696,680 posts

Chivalry’s mortal enemy: Toxic masculinity.

Reddit View
November 21, 2018
32 upvotes
https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2018/10/24/chivalrys-mortal-enemy-toxic-masculinity/


Post Information
Title Chivalry’s mortal enemy: Toxic masculinity.
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 32
Comments 23
Date 21 November 2018 05:56 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/163713
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/9z5jgv/chivalrys_mortal_enemy_toxic_masculinity/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
Dalrockthe red pill
Comments

[–]Modredpillschool[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (3 children) | Copy

I didn’t respect her autonomy, her legal standing and personhood. As pathetic as this may sound, I saw her as my property, to be defined by my name and according to my legal standing. (She kept her name.) While this was not sexual assault, my insistence was a violation of her independence. I had inherited a subtle, yet still violent, form of toxic masculinity.

Take special notice of the fact that feminism has been on the warpath to redefine words to serve themselves. Notice the use of "violent" here, in a case that is distinctly not violent.

This is one of the most common examples of newspeak that they employ.

Want a fun game? Look for newspeak in the world around you. See how they change language to enslave you.

[–]1Imperator_Red 32 points33 points  (4 children) | Copy

Women like being owned. I whisper into my feminist girlfriend's ear that she is my property while I'm fucking her. She goes crazy and tells me she belongs to me and I can do anything I want to her. I tell her not to worry because I'll take good care of her and she thanks me profusely.

Sometimes she gets lippy and says something like, "only in the bedroom though when we're having rough sex." Then I pull my dick out and tease her with just the tip until she apologizes and admits that I own her all the time. There's no reason shit tests can't be fun. I've noticed that if a girl really likes you she sometimes telegraphs her shit tests - like in the case I just mentioned. She's almost grinning when she says it - like she knows it's a shit test, I know it's shit test, and she knows I know it's a shit test. They want you to pass.

Also I know this sounds like a made up TRP fantasy jack off session, but what can I say, it's 100% true. I wouldn't have believed it myself two years ago.

Edit: Ok I have to relay this little anecdote. I sent this article to my gf and apologized for my toxic masculinity. Then I said "this guy's wife definitely imagines other men when they have sex." And she responded "If they have sex."

[–]1Your_Coke_Dealer 11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

Edit: Ok I have to relay this little anecdote. I sent this article to my gf and apologized for my toxic masculinity. Then I said "this guy's wife definitely imagines other men when they have sex." And she responded "If they have sex."

this guy's wife definitely imagines has sex with other men

[–]Bigpimpin42 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Can confirm 100%. I dated a feminist with a Daddy kink and every time we fucked she would lose her shit whenever I called her my little slut or a dirty whore. She would never initiate, but she would start acting like a brat and challeng me until I'd pin her down

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]Senior Contributor: "The Court Jester"GayLubeOil 15 points16 points  (2 children) | Copy

At 100 IQ people don't gather their own information. Consequently if their loaded up with faulty definitions like "toxic masculinity" they will never question the terms on their own.

The language program is constructed at the 120+ range and then run unironicaly bellow 100. If you point out contradictions in the program you will be met with thought terminating cliches.

So basically life in the modern west is a poorly programmed text adventure game

[–]surely_not_a_robot_ 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Consequently if their loaded up with

*Talks about IQ

*Uses wrong 'they're'

[–]SoulRebel99 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

So what if you do your own research and have an IQ around 120 or higher?

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]1Imperator_Red 1 point2 points  (2 children) | Copy

Pretty much this. Although I don't really understand what you are saying with the mothering instinct and neoteny thing.

[–] points points | Copy

[permanently deleted]

[–]donquixoteesq 2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

This. To be a gentleman it is implied that you have power to be an asshole but you decide to behave as a protector because of your noble morals.

[–]awakenedspirit1 11 points12 points  (0 children) | Copy

I used to think the same thing. "Progressive" ideas. Women have worked so hard to be heard. They've been "oppressed" for so long, it's time we (men) listened. Even had a "this is what a feminist looks like t-shirt" I would wear. On purpose.

My last LTR said "You're the most open to feedback of any guy I've dated". I was so proud! Right up until the cheat & ghost. Next guy? Dive bar bouncer.

Red Pill; it's delicious.

[–]Senior EndorsedMattyAnon 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

This form of exaggeration is commonplace and interesting. The intention is to manufacture special victimhood status for all women in the face of ever expanding privilege and special treatment.

In this case by redefining a negotiation strategy is "violent", the intended response is to invite retribution on the offender as if they were actually violent. "As a condition of marriage I want you to take my name" is a negotiation position. To frame this as violent is to make the negotiator into a criminal.

The same insidiousness is seen in so-called sexual assault, which has an ever-expanding definition now including "verbal assault".

See what they do there? Words are now to be grouped together with physical assault with the intention that they get the same response. Real victims of violent rape are disappointed that their experiences are grouped together with someone who got called a slut at a party.

But the victimocracy must continue: with insufficient numbers of actual victims they have to swell their aggreived membership with ever lower standards of "assault" and "violence".

Women always see themselves as victims (because it gets them special treatment), so there is an instinct to always look for sources of victimhood.

There are plenty of betas (eg the linked article) to make this approach very profitable (resources, attention, special treatment) for women. Too many (gullible) men who believe themselves to be responsible for and supporting "toxic masculinity" and "rape culture". They feel responsible for crimes they never committed - exactly as intended.

[–]MisplacedSanityP 4 points5 points  (1 child) | Copy

All third wave male feminists are cucks. There's nothing else to it. They've bought into the idea that any person who succeeds must have oppressed someone else, rather than the reality that the world is built up by hierarchies of competence. Does anyone doubt this thinking that it's all about whoever has the power is always at the top? If so, I implore you to question how those people got the power in the first place.

[–]TheTrenTrannyTrain 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Lol, it's funny AF because one of the retarded mods over at steroids was on a warpath to eliminate "toxic masculinity" from the sub. Seriously ironic given everyone on that sub takes test, aka essence of masculinity.

[–]MakoShark93 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

He was probably having an estrogen uptick.

[–]DropDeadTyrant 5 points6 points  (2 children) | Copy

If she won't take the last name, then I'm sure she won't let the children have it either. What's the point of having kids if they don't take your last name? In that case, they might as well not even be yours.

[–]IQtheMC 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

That is childist. How dare you refer to children as 'yours'. - guy from future

[–]Terdmuffin 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

You hyphenate, duh. But you have to alternate the order between kids.

[–]self-medicate 2 points3 points  (4 children) | Copy

I'm a bit confused about the lesson here. Was the newspeak think your point?



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter