TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

The Trolling Panic Exposed - The Net is Not a Hostile Place for Women

Imnotmrabut

June 13, 2018
93 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/the-truth-behind-the-trolling-panic/21498#.WyGaQxnTWyV
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title The Trolling Panic Exposed - The Net is Not a Hostile Place for Women
Author

Imnotmrabut

Upvotes 93
Comments 41
Date June 13, 2018 10:34 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/8qwqad/the_trolling_panic_exposed_the_net_is_not_a/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/the-trolling-panic-exposed-the-net-is-not-a.1177387
https://theredarchive.com/post/1177387
Top posts by Imnotmrabut

Girls if you hit, slap, belittle, kick, punch, choke, throw things at, or control your boyfriends, you are the abuser.

17752 upvotes
February 24, 2017
/r/MensRights

Telling a feminist the truth.

6698 upvotes
August 22, 2018
/r/MensRights

Irony Time - The Red Pill Wins "Women In Film Award"

5929 upvotes
May 26, 2017
/r/MensRights

Woman who tortured, killed man was featured speaker at Women's March - guilty of second degree murder and two counts of first degree kidnapping

5059 upvotes
January 24, 2017
/r/MensRights

40% of young men contemplating suicide never tell anyone how they are feeling. #NotEveryDayIsInternationalMensDay

4956 upvotes
November 15, 2016
/r/MensRights

If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your Community

4495 upvotes
May 15, 2017
/r/MensRights

Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds

4262 upvotes
December 28, 2017
/r/MensRights

Ladies And Gentlemen - Feminism, The Circus That Never Ends. P¬))

3849 upvotes
August 26, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]azazelcrowley 28 points29 points30 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I don't doubt that there's a lot of sexist commentary women put up with, it's similar for men. I'm more than happy to talk about that and help them confront it, especially if they are someone who does it for us, but I just can't bring myself to pretend it's as important as institutional or legal discrimination.

The problem is that media presents it as disproportionately something women put up with, whereas the study shows, that's not the case and it's about equal. Are women prepared for this to be yet another issue where mens experience is erased and female supremacy is advanced, until some decades later when feminists will blame patriarchy for men not being covered?

[–]tenchineuro 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The problem is that media presents it as disproportionately something women put up with

That's because *everything* affects women more, somehow.

World to End Tomorrow: Women and minorities hardest hit.

[–]turbulance4 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Hijacking the top comment for anyone who wants a direct link to the pew study instead of the Spiked op-ed

http://www.pewinternet.org/2017/07/11/experiencing-online-harassment/

[–]goodmod[M] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Why not make a separate post of it?

[–]turbulance4 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Good idea, I suppose... Just didn't think of it.

Honestly I kind of get mildly upset when there are 7 posts about the same story. I'd prefer to have 1 place where we can keep all the conversation about a specific topic. I know Reddit isn't really set up that way tho...

[–]goodmod 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You can post a copy at https://www.reddit.com/r/MRRef/

[–]SpareAnimalParts 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why do I get the feeling that a lot of the time when someone says they're a feminist online, any criticism, any discussion that doesn't automatically agree with their viewpoint, and any attempt to disprove their claims is called "trolling"?

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well to be fair, it diverts from actually having to engage in debate and defend the point... much easier to just call dissent trolling. To me, attacking a differing opinion or stance that is otherwise civilly expressed amounts to an admission that a stance cannot be defended.

[–]GreyTortoise 13 points14 points15 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

The net is a hostile place. You can be buying fifty dildos one second and have your card info stolen to have a thousand dildos bought and shipped to your house the following month.

Joking aside, it has always been a place for hostilities to be encountered and dealt with as a norm. Anonymity is a dangerous thing to provide for an entire community and have it be the standard at all times. If you don't know who you're around, you don't know what's going around.

[–]PIG_CUNT 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What did you do with the dildos? Asking for a friend

[–]1212121014 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I agree. All that you can do is walk away when someone tries to escalate an interaction.

[–]PIG_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Have you looked around reddit? There’s definitely a second option...

www.trolino.com/image?id=108767

[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

www.trolino.com/image?id=108767

Cute, in my opinion no internet argument has ever been won.

https://xkcd.com/386/

[–]PIG_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

My point is that it IS another option, and many people engage in it.

[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

My point is that it IS another option, and many people engage in it.

I argue with people on the interwebs, I think anyone who posts in any forum or comment section of an article does so occasionally. I'm just not silly enough to think I've won, even when looking at the exchange it looks like I did.

But winning aside, I don't think these discussions are without value. Sometimes I argue against something and later, sometimes years later I see that I was wrong. It's even possible that I have helped change the minds of some posters on some issues, but I'm not gonna assert that as a fact.

[–]PIG_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That’s all irrelevant to my point. My point is that it is another option. It’s untrue to say the ONLY thing you can do is to walk away.

[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

That’s all irrelevant to my point. My point is that it is another option. It’s untrue to say the ONLY thing you can do is to walk away.

Ok, that's correct. You can escalate also, you can continue to be calm and defend your point, you can concede the point, you can apologize and genuflect. There are lots of options. But once the other poster has escalated, they probably won't back down so you will be part of a verbal slugfest either fighting back or being a punching bag.

And I think that was the point, when it reaches that stage, unless you enjoy pointless argument for it's own sake, walking away is probably the simplest and best option.

[–]PIG_CUNT 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Exactly: walking away isn’t the only option. Which is all I’ve been saying all along.

[–]tenchineuro 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Exactly: walking away isn’t the only option. Which is all I’ve been saying all along.

Yeah, but I've got something to do now, so I'm walking away. :-)

[–]PIG_CUNT1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Thank god

[–]marcooni1 11 points12 points13 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"Jess Phillips called for social-media trolls to lose their anonymity online, and told of how she had received 600 rape threats on Twitter in one evening. " One thing always amazes me. When people say that they get hundreds of rape and death threats. How the hell they know that there are hubdreds of them or 600 like Phillips allegedly got? Did she counted them one by one or can you sort them all out by word or she just did 1,2,3,600.

[–]Clemicus 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

The claim seems to be from when Sargon tweeted, 'I wouldn't even rape you' (The Daily Mail article from October 2016 uses a screenshot). That was treated as a threat. The number was either made up or someone inflated them.

Notice it doesn't mention when this took place or by whom. Philip is trying manipulate in the hope to try and bring about new laws and policies, even though research suggests males and Tories receive the most abuse online.

Tweet dump: https://github.com/HedleyPty/Jess-Phillips-was-not-raped-

June 2018: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-birmingham-44438468

August 2017: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4825206/Labour-MP-Jess-Phillips-gets-600-rape-threats-one-day.html

August 2017: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/labour-mp-jess-phillips-rape-death-threats-one-day-social-media-attacks-training-a7915406.html?amp

October 2016: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3617766/Labour-MP-Jess-Phillips-receives-600-rape-threats-just-days-launching-campaign-end-online-sexist-bullying.html

May 2016: https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/jess-phillips-rape-threats-twitter_uk_574d95c6e4b03e9b9ed6262c?guccounter=1

May 2016 (Reclaim the Internet campaign): https://m.huffingtonpost.co.uk/jess-phillips/online-abuse-women_b_10133700.html

http://www.reclaimtheinternet.com/about/

[–]goodmod[M] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This would make a good post on its own.

[–]thrway_1000 22 points23 points24 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They love to claim victimhood.

Archive -- https://archive.is/sZbSK

[–]PIG_CUNT -4 points-3 points-2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Whoa, you’re off base there. Feminists certainly seem to love to claim victimhood. But to attribute that to women is the height of sexism.

Most women don’t see themselves as victims nor do they see men as oppressors.

A very small but vocal minority of women see ALL women, not just themselves, as victims, and ALL (#YesAllMen) as oppressors.

Please don’t mistake the two. That’s misogynistic and unwelcome here.

[–]tenchineuro 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They love to claim victimhood.

Whoa, you’re off base there. Feminists certainly seem to love to claim victimhood. But to attribute that to women is the height of sexism.

He said "they", not 'women'.

Most women don’t see themselves as victims nor do they see men as oppressors.

Do you have a source for this?

[–]AloysiusC 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

My theory on the whole harassment racket is that women are used to being treated significantly better than men. It's been shown that people view treating women equally to men as sexist against women. And when that's all you know, then you don't register it as preferential (privilege blindness is another projection btw.)

But the internet (especially in the early years) is very anonymous. That makes it more egalitarian in a way. So women perceive the internet to be far more hostile than real life because it's equal or just slightly better treatment as opposed to outright preferential treatment. Then they wrongly conclude that it's sexist and hostile toward women.

[–]i_reckon_not 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably about time to post this old chestnut again: There Are No Girls on The Internet

[–]tetsugakusei 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Feminism is Puritanism, hence its easy overlaps with a conservative Prime Minister.

But I do think a lot of women anyway have a rather distorted view of the internet. They arrived late. And by the time they arrived they came for the highly sanitised surface internet of Snapchat and Facebook; Reddit is their scariest extreme experience, where they might have to hear a bad word.

This curated internet life parallels with real lives that are also often highly curated; it's not uncommon for a girl to say she just goes with the flow or to follow her boyfriend's hobbies. What they don't recognise is these party invites they receive all over the place or seemingly random suggestions to "come camping with us" are quite strategic seductions by men to get them in their lives. Life just feels like random fun things that just appear in front of them.

Life for many girls is like playing on Level Easy, so they expect the same for the internet.

[–]25511367325325869452 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yup, i can imagine the culture shock when you go from facebook's "you look great hunny! Lovely pictures :33####" into "kill urself faggot" on anon boards

[–]William__F0ster 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Science Festival

Jess Phillips

Two fucking things that should never, ever, appear in the same fucking sentence.

[–]xNOM 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Note to self: Emily Dinsmore. A journalist who actually reports some facts.

[–]girlwriteswhat 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just an FYI to commenters here, the YouTube channel "the glass blind spot" has a BUNCH of in depth videos on this topic (focussing on the UK) that are very good.

[–]Philip8000 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, it's a hostile place for women. It's just that the internet is just as nasty for men, sometimes more so. The internet is just a hostile place, period. There are a lot of assholes and trolls out there, spewing insults and threats because they have nothing better to do with their lives.

[–]hav1t 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I would have agreed if the title said, "The Net is Not a Hostile Place".

[–]benbrum 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

From that Pew study: "Overall, men and women differ modestly in the types of harassment they encounter online. Men are somewhat more likely to be called offensive names (30% vs. 23%) and to receive physical threats online (12% vs. 8%), although other behaviors – like embarrassment, stalking or sustained harassment – show no statistically significant differences by gender. Overall, men are slightly more likely to experience any form of online harassment (44% vs. 37% of women).

Still, sexual harassment is more common among women than among men and is a particular problem for young women. Among adults ages 18 to 29, women are more than twice as likely as men to report experiencing sexual harassment online (21% vs. 9%). And among the youngest adults – those ages 18 to 24 – women are more than three times as likely to be sexually harassed online (20% vs. 6% of men)."

[–]tenchineuro 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Among adults ages 18 to 29, women are more than twice as likely as men to report experiencing sexual harassment online (21% vs. 9%).

I'm just not sure that all reported harassment is real. I've seen lots of women go crazy when you say something they don't like, even when it's not about them.

[–]benbrum 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hard to tell anything these days. Social media has an ugly Animal Farm side effect.

[–]tenchineuro 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hard to tell anything these days. Social media has an ugly Animal Farm side effect.

I think it happens at lot in real life too.

[–]womblefish 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Women are much more likely to appeal to authority for support and protection. Therefore even if they both experienced the same levels of harassment, I would expect women's reporting levels to be much higher than men's.

[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women are much more likely to appeal to authority for support and protection.

Why there aughta be a law. :-) Well today, there is.

Therefore even if they both experienced the same levels of harassment, I would expect women's reporting levels to be much higher than men's.

I agree quite soundly, with the caveat that women can lie about this as easy as anything else, there need be no actual harassment.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter