A woman’s Thinking in a Word: Sequential.

Whisper · 2018-01-29T07:25:17+00:00

A woman is unable to be in one emotional state and imagine herself in another.

Therefore, to her, how she feels now is how she always felt.

If she is angry at you, then she never loved you, and she faked every orgasm.
If she is happy with you, then she didn't really mean all those dishes she threw at your head.
If she is happy, the world is wonderful, and everyone with a problem is just a whiner.
If she is sad, her life is a mess, she's ugly, and she's going to die alone.

Never attempt to reason her out of any silly idea she has in this way. Simply change her emotional state, and she will abandon it herself.

BertranThePharmacist · 2018-01-28T22:34:17+00:00

I think I can add a more bitter example that happens in low/no-sex marriages: when your wife responds to your sexual advances by saying "another time" or "tomorrow" she does not mean that. But right in this moment she needs to politely get rid of you and she is solving the problem that is existing now.

If you wait for tomorrow expecting changes, there probably will be a headache. Or she is tired. Or whatever. She will solve the now-existing problem again without even realizing that you remember her words of yesterday, yesterweek or yesteryear. And if you remind them to her, you are so unforgiving, how dare you?

JohnIan101 · 2018-01-29T03:58:45+00:00

Their brain is sequential. It analyzes moment to moment, not being capable of going any further than that. Whatever the fuck the next second brings, she’ll definitely be absorbed by that moment and changed by it.

A lack of perspective; without, there is no ability to measure - all things taken at face value.

justgotalpha · 2018-01-29T15:39:43+00:00

I learned you should never take a womens word at face value..they live in the moment and only At the MOMENT set a date with her next week and theres 90%percent she may flake and 10% she might actually want to see you!

2018-01-29T08:48:56+00:00

The best read on the subject is Gustav(e) Le Bon's The Psychology of Crowds.

For the realistic psychological description laid out by OP doesn't regard females only (although it regards all females).

Only exception to your reality-adherent account: when it comes to scheming against other females, acting of social status consolidating/gaining behaviour, exploiting weak-willed option-deprived males, and, in general, plotting.

In all of those lines of action, you will see the female brain turn capable to transcend its being-in-the-moment, and their intelligence awaken and put to use in full.

Yuri_TxM · 2018-01-28T22:03:12+00:00

I strongly agree with that. Really makes sense.

Another thing that I realized this week is that everything in a woman points and aims to be a mother. They live to be mothers, and they can't be more satisfied when they have a kid. All the other stuff are up to us, and they can't plan not organize anything aside the "cave" we've been living in since prehistoric times.

Probably there's a link between be a mother and cook the game meat with being sequential.

JackGetsIt · 2018-01-29T20:37:45+00:00

This is an interesting analysis but I think women certainly have the ability to not think sequentially even though it may be their preference.

I do agree with you that each sequence effects their emotional states and they can't necessarily predict how certain situations might affect them emotionally.

The most critical difference I see is that women can't creatively imagine the emotional states of others. Men do this a lot more efficiently after some practice and with good guidance.

Women are 'affective' empathizers aka 'emotional' empathizers. They empathize through emotional contagion. They mirror others emotional and arousal states. Think spock's mind melding.

Men on the other hand are 'cognitive' empathizers or 'mentalizers.' Which mens men understand emotion through the logical deduction of the context of the situation. Think Jon Luc Picard. Able to predict and anticipate the states of mind of his crew and to make good decisions all while blocking emotional contagion into his own mind so that he can stay mission focused.

Women with bipolar or BPD have severe defects in cognitive empathy.

I think higher quality women have awareness of their extreme emotional contagion and therefore attempt to monitor their environment closely for threat and constantly reach out for emotional allies.

Women raised with strong father figures get some training in cognitive empathy and they are better able to make smart choices. "I won't go out with the girls tonight because I know that I might 'catch' emotional attraction to other men. I love my boyfriend/husband and my dad/father figures taught me not to be a cheater."

That is why our logical thinking cannot do shit to them. You can try and explain anything to them like you would do to a man, and they wouldn’t understand

Partially true which is why women influence each other through threats and acts of emotional terrorism. Men can easily do the same thing. This is called Dread Game. However, in healthy relationships women don't need to emotionally terrorize their men and men don't need to dread their women.

In conclusion, guys, learn to control the short spans of time in which girls live. They are neither long-term thinkers, nor lovers of logic.

This we have strong agreement on. Women can learn to respect logic through with strong male figures in their life.

I think this is an outstanding post that needs more upvotes and discussion. Your post also helps men understand why pickup works (the guy orchastrated positive emotions), why relationships work or fail (mail leadership), and why girls break up (exposed to competing emotional contagion). Your post also relates to how women experience sexual arousal (intense mirroring and agitation and a mix of fear and submission).

These are all redpill truths and your post is like a nice unifying theory!

VirginPlaya · 2018-01-30T17:10:06+00:00

If women would live moment by moment (and in the moment?) all of them would happy (as per definition of nirvana in Buddhism). Yet that is not the case.

Or maybe I misunderstood the op's point.

waldo888 · 2018-01-29T02:04:46+00:00

I think the only time they can plan ahead and use reason is if a strong authority guided them...same for most people though...women are just like the mob.

2018-01-31T08:02:01+00:00

what is the male equivalent?

I want to understand myself better.

serkandemirel0420 · Sun Jan 28 21:52:17 2018 UTC

Spesific example would be better.

racethesunset · Mon Jan 29 1:34:37 2018 UTC

Fucking on point. I know it’s abstract but it’s accurate generally, at least.

If you break sequence on even low hanging everyday shit it can cause problems for a woman that felt invested at all in the activity.

Something as simple as, stop by this store, then a friends, then grab a drink, rearranged or optimized, is catastrophic to most females.

Ambiguousdude · 2018-01-29T11:29:55+00:00

So the best way to beat this is just to be great all the time? I'm just me ffs, seems impossible

Title	A woman’s Thinking in a Word: Sequential.
Author	Rares5555
Upvotes	58
Comments	30
Date	January 28, 2018 9:44 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/7tnd39/a_womans_thinking_in_a_word_sequential/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/a-womans-thinking-in-a-word-sequential.48441 https://theredarchive.com/post/48441

Comments