Feminists are feeling threatened by sex robots.

hackableyou · 2017-05-02T13:45:49+00:00

This writer writes as though it is a crime for men to take control of their own sex life. It almost as if when women decided to say that they have a voice in if and when they have sex, that is the same thing as them having a voice and control of men will have sex.

KR_Blade · 2017-05-02T12:33:01+00:00

well of course they are, with the feminist movement getting as crazy as it is, of course men are gonna want sex bots over real girls anymore, feminists are pushing men away from wanting to date anymore in fear of false rape accusations and the other BS feminists can do and get away with.

Rasalom72 · 2017-05-02T13:05:23+00:00

I love the fact that she thinks that sex robots are in some way interfearing with women's "attempts at independence".

What she means is that men will now have another option then having to shell out to some harpy just to get sex. And women can't have men not paying them in some way.

I hope more and more men simply start opting out of society all together. Don't earn a lot, just earn enough to live comfortably. Don't pay lots of taxes that go to women.

fengpi · 2017-05-02T13:52:24+00:00

Feminists are very concerned about ~~how their pussies will drop in value~~ the many deep ontological questions about consent, consciousness, the boundaries of sentience, the implications for legal rights and how technology may lead to the degrading of human relationships. ~~But mainly how their pussies will drop in value.~~ Very philosophical stuff.

ExpendableOne · 2017-05-02T20:40:37+00:00

I don't know why feminists would feel threatened by this given the way women treat men in dating. The sad, if not ironic, reality of this is that the only men who would seek to use any kind of sex robots in the future would be men that have no other options, because men love women more than anything and want connections with real women more than anything.

No man would choose a pocket pussy over a real woman, but there are certainly plenty of women who would choose a dildo over real men. There are probably more women out there who would than women who wouldn't, and it's only going to get worse as sex robots become more common, because most women simply do not care or love men the way men love or care about women.

MRA-automatron-2kb · 2017-05-02T15:39:54+00:00

Here are 3 comments below the article

(I won't even bother giving my opinion)

Because women haven’t sexualized domination. They haven’t been socialized to dominate. They don’t believe that men should be subordinate and that they exist only for their use and abuse.

Why do you think disabled men deserve sex? Nobody deserves sex. It is not a human right or a human need. Anything that involves the bodies of other people is not a right.

The only people who seem ‘on the verge of tears’ here are the legions of MRAs who come here whining about my cruel attempts to take away sex robots away from sad lonely men. I’ve deleted most of you, because your comments generally degrade into the ‘misandry!’ accusations and are so repetitive and stupid I don’t feel like our readers should have to waste their time, but goodness the things you boys get yourselves worked up over! You’d think there would be bigger issues to concern yourselves with!

thrway_1000 · 2017-05-02T11:22:07+00:00

https://archive.is/PNQTu

HotDealsInTexas · 2017-05-03T02:18:20+00:00

Sex robots epitomize patriarchy and offer men a solution to the threat of female independence

Sex robots don’t offer men “companionship,” they offer men complete dominance.

No... they offer men a solution to the threat of female dominance, and offer men complete independence.

People love to pretend as though everything from prostitution to pornography to sex dolls are a solution to not only men’s supposed loneliness and unmet sexual “needs,” but to their violent, perverse desires. It being the future and all, “sex robots” are the natural next step. Similarly, men have claimed sex robots are the perfect solution to their apparent inability to stop raping and abusing women, as well as their inability to socialize with women as though they are actual human beings.

Speaking of inability, are you really incapable of waiting an entire paragraph - no, even an entire sentence before saying something insulting and dehumanizing towards men?

One might ask how creating “realistic,” non-human dolls that men may project their desires onto and do whatever they wish with will impact women and men’s view of women, but capitalist patriarchy doesn’t ask questions so long as there is a product to sell and an erection to satisfy.

One might ask how men having "relationships" with... well, I guess animate objects affects actual women who are not part of said relationships, but Feminist Journalism doesn't ask questions as long as there's a man to bash and a female insecurity to validate.

In a new report at The Guardian, journalist Jenny Kleeman investigates the newest thing to come out of the multi-billion dollar “sex tech industry”: “humanoids” created for men’s sexual use.

[scare quotes intensify.]

Feminism has insisted, over decades, that women are human, that we don’t exist for men, and even that we don’t need men. But as we’ve worked to disentangle ourselves from marriages within which rape is legal, to fight compulsory heterosexuality and male-centered sex, to push back against sexual objectification, and to challenge men’s right to buy sex, it appears men have been working on their own solution to our attempts at independence.

"Feminism has spent decades trying to make women independent from men. But now it appears men have been working on making themselves independent from women, and that's terrible."

Kleeman points out that RealDolls are “closer to porn stars than real women,” but that isn’t entirely accurate. They are hairless, flawless, have small, “perky” nipples, exaggerated breasts, small labia, and can splay their legs in ways no human women can.

First of all, I want a citation on that, comparing the range of motion of sex bots to, say, that of dancers or gymnasts. As usual, Feminists love to body shame and dehumanize attractive women.

Second, how much do you want to bet that the author owns at least one sex toy that is larger than 99% of real human penises?

They don’t bleed, cry, vomit, or feel pain, which even porn stars can’t avoid doing when abused, as they so often are on film... The robots, when they go on sale, will start at $15,000 each.

What? That's appalling! 15 grand and they can't even cry or vomit? What a ripoff!

The company also sells a more affordable option — for only $100 you can buy the bottom half of a woman’s face, to stick your penis into at will. “They work with this new system called ‘The Autoblow 2,'” one employee tells Kleeman, which he describes as “an automated pleasure system for men.” Shockingly, just over 95 per cent of RealDoll customers, even those who buy the few available male dolls, are men.

Okay, you know what? New rule: all female-written articles complaining about sex robots etc. are REQUIRED to include photographs and detailed descriptions of every sex toy the author owns.

Matt McMullen, the founder and CEO of Abyss Creations, is the innovator behind both the dolls and the robots. He looks part snake and part Good Charlotte band member — kind of like what might happen if you introduced an alien to human life via the 2002 bedroom of a pasty teenage boy, then released it into society equipped only with dentures and the phone number of a plastic surgeon.

I did a double take here. I thought she was making fun of an unrealistic sex doll, but now, she's actually mocking and body-shaming an actual fucking human being, saying he looks "part snake," etc. Fucking Christ the dehumanization is real.

These sex robots strike me as an MRA/gamer’s dream come true. No longer do these men have to put up with women who have flaws like opinions, feelings, and human bodies…

Shit, where's my fucking Bingo card? We've got the obligatory zero-effort dig at MRAs and gamers now.

He smirks defiantly at Kleeman after she says this, as if to say, “Fuck you, real woman. You aren’t going to win this one.”

I mean, I knew from the beginning of this article that the author was jealous of the sexbot, but this pretty much confirms it.

McMullen has even programmed in a jealous chip, ensuring his ego is sufficiently comforted into believing Harmony cares about him enough to not want him talking to “other girls.” This seems generally in line with his adolescent perspective of relationships, which indeed one might be stunted by if they were a snake-alien who first learned about girls on 8chan.

"Adolescent perspective of relationships"

Says the woman who literally cannot grasp the idea that a man might desire emotional intimacy and want to believe someone he actually cares about him.

You know what? I almost want sexbot manufacturers to release a "Feminist-approved" personality software that causes the robot to do nothing but insult its owners, call them snake-aliens, etc. Maybe even give it wifi connectivity so it can write articles on FeministCurrent. It wouldn't be that hard to do better than the real thing.

Similarly, McMullen says Harmony and her sister robots exist “for people who can’t interact with other people.” It’s not at all coincidental that this argument is the exact same one used in defense of prostitution.

What McMullen and his weaselly counterparts seem never to understand is that the idea that men’s happiness should be catered to by women’s bodies and that “loneliness” is an acceptable excuse for objectification epitomizes patriarchy. It says that women should nurture men no matter what, to their own detriment.

Oh, "weaselly" now.

Look... what I can't understand is that Feminists seem to simultaneously believe that any men who would buy a sex robot is a horrible disgusting human being who no women would ever interact with, but are simultaneously afraid of how the robots will affect their relationships with women.

Kleeman quotes David Levy, the author of Love and Sex with Robots and founder of the Congress on Love and Sex with Robots, who similarly believes sex robots will have “therapeutic benefits” in the future. He writes, “Many who would otherwise have become social misfits, social outcasts, or even worse, will instead be better-balanced human beings.” But why is it almost solely men who need the supposed “therapeutic benefits” of a compliant woman? Are there no lonely, disabled, or socially awkward women on this planet?

Is that a rhetorical question? You're sitting there writing a multi-page article complaining about men choosing to stick their junk in a piece of plastic,so I think we already know the answer.

But, seriously: of course there are... but apparently, they aren't buying sex robots, even the male ones. Maybe that's because society tends to treat those women like human beings instead of calling them snake-aliens.

But to compare sex dolls or robots to women is not at all farfetched. The men who want sex dolls literally do want to use them as a replacement for real women. “If my RealDoll could cook, clean, and screw whenever I wanted, I’d never date again,” one man wrote in a sex doll forum. A man Kleeman meets in Detroit calls one of his dolls his “wife,” and has stopped dating now that he’s found his perfect match.

Again, I'd like to point out that despite making it very clear that she considers these men to be subhuman scum, but is still concerned about them dropping out of the dating pool.

The solution to men’s violence is not to offer up even more female bodies for men to treat as inhuman. It is not to create replicas of women who don’t talk back, don’t have needs, don’t feel pain when abused, and who exist only to support the male ego. If objectification resolved male violence, we’d be home free by now.

You know, I'm really getting sick of the utter hypocrisy of the author saying a goddamn thing about treating anyone as inhuman. Like, fucking hell. Obliviousness and lack of empathy from Feminists towards men is pretty much par for the course, but this one crossed the line into outright hatred. Fuck the rest of this article, I'm just gonna skip down.

Meghan completed a Masters degree in the department of Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies at Simon Fraser University in 2012

Oh, how could I possibly have guessed.

and lives in Vancouver, B.C. with her dog.

AAAAAHAHAHAHAHA

And with her attitude towards men, no wonder. Whether she's single by choice because she hates men so much she would never willingly associate with one, or out of necessity because she hates men so much she can't pretend to think of one as a human being for even a few hours, it's because of your attitude. Hey, OP, why not buy yourself a sexbot? Oh, that's right: writing hate propaganda doesn't pay enough for you to afford one.

Like this article? Tip Feminist Current!

If you promise that the money will go towards buying the author a sex bot so she can have an outlet for her hatred towards men, and insult and degrade the robot instead of insulting and degrading real men over the internet... I still won't donate, but it's a worthy cause.

MRA-automatron-2kb · 2017-05-02T15:24:41+00:00

"when in fact they reinforce an incredibly dangerous idea: that women’s bodies are only bodies, and exist only for men’s use."

Women are the ones who promote that concept.

"Feminism has insisted, over decades, that women are human, that we don’t exist for men, and even that we don’t need men."

Until they need men to fix and repair infrastructure.

The article and the comments go on and on about men's need to humiliate and domination and rape.

They don't get it that men want a supportive and LOYAL companion.

Men don't want to emotionally invest in a woman only to have her leave after 6 months or 20 years.

They are also irrational in saying men who use dolls are creepy and rapists

and on the other they don't want creepy men to stay home with their dolls.

And there's no mention of the risk men face with the day after false accusations.

belil569 · 2017-05-02T18:20:34+00:00

The entire thing is pretty much a three paragraph story so much filler and shit writing to be offended

greybushes1987 · 2017-05-04T17:58:16+00:00

one word: VIBRATORS

richardnorth · 2017-05-02T13:16:15+00:00

The amount of stupidity in the title of that article alone is incredible.

ifelsedowhile · 2017-05-03T03:07:56+00:00

good thing is that Meghan Murphy is a SWERF and TERF so she will never amount to anything more than an obscure blogger because her brand of feminism has been demeed not profitable by the elites back in the 1980s.

2017-05-04T09:17:54+00:00

Good on them. Any women who feels threatened that men will choose lifeless machines over them is starting to wake up to her own inadequacy. About time for a reality check.

andejoh · 2017-05-04T22:33:25+00:00

Sex robots actually give women complete independence. Imagine, why would a man need to ask a woman out if he has a ready sex bot? Woman wouldn't have men making unwanted advances. Women would have to ask men out, which ensures their enthusiastic consent.

LatexSanta · 2017-05-03T12:38:19+00:00

Never stick your dick in crazy. Sex bots aren't likely to be crazy. Therefore, stick your dick in a sex-bot. Life, uh, finds a way.

2017-05-03T15:41:06+00:00

First compete with regular women feminist lolcows.

ZimbaZumba · 2017-05-04T15:30:38+00:00

Feminist Current is truly a vile publication.

The comments section give you an idea of the type of people who regulary read it.

usery · 2017-05-06T00:43:44+00:00

Feminists know they don't want equality, their demand is to be treated as girlfriends, so the indifference will be intolerable.

McGauth925 · 2017-05-06T15:50:36+00:00

Well, they're not stupid: they should feel threatened by anything that threatens their power.

Title	Feminists are feeling threatened by sex robots.
Author	jaib9
Upvotes	26
Comments	52
Date	May 2, 2017 10:53 AM UTC (9 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/68sf4v/feminists_are_feeling_threatened_by_sex_robots/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/feminists-are-feeling-threatened-by-sex-robots.923577 https://theredarchive.com/post/923577

Comments