I recently watched The Red Pill for the first time in my life, and I noticed that I had a similar experience as the author herself: What the MRAs said sounded right, but it did not feel right. Even though male shelters sound like something that should definitely be supported, the idea still feels somewhat ridiculous. When I imagine a group of men sitting in a circle and discussing men's issues, I immediately get the thought: "Guys, what are you doing? You're supposed to be riding horses, wearing armor and slaying dragons or something."

For feminists, my diagnosis would be clear: I have male stereotypes that can be categorized as toxic masculinity. Now let's accept their terminology for a moment and say that is true. As I understand, feminism is supposed to help men liberate themselves from this toxic masculinity – but does it, really? Feminists perpetuate the idea that men are privileged, and therefore men's issues do not really exist (cf. this cartoon). Instead, if men want to help social justice and equality, they are supposed to be allies to the feminist movement and learn that the real issues that are causing their distress are their own misogyny and their aggrieved entitlement.

If you're stuck deep in this narrative, it may be hard to realize how much of a punch in the face that statement is to men. When it comes to women, feminists constantly emphasize their "lived experience", but apparently the perception of men does not matter at all. As men's issues are not really discussed in left-wing politics, I never cared about them that much, but invalidating them goes one step further than just ignoring them.

Even though I personally do not feel very strong, the assertion that I have all that privilege makes me think that I'm supposed to be strong because I am a man, and that other men are also strong. This is pretty much what feminists call "toxic masculinity", but I do not think they realize how they contribute to it. Now I do not like that term after all; if women confront each other with unhelpful gender stereotypes, feminists would call it "internalized misogyny". Thus, for some symmetry, I propose to use the term "internalized misandry" when talking to feminists. I know that some out there have good intentions, so maybe it will get them thinking.

It is hard to accuse someone of hating men and feminists go pretty defensive, but why not try doing as they say, show some weakness, and explain: "This narrative invalidates my lived experience as a man and fuels some misandrist thoughts inside me, leading to exactly those stereotypes that you aim to combat. I want to join you doing that, but you have to hear my side of the story."