Some nice statistics about US population - is it easy to be a 0.1% man?

Red_Faust · 2017-09-06T14:03:03+00:00

And the older you are, the less competition you have.

Basically from what I've seen, the majority of 40+ yo men are out of the game. Even if they are single they don't lift or take care of their social skills.

Every girl consistently says I'm 5 years younger than I really am.

Of course, if you go for really younger girls (I've been with a 21 yo last year, and another 21 yo this year, among others more near my age), the stronger your competition, those younger men they tend to hook up with.

But who doesn't love a challenge? ;)

rpwunder · 2017-09-06T15:02:13+00:00

This doesn't mean you are in the "top" percent. It means you are whittling down the population of people who don't match your exact characteristics.

Filling out all my info correctly, I was able to wittle down to a population size of 1 person. I guess that's me. Doesn't mean I am "better" than everyone else. Just means I am the only person with all of those characteristics that I selected.

slumdog-millionaire · 2017-09-06T15:09:03+00:00

I'm gonna call BS.

I played around with the website. It isn't anywhere near granular enough to accurately determine your SMV, and that’s not its intended purpose. It just tells you what percent of people are similar to what you described.

On paper, I could be perfect.

I could be 6'4", have a PhD with an expected annual take home of $300,000 with 7 figures in the bank and a 9 inch dick, but it doesn't take into account my face is busted beyond belief, I'm currently jobless and I have a 3 inch girth.

Conversely, I could have no high school education, be unemployed, and have an average 6 inch long dick, but I'm worth 3 billion, have honorary degrees from universities, the bone structure/face of a Greek god and a dick thicker than Greek yogurt.

Both cases are closer to statistical outliers than they are to the norm, but my point is that numbers are only part of the story, and this site is giving you a very incomplete story.

MattyAnon · 2017-09-06T17:06:14+00:00

TRP cares about "top" as in "maximum SMV".

The problem with your stats:

are a single heterossexual male of any race;

Single negative affects your SMV, and doesn't exclude you from women desirability. We are competing with married men, men with boyfriends, men seeing multiple FWBs.

As such, if we're talking "top", then single is irrelevant.

have more than 18 years old and less than 54;

Problem here is that this is approx half the population, but it's the only half that counts. You need to be top WITHIN the dateable demographic. You are competing with Chad age 25, not his grandfather.

earn more than 14k per year and at least stepped into a college;

Betabucks.

You have more chances to get laid if you're an unemployed drug dealer or a bar tender than if you're a doctor.

has a healthy weight;

I buy this as important.

workout at least 75 minutes per week;

This is NOT relevant. Working out 75 mins per week helps with muscle and weight, and we already included weight above. In terms of SMV, you are better off slim and never going to the gym than fat and working out 3 hours a day.

don't have children;

Children negatively affect your relationship value, not your SMV.

Because a 19-25 year old single childless woman that exercises at least 75 minutes per week and is in a healthy weight is only 0.18% of American population.

Much narrower age ranger, so of course it's a smaller number.

It's fucking easy, actually.

Well no. If all this was true, then being a microdicked dwarf would make you a top 0.35% man and you'd get laid like a rockstar.

Reality is this: whatever dating pool exists for her, you have to excel in it. Her pool consists of "men who will approach in person or on social media who she can verify is both attractive and safe enough to risk a sexual encounter with and won't fall for her shit tests". Those are her options. That's your competition. No more, no less.

francisco_DANKonia · 2017-09-06T14:19:58+00:00

I'm calling BS on this. I put my stats in and found only 9000 men better than me in every way. There is no way that is true

Toxicbutt · 2017-09-06T14:45:17+00:00

It's all about perspective. Nice find OP.

CHAD_J_THUNDERCOCK · 2017-09-06T15:26:10+00:00

This calculator is hugely flawed. It assumes all variables are independent.

I put in some stats like "100k income, white, 6 inch dick, postgrad degree, 6ft tall, healthy weight + exercise".

Only 557 in America fulfill these requirements.

Well I know at least 250 (though I dont know their dick sizes).

If you come from a rich family then you likely will be born taller, have an easier route to college, and probably exercise a bit.

Jammku · 2017-09-07T02:30:21+00:00

Find a Profitable Niche Easy

Needs more explaining here.

xzMalware_ · 2017-09-06T19:27:13+00:00

This has encouraged me to go lift right now.

RoMSie · 2017-09-06T19:54:18+00:00

This makes me sad to see so many people are that disfunctional.

[deleted] · 2017-09-06T16:49:35+00:00

I don't think this is accurate whatsoever.

Woujo · 2017-09-06T18:38:43+00:00

There is no database where this information is stored so this site is just a gag site just making shit up.

ex_addict_bro · 2017-09-06T20:22:07+00:00

WTF, recently that LARP-TRP guy, now this shite. Reported.

mbillion · 2017-09-06T21:27:46+00:00

I would like to see your math - you are not even close

Piano1987 · 2017-09-06T16:25:22+00:00

I'm curios how much % you'll get if you look for a HB10

burnta11 · 2017-09-06T17:53:23+00:00

It would be interesting to see some bare minimum combinations that still fit the 80/20 rule.

mental_models · 2017-09-06T20:19:52+00:00

my own pseudo-science interpretation.

TYPES = characteristics

'wealthy redpill' = 440,000 members (open/poly, over $100k, over 18yo, idgaf about the rest)

'natural/chad' = 830,000 members (anypill, 19-34, healthy weight, tall, bigDick, idgaf about the rest)

TRP 'self-improved members only' = 300,000 members (open/poly, 19-54, >$25ksalary, healthy weight, at least 150min moderate or more exercise)

Total = ~1.6 Million. (assuming no overlap, but I'm not getting paid for this) Saying that this 1.6 Million reps the 20 side of pareto... then the total pool of actual competition would be around 8 Million.

the top 20% (the 1.6M) would then have it's own pareto, where the highest SMV 320,000 members ruling the roost.

those 320k represent the top 4% of the 8 Million 'competition' group.

eesports10 · 2017-09-06T21:46:32+00:00

I put in all of my stats and it says there is 0 people who fit the criteria lol.

yessum447 · 2017-09-06T21:51:03+00:00

You're just introducing the pool in which we must compete. Nothing special about being in this pool of people, in order to be successful you have to be better than all/most of these people.

e_z_p_z_ · 2017-09-06T22:34:31+00:00

there's no fucking way <1% of the US population fits that criteria.

edit: says there are a grand total of ~350 males in the entire country who are 19-25, white, went to college, make 50-70k, and have a dick over 6 inches....

[deleted] · 2017-09-06T22:54:58+00:00

The hardest part of the red pill, for me, is realizing that only a handful of men in the world are threats and the rest of the 7 billion people are just trash mobs.

nazis_are_socialists · 2017-09-06T16:33:40+00:00

So only 0.014% of men in the US are aged 19-54 and make as much or more money than me, and have the same or better level degree than me, and lift and are a healthy weight, and are interested in women, and are as tall or taller than me, and have a dick longer than mine.

Seems like a pretty small percentage...I'm not sure if these numbers are accurate.

gaki123 · 2017-09-06T18:48:59+00:00

You should be above 100 iq to post

PantsonFire1234 · 2017-09-06T21:05:32+00:00

That's utter bullshit. I'm always top 10% wherever I go nowadays until I find myself in a concentrated place where all high value men gather. Be it a party, big event, football match finals or just Tinder or some shit. Suddenly you are bordering on 20%.

The problem today is that everything is connected and you are basically competing with every male on the planet. Even if only 10 guys per country outrank you. That's stil 10 x 150+ = 1500+ men who your bitch can leave you for because "I don't need you asshole!". And on and on it goes.

Women ofcourse likewise are competing fiercely. But unlike them men are much more realistic about their sexual options. Which means that men generally figure out around their mid twenties whats doable. While women chase the magic dragon until they hit the wall.

Again hardly any women ever gets with a +5% guy. But that won't deter her from trying and being an absolute cunt to any guy who is actually within her league.

Leviticus59 · 2017-09-06T17:38:10+00:00

B.S.

I entered my own stats and it says there's only 13,XXX guys better than me. Hell, there's probably more than that in my own metro area.

francisco_DANKonia · 2017-09-06T14:14:38+00:00

WTF. I'm in the top .35%? That's nuts.

Title	Some nice statistics about US population - is it easy to be a 0.1% man?
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	190
Comments	104
Date	September 6, 2017 1:52 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/6yfqq5/some_nice_statistics_about_us_population_is_it/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/some-nice-statistics-about-us-population-is-it.45812 https://theredarchive.com/post/45812

Comments