TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Female yoga teacher cut boyfriend's private part

MRA-Sid

November 28, 2021
197 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.newsncr.com/national/rajasthan-female-yoga-teacher-cut-boyfriends-private-part-in-jaipur-called-later-and-said-sorry-a-mistake-has-been-made/?
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Female yoga teacher cut boyfriend's private part
Author

MRA-Sid

Upvotes 197
Comments 49
Date November 28, 2021 11:58 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/r42sax/female_yoga_teacher_cut_boyfriends_private_part/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/female-yoga-teacher-cut-boyfriends-private-part.1086131
https://theredarchive.com/post/1086131
Red Pill terms in post
MRA
Top posts by MRA-Sid

Johnny Depp and Alec Baldwin slam 'inhumane' court system and 'gender bias'

2973 upvotes
June 25, 2021
/r/MensRights

Student admits falsely accusing several men of rape. Judge refuses to punish her.

2918 upvotes
January 9, 2020
/r/MensRights

Best, loyal, trustworthy, honest, loving, caring friend of a man

2816 upvotes
September 17, 2019
/r/MGTOW

Man battles ‘severe’ burns after wife pours boiling oil on his face for returning late from work - Men can’t file domestic violence case since law is only for women

2776 upvotes
January 6, 2021
/r/MensRights

Wife stabs husband after seeing her younger self in old photos, thought he was cheating

2635 upvotes
January 24, 2021
/r/MensRights

Outrage as Finnish Court Orders Man to Pay Alimony for Child That Resulted From His Wife Cheating

1846 upvotes
October 19, 2020
/r/MensRights

Innocent until proven guilty Laws made to protect women shouldn’t be used to exploit men. 498A is most misused law.

1367 upvotes
March 14, 2019
/r/MensRights

Nurturing a toxic demon

862 upvotes
November 21, 2019
/r/MGTOW

Comments

[–]bob4256 62 points63 points64 points 4 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link

Doctors in America kill roughly 2 infant boys by cutting their dicks with a knife every week.

[–]TrilIias 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (31 children) | Copy Link

source?

[–]18Apollo18 41 points42 points43 points 4 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

This study finds that more than 100 neonatal circumcision-related deaths (9.01/100,000) occur annually in the United States, about 1.3% of male neonatal deaths from all causes. Because infant circumcision is elective, all of these deaths are avoidable

[–]TrilIias 18 points19 points20 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

https://circumcisionnews.blogspot.com/2010/05/fatally-flawed-bollingers-circumcision.html

I'm fully against non-consensual circumcision, but this link calls that source into question.

[–]bob4256 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

There has been over 100 million infant males circumcised in the USA throughout history and we are supposed to believe this unnecessary surgery has never killed anyone ever..... meanwhile people have written about how their baby died from circumcision.

[–]TrilIias -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't doubt that circumcision has killed baby boys, and any non-zero number of unnecessary and avoidable deaths is too many for me.

I'm just wondering about specific numbers. How many and how often? For all I know, Jake from the link I provided is totally wrong about Dan Bollinger's 117 annual deaths figure, but I don't know. Maybe someone else does.

[–]bob4256 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Zero people know how many people die from circumcision around the world throughout history. In America its all covered up. Why would a doctor ever say yes I killed your son via circumcision. There is zero benefit to admit this. They just blame parents for not taking care of the wound.

[–]needletothebar 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

who is jake and why should we take his blog seriously?

[–]TrilIias 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why should anyone take anything seriously? If not a blog, then what? It's not as if academia has proven to be especially credible. I don't care how seriously you want to take Jake or any other random blogger, I'm interested in his arguments, not him. If his arguments are weak then fine, dismiss him. But are they?

[–]Skinnyguy202 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is “Jake” -the guy that wrote the paper- pro circumcision? By reading his comments… it seems so.

[–]needletothebar 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

yes, your blog calls a peer-reviewed study into question. LOL

[–]TrilIias 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well frankly, I have well over a dozen studies I still need to read whenever I manage to find the time, so I'm not really able to read through Dan Bollinger's paper, but it's very often cited by MRAs and Intactivists, and I've seen the blog's arguments against Bollinger's research used by others. Regardless of the source, if the blog is right it would be pretty embarrassing for MRAs, but wouldn't justify non-consensual circumcision, nor would it prove that there aren't a significant number of baby boys being killed each year by circumcision. Still, it would give us good reason to stop citing that research.

If, however, someone who is familiar with Bollinger's research is aware of the criticisms made by the blog and finds the blogs arguments to be weak, this would be a good opportunity to explain how.

[+]Gaiinahat -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

According to the NCBI:

The only study which presents the contrary data on the circumcision-related death has estimated that approximately 9.01/100,000 neonatal circumcision-related deaths occur annually in the United States. This study has been shown to have no credibility, as it was based on an assumption that the difference in annual death rate between male and female infants was entirely due to circumcision-related deaths. Morris and co-authors in their recent study showed that the sex difference in infant mortality was similar for countries having low and high infant circumcision rates.

Source

[–]Skinnyguy202 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Circumcision is a relatively safe procedure with a low rate of complication which ranges from 0.19%-3.1%.[1] The majority of complications are minor and treatable.

A relatively safe procedure that harms boys and puts them in an extreme amount of pain.. This seems to be a “the benefit outweighs the risks” type of thing, although, I may be wrong.

[+]Gaiinahat -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Just quoting the science. Debunking the myths.

[–]Frosty-Gate-8094 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here is a piece of science for you.

https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/969643-overview#a1

For male infants, neonatal circumcision substantially decreases the risk of UTI. Schoen et al found that during the first year of life, the rate of UTI was 2.15% in uncircumcised boys, versus 0.22% in circumcised boys. Risk is particularly high during the first 3 months of life; Schaikh et al reported that in febrile boys younger than 3 months, UTI was present in 2.4% of circumcised boys and in 20.1% of uncircumcised boys.

Here's another study.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18838417/

This suggests that UTI incidence in boys peak in the immediate posts circumcision period.

You mentioned that complication rates of circumcision is 0.19-3.1%.
The risk of UTI fall from 2 to 0.2%..

The difference isn't enough to justify a surgical procedure..

UTI in boys can be treated with antibiotics the same way they are treated in girls...

The benefits of reducing UTI cancels out the risks associated with surgery itself..
In the long run, there are psychological issues and problem with sexual functions which affect over 25-30% circumcised men.

The benefits simply do not outweigh the risks.

This is science 101 for you..

[–]Greg_W_Allan 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Brian Morris again. Please avoid citing claims by sadistic pederasts.

[+]Gaiinahat -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I'll take the credibility of the science from NCBI over your disdain for someone who was accused of guilt by association from anti-circumcision activists, without evidence, was never charged, went to trial, or convicted of any crimes regarding children. But hey, that's just how I roll, you get no hate from me.

[–]Greg_W_Allan 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You call that "science"? Read it again bearing in mind it's produced by folk who profit from the practice.

[–]Gaiinahat -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you have evidence to the contrary that it's not science? I'm always willing to change my perspective given conclusive evidence contrary to my current perspective. Please, feel free to change my mind.

[–]lmaogetbodied32 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Circumcisions always result in complications. Complications are the reason it’s done in the first place. If you do not define complications as loss of sensitivity, or the ablation of multiple reflexes, then it’s easy to throw around the fact that it doesn’t result in complications.

Brian Morris has been relentlessly criticised by the scientific community due to his false interpretation of data and false methodology. He also pays junk publishers that have no real peer review process to shit out these pseudoscientific articles.

Ironic how you are in a men’s rights sub and support one of the most common human rights violations subject to men

[–]Gaiinahat -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Circumcisions always result in complications. Complications are the
reason it’s done in the first place. If you do not define complications
as loss of sensitivity, or the ablation of multiple reflexes, then it’s
easy to throw around the fact that it doesn’t result in complications.

This is an excellent point that I cannot disagree with. That raises the question of who is it that defines what is considered to be "complications"? Is loss of sensitivity defined as a "complication"? Who decided that it was or was not?

Brian Morris has been relentlessly criticised by the scientific
community due to his false interpretation of data and false methodology.
He also pays junk publishers that have no real peer review process to
shit out these pseudoscientific articles.

Sources on this, please. Sounds fascinating.

Ironic how you are in a men’s rights sub and support one of the most common human rights violations subject to men

First of all, let me be clear on my position here. I'm not a supporter of circumcision. Just because I'm not anti-circumcision, doesn't mean I'm pro-circumcision. I believe in looking at the facts, weighing the positives and negatives, and deciding whether or not the procedure is the in the best interest of the person involved.

Once again, that begs the question, who is it that decided circumcision is a human rights violation? Why hasn't it been made illegal?

[–]needletothebar 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326040454_Factors_Associated_With_Early_Deaths_Following_Neonatal_Male_Circumcision_in_the_United_States_2001-2010

[–]bob4256 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Just Google how many babies die from circumcision. Google doctors opposing circumcision. Information is extremely easy to find.

[+]MiddleReasonable647 -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

One study found zero deaths in circumcisions in America over a 10 year period. Babies do not die of circumcision. I would cite the article but my citations get deleted here.

[–]needletothebar 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

you made that up. no such study exists.

[–]MiddleReasonable647 -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Yes it does. Use google scholar.

[–]needletothebar 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

i've looked. it's not real.

[+]MiddleReasonable647 -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It’s real. The claim that 200 infants die annually in the US from circumcision is a total fabrication. They called at all mortality of infants in the postop circumcision period deaths due to circumcision to arrive at those numbers. Actual cause of death is never the circumcision procedure per se. (Never meaning over a 10 year period none were seen. It could happen, but it would be so rare as to be “never”.).
If 200 kiddos died annually, you can bet that parents would have stopped circumcision a looong time ago. I have never heard of a death from that procedure. Never.

[–]needletothebar 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[citation needed].

[–]bob4256 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I personally am unaware of this study. Let's just say its real. Was it a study done at 1 hospital or 1 area? I could definitely see a scenario in which zero babies died from circumcision at a top rated hospital in Alaska but one of the many problems with circumcision is that it is global. The penis is a highly vascularized organ. When it is cut it bleeds unless the cut is more of a clamp. Which is extremely painful. Also remember this has been going on for thousands of years. Do you honestly believe thousands of babies have somehow NOT died from infection thousands of years ago? The true death count from cutting baby genitals throughout history is probably insane. If a baby died from circumcision thousands of years ago they could just say it was the devil. If a baby dies from circumcision now they can call it a hundred different things.There are a ton of studies supporting circumcision because they make money from circumcision. Studies can be easily manipulated by money. Human are manipulated by money. Circumcision makes money. Admitting circumcision is bad is very unprofitable and unpopular.

[–]Rarefatbeast 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

2 is not that high considering the population. But then again, I think death from childbirth in the US isn't that high either relatively speaking to other things.

Same goes for police deaths on duty, and black males being killed by police unarmed.

That said, for something that is absolutely avoidable, 2 deaths a week is too much..

[–]Rhum-runner 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Best argument against it and somehow this is the first time I’ve came across this info.

[–]bob4256 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The majority of people have absolutely no idea about this.

[–]Jimmy5772 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This would be laughed at by a lot of women thinking “good on her”…..”the arsehole must have deserved it” or “ haha whata crazy lady”

But lets flip it…….. “Male fitness instructer cut girlfreinds private parts”

Now its not so funny is it.

I love flipping a story and see how differently society would react

[–]Mythandros 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have to be honest, cutting off someone's genitals should result in a life sentence with no chance of release, either that or execution.

This kind of crime is disgusting, repulsive and should be punished as harshly as murder.

[–]StudentOfTheTruth0 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

India is an absolute feminist shithole for men to live in, I can only feel sorry for Indian men. It made me especially livid to say

"A surprising case has come to light in Jaipur, the capital of Rajasthan."

Imagine if a man had cut off the private parts of an unconscious woman. Would this crap newspaper, or any media anywhere in the world, describe it as "SURPRISING". As opposed to brutal, criminal, barbaric?

Just a note to this editorial board: you may be surprised by it by I am not. I have heard so, so many similar stories of female brutality. No, there is nothing surprising about this.

An infamous American one is this one:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G6_klWFzzgw

Note also the audience's reactions and BTW Sharon Osbourne stayed on the show after this.

Surprising, my behind. Routine female behaviour.

[–]Jolt_Ready_95 52 points53 points54 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What?! That bitch deserves nothing less than death penalty! We know very well that it will be highly laughed at by many people because they want to promote misandry as much as they can. This is no simple thing!

This is sexual assault but much worse. But some people are so immature that they find this funny. So for such idiots, I tell them to reverse the genders to see how terrible it is.

[–]bludragon355 28 points29 points30 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When people have to reverse the genders to see how terrible it is, it just shows you how sexist the world is.

[–]Kinexity 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Nah bro. Death penalty is not cool. However putting her in a silenced room with no stimuli for 50 years to make her brain turn over time into complete mush - now that's some high level punishment.

[–]dungeonmonkey69 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oath. Break her slow

[–]nikogetsit 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She seems too dangerous to be in society, lock her up.

[–]Kaylarmagic 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A crime this severe should be life in prison. What a fucking psychopath.

[–]CDewfus 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No wonder guys have trouble trusting girls nowadays

[–]Alarming_Jicama2979 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The body never forgets trauma. It’s locked away inside the CNS( central nervous system)

[–]sleepyJoeBidet 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do she tried to blame this in b something she did in her sleep ?

After drugging him.

Right........

Does Pakistan have the death penalty ?

[–]rabel111 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Lets call this what it is. Sexual mutilation. Its a hate crime and deserves severe punishment.

[–]Rachel794 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She deserves to be severely punished and face consequences

[–]No-Feedback7437 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is assault and no matter what he did doesn't justify this action

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter