To be clear , Based on studies conducted in molecular anthropology we know that more female lineages have survived compared to male lineages. This can occur only when less number of men are passing on the genes to next generation. I believe this can give insight into the Environmental condition of avg men (hypergam y,war deaths, cuckoldry)in the past and this can be used as counter argument against feminist stance that "Men are historically previlaged".

I think this can help us put forward a statement that irrespective of geography and culture women have intrensic value , where as worth of men is based on what he can bring to the society.

My belief is different groups were previlaged at different point of time based on prevailing socio-economic and environmental conditions. Even when men seemed previlaged it was only enjoyed few percentage of men in upper echlon and vast majority of men had it worse.

What is your opinion ?