TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Uproar as a man is fairly elected as the "Women's Officer" at a university student union

JellySausage

April 8, 2015
96 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/higher-education/uproar-over-university-of-tasmanias-womens-officer/story-e6frgcjx-1227294745859
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Uproar as a man is fairly elected as the "Women's Officer" at a university student union
Author

JellySausage

Upvotes 96
Comments 27
Date April 8, 2015 1:53 AM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/31tnxz/uproar_as_a_man_is_fairly_elected_as_the_womens/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/uproar-as-a-man-is-fairly-elected-as-the-womens.983712
https://theredarchive.com/post/983712

Comments

[–]CrustythePrawn 35 points36 points37 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

HeForShe - nothing to complain about here - the feminists should be over the moon with this win for the cause

[–]ralphswanson 31 points32 points33 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Why can't feminists let women decide who will represent them? It was a fair vote. Do they think women are too incompetent to make such a choice?

[–]ckiemnstr345 16 points17 points18 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One of feminism's biggest tactics is to shame people for the decisions that they actually make. Feminists don't like it when people make informed decisions that don't align with the feminist narrative.

[–]JellySausage[S] 23 points24 points25 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is of course - no "Men's Officer".

http://tuu.com.au/representation/elections/

[–][deleted] 18 points19 points20 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

my issue here is this man was elected by majority to this position. now another minority political group isnt happy with it and want him removed.

This group of feminist want destroy democracy. it doesnt matter what the majority want, to them only there political agenda is important. where does this stop? do they want to campaign to have our prime minister replaced by a female even though he won by majority of Australians voting for him/his party.

ffs - this womans officer should not resign on principle.

[–]questionnmark 15 points16 points17 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If a woman is seen as just as capable of doing anything a man is capable of then surely a man is just as capable as a woman.

[–]scanspeak 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How dare you! Off with your head!

[–]silly_vasily 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Triggered

[–]disposable-name 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't worry. In order to be fair, I'm sure the position of Men's Officer will be filled by a woman...

[–]Carbon_Dirt 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"But there is no position for Men's Officer!"

"Well we can't deprive a woman of a career! Let's make that position and hire a woman for it!"

"Oh, but we're still giving the title of Women's Officer to a woman."

[–]disposable-name 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

New, female Women's Officer: "I totally earned this on merit alone."

[–]ExpendableOne 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you qualified for the job? Yes? Then why is your gender relevant? It really doesn't get more textbook than that. It's just discrimination.

[–]TracyMorganFreeman 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you think only women can represent the interests of women, then you're a sexist.

[–]JohnKimble111 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Site says I have to be a subscriber to read the article so here's an alternative: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-07/call-to-dump-man-as-womens-officer-at-tasmanian-university-union/6374202

[–]Helpimstuckinreddit 9 points10 points11 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Heard on the radio earlier that he ended up resigning. Poor guy.

[–]rottingchrist 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

University student union...

Guy is probably anti-male already. I'm sure he took the treatment like a real feminist should.

[–]elwahrio 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

He was anti-male, he said he wanted to use his position to promote HeforShe.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well hopefully that changes in short order. Someone should reach out to the poor guy

[–]dingoperson2 6 points7 points8 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But a female teacher or female counselor can CERTAINLY serve boys or men /s

[–]redditorriot 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Can someone with access archive it so we can read it, please?

[–]thrway_1000 7 points8 points9 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems archive.today doesn't work on that site. So here's a copy/paste:

Uproar over University of Tasmania’s ‘women’s officer’

The University of Tasmania’s student union will not be able to remove a man elected to serve as the body’s women’s officer, despite uproar among students.

Nearly 1000 people had signed a petition yesterday calling for the removal of James Ritchie, who was elected to the women’s officer position for the Tasmanian University Union last week.

TUU president Heidi La Paglia said that she regretted an issue in advertising the position had allowed Mr Ritchie to be elected.

“We are dealing with the issue, we discussed it today, and we reaffirmed that the women’s officer position has to go to a woman,” she told HES.

But Mr Ritchie cannot be forced to stand down because the advertised description did not specify the position had to go to a woman.

Ms La Paglia said the position was open only to a person who statutory declared themselves as identifying as a woman.

The most recent TUU descriptions makes no specific reference to who is eligible for the women’s officer position, only noting “an interest in higher education and student issues would be advantageous”.

Yesterday the TUU moved to change that, Ms La Paglia said, to reflect previous descriptions.

Mr Ritchie won the role, for Northern women’s officer, 112 votes to 88 votes, running against a female candidate.

While Mr Ritchie could not be reached for comment, he told the local Launceston-based Examiner newspaper he would take the position seriously.

“It’s not a publicity stunt and I’m genuinely interested in helping women with whatever issues or feedback they give me. I want to help them do that and I think that’s good for women and good for men and that’s good for the community,” Mr Ritchie said.

It’s understood the TUU is in discussions with Mr Ritchie about an alternative position.

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]redditorriot 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perfect, thanks!

[–]DoItLive247 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yet the "Sexuality & Gender Equality Officer" has a Casual vacancy.

http://tuu.com.au/representation/elections/

[–]govt_took_my_baby 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the same problem they have with national democracy seen for years - we have representative democracies ie we elect people to represent us and our views in office. Is that enough? No, apparently they have to physically represent, too. It's so dumb "only a vagina will do!"

[–]GeorgeOlduvai 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"People with a disability generally want to be represented by people with the same lived experience that they have."

So being a woman is a disability now?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am so confused by this.

On the one hand I am pissed that the is a Womens Officer and not a Mens Officer. But on the other, I hope he does a way better job than any of his female predecessors...just to stick it to those whining bitches.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter