–]abdada1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yep.

Also, I was insured for 20 years with max deductible zero claims zero submissions. $66/month as a smoker.

Quit smoking in 2013. ACA hits. Now my insurance is $460.

Finally found an insurer to drop it to $240.

I have never filed a claim ever. Never used a copay. Never did anything but pay cash upfront for a huge discount.

  1. Abs. Low BP. Very fit.

Fucking fatties.

[–][deleted]1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

What's bad about Obamacare is it doesn't even do that much wealth distribution to the old and sick, the purported benficiaries of the whole thing. It mostly goes to the healthcare and insurance companies. Just thinking about it makes me sick.

[–]FALSE_RAPE_AWARENESS 1 points1 points1 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

On the other hand more DH's means less competition for me. Mayo it up guys.

[–]abdada1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Bingo.

Chicago is 66% Mayo, 32.5% Gyny and 1.5% fit dudes. 20:1 ratio.

[–]babyboi120 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

...and a girl breaks out the “I have a boyfriend” line, treat it just as you would last minute sexual resistance

How would you treat last-minute sexual resistance? Ignore it and proceed with your advancements?

[–]CarlJungler[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yep. Unless you have a working moral compass (mine is functioning properly now).

[–]coffee_and_lumber0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I sought out girls in relationships. Girls with boyfriends. Girls with fiancés. Married girls. What I found both bothered and excited me. I use the phrase “drunk with power” intentionally because that’s truly how it feels.

Hoo boy, I had a run of that. When I moved to my current city, I brought my then girlfriend with me. She was a solid 8, maybe 9. We used to hang out at the neighborhood bar, and this one particularly friendly woman who hung out there showed obvious interest. The gf definitely raised my SMV to this woman. Fast forward a year, year and a half and I've kicked the girlfriend to the curb. This neighbor woman was only maybe a 6 or so, but had that good dirty down for anything vibe to her. She also had a boyfriend. A jealous, BP boyfriend. Who fucking hated me, mainly because her interest in me was obvious and my disregard for his existence was just as obvious. I found I just. did. not. give a fuck, and in fact, him being around was even more motivation for me to corner her in the bar bathroom, sometimes to make out with her, sometimes to make her suck my dick, which she did rather enthusiastically. Being the bad guy is fucking fun sometimes.

[–]1cover200 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Aren't there single girls enough for the hanging Chads out there? I don't get the point of going for a girl who's already in a relationship, does that make her more desirable to you? If so you're acting like a woman, Chad, by looking for social proof!

Reverse the genders and realize how much women hate and fear other women who are homewreckers -- since this is typical FEMALE behavior, Chad.

[–]squatch1968 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think this character you have created is the guy YOU want to be with.

[–]ChadThundercockII-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Dad, is that you ?

Jokes aside. If a girl is married, do you need to give her more attention or treat her like other girls ?

[–]CarlJungler[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well it's the short game with married/engaged chicks. It's mostly opportunistic, and almost every "success" I had in that arena was by meeting randoms at bars/clubs. Bachelorette parties are a gold mine.

Apart from that, the game is the same because the girls are the same. They've locked down their BB, but despite the ring, many are Alpha widows who still crave that AF.

[–]1cover200 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Bachelorette parties are gold mines because there are sets on spades, those girls not getting married and especially those without guys are really feeling it, competitive with the others at the party (they'll compete with them for the bouquet the bride tosses in a few days), and so the mood is perfect to get the OTHER girls.

Not the bride, you moron.

[–]CarlJungler[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you think only single girls attend bachelorette parties?

The bride-to-be isn't the target, it's her married or engaged friends who are also at the party who are looking to compete with the single girls and show they're still "fun".

[–]ChadThundercockII0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Interesting. I'll keep that in mind.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter