In Kenya 35,000 boys have been circumcised in vans like this one without parental consent. Parental consent is required by law for medical male circumcision up to the age of 18. Some of the boys that have been circumcised were under 10. This negative outcome is being ignored by the US backed WHO

Itrusttheinternett · 2021-11-21T15:37:49+00:00

Source: https://newsfounded.com/kenya/35000-boys-get-the-cut-without-parental-consent-the-standard/

"Circumcision has been repeatedly proven harmful and to have very limited medical benefit. The VMMC Drive (Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Drive) in Africa has shown no appreciable, attributable benefits (5) in a recent review. Here are direct quotes from a study published in nature 26 October 2021:

"As summarized above, surveillance data indicate that HIV incidence was declining in most of the priority ESA countries before the large-scale rollout of VMMC began [12,13,14]. Moreover, these data provide no evidence of substantial changes in the downward trending trajectories of HIV incidence to support the argument that VMMC has had a significant role in reducing HIV infections in priority countries. Although a recent systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that VMMC is “an important evidence-based intervention for the control of generalized HIV epidemics”, [9] as presented below, we did not find convincing evidence that VMMC has had a significant effect on reducing HIV incidence at the population level."

"Borgdorff et al. [25] used data from a health and demographic surveillance system (HDSS) in Kenya to determine trends in HIV prevalence and incidence between 2011 and 2016. They found that, overall, HIV incidence declined over the surveillance period. They also found that while having a circumcised male partner was protective for women and girls, the protective effect of circumcision was not significant for incident HIV infection among men and boys. Borgdorff et al. [25] concluded that “the decline of HIV prevalence and incidence cannot be directly attributed to increasing ART and VMMC coverage. Other explanatory factors might include the natural history of the HIV epidemic in eastern Africa, which showed declines of HIV incidence even before the onset of large-scale ART use and expanding VMMC coverage”. This claim is consistent with the data presented in the preceding section and, as further illustrated below by Makhema et al. [26], suggests that there are likely many factors responsible for reductions in HIV incidence where they occur, and it is simplifying and misleading to assert (since the evidence is weak) that VMMC initiatives are a major determinant among these factors."

Studies have recently been released where 800,000 Belgium men were studied (3,500 circumcised), and those that were circumcised had a significantly greater chance of acquiring STIs (6).

"In this national cohort study spanning more than three decades of observation, non-therapeutic circumcision in infancy or childhood did not appear to provide protection against HIV or other STIs in males up to the age of 36 years. Rather, non-therapeutic circumcision was associated with higher STI rates overall, particularly for anogenital warts and syphilis."

Another recent study with 500,000 participants in Ontario, Canada, also found no link between circumcision and HIV (7)."

Source of text: https://www.reddit.com/r/OneY/comments/qm4uq4/a\_copy\_pasta\_essay\_i\_made\_about\_circumcision/

Studies: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34564796/

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34551593/

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41443-021-00484-x

MixedKid05 · 2021-11-21T22:59:41+00:00

Disgusting, forcing this on children, of course this is all supported by America, and people like Bill Gates and the Clintons, because of some questionable study done in Uganda, which supposedly showed a 1.3 percent difference in HIV rates between intact and cut men.

Studies in Canada and Europe saw no difference, studies done in other African countries generally saw no difference either, though saw some an increase of HIV in circumcised males. Of course those are ignored by the WHO and UN, because it doesn’t fit their agenda.

rabel111 · 2021-11-22T02:48:21+00:00

Circumcision without consent is a serious sexual assault of a minor. Are the WHO workers responsible going to be brought to justice? Or are they going to be protected child rapists of the WHO

FurherJordy229 · 2021-11-22T00:10:01+00:00

Wtf bro that's creepy. That van is used to cut off pieces of boy's penises.

ThePigmanAgain · 2021-11-21T22:58:57+00:00

"circumcised"

You misspelled "mutilated."

Physical_Impact4086 · 2021-11-22T02:04:25+00:00

Fuck the WHO.

hehimCA · 2021-11-22T01:15:41+00:00

Disgusting. Thanks for posting.

sleepyJoeBidet · 2021-11-22T00:16:00+00:00

Better in the van then on some rock in the middle of a field.

Kenznottz · 2021-11-21T19:39:15+00:00

This has nothing to do with mens rights, why is this here?

Comments