http://www.salon.com/2015/01/15/the_ugly_truth_about_sexual_assault_more_men_admit_to_it_if_you_dont_call_it_rape/

If someone has access to the article to verify the statistics, that would be great. (My university doesn't provide me access to this particular journal.)

About the journal:

Violence and Gender is the first and only peer-reviewed journal focusing on the understanding, prediction, and prevention of acts of violence. The Journal is the international forum for the critical examination of biological, genetic, behavioral, psychological, racial, ethnic, and cultural factors as they relate to the gender of perpetrators of violence. Through peer-reviewed research, roundtable discussions, case studies, and other original content, Violence and Gender explores the difficult issues that are vital to threat assessment and prevention of the epidemic of violence.

- http://www.liebertpub.com/vio

This is supposed to spark discussion about the RP/BP divide: a good number of RPers believe that there are two disjoint sets of people, rapists and non-rapists, and that this set stays fairly static over time. Whereas, a good number of BPers think that people can be influenced by society, their own development, the environment or context they are in, and other things with regard to how likely they are to commit an act of sexual harassment, assault, or rape; that a positive influence can be exerted by anti-rape movements; and, that there are much finer gradations of people besides rapists and non-rapists and that this distribution of people may very well change dramatically over time.

Does the article support one side or the other? Is it a credible article? What does the article imply, if anything? If it is poorly designed or carried out, how could it be amended?