The red pill and that wing of manosphere generally talk about daughters in a very strange manner. If you have spent time in that subculture they seem to advocate raising girls in a very tradcon manner and what to me seems incredibly sex negative. The view of female sexuality in that space from the outside is very toxic. One question that was asked on a panel is if there were two women, a virgin who has a ton of negative personality traites and a woman who has had 1000 of sexual partners and a ton of positive personality traits they chose the virgin. Aside from this being way more analogous to grooming than they accuse the LGBTQI it does seem that those thought leaders push a strange disconnect on sex. Red pill thought leaders are always going after "304's" (a very middle school 80085 type term) and if you look at podcasts like fresh and fit or whatever they treat thebsex workers that come on horribly dispite them probably enjoying thier work very much. Why is the red pill so anti sex work and sex negative while engaging in that behavior? If thier daughter became a sex worker they certainly would cut off contact and they would never enter a long term relationship with a sex worker, but they certainly will have sex with a lot of them. On a side note there is a homophobic streak there that is strange, the view of bisexual men or men who are fine with their partners being with other men (and its only other men not other women) is very counter to what seems to be their goal.

If they were trying to push a view that men should only look for relationships that will end in marriage, and strick monogamy their views would make more sense but thats not what they seem to advance.

So help me understand the disconnect there. Why would raising your daughter to be sex positive and treating sex work as a reasonable career path so negative when those are the exact women these men seemingly want to be with?