Female teacher found guilty of two counts of luring a minor, one count of sexual exploitation and one count of touching for a sexual purpose against male students. Receives house arrest.

[–]wwwhistler 136 points137 points138 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]another-white-male 15 points16 points17 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]MisterDeagle 162 points163 points164 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]kireol 88 points89 points90 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points31 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]samsc2 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]bigoted_bill 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]MisterDeagle 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/sex-crimes-pictou-amy-hood-teacher-teenage-boys-1.3895637

Hood will be subject to electronic supervision during house arrest. Two years of probation will follow.

As part of her sentence, Hood must give a DNA sample and go on the sex offender registry for life. She must stay off the internet, except for work, and even then must be supervised.

She must stay at least two kilometres away from her victims and can't work with children, except her own. She also has to avoid places frequented by children unless accompanied by an adult for 10 years.

It looks like they did make her register as a sex offender. That little bit of info was missing in the other article. Also, the Crown prosecutor was asking for 4 years so at least they didn't have their heads up their asses. She should have served time in my opinion but at least the rest of the usual punishment is there.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Perniciousus 23 points24 points25 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]me_he_te 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]vortish 58 points59 points60 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Kill_Frosty -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]possiblyhazardous 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 21 points22 points23 points 9 years ago (28 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Yes, she did. It is called statutory rape and it is a criminal offence due to the fsct that minors are unable and are not allowed to provide consent.

As proven in this document, Amy Hood was involved with sexual engagement with minors who were in the age range of 6th grade-9th grade.

https://www.zerocensorship.com/uncensored/canada/nova-scotia-teacher-carolyn-amy-hood-convicted-on-sex-with-student-charges-296445

Canadian law states that as of 2008 the age of consent has been set at 16 years old. Grade 6-9 would place the victims under that age. Therefore, Amy Hood is a rapist and belongs in jail if not for her gender obstructing justice.

According to Canadian law:

Age of Consent for Sexual Activity

Under 12 years Consent is illegal

12 and 13 years Consent is illegal (only legal if partner is less than two years older and not in a position of trust or authority over the younger teen and the relationship is not exploitative)

14 and 15 years Consent is illegal (only legal if partner is less than five years older and not in a position of trust or authority over the younger teen and the relationship is not exploitative. Married couples are also exempt)

16 – 18 years Consent is legal unless they are involved in exploitative sexual activity.

Under 18 years: Anal Sex Consent is illegal, unless in heterosexual marriage4.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]AANickFan -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

[–]AANickFan 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

There's no such thing as being too "old" to qualify for pedophilia once you turn 12 years old lmao.

That isn't what I said at all. Stop strawmanning.

Also, rape and pedophilia are defined by psychologists as havjng nothing to do with sexual attraction, its about having power over another person who is not able to fight back.

I'm sorry, that is not what the literature says. That is what feminist PC culture says, and has its roots in marxist ideology, as feminism of this brand also claims that heterosexual activity is also a power struggle between men and women.

You're helping me prove my case in showing how the arguments and claims of fringe political ideologies can actually succeed in infecting the general public without anyone's awareness, as is also exemplified in the baseless rhetoric of people who believe that a 16 year old and a 40 year old having sex is wrong in places where it is illegal. Their claims often run along the lines of moralized one-liners rather than reasoned arguments, and these one liners don't come from actual thinking but from passively taking in what has been repeated. A lie becomes true when repeated often enough.

If you need references to pedophilia, I can provide them. You should be able to google it yourself.

Here's a starter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronophilia

Pedophilia is a psychological disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a sexual preference for prepubescent children.[6][7]

You can click the references, but yes, even an "adolescent", aka teen, can be a pedophile, even if theyre underage.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/adolescence

Adolescence describes the teenage years between 13 and 19 and can be considered the transitional stage from childhood to adulthood. However, the physical and psychological changes that occur in adolescence can start earlier, during the preteen or "tween" years (ages 9 through 12).

[–]scotiannova 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+]icyw31ner -13 points-12 points-11 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]icyw31ner -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Sbaker777 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]fingermysphincter 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Phoxner 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Phoxner 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Gedigen 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Koiq -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]texasbloodmoney 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

A person under 16 years of age cannot legally give consent to sexual relations with an adult. That's literally why it's called statutory rape. It's defined as rape by statute law, not by matters of consent.

Also, many states have laws saying that no person under the age of 18 give legally give consent to sexual relations with any adult appointed to a position of responsibility over them, ie teachers, coaches, etc.

So, your question isn't a good one. Also, your personal experience is literally meaningless in the face of statute law. The fact that you have no negative consequences in no way implies that those adults weren't breaking the law.

The point is that the statute is meant to protect minors from predatory adults. We're increasingly seeing that predatory women are often not properly punished. I can't help but wonder if that's related to the increase in female teachers getting caught sleeping with their students.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The point is that the statute is meant to protect minors from predatory adults. We're increasingly seeing that predatory women are often not properly punished. I can't help but wonder if that's related to the increase in female teachers getting caught sleeping with their students.

Ah, but let predatory teens have their way with predatory teens and no legal repercussion, right? Since that will just be couched as "normal teen experimentation", and therefore "innocent", right?

The law doesn't prevent predatory acts. It just makes it illegal in a one way direction. It does not prevent teen -> adult predatory sex acts, nor adult -> adult predatory sex acts, nor teen -> teen predatory sex acts, where we agree that predatory means seeking someone else out solely for sex (and not rape, which is already illegal, nor molestation, which is unwilling groping, etc).

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]pdg45acp 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]rg57 -6 points-5 points-4 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]UnlikelyToBeEaten 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]chaun2 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]tonytwotoes 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Carrisonfire 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]icyw31ner 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]double-happiness 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]pvtshoebox 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]YuenHsiaoTieng -32 points-31 points-30 points 9 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

[–]chaun2 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]mitzibishi 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]InBaggingArea 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–][deleted] 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085980/?ref_=tt_rec_tt

A rich father hires a tutor for his son. The son is a horny teenager and the tutor is a gorgeous blonde. Complications ensue.

Adult woman, horny teen, made into an actual movie where all the actors, cameramen, etc were perfectly fine with the story, not disgusted and leaving because it glamorizes "raping kids/pedophilia".

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0169547/

American Beauty is a 1999 American drama film directed by Sam Mendes and written by Alan Ball. Kevin Spacey stars as Lester Burnham, a 42-year-old ...

42 year old fantasizes about his daughter's hot cheerleader friend, faps to her, etc. Still not pedophilia. Why wasn't it condemned as brutal child rape desires/glamorizing when it came out?

You might be forgiven for calling it pedophilia if you're young and stupid, or you've passively absorbed the social claims of current year, because this was not called such prior to around 2008.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronophilia

Pedophilia is a psychological disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a sexual preference for prepubescent children.[6][7]

Hebephilia and ephebophilia are sexual preferences for pubescent and post-pubescent youths, respectively.[12]

Teleiophilia (from Greek téleios, "full grown") is a sexual preference for adults.[14]

Gerontophilia is a sexual preference for the elderly.[16]

These terms are actually quite new, because there never used to be broad age line between child and adult, aka teen/adolescent, etc. Why do you think the Jewish "become a man" ceremony is 13 and not 18, and they don't have a "become a teen" ceremony?

Pedophilia is a disorder, and unnatural and counterproductive to species survival. That's why it exists in such small real numbers compared to the rest of the population, like homosexuality. Sexual attraction to human beings that can shoot viable sperm or capably bear children is not a disorder, and despite the APA being on board with pedophilia as a disorder, has repeatedly resisted placing "liking teens" in the disorder category, even though it is starting to bear the resemblances of one, given that it can ruin lives for someone 18 or older to act on it (sometimes ruining lives of guys under 18 to act on it as well). One criteria for disorder is something which causes you to be unable to live a comfortable, healthy life, and being put in a cage with a bunch of people who need medication is not conducive to a comfortable healthy life, so why isn't it a disorder yet by APA standards?

Given your meaningless and abusive posts that seem to be the only thing you do in this sub, I find it likely you're just a troll.

[–]sillymod[M] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Hypertroph 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Hypertroph 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, you worded that in a completely loaded way. Of course I don't think molesting 15 year olds to be okay.

Canadian law does allow minors to make legally binding decisions and provide informed consent in some areas, like the medical field. The law only says age is a strong reason to question a person's competence, but does not eliminate the possibility of it. Why does that not apply to sexual activities? 16 is an arbitrary line, albeit a necessary one. There are some 15 year olds with the maturity to understand the consequences of their actions, and 17 year olds without. Why are they automatically considered incompetent when sex is involved, unlike other areas?

That said, a teacher abusing his/her position to solicit sex from their students is absolutely inappropriate, regardless of the ages involved.

[–]Bandymidget 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Hypertroph 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Hypertroph 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]gods_bones 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Female teacher found guilty of two counts of luring a minor, one count of sexual exploitation and one count of touching for a sexual purpose against male students. Receives house arrest.

Comments

feminism

normietears.