~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
InvincibleV
[–]Gamer4life94231 points232 points233 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Oh have to remember one thing your not allowed to touch her money or her things but all your money and everything you own are now hers lmao
[–]Throwthe882790 points91 points92 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Also, love is what’s important, not money! Remember this one!
[–]ParalyticPoison58 points59 points60 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
"Equality" as defined by crazy people.
[–]paneracist52 points53 points54 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
1 for you and 1 for me.
2 for you and 1, 2 for me.
3 for you and 1, 2, 3 for me.
4 for you and 1, 2, 3, 4 for me.
"50%" for you and 50%, alimony, child support, utilities, car payments, and all expenses paid trip to CC paradise in perpetuity for me.
[–]hamburgerstake36 points37 points38 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What's mine is mine, and what's yours is mine.
[–]NagyonNagy7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I swear I had women argue this to me unironically with "this is how it works, I deserve this".
[–]ChilledEfilist3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
lol this is so true.
[–]mukhtar243 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
LMAO 🤣 🤣 totally hypocritical
[–]Slapnuts71188 points89 points90 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Cognitive dissonance is a thing.
[–]Iperovic32 points33 points34 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
All women live in cognitive dissonance...society keeps telling them one thing, their nature another and it's why we have this chaos.
[–]Yashugan001 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
in other words: they are not logically consistent ... but they want to be the leaders of men
[–]Ornn50057 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is not cognitive dissonance, this is full blown doublethink
[–]WaywardStag77 points78 points79 points 6 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
It actually makes sense.
As men, we know we are capable of looking after ourselves and don't need to latch on to a high income earner for security. So high income earning men couple with women of vastly different income levels.
If there's a 20% pay gap (hypothetically), but 50% of high income men are with low-mid income women, the pool of high income men available to high income women is less than 1 to 1. That means high income women either have to stay single, or be less shallow and date men who earn less than themselves.
What I find most interesting is the entitled tone of these kinds of headlines. Why does society accept this gold digging bullshit in the first place? Clearly a headline like "Men are struggling to find women who haven't slept around" would generate complaints, but women's shitty behaviour is accepted universally.
[–]justiceavenger242 points43 points44 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women worship, that is why. When you put someone on a pedestal dont be surprised when they look down on you.
[–]NathanHollister14 points15 points16 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Except the pay gap has been disproven, which is the point of the OP.
[–]WaywardStag19 points20 points21 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Of course there is a pay gap, it's very easy to get statistics about male and female yearly earnings and they clearly show that men earn more than women. The point is that the pay gap is caused by choices not discrimination.
[–]Nybaz13 points14 points15 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Earnings and pay are different things. A woman is paid the same as a man for the same job, because it would be illegal doing otherwise.
The men earn more because they work more, both quantitatively and qualitatively.
[+][deleted] 6 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Nybaz3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
My apologies, because English is not my first language, my understanding is that pay is intended as pay per hour, while earnings means the total. Also, obviously I intended same job as in all things being equal, which obviously is very difficult.
Bottom line is, I think you are right, women generally earn less, because they work less ours, or are less qualified.
[–]L_Ollonais3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Same pay rate but you work fewer hours, choose fewer overtime opportunities, and take more time off... Pay and earnings ARE different.
[–]meshflesh4064 points65 points66 points 6 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
I have yet to find a woman making less money than me for doing the same job. These myths need to stop.
But I have met women at work that make less than because
A) they dont do overtime like i do B) they have children and always have to take off from work. To tend to them (understandbly so).
And in general,, women take on less dangerous jobs and work kess hours to tend to their families.
That is the real reason for the wage gap, nothing more nothing less.
[–]ThePlague25 points26 points27 points 6 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link
It's been illegal in the U.S. for almost 60 years to pay women less than men for the same work and with the same experience. However, the persistence of the "gender wage gap" myth, more accurately called an "earnings gap", is due to women love winning the victim olympics. The simple truth is that, as a group, they don't work as much as men and that completely explains why as a group they earn less.
Women participate in the labor force at a much lower rate than men: https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables/civilian-labor-force-participation-rate.htm
And when they do participate, the work fewer hours: https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2015/time-spent-working-by-full-and-part-time-status-gender-and-location-in-2014.htm
From the first link: In 2018, 69.1% of Men 16 and older worked, while 57.1% of Women worked. That makes for a 1.21 ratio. That's over 20% right there. The second link has employed men working an average of 8.1 hours per day (both full and part-time) while employed women only work 7.3 hours. That's a ration of 1.11, For a combined (Participation Rate Ratio x Hours worked ratio) of 1.34. That's over a third more total man hours than women hours engaged in employment.
[–]throwlaca19 points20 points21 points 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
The "Wage gap" doesn't refer to same compensation for the same job. It refers to the problem that a man working as a CEO earns more than a girl working as a receptionist.
I know its stupid to compare those two jobs, but that's actually the "wage gap" that feminists discuss. They want women CEOs and men receptionists. By the force of law, if necessary.
[–]ThePlague12 points13 points14 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Right, or the whole "women in STEM" thing, since those fields generally earn well. They've been throwing money at women to go into STEM since at least the mid 80s (scholarships, grants, etc), and it still hasn't made much of a dent.
[–]NathanHollister14 points15 points16 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
It's almost like women don't want to go into STEM.
[–]throwlaca11 points12 points13 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They hate it. Hate it with all their guts, and when they finally cave and get into stem, they do a weird, different version of "Stem" work, generally focused on people, relationships or emotions and sidestep the real work. I've seen this happens countless times. They just can't do it.
[–]BertTheWelder3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
When my company posts want-ads for low-level administrative staff, it tends to get mostly female applicants. When it posts ads for blue collar jobs, it gets mostly male applicants. The blue collar jobs tend to pay a bit better than the admin jobs, and that’s because if we tried to hire blue collar folks at receptionist wages, we would have few if any qualified applicants.
I wonder what would happen if we interviewed a candidate for a receptionist and told her that her resume is so impressive we have a higher-paying job we want to put her in, but it requires her to wear a hard hat and work outside, regardless of the weather.
[+][deleted] 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]BertTheWelder1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That’s an awesome story. If you do find it I’d love to read it.
[–]tommygun16887 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
So you're mathematically saying women earn more for less work?
[–]ThePlague5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well, it depends on what they're claiming the "wage gap" is: if they claim that women earn about 67 cents or more for every dollar a man makes, then yes, women would be earning more for less work.
[–]Stahlboden5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Another "misogynistic" thing to add is there are "ladies' ways" for earning money or other valuable things that are not registered anywhere, don't go into wage stats and obviously aren't taxed: Paid dates, sugardadding, various forms of prostitution, explicitly and implicitly sexual streaming, living off provider husband, divorce settlements, alimony, child support (partly), various quotas and dotations.
[–]Abusedhusband1236 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Actually according to studies, the entire gender wage gap disappears and even reversed once you control for only one factor: job choice.
Men tend to go for dangerous undesirable jobs like coal mining and garbage collecting that pays a high wage in the west, whereas women go for comfy jobs that everyone wants like receptionist which pays peanuts.
And guess what the irony is? I got the above from inceltears of all places, when I was pretending to be a feminist and some of the neckbeard incel hating incels in denial there wanted to disprove the gender wage gap LMAO.
[–]BellyHunter5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I believe the gender wage gap is mostly for career choices. Here's a quick and insightful video to understand everything.
Also salary differences for the same job do exist. It concerns higher paid jobs like engineering, actors or athletes. Profitability is the main reason for these discrepancies.
In lower paid jobs there aren't as much wage gaps because there isn't much that can be done to elevate the pay compared to higher paid jobs except working more hours.
Now guess what? Most higher paid industry are male dominated. Women deliberately choose to work in childcare and nursing.
[–]Mort11861 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
It is a multi varied study and they concluded that it has nothing to with the fact they have a vagina. The points you mentioned are correct, but there are many more.
Strange part is I have not come across any feminist arguing those merits, they usually isolate their argument to one or two cases, like the amount of executives dominating the top ipo's are men, but there is valid reason behind that, like some of the points you mentioned and what they dont know and what I worked in was scrutinizing executive applications for board positions. Employees, The execs, the supervisory , shareholders & global governance advocates that an application for position on the board should take into account many factors before they would even consider it, there are some general governing principles, like age, experience, qualifications , other board seats, gender (but it is not a deal breaker, but rather taking into consideration as woman might be able to bring something new to the table) skills and number of years on the board.
There are some parts of the world, like France that legislated female gender quotas on boards and alot of other countries are following suit. I personally think that to legislate it and make it a hard and fast is completely ridiculous, governance practices had nuanced approach to the issue which in my view is much better and fair, as apposed to legislation which i think is a form of totalitarianism.
[–]TigPlaze39 points40 points41 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's so absurd. She won't even consider dating someone who makes less than she does.
[–]bamabeatsny[🍰] 20 points21 points22 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Both articles, by a woman, and clearly they want to have it both ways.
I'm shocked. /s
[–]CastandRefused18 points19 points20 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
🤡🌎
[–]NickTesla201812 points13 points14 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oppression! Clown world! Honk Honk
[–]Phantom_Spark9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hilarious because it’s women and feminists writing these articles. But don’t think they won’t try some absurd nonsense as the reason why men make more and women can’t find men who make more. It hurts even saying that. Such extreme conflictive dissonance is painful.
[–]NietzscheExplosion8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wow march to september pay gap closed and exceeded. Well done newyork post!
[–]itwasntme197 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Good for them, they can use the extra money to support Tyrone's rap career and cat food.
[–]monk20194 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sucks for them
[–]strainer1234 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Doublethink at its finest. Feminists want to make as much as men, and if a guy doesn't make more than they do they look down on him, there's no winning.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's never enough.
[+][deleted] 6 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]NathanHollister5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Yes, but you're damned if you do and damned if you don't really. Pay young women more= they stay single because they want a man who makes more $ than them. Pay them the same= they somehow make it out to seem like they make less. Pay them less= they cry and moan.
[+][deleted] 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]NathanHollister1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
We will always have those things, but you and I would be killed by the unwashed hordes. Because if our society continues like this, we will eventually get overrun by Muslims.
[+][deleted] 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]NathanHollister1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
They are only peaceful until they make up 10% of the population. Then, they start flexing their muscles.
In our current situation, either we take womens rights away now, or the Muslims do in 70-80 years.
[–]that_nast2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Derp derp derp!
[–]Lacrimosa2k72 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I've seen cognitive dissonance and self conflicting content spewed by online "journalist" sites before, but this one really takes the "L".
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
for fucks sake its always about money with these whores. i'm seriously getting pissed off by now.
[–]jkballzer1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
🤡 🌎
[–]throwlaca1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women don't need money. They don't have any use for it, it only makes them more lonely. Check out all the big hollywood stars in their 40-50, the loneliest women on earth.
They are earning a lot of money and getting lonelier and lonelier. Psych medication sells are skyrocketing. Soon they will realize the trap they put themselves in.
[–]thealleycatking1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
hmmm
[–]edgysecularist1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
AWALT no self awareness
[–]MrMagtow1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Needs more.... more! I should buy some shares in a popcorn company.
[–]MLG_Bob_Ross181 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Which one is it feminists? Make up your mind
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The ultimate strategy
[–]senior_chop1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Doublethink by the ministry of lies
[–]sjd1011 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Bahahahah oh the hypocritical delicious irony
Remember, your money is her money. Her money is her money. Your house is her house. Her house is her house.
Women can’t win without men, don’t let them piggy back you to the finish line. Lay their ass in the fucking mud and let them roll.
[–]mswilso1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If women actually were paid less than men, employers would only hire women...
[–]Thewinedup1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I recently moved in the six figures range pay wise. The last two women that I met, talked to, dated both made significantly more than I do. There is no pay gap, it is a myth.
[–]WoodrowWilsonSux1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
These kinds of articles exist partly because women are primarily susceptible to clickbait and still buy magazines.
[–]FightClubHamster691 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pure craziness. All these hoes want the top 20% guys while being the bottom 80%. Just run gents.
[–]Abusedhusband1230 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
I am convinced the elites who control society and direct all our official propaganda also have low IQ, how else can you explain absurdly contradictory news article titles like these?
[–]Timdeuces0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So which is it?
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
pick one
[–]H4n5Grub3r0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Probably the wrong subreddit to state this, but here I go anyway. People don't realise how long shit takes. The only thing you can tell from the gender pay gap is that there are proportionally less women in high paying jobs and disproportionately high numbers of women in low paying jobs. What the feminists don't (want to) realise is that this won't change soon, not next year, probably not in the next decades, shit takes time, equal numbers of men and women in all jobs will probably never be reached, not that that's necessarily bad. The funny thing is, if they weren't so dead set on reaching their goals by the end of the week, they wouldn't be driving people away from their cause, but no, they can't wait, they have no patience and in the process they're splitting society.
[–]pawuloni0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
If gender pay gap was a thing I would hire only women XD. Sadly they took all population and made statistics
[–]BristolTattoo0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I wish it could go back to when women weren’t in the work force and could focus on building a good family life . I think this generation can see that it’s a valid job as most of us have experienced broken marriages , being dumped at daycares and a evermore fractured family unit . I don’t get why a lot of women find it offensive to suggest this , maintaining a good family life is a hard and valid job . Me and my other half would love for his wage to cover both of us but since women joined the workforce there’s no way the average guy can earn that money to support a small family and he works incredibly hard but there are limits to what employers are willing to pay :( so I’ll keep working and maybe one day we’ll have enough for a baby . What lots of people fail to see is , they didn’t introduce half the population into the workforce and then find them jobs and pay them what the men were earning . They just over time had to gradually split it.
[–]JobertRordan1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
My wife and I count ourselves very blessed that I make enough money that she can stay home and raise our daughters; she just turned 30, and her "dream job" has always been to be a mother.
[–]BristolTattoo0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That’s beautiful 🙏🏻 we hope to find ourselves in that position too :) x
[–]JobertRordan1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'll pray you're able to. :)
[–]SomeGuy12510 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No connection at all goy.
You simply need to man up.
[–]vector56330 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Good! Now make these bitches pay child support and alimony to men.
How does it feel now? Equality at it's fullest!
[–]Bri-700 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Very much want women to bear the cost of socialism they are bringing. Tax em and let them live alone. Pretty certain it is much worse for them.
[–]fil1350 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
82% of money spent is spent by women. This is why all the tv shows are catered towards them. The companies paying for the commercials are buttering up their targets.
THIS is the overwhelmingly most important money gap. Men, don't spend money on women and don't give them access to your money. Until this gap is closed, all media and laws will be biased towards women.
[–]AlmostWardCunningham-5 points-4 points-3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Not from what I can tell, most single women don't make anywhere near what men make.
[–]throwlaca4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Most single engineer women make exactly the same as single engineer men.
[–]NathanHollister4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Every woman who has the same experience and education and work ethic will make the same money as a man doing the same job. The so-called gender wage gap is simply averaging the income of all people. This isn't fair because some jobs (predominantly held by men) pay more.
So do men make more money? Yes. Why is this?
Men work harder jobs than women, and hard jobs pay more than easy jobs (doctor, ceo, salesman, coal miner, etc make more $ than waitress, secretary, phone answerer, etc.).
Men work more hours, and more odd hours (more pay for weekends and nights, OT for extra hours)
Men take less vacation and less sick leave and call out less
More men participate in the labor force, so some women have zero earned income due to not working, and this is averaged in.
Men are less likely to leave gaps in their resume. (I.E. they don't take gap years, or take a year off to travel the world or whatever).
While men have fewer degrees, their degrees are actually in fields that are pertinent to a job. If you major in women's studies and I major in engineering, I'll make more money then you, while you make lattes at starbucks and claim the patriarchy is oppressing you.
[–]NathanHollister2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Sounds like they ought to work harder then.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]Gamer4life94231 points232 points233 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]Throwthe882790 points91 points92 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ParalyticPoison58 points59 points60 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]paneracist52 points53 points54 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hamburgerstake36 points37 points38 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NagyonNagy7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChilledEfilist3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mukhtar243 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Slapnuts71188 points89 points90 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Iperovic32 points33 points34 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Yashugan001 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ornn50057 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WaywardStag77 points78 points79 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]justiceavenger242 points43 points44 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NathanHollister14 points15 points16 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]WaywardStag19 points20 points21 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nybaz13 points14 points15 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]Nybaz3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]L_Ollonais3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]meshflesh4064 points65 points66 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThePlague25 points26 points27 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwlaca19 points20 points21 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThePlague12 points13 points14 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]NathanHollister14 points15 points16 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]throwlaca11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BertTheWelder3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]BertTheWelder1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]tommygun16887 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ThePlague5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Stahlboden5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Abusedhusband1236 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BellyHunter5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Mort11861 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TigPlaze39 points40 points41 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bamabeatsny[🍰] 20 points21 points22 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CastandRefused18 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NickTesla201812 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Phantom_Spark9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NietzscheExplosion8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]itwasntme197 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]monk20194 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]strainer1234 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (6 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]NathanHollister5 points6 points7 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (4 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]NathanHollister1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]NathanHollister1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]that_nast2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lacrimosa2k72 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jkballzer1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwlaca1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thealleycatking1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]edgysecularist1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MrMagtow1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MLG_Bob_Ross181 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]senior_chop1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sjd1011 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mswilso1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Thewinedup1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WoodrowWilsonSux1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FightClubHamster691 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Abusedhusband1230 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Timdeuces0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]H4n5Grub3r0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]pawuloni0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BristolTattoo0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]JobertRordan1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]BristolTattoo0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]JobertRordan1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SomeGuy12510 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]vector56330 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Bri-700 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fil1350 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AlmostWardCunningham-5 points-4 points-3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]throwlaca4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NathanHollister4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NathanHollister2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link