Blog Article: http://www.redpilldoctor.com/cold-approach-is-a-lone-wolf-fantasy/




Introduction

Modern society is so used to delegating tasks such as punishment, compensation, protection, and acquiring food to third parties (i.e. government and famers). This did not exist for most of human history. Our previous environments required an enormous amount of cooperation to settle disputes, feed oneself, protect territory, and defend against other tribes. Being a ‘lone wolf’ or a (male) stranger was extremely dangerous and such individuals were avoided or attacked. Combine that with the fact that women are not independent and you have the female evolutionary desire for group belonging and status by proxy (Diamond).

Sex with strangers is foreign to mankind. Never before in the history of human beings could a male approach a female from another ‘tribe’ who he has no connections with, yet alone proposition her with sexual offers! Women were guarded by men in the vicinity at all times. You would always have to go through a barrier of men (i.e. family) first for the reasons stated above. It wasn’t until after the invention of agriculture (~12,000-10,000 BC)[1a],[1b] , the Industrial Revolution (1768)[2a],[2b] , western women’s suffrage (1893, 1920)[3] , women entering the workforce (1768-every war)[4] , marital reform, and finally the invention of the birth control pill (1960)[5] that the culture and logistics necessary for casual sex were in place.

Thus, that whole James Bond mysterious Alpha-Sigma fantasy, is just that, a fantasy. It's all about status because, unlike men, women's sexuality is inextricably linked to social dynamics and hierarchy. Cold approach is an attempt to circumvent the need for group belonging. You are trying to cut out the middleman and go straight for the pussy because forming family ties and developing successful social circles takes a lot time, effort and even luck by virtue of birth to achieve (the first hindering casual sex goals).

Cold-approach puts you in a position of compensation. You must make up for sexual attribute displays that occur in a 'tribal' setting (i.e. a party) by substituting it with mere hints and exceptional qualities...



How does one compensate for their lack of 'tribal' belonging?

Assumption: You're seeking casual sex (no commitment of any sort).

1) Exceptional Looks

The first hurdle is meeting her minimum-looks threshold (different for every girl). The second is great looks. Not good looks, great looks, the equivalent of this is being a girl's particular fancy for one reason or another. This is because the benefits of facial aesthetics lie on an exponential curve (click image). The space between good looks and Chadtastic provides diminishing returns. After that, the value skyrockets. Good looks simply get your foot in the door.

2) Gainz

Not 'athletic', not 'fit', ==> visibly large and muscular. You need a physique that shows through your clothes.

3) Great game

4) Play the numbers game

This method will increase your chances of running into the exceptions (not an even distribution). The guys that I know that smash ass left and right without revealing their social connections have Tinder as a part-time job.

5) Fake pre-selection

Fake texts from 'girls' and fake hot social media friends. Remember the 'machiavellian bodybuilder' in the misc section?

6) Be a 'Bad boy'

Tattoos. Especially a criminal (i.e. drug dealer) or gang member (literal tribe member). Women love criminals.

Alpha-M Guide: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=alpha+m+bad+boy

7) Power

Be an iconic barrier to entry to something she needs: school grades (teacher/TA/professor), auditioning (actress/dancer judge), paycheck (boss), club entrance (bouncer/doorman), something that makes you the official decision maker in her context.

8) Money

You can be just decent in the previous categories, but you have a Lambo or sporty Porsche and that does the trick.

  • Most guys that acquire success with the cold-approach fall into groups (1) and (4), being a girl's niche and playing the numbers game respectively. Keep in mind that social media, 'education', and daddy-government handouts have skyrocketed women's expectations in every category, specifically the minimum-looks threshold. A good portion of the westernized female population have developed a high tolerance due to constant validation they receive everyday on their cell phones from chads and betas around the world for simply existing.

What happens if you don't make-up for lack of 'tribal' belonging?

You could be good looking, confident, dress decent, and make good money but still won't be even be considered for insemination. Take the same you and place a fun social circle around it, then suddenly she's sexually interested. This is because women don't see you for you, they see men as tools to extract things from. When you have status in a social circle, she sees the social circle as power that you personally wield in the environment that she can potentially tap into. Her body will then tell her to bestow her vaginal affections upon you so that privilege, power, status, and resources trickle down to her via sexual association without having the burden of gathering, developing, and maintaining it herself. Women don't want power, they want access.

  • This is why women insist on you two being a public social setting instead of a one-on-one. The attributes they sought after cannot be optimally determined with you isolated because (most) men have no inherent sexual value. Women are human beings, men are human doers (future post).

Cold Approach Is Attempting to Defy Physics

The majority of your successful 'cold'-approaches weren't cold at all, you piqued her interest the moment she saw you, then you escalated from there. Most practitioners believe that you can simply approach any attractive woman with no initial interest (the 'cold' in cold-approach), then miraculously summon the tingles with their super-duper magic potion rituals + confidence.

"Abrah, Kadabrah, alakazmashpussy!"

Predictably, this sex-alchemy fails.

"That's because approaching is a response to IOIs. It is not a stimulus. And this art is being lost. If she isn't looking at You like she wants to get banged, Brother, it just ain't there and You are wasting Your time."

She either likes you or she doesn't. And when a woman likes you, it's usually obvious (or leaves a trail of hints). There's very little you can do to change this unless you can increase the DHV. Sure, there are shy girls. Sure a woman's feelings for you can change over a longer period of time, but this isn't worth the effort. Just ask any veteran PUAs such as Roosh what happens when you go down this path for years. You are much better off investing in yourself, being more social , and letting things happen organically than trying to force it.

"To catch the pussycat, don't go directly for the pussycat, have what the pussycat wants" - unknown


Cold-Approach is Inefficient

One-on-one dates are NOT how most sex is had. If she does not see how she can gain access to social capital via your introduction (without compensation as stated above), she more than likely won't be interested. Believe me, take this from a tall, good looking guy who spent years attempting to circumvent the need for a 'tribe' while pursuing casual sex with cold-approach. Little success came from it. Only solo interactions with women whose niche I so happen to fit were successful. They think something's off when they repeatedly see you without friends or when you decline social invitations in favor of one-on-one interaction. The times where I had social status? No problemo. I can already hear it, "Hurr durr, your game just sucks bruh!". Bruh, I'm no stranger to chad conquests.

You cannot possibly replicate the dynamic and imagery of a social scene and all the indirect indicators of value by yourself. Social connections and events + social media creates a chain reaction of pre-selection and social proof across multiple contexts simultaneously without you having to be present. Your reputation precedes you, nullifying the need for reintroduction. Using the loner cold-approach technique, you have to start all over again with every girl you meet.

The idea behind cold-approaching was to get guys comfortable with talking to women and given a big enough sample size, a girl is bound to allow you to stick your penis inside her (read: number's game). This is mathematically sound, but remember, most guys that do this don't compensate for the lack of tribe as stated earlier. For this reason, cold-approach is spam. Over time this has women strengthen their male-filtration mechanisms via totalitarian 'harassment' laws, bitch-shields and other unpleasant behavior upon approach to scare-off and punish the undesireables (sometimes you're considered undesirable just for being scared of the bitch shield).



Conclusion

I repeat, women's sexuality is inextricable from social status. It is biology. Any attempt to circumvent this without compensation will result in failure (especially in college). Cold approach can no doubt work. I've succeeded with it before. Do not for one second believe I am unaware of the major insights into female sexual psychology acquired from the foot soldiers of pickup (i.e. shit tests, pre-selection, social-proof, etc), but the turn-over rate doesn't justify the effort. It should only be a compliment to self-improvement and a social life.

So go ahead, be the lone-wolf alpha-sigma all you want, just understand you will acquire inferior results compared to men with objectively lower SMV + social circles. Be prepared to put in effort to compensate.



Link Notes/Other

  • 1) This post was an expanded version of a comment I made in this post

  • 2) "Women are not independent" link was posted and discussed three times in the manosphere, each with their own entertaining comment sections (TRP 1) (TRP 2) (ROK 1)

  • 3) The '(Diamond)' source is an amazing book called, "The World Until Yesterday" by Jared Diamond. It dismantled much of the TRP-related evolution theories I've had regarding human beings. In this book, the author thoroughly compares civilization to lives of hunter-gatherer societies with little to no contact with the outside world from around the globe based on multiple years experience living among the people and accounts from other anthropologists to show what we can learn from our past. Highly recommend.

  • 4) Sources '[1b]' (agriculture) and '[2b]' (industrial revolution) come from the same historical-account film, "Man Kind". It's an amazing show that's available on Netflix or in sections on Vimeo and Youtube (YT doesn't have episode 1 where [1b] links to). Highly recommend.

  • 5) 'Alpha-M' mentioned in the 'bad boy' section is a good looking, ripped dude that has good advice on clothing styles, cologne choices/tips, and other man-shit. Worth checking out.




Subscribe to my blog: RedPillDoctor.com

Subscribe to my Channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4G4BacOY7co

Follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/dr_warlockTRP

Follow me on TRP.red: https://www.trp.red/follow/dr_warlock