TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Hillary Clinton's first campaign speech is all about feminism - God forbid this woman gets elected

EyeRedditDaily

April 24, 2015
64 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2015/04/24/hillary_clinton_s_first_campaign_speech_it_s_all_about_feminism.html
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Hillary Clinton's first campaign speech is all about feminism - God forbid this woman gets elected
Author

EyeRedditDaily

Upvotes 64
Comments 37
Date April 24, 2015 6:35 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/33qngo/hillary_clintons_first_campaign_speech_is_all/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/hillary-clintons-first-campaign-speech-is-all.981917
https://theredarchive.com/post/981917
Red Pill terms in post
feminism
Top posts by EyeRedditDaily

New homeless shelter for men opens in Orlando (and it is beautiful)

405 upvotes
January 28, 2015
/r/MensRights

Lawmakers inch closer to eliminating alimony - NOW (apparently in the name of "gender equality") lobbies against reforms that would abolish lifetime alimony and presume 50/50 parenting

142 upvotes
April 14, 2015
/r/MensRights

22% of women who take a Spring Break trip are abducted and never seen again.

11 upvotes
February 25, 2015
/r/MensRights

Contradictory claims: "Women earn less money than men" vs. "Men get richer after divorce, women get poorer"

5 upvotes
March 11, 2015
/r/MensRights

Do you think that sexual assault on college campuses (US) is a "problem" in the sense that it is more common than any other similar crimes?

0 upvotes
March 3, 2015
/r/MensRights

UConn women win 10th national championship - In an industry dominated by women, the most successful (by far) coach is a man

0 upvotes
April 8, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]save_the_rocks 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I was going to post, but figured it's been covered before... Didn't realize that Hillary had a history of domestic violence.

http://nypost.com/2015/04/05/when-hillary-hit-bill-with-a-book-and-other-white-house-tales/

[–]redditorriot 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Alleged. Nothing proven.

[–]save_the_rocks 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The President made a public statement that he needed stitches from walking into the bedroom door at night shortly after the scandal broke.

Yet the blood was all over the bed... which wouldn't make sense if he busted open his head while walking to the bathroom.

It's a lame excuse.

[–]redditorriot 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Again, nothing proven, hearsay evidence.

[–]save_the_rocks 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's a little more than an empty allegation. There's plenty of physical and circumstantial evidence to cast doubt and merit a conversation.

[–]redditorriot 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Gossiping, yes.

[–]KamiNekoSama 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

She very likely will. She undoubtedly has the female vote, and i sure as hell am not going to vote for Jeb Bush just for the hopes she doesn't get elected.

[–]mariox19 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"If Hitler invaded hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil in the House of Commons." - Winston Churchill

[–]MonkeyCB 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Which is so fucking retarded. What the hell is going on in Washington if people are so far gone that they can't even see this shit. Not only do people not want another Bush in, but I'd gladly vote for anyone running vs Hillary as long as it's not Jeb. Otherwise I'm voting independent and fuck the rest.

[–]FukRPolitics 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm voting Republican. and so will most people who don't want a HRC Presidency.

Make no mistake -- this subreddit is not representative of the broader men's movement politically, or even men in general. Men are overwhelmingly conservative -- there is not a single study ever conducted on gendered voting preferences that has even come close to claiming otherwise. So keep that in mind when you watch this sub.

This sub is a creature of reddit, with reddit's political biases. It does not share the opinions of most men in any regard.

[–]RockFourFour -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'll sooner vote for deeze nuts than vote for Clinton or whoever gets the republican nod.

[–]eletheros 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Remember this time when one of her Supreme Court nominees votes to strip you, and men in general, of due process rights.

[–]Throwaway4987350 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

IMO republicans are just as bad or worse on civil rights.

At this point you can't use your vote to effect your civil rights vs the powers that be. But you can use your vote to effect social policy such as gay marriage, abortion and gender rights.

I think if a whole bunch of pro-choice men vote republican because of the left's shitty stance on men's rights issues, it will send a clear message.

[–]eletheros 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

IMO republicans are just as bad or worse on civil rights.

No, not even close. The entire "always believe the victim", "even if your innocent it's a learning experience" nonsense comes from the left. From Democrats. Hillary herself has done it.

[–]FukRPolitics 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She'll get maybe 1 or 2% points more of the female vote than a male Democrats would. Most of those will be drawn from women who otherwise wouldn't have voted. Republicans and their Leaners are not going to vote for Hillary under any circumstance. Almost every Democrat wins the female vote.

And you're on reddit, so don't think for a moment that your left-wing biases are universal or even common among the broader electorate. If your hatred of Republicans was the norm, they wouldn't win half the elections.

It is extraordinarily unlikely that a party will get three terms in the white house under the current dynamics.

Plus, and let's be honest here, you have a long history of showing up here only to shill for the Democratic party.

[–]KamiNekoSama -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seriously?! Hahahaha. Thanks for the laugh this morning.

Plus, and let's be honest here, you have a long history of showing up here only to shill for the Democratic party.

Either you are trolling me or you have mistaken me for some one else.

[+]megapoopfart -11 points-10 points-9 points 11 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Still better than any republican candidate.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

The lesser of two evils is still evil.

[–]megapoopfart 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

perfect is the enemy of good

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Who said anything about perfect? You don't have to be perfect to be not evil.

[–]megapoopfart 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

im just saying i vote pragmatically

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos"?

It's important to ask why you only have two choices, and vote in a manner that would change what is causing it.

[–]Men13 -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yes, but still the lesser of the two.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

As long as you keep giving assent to a system that is only allowing you to choose evil, you will always have evil.

"Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos."

[–]Men13 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You only have control of your own actions, not of other's. As such it's your responsibility to act in a way that you believe will result is the least evil (most good)

Now, if you think the system is bad, then by all mean - act in a way that will change that system. Revolt, protest, fight.

If you choose not to - either because of laziness or a sense of futility - then so something smaller, like vote for the lesser evil. Actually, you should do that even if you revolt, protest and fight.

By not voting you're doing nothing. You might tell yourself that "I'm not giving assent to this system", but you're not even showing it in any way - you're not counted as a person who protests the system, you're counted as a person too lazy to go and vote.

So not only are you counted as giving assent, thus strengthening the system in the eyes of the population ("the system is so good that people don't even feel the need to care about who leads them"), you're also giving half a vote to the person you believe is the greater evil.

So you might stand here and try to sound high and mighty, but at the end of the day you choose the action that helps the greater evil.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You only have control of your own actions, not of other's. As such it's your responsibility to act in a way that you believe will result is the least evil (most good)

Least evil is not inherently most good, though.

It's like debating whether we should be murdering 3 people or 5. The answer is "murdering is evil." If you want to say "we have to choose!", then ask yourself why your choices are so limited. The answer is probably evil entities limiting your choices artificially.

Now, if you think the system is bad, then by all mean - act in a way that will change that system. Revolt, protest, fight.

Sedition is literally illegal and punishable for life in prison in US.

So not only are you counted as giving assent, thus strengthening the system in the eyes of the population ("the system is so good that people don't even feel the need to care about who leads them"), you're also giving half a vote to the person you believe is the greater evil.

So you might stand here and try to sound high and mighty, but at the end of the day you choose the action that helps the greater evil.

That doesn't follow. By trying to convince others of the problems of the system, you're not enabling the system.

For example if I said your voting in the two party system while doing nothing about trying to change what causes it to be a two party system you are the one facilitating evil.

And since I have to convince people of how the system does this to accomplish anything, I'm doing exactly what I can to actually affect it. You are instead voting to change something else that won't change what I think is the core of the problem, while trying to sound high and mighty about practicality while ignoring the possible explanation for what the real problem is.

[–]Citizen1139 -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

They downvoted you but that's exactly the logic most democrats will use. Clinton might be bad but the Republican candidate will make her look sane in comparison. Meanwhile I'm voting for Bernie Sanders.

[–]FukRPolitics 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So? Registered Democrats make up a smaller portion of the electorate right now than at any other point since the Great Depression.

Not doing anything about the economy crippled their party in ways that most liberals have not begun to come to grips with. They will not hold either house of congress again for a good 20 years. But it won't likely be until they lose the White House that they finally start to work on the economic issues that would actually win them elections. Until then, they'll keep pushing these upper-class boutique issues that people kind of agree with them, but don't really vote on.

[+]megapoopfart -11 points-10 points-9 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Really not looking forward to this election becoming an anti hillary jack off sub at /r/mensrights. I don't care for her, but you're right, the republican candidates make her look sane by comparison.

[–]guywithaccount -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Any anti-1% jacking off is welcome here or anywhere. It doesn't how bad Republicans are, electing Hillary is not going to help anyone but her sponsors.

Sanders and Warren need to get together and decide which of them is going to challenge Clinton in the primary, cause both or neither would be bad. And Americans need to start seriously thinking about how to get big money out of politics, end gerrymandering, and reform elections to provide third parties with a level playing field, instead of meekly settling for The Democrat or The Republican term after term after term.

[–]megapoopfart -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

totally agree (sort of, im still a lesser of two evils voter in the final election). mensrights can sometimes feel like a right wing only place, which is where im coming from. mostly i fucking hate presidential political cycles.

[–]KrisK_lvin 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Articles by Amanda Marcotte - She needs her own flair really.

If it must be read at all, suggest reading it here.

[–]Not_A_Dinosaur 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

ITT: Republicans BAD. Whatever, Clinton doesn't have beliefs since she will expedite a change in rhetoric to suit her and her husband's increase in power and in their own personal coffers. Maybe you ought to wait to see who all announces their candidacy, and perhaps ACTUALLY see what some Republicans actually believe. This election should see a much more moderate and libertarian leaning Republican party, which I wholly endorse. Also, I would like to see this sub stay on topic without devolving into r/politics.

[–]solaria_mra 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'd vote for Elizabeth Bathory if only viable alternative was one of these Republican psychopaths.

[–]thtechnologist -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We already know about any of the R's that will run that have a chance. As an independent, they all look like they belong in a loony bin.

[+]notIsugarpie -7 points-6 points-5 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Advice: don't believe the hype. Hillary knows what her bread is buttered on, and she knows that, this early in a campaign, she can run to the left. She needs money, and democratic activists are unsure of her message (a lot of them want Elizabeth Warren, whose a "red meat" democrat). She's basically getting a free ride through the primary, and the GOP candidates are busy beating up each other. Now is the perfect time to consolidate her democratic base bonafides, raise a ton of money, and still claim the center way before the GOP picks a nominee. Hillary is running a smart campaign, just because she says it, doesn't mean she believes it. Going through the feminist creed gives her credibility with the base, raises excitement for her, and keeps Warren on the sideline.

I will vote for Hillary, because there's only one real issue I'm concerned with (ie one that trumps all others): the economy. The economy does well under democratic presidents and falters under Republican ones. Look at the economic numbers for ever GOP govenor who wants the nomination (hint: all of them finished in the bottom half of 50 states in job growth, as a percentage, since the recession, except for Rick Perry. Christie finished 40, and NJ is an economic nightmare. Walker finished in the 30's and hasn't come close to delivering the 250k new jobs he promised in 2010 when he ran for govenor. Pence and Kasich are also in the bottom half of 50 states, and all are well behind the national average) With a dreary economic record like that, compared to the economic boom that Bill presided over (and the last budget surplus), Hillary is an easy economic winner for me. That's why she has my vote.

[–]rocelot7 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People need to learn that politicians don't control the economy, the economy controls the politicians. All economic reform has been reactionary.

I agree with you I don't think she believes half the shit she's spewing, but Hilary is same old shit when it comes to that front.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter