TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'

PeterWrightMGTOW

January 28, 2018
79 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.businessinsider.com.au/trump-says-he-is-not-a-feminist-2018-1?r=US&IR=T
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title TRUMP: 'I wouldn't say I'm a feminist ... because I'm actually for EVERYONE'
Author

PeterWrightMGTOW

Upvotes 79
Comments 81
Date January 28, 2018 7:47 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7tj090/trump_i_wouldnt_say_im_a_feminist_because_im/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/trump-i-wouldnt-say-im-a-feminist-because-im.906933
https://theredarchive.com/post/906933
Red Pill terms in post
feminist
Top posts by PeterWrightMGTOW

Petition To Remove 'Accused DV Perpetrator' Amber Heard from Aquaman 2

2744 upvotes
March 23, 2019
/r/MensRights

[Violence Against Men] Amber Heard's Firing From 'Aquaman 2' Being Actively Discussed By Warner Bros

2681 upvotes
February 8, 2020
/r/MensRights

High school girls make false sexual assault accusations against boy because they ‘Just don’t like him’

899 upvotes
October 19, 2018
/r/MensRights

Military draft: Judge rules male-only registration is unconstitutional | USA TODAY

779 upvotes
February 24, 2019
/r/MensRights

Marin filmmaker Cassie Jaye's new film, 'The Red Pill' is a bitter one for feminists to swallow

631 upvotes
November 5, 2016
/r/MensRights

BBC pay review: More MEN than women will be handed salary rises by the Corporation after audit

522 upvotes
March 1, 2018
/r/MensRights

Red Pill Screenings Stopped: You May Not Watch

404 upvotes
April 19, 2017
/r/MensRights

Philip Davies accused of "mansplaining" during International Men's Day debate

398 upvotes
November 17, 2016
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Hannyu 24 points25 points26 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

I mean, no shit? This is consistent with what he's said all through his campaign and presidency. He has repeatedly negatively responded to questions about identity politics and claimed that he is for all (legal) Americans.

He's crass and rough around the edges, but he has consistently been who he said he was. I don't know what is surprising about that to anyone at this point?

[–]MattClark0995 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't like his tweeting. His numbers would better if he just stopped tweeting nonsense.

Also this news should shock absolutely no one. Glad he didn't give into giving the default answer to this stupid question.

[–]Hannyu 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree, sometimes he needs to just put Twitter down, but I also see where the media has gone full left wing agenda, there's no truly unbiased news anymore and social media is a great platform to get your message out directly.

[–]awksomepenguin 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But his tweeting has shown the rest of the right that the world won't end if you fight back against the media when they misrepresent them. If he could have more tact (tact being the ability to tell someone to got to he'll in such a way that they look forward to the trip) with his tweets, he would have a much larger, more positive effect on his numbers and those of the Republicans generally.

[–]Hannyu 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I dkn't know, I think the lack of tact is what makes him fun. Tact is another way to say boring ass politician speak. He got voted in because he wasn't that.

[–]Tarcash[🍰] -5 points-4 points-3 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

And he says he is a women-molesting, job killing, racist asshole. None of these things are good. Just because he says what he is doesn't make him a good person.

"Grab 'em by the pussy" Trump. Ugh.

[+]Ratamoraji1 points 8 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

How are you determining that he is a racist? How is he killing jobs? I need you to back up what you are saying with some proof.

[–]eightgaydiamonds 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He probably has cnn on at work or something and gets brainwashed. Or he is stuck in the days when republicans were antigay theocrats.

[–]Hannyu 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Job killing? I mean, you're probably right on the groping, but job killing is a hard sell.

I'd also disagree with racist, but I don't subscribe to the modern view that anything less than kissing ass of minorities and walking on eggshells for their convenience is racist. Wanting to keep immigration legal isn't racist. Not giving special treatment to minorities isn't racist. Calling shithole countries shitholes isn't racist, it's just the truth. Haiti is a shithole, regardless of what color people live there.

[–]mwobuddy 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can you molest the willing?

[–]MattClark0995 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is typical "resistance" talk. "Racist" (I think you mean "white supremacist" which is the new, upgraded word liberals use against people they don't like).

And job killing? LOL shows you know very little. Even the Washington Post admits that Trump's first year job numbers are "very, very good"

This along with the tax bill which has resulted in nearly 300 companies giving bonuses, wage increases, expansion of benefits, and further investing (creating more jobs) and I have to call you full of shit.

Seriously, keep that load of bull on r/politics where it belongs.

[–]BreakfastGolem 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You sound like a purposefully children bombing, Iran funding, economy destroying, worst thing to ever happen to America Obama supporter. Disgusting tbh

edit: the only thing that is more disgusting than an Obama supporter is a Bernie supporter (and just Bernie himself). They're just altogether objectively bad people in every conceivable way.

[–]Tarcash[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think there are plenty of things worse than that. A rapist, a murderer, a child-rapist.

I think you have your morals a little out of alignment.

[+]Eryemil1 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I really feel Trump's got my back. /sarcasm

[+]BreakfastGolem -7 points-6 points-5 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yup, because the DNC is so much better /if you actually believe this you might as well be a feminist and never come here again

[–]Pillowed321 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can you quote me where he said the DNC is so much better? Or are you just making things up because you care more about Trump than you do about men's rights

[–]KingRobotPrince 15 points16 points17 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

While I understand the underline point "feminists favour women disproportionately, therefore, although feminists claim they want equality, it clearly is not the truth", I feel like this might not be the best public figure to throw support behind.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points14 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel like this might not be the best public figure to throw support behind.

Trump has done more for men than any other president has ever done. Trump's education department has started killing the college kangaroo courts. Trump's tax cut is helping middle class men, who pay a disproportionate amount of taxes compared to women. Trump is destroying the anti-white male narrative that the left is spewing and the first reaction of this subreddit is to hate him?

edit: I should also point out that Trump has not gotten us into any global conflict yet that would call for more troops (we know who serves on the front lines) and has crushed any chance of the TPP, which means more manufacturing jobs for men.

[–]Pillowed321 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This. People who support true equality are usually anti-feminist, but that doesn't mean every anti-feminist is supporting equality or supports MRAs.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I understand your reservations but we need more politicians to speak out like this. It's not like the MRA movement has gained any favourable imagine appeal anyway. It's never going to be clean enough.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly, he's not a feminist, he's a traditionalist.

Either way he's an enemy of men.

[–]ee4m 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

Especially the .01%.

[–]MattClark0995 -4 points-3 points-2 points 8 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Yes that tax bill which brought our tax rate down to most of Europe's level has benefited ONLY the 1%. Never mind the nearly 300 companies that have already announced wage increases, bonuses, expansion of benefits and further investing because of the bill.

Your welcome for that trickle down economics.

[–]ee4m 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago* (21 children) | Copy Link

The taxes for the average people are going up in ten years and trillions in tax burden has been passed on to the ordinary tax payer from the .01%.

And workers are long overdue a raise. Our wages have been stagnated for decades while the top made record profits and wages.

Look at all the men homeless and killing themselves because of money problems, while the top have made record gains.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

Taxes will only go back to where they are now (the cuts will expire), and that’s only if congress won’t reauthorize. Would you rather have 10 years of reduced taxes or no years?

[–]dungone 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

The tax cuts for the rich don't expire, just the ones for the rest of us.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

All individual’s cuts expire, regardless of income. It is the corporate rate cuts that are permanent.

[–]dungone 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Corporate tax cuts go to the wealthiest Americans.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Not true.

Corporate cuts go to corporations. Millions of Americans are employed by those corporations and they benefit individually (as can be seen by the bonuses and pay increases already being handed out by over 300 of those corporations). New jobs are also created by the additional investment (Apple, for example). New jobs create even more upward pressure on wages. Companies also increase dividend payouts, and their increased financial health raises their stock valuation (as you know, many middle class Americans are heavily invested in the stock market).

Hell, even Obama wanted a corporate rate cut because he wanted credit for the certain economic boom that would follow.

I’m far from wealthy (middle, middle class) yet I will benefit significantly from the cuts. I can’t be bitter that others benefit more than I will...it’s not helpful and changes nothing.

[–]dungone 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You don't benefit from the tax cuts. You get a couple of years of cuts, after which the massive debt that these cuts will accrue will force cuts in social services and safety nets that you yourself benefit from. The only people who benefit long-term are the rich.

corporate cuts go to corporations.

Corporations are not a social service designed to benefit workers. They serve the interests of their shareholders and well-placed corporate executives. Every last penny goes to them long before it goes to workers. American corporations are already sitting on massive piles of cash and none of that is going towards higher wages. Giving them tax cuts won't help.

Besides, if you really think that this tax cut was designed to help the middle class, ask yourself why they kept the carried interest loophole (for wealthy money managers) and ask yourself why, instead of getting rid of that, they got rid of our ability to deduct state taxes from our federal taxable income. Trump and his Republican friends basically said that if you make your money from a job, you will now get to have it taxed twice - first by your state and then by the feds. Trump and his Republican friends then said that if you're rich and you have a lot of investments, you get all these amazing loopholes so they don't have to pay their fair share of taxes and on top of it all of your corporate investments get a massive tax cut.

And you think this benefits you? I think you're being a rube.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I don’t think you know my tax situation, so you claiming I won’t benefit is, well, disingenuous. I will benefit, for the next ten years. I have run the numbers and I will pay significantly less. In addition, I got an unexpected bonus, so I have already benefited. My situation is not uncommon, and I’m not wealthy. I will do better under this tax structure than in the Obama years, where tax cuts were taken away.

Corporations create jobs. I want the corporation I work for to have loads of cash. The more the better.

[–]ee4m 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

Depends on the strings attached, if I'm being tricked, paying more in the long run and have hd my wages stagnated for decades while the .01% have been making record profits, im not going to be happy am I?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

But you’re paying less in the long run. You get a tax break for 10 years, your taxes then go back exactly where they were...yet you can’t admit you’re better off in the long run? You seem to be an ideologue. I don’t remember any tax relief under the previous administration. In fact, our last administration supported letting the Bush cuts expire (which they did).

Effectively, the cut is a wage increase, at least for 10 years. If you’re not getting wage increases, maybe you need to improve yourself with education, training, etc.

[–]ee4m 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

What about the trillions in property tax breaks for the .01% thats added to the deficit, which is tax burden passed on to you.

Now, if the rich get larger, permanent tax break, that means you get a larger share of the tax burden for you.

Effectively, the cut is a wage increase, at least for 10 years. If you’re not getting wage increases, maybe you need to improve yourself with education, training, etc.

People in general, have not been getting real wage increases, relative to productivity and inflation for decades, while the top have been making record gains.

Politicians and corporate masters are scamming us.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Not sure what property tax breaks you’re referring to. The new tax plan reduces the deductions for property tax to a limit of $10k. That affects the wealthy almost exclusively (increases their Federal tax burden). Do you know any poor people paying over $10k in property tax annually?

[–]ee4m 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The estate tax (I probably shouldn't have said property tax), trump gave trillions in breaks to the .01%, him and his friends and their kids (the only people that have estates).

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Trump does not make tax law, Congress does, so lets give credit where it’s due.

Under Obama, the estate tax exemption went from $1M to $5M (yes, a 500% increase). This was done primarily due to farming and other privately owned small businesses. Children who inherited, for example, a farm worth $10M would (previously) incur a tax bill of about $4M. The only way for them to pay that (in many cases) is to sell all or part of the business. Seems a bit unfair to me, but it could be argued that it’s not unfair.

The new tax bill, using the same reasoning, takes the exemption to $11M until the year 2026. So this tax break only affects those who die in the next 8 years with estates valued at more than $5M. Additionally, the most an heir in that situation could benefit is roughly $2.4M (40% of $6M). This is a tiny number of people and does not amount to “trillions”. In 2016, for example, only 11,000 estate taxes were filed, amounting to about $20B in tax revenue. Many of those estates were valued at significantly more than $11M. If the entire estate tax went away for 8 years, it would cost the govt about $160B. This change will cost the govt far, far less.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

down to most of Europe's level

What? Europe mostly has higher taxes than the US. That's why, for example, there are 5000 homeless people in the UK compared to 500,000 in the US at only 5 times the population.

Never mind the nearly 300 companies that have already announced wage increases, bonuses, expansion of benefits and further investing because of the bill.

And what do you think the effect of collecting much less taxes is going to be? This creates a funding gap - who's going to pay for it? You've made the poor poorer, the rich richer, and the middle class has been tossed a carrot to go along with it that won't last long either.

[–]JoelMahon 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (27 children) | Copy Link

Yeah he's for himself and people as much like him as he can find, obviously a sexist, please don't continue to associate sexist men with mensrights, hard enough dealing with that stigma from external sources without adding internal ones too.

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Yawn! Everyone's a "racist", "sexist", "homophobe" blah... blah... blah...

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

not an argument.

[–]JoelMahon -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Are you trying to deflect by claiming no one is racist/sexist/homophobic?

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

"Everyone I hate is literally HITLER"

[+]JoelMahon -8 points-7 points-6 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Again, these aren't arguments, I also didn't say he was hitler. He's sexist because he thinks it's fine to grope women without consent but not men (presumably, unless you think he'd welcome a guy's hand to his groin).

He banned transsexual people from the military, now while I personally don't believe transsexualism should be celebrated since it's one of many forms of body dysmorphia, that doesn't mean it's not discriminatory to ban them from something where it's been shown to not be problematic, not to mention singling out that particular form of BD is discriminatory.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

it's fine to grope women without consent but not men

More Sharia-blue talking points. You conveniently left out "and they let you do it."

He banned transsexual people from the military

Because they take fucking hormones that OUR TAX DOLLARS have to pay for! This also has NOTHING to do with men's rights!

[–]JoelMahon -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

More Sharia-blue talking points. You conveniently left out "and they let you do it."

Retroactive forgiveness isn't consent, besides when a millionaire can ruin you, are you going to say shit after the fact? You think Donald Trump is such a sexy guy women are totally fine with unsolicited groping? You know how few women actually want to be groped out of the blue by an ugly old guy? Sure they exist, but it's not like he can read minds can he and only grope them.

Because they take fucking hormones that OUR TAX DOLLARS have to pay for! This also has NOTHING to do with men's rights!

So make them pay for them? What does that have to do with taking them out of the military? Also last I check healthcare was privatised so who's tax dollars are paying for the private insurance and why is that going on?

Also the other guy brought up his phobes first, I was just explaining against his claims, not my fault he did it.

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You know how few women actually want to be groped out of the blue by an ugly old guy?

er... you mean ugly old guy worth billions of dollars, a huge famous public profile and masses of power? Men like him have to fight off the slags left right and centre.

The Truth

[–]JoelMahon 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah fight off women who want money, a grope for no reimbursement is not on their list of priorities. If it was why did Harvey W get so few willing recipients if any?

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

...I can hear you singing the song from halfway round the world LOL!

[–]ee4m -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think banning transgender people from the military was just so the media could change the story to distract people away from anti war activism.

And when he did that interview he was surrounded by willing women.

No fan, im just putting some perspective on the idpl related outrage.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

His spokesman is a woman so Trump isn't sexist.

[–]JoelMahon 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

ah yes, I have a black friend so I'm not racist either /s

[–]drunkjake 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

You really should give this a watch and read up more on similar stories. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxaKUo5naoY

[–]JoelMahon -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

What does this have to do with sexism? I never said he was racist I said he was sexist, although I do believe he is racist btw, and you can be racist and put on appearances, he wasn't always senile, he knew you couldn't be openly racist in the work place without hurting his bottom line. You can also be racist and have friends of the race you hate, there are black people who are racist towards black people, if you think a few people getting along well with trump who happen to be not white is a testament to a lack of racism then you're literally using the argument I used sarcastically as a joke.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

He had blacks in the oval office for Martin Luther King day so he's not a racist.

[+]RROE20111 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link

Remember when he was sued for discriminatory housing practices?

Or the Jew comments?

Or the Mexican comments?

Or the Pocahontas comments?

Or Obama Kenyan comments?

Or those wrongfully convicted men who he still thinks are guilty?

The Central Park Five?

You're absolutely bonkers if you don't think he's a fucking racist.

[–]Mashiki 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

None of those comments were racist. But if you actually are a racist, then it's not surprising you see racism everywhere.

[+]RROE20111 points 8 years ago* [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

Haha holy shit. Ok so you guys are just fucking stupid?

Got it. Glad we could clear that up.

I will tell you, if someone comes around selling beans, don't trade your only cow for them.

It's not like the story.

You're prone to just believing anything you hear apparently. I'm just worried about you.

[–]Mashiki 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

When you use personal attacks, or attack a group of people like that? All you're showing is your intellectual cowardice, apparently "believing anything you hear" is actually looking something up in-context instead of being spoon fed.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably the only thing I can agree with Trump on..

[–]Pillowed321 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's interesting how the votes on the comments ITT have changed. Early on when mostly MRAs were voting, people who support gender equality were upvoted while the people who were strawmanning or pushing the anti-MRA alpha male bullshit were downvoted. Now it's reversed... almost as if non-MRAs are brigading this thread hours later.

[–]contractor808 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

People too triggered by Trump to celebrate a sitting US president saying he isn't a Feminist... it's a big deal people.

[–]MRA-automatron-2kb 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

In Canada we have a Prime Mangina who worships females and who despises males because he's too scared of women to be an egalitarian.

Trump is a courageous man.

[–]ee4m 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thats not what it is. The neoliberal left hides what they really are behind identity politics, the neoliberal right claim to the antidote for neoliberal identity politics.

When the real problem is neoliberalism itself.

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. You get an upvote from me.

[–]Pillowed321 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You really think everybody who isn't a feminist is good? There are a lot of terrible people out there that aren't feminists. This is /r/mensrights not /r/anti-feminism, and anybody who actually cared about men's rights wouldn't be dumb enough to think that every anti-feminist is automatically on our side.

[–]GreyTortoise 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Cut it out, fellas. We all know who he's for. Regardless of the effective point he's making, his presence in office is actually a detriment to the MRM.

[–]Lupinfujiko 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Is he? Why? I'm not sure if I follow the logic here. We sure as hell weren't getting help with the other candidates.

[–]Pillowed321 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Trump has united feminism and made feminism more popular than it's been in years. And a lot of his views, like expanding the war on drugs or believing the Central Park Five are guilty even after they've been cleared, go against everything the MRM is fighting for.

[–]Lupinfujiko 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I had heard of the Central Park Five before. Thanks for that. What a gruesome story.

Under Obama we had, "a woman makes 77 cents to every dollar a man makes" and, "it is never okay to hit a woman". I feel like feminism kind of hit a peak during that era.

To me, Trump is a symptom, not a cause. I think that people saw through that virtue signaling bullshit, and were sick of the PC culture, and hence they voted for Trump. This gave us a decent litmus test for where the political mind of America was at the time. And it was blowing in our direction.

So Trump. I don't think he's necessarily good for our movement. But he sure isn't worse than Obama. And I highly, highly doubt that Hillary would have been any good for us either.

In Canada we have Trudeau. And he's certainly no good for the MRM. Not by any stretch of the imagination.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

[+]Consilio_et_Animis -9 points-8 points-7 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

his presence in office is actually a detriment to the MRM.

Cut it out Soy-Boy.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I have a mind blowing revelation for you. You can be both against trump's actions/statements/political views AND not be a regressive progressive. And even then lame overused insult's aren't arguments, crazy right ?

[–]Consilio_et_Animis -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I have a mind blowing revelation for you.

Let me guess — you are a mangina?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You know how people use the horse shoe theory to make fun of the retarded element's of the left ? You're the other side to that. You might as wel be a tumblerina calling me a misogynist neckbeard troll for all the substance you bring to the table.

I couldn't be less impressed.

[–]Consilio_et_Animis -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Confirmed: You are a mangina.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

lol, oh no, some random loser on the internet thinks im a wimp. However will I go on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sonLd-32ns4

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mangina song — no surprise.

[–]Pillowed321 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Let me guess -- you are not an MRA?

[–]Pillowed321 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Soyboy? Really? Wow you really convinced me you're committed getting rid of gender-shaming like a true MRA! Reading your other comments in this thread you should just go back to /pol/ if you're this triggered by people calling your "God Emperor" a jackass. Grow up and let the adults talk.

[–]Consilio_et_Animis -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oooooooooo... downvote me big boy!

[–]JonTargaryen35 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Best man in the world

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter