~ archived since 2018 ~

Research: Feminist Hate is Real

Specific_Detective41 · 2026-04-24T10:30:52+00:00

This substack post provides a critical analysis of this research article: https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/g3nAVY7gC5 The author is correct...

Specific_Detective41

April 24, 2026

138 upvotes

/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Archived from /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates is a place for the discussion of men's issues from a left wing perspective.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Research: Feminist Hate is Real
Author	Specific_Detective41
Upvotes	138
Comments	87
Date	April 24, 2026 10:30 AM UTC (3 months ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/1subvml/research_feminist_hate_is_real/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/research-feminist-hate-is-real.1578774 https://theredarchive.com/post/1578774

Comments

[–]alter_furz 81 points82 points83 points 3 months ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]AdOtherwise3824 41 points42 points43 points 3 months ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]Da_reason_Macron_won 8 points9 points10 points 3 months ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]AdOtherwise3824 5 points6 points7 points 3 months ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]SuperMario69Kraftleft-wing male advocate 9 points10 points11 points 3 months ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Also, when women are celibate, it's usually not involuntary. It's usually a choice manufactured by misandry.

I've recently also heard another explanation for why women are less horny, one that's interestingly not bioessentialist nor social constructionist. It could be that women's libidos are lower than men's because women are more likely to take antidepressant drugs, which is also why they think they're happier without men in their lives and are not complaining about loneliness. It's technically a biological explanation but a medical rather than genetic one, meaning that it can be changed given the right environment and alternatives. Legalizing and destigmatizing marijuana, psilocybin, and other recreational substances would likely provide a less harmful alternative to these synthetic prescription drugs.

[–]sunyata150 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]SuperMario69Kraftleft-wing male advocate 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]sunyata150 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ExternalGreen6826feminist guest 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]AdOtherwise3824 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]SuperMario69Kraftleft-wing male advocate 8 points9 points10 points 3 months ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]senescenzia 17 points18 points19 points 3 months ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]petemaverick86 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point2 points 3 months agolocked comment (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 -17 points-16 points-15 points 3 months ago (74 children) | Copy Link

[–]senescenzia 20 points21 points22 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]azazelcrowley 20 points21 points22 points 3 months ago (29 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 -14 points-13 points-12 points 3 months ago (28 children) | Copy Link

[–]SuperMario69Kraftleft-wing male advocate 7 points8 points9 points 3 months ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[+]Turbulent-Raise4830 -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 months ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]SuperMario69Kraftleft-wing male advocate 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 months ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]SuperMario69Kraftleft-wing male advocate 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]AdOtherwise3824 5 points6 points7 points 3 months ago (10 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 months ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]AdOtherwise3824 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 months ago (6 children) | Copy Link

[–]AdOtherwise3824 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 -4 points-3 points-2 points 3 months ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]AdOtherwise3824 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise48300 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]AdOtherwise38241 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise48300 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]LeftWingMaleAdvocates-ModTeam[M] 1 point2 points3 points 3 months agolocked comment (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]OGBoglord 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 -1 points0 points1 point 3 months ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]OGBoglord 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[–]OGBoglord 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]OGBoglord 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise48301 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]OGBoglord1 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yeah thats not really the case,

It very clearly is, but I didn't expect you to acknowledge it.

sexual violence is not only about sexual desire but also about power, entitlement, control,... and of course the maintenance of gender hierarchy . Thats a more accurate statement, and its correct btw

'Sexual violence helps maintain gender hierarchy' is a different argument than the one that many Feminists make: 'men, in general, employ sexual violence as a tool to maintain gender hierarchy over women' - the later is verifiably incorrect.

I don't have time to get into the weeds with you on that though, so let's just circle back to my main point:

There is so much evidence of mainstream, Feminist-aligned media, academic, and social spaces pushing the idea that the average man is either sexually assertive or has the propensity to be - of course someone with that ideological bias would be more inclined to perceive a man as occupying an active role in a sexual scenario than a passive one.

Your statement is the typical taking something that has a slight ring of truth and twisting it to serve your purpose

Quite ironic coming for someone who reflexively blamed "toxic masculinity" on a phenomena without even reading the accompanying article.
I'm actually presenting an argument while acknowledging the speculative nature of it. You, on the other hand, are dogmatically defaulting to "toxic masculinity" because it serves to affirm the validity of Feminist frameworks.

It would be so much more honest if you simply admit that you don't know why women are less inclined than men to identify male assault victims as victims, especially considering that Feminists have commonly argued that "toxic masculinity" is the very reason why the exact opposite is true.

[–]LeftWingMaleAdvocates-ModTeam[M] 0 points1 point2 points 3 months agolocked comment (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Cmoke2Js1 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]ExcitableSarcasm 11 points12 points13 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[+]Turbulent-Raise4830 -10 points-9 points-8 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Centaur_Warchief123 9 points10 points11 points 3 months ago (40 children) | Copy Link

[+]Turbulent-Raise4830 -10 points-9 points-8 points 3 months ago (39 children) | Copy Link

[–]Centaur_Warchief123 14 points15 points16 points 3 months ago (38 children) | Copy Link

[–]SpicyMarshmellow 7 points8 points9 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]Turbulent-Raise4830 -9 points-8 points-7 points 3 months ago (36 children) | Copy Link

[–]Centaur_Warchief123 8 points9 points10 points 3 months ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 -2 points-1 points0 points 3 months ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Centaur_Warchief123 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]dependency_injector 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (31 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 -1 points0 points1 point 3 months ago (30 children) | Copy Link

[–]Punder_man 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 months ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[–]Punder_man 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Nice deflection there but no..

If Feminism is "About Equality" and "For men too" as most feminists claim..
Then surely it would have been a simple matter for those feminists to include men in not having their genitals mutilated without their consent right?

But they didn't..
Because Feminism is NOT about equality, rather its about the warped version of equality where they see women as perpetual victims and so anything they achieve is "Balancing the scales"
It doesn't matter if in doing so they generate inequality for men..

Here's another example for you
In the USA there was a bill submitted that would have made it mandatory for women who turn 18 to agree to be drafted just as men are..

Feminists protested this bill using slogans like: "Don't Draft Our Daughters!"
While protesting they claimed "No one should be drafted"
But what happened once the bill was defeated?

Did those "Feminists" continue protesting to have the draft removed for men as well?
NOPE! They fucked off into the night because the status quo had been restored, women would not be drafted but men would still be drafted.

Feminists CLAIM to oppose things like Male Circumcision or The Draft.. but those are all just lip service claims, designed to make feminism LOOK like its a movement that cares about equality..

But in reality its ONLY focus is on women's rights and issues..

Maybe you should inform yourself about the shit feminism has done in the name of "Equality" before calling me out?

[–]Turbulent-Raise48301 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Punder_man2 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

If you dont like the draft for men then do something about it, dont expect others to do it for you.

If FEMINISTS are making the claim of "Feminism is for Equality" or "Feminism is for Men too"
Then should I not expect Feminists to lobby for men's issues too?

If Feminism is about focusing on women's issues / rights, that's fine.. but if that's the case then FEMINISTS need to stop gatekeeping equality..

Your other example is the same, you are askinbg men to set aside the issues women face to foxcus on men. fss the US is going back on abortion and you think women should be occupied with the draft for men? LOL yeah that makes sense.

Just saying.. but its not EXCLUSIVELY men who were pushing for Roe Vs Wade to be overturned..
But it sure is painted that way..
Convenient how they ignore the hundreds of thousands if not millions of women who were pushing for Roe Vs Wade to be overturned and abortions to be restricted / banned..

Nope! Its constantly framed as "Men wanting to control women's bodies"

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830-1 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Punder_man1 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You are the one who clearly does not understand it..
Let me break it down for you:

Premise One: Feminism claims to be a movement about Equality and claims to be for men to

For this premise to be true we would expect to see feminists giving equal time / consideration to the issues men face as they give towards the issues women face.

But that is not what we see in reality so the premise is false.

Let me be clear here as well, I am 100% fine with feminism being a movement devoted to uplifting / resolving issues / problems that women face. Its literally in the name..
But, if that's the case I want feminists to be HONEST about their movement and to then stop LYING about the movement being about "Equality" or "For men too"

I would also want feminists to stop gatekeeping equality and stand aside so we as men can get access to the resources so we can help resolve the issues we as men face.

How is that such a fucking insane concept for you to understand?

If I am wrong PROVE it to me..
Give me direct verifiable evidence of feminism / feminists ACTIVELY advocating for men's rights / issues.

And to be clear I will NOT accept the cop out of "Feminist have been fighting to make it acceptable for men to cry / be emotional" because that is bullshit.
But if you have evidence of feminists tackling any other issue men face then i'd love to be proven wrong here..

Until then.. You appear to be the one who doesn't understand things and its clear that you dont.

[–][deleted]2 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]dependency_injector 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (19 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (18 children) | Copy Link

[–]dependency_injector 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (17 children) | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise48301 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]dependency_injector2 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise48300 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]dependency_injector1 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise48300 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]dependency_injector2 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise4830-1 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]dependency_injector1 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise48300 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]dependency_injector1 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise48301 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]dependency_injector2 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise48301 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]dependency_injector2 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise48301 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]dependency_injector2 points 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Turbulent-Raise48301 point 3 months ago [recovered] | Copy Link