~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
sw4nkert0n
[–]eduardkoopman231 points232 points233 points 7 years ago (46 children) | Copy Link
Agreed. Women have much harsher and harder standards for guys, EVEN/ALSO when it comes to looks. If a man is SHORT-ish and/or has an below average face; it's GAME OVER basically (or he has to be a multi mullionaire and basically pay the woman shitload to be around him)
[–][deleted] 175 points176 points177 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
80 / 20 rule proven yet again.
80% of women chasing the top 20% of men. And even men in the 20% are getting sick of how terrible women are.
[–]Lubomir199477 points78 points79 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The top 20% have always been sick of them. That's why they never commit to one.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
True.
[–]PubliusVirgilius40 points41 points42 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Its more lile a 95/5 rule now.
[–]BitcoinBoffin5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
That's pretty close to Zipf's law.
[–]laptopdragon0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
ooo, a mystery. I wonder if likes /dislikes can be applied to Zipf's law too.
[–]metallica112 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
this, its closer to 95/5. I'm not hot but I'm a little bit above average and stay in awesome shape and Its like pulling teeth to get a date with a non-fat girl on tinder/bumble. One ever two weeks if I really really try.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
6' plus, 6 pack abs, 6 figure income, chad face.
Their standards are absolutely retarded and cruel af.
good looking boys with fat chicks has become a normality.
[–]metallica111 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
its insane. I Actually posted my picture on "reddit truerateme", which is EXTREMELY harsh on judging people. they grade on tight bell curve where being a 6/10 means you are top 10%, 7/10 is top 1-5%. most men get 3-5 on there, occasionally.
My rating was 6-7 (I have a great body, decent face), and I usually only match with fat girls on bumble/tinder.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The rule of the jungle has taken over.
Under 6', you gotta be wealthy now to have a turn on a beautiful chick.
Also u are easily replaceable. For above average girls the sky is the limit.
[–]metallica111 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
yeah. how far will the division go?
its crazy.
unlimited sexual freedom = stigma being promscuity stripped away. promiscuity is now TRENDY
+
access to thousands of men, picking the top ones (via apps)
Hypergamy released on an insane scale.
Women are literally getting HIGH and euphoric off of these experiences and validation.
but what goes up must come down. its the brain's natural balance. you can KEEP getting higher, otherwise you'd reach dopamine nirvana and your brain would implode from the over stimulation.
the crash comes.
I can't imagine feeling like you can get ANY MAN you want at ANY TIME, only to be invisible 15 years later to the garbage boy
Yes. Well put. Seems accurate to me.
Then they become feminists out of jealousy, cause then cant get the 10/10 chad thundercock anymore.
They cry about non existent rape culture etc ( in the western nations)
They really just want to restrict other women's cc rides it seems.
[–]StupidDebate22 points23 points24 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What if you're in the bottom 20% and sick of how terrible women are?
[–]RoboMandrake6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Go silicone. Add the AI option now or later, if desired.
[–]t353tfb1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Also note that there's almost an 80/20 distribution going on within the top 20, which means the top 2% probably get so much pussy that the next 17% feel like betas by comparison.
[–]DankoJones8487 points88 points89 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
"If you aren't hot, you'd better be rich."
-a dumb bimbo coworker of mine
[–]carninja6835 points36 points37 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
“If she doesn’t find you handsome she should at least find you handy” Legendary Red Green
[–]eduardkoopman25 points26 points27 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
T0 be more correct, and total. This she (probably white woman) should had said:
"If you aren't hot, AND of good height (aka not short), AND white (especially not asian (or black) man); then you better be super rich"
referential graphs. https://imgur.com/a/1dUuib8
https://i.imgur.com/PCJuM9C.png
source of graphs: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=895442
[–]Marque017 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Let me guess. She was fat and post-wall too, right?
[–]DankoJones8417 points18 points19 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Early 30s with a kid, not bad looking but the most obnoxious personality you can imagine. She cried when she got fired for thinking the rules didn't apply to her. It took all my strength not to laugh out loud.
[–]Marque016 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Haha. Post wall with nothing to offer but someone else's asshole kid :)
And she still feels that she deserves a millionaire
[–]JJ33143 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Just figured I'd respond to you with a mini rant, since I was too lazy to cross post this elsewhere. Came a across a profile a few days ago on r/datingoverthirty (which I visit occasionally to cheerfully read about the difficulties of entitled 30/40 something women thinking they deserve men who are above them in SMV).
One post I read was from a 40 year old woman with multiple sclerosis. Certainly not mocking her for having that, but she proceeded to talk about how it was completely unacceptable for her to get with a guy who has kids.
She rationalizes that her "disability" (her term) is nonetheless invisible, and "most guys don't seem to care." (Either it's currently a disability or not lady, WTF).
The point is this: a man with, say, a couple of kids will eventually see them leave the home, if he even has full custody (and overwhelmingly he does not). That unforgivable flaw, which a lot of her age-matched dating prospects have, will get better over time.
She has a neurologic disorder that will in all likelihood get worse over time, and quite possibly result in her being definitely and legitimately physically disabled by the time she's in her 50s (and this is not even speaking of the increased risk for cognitive issues that comes with this disease). Meaning, a self aware man would have to accept the possibility of being her part time nurse inside of 10-15 years. Again, not mocking her condition, but I thought to myself "Why the fuck is she holding herself above men with children?!" as if they're some untouchable class that are beneath her? Your average 40 year old woman, without major medical problems, has no business thinking this way, since most 40 year old women look terrible, let alone this woman. Rollo Tomassi is totally right in saying hypergamy always seeks a better than deserved arrangement.
[–]CeleritySteam0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Thots hold men with children in contempt while thinking those same men should subsidize their children.
At least the men can pay for their own kids and could absolutely parent them better without their interference.
[–]jrpark053 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A thot said that once to a group of us men, and I then told her that if she's chunky or is a bitch, then I wanted nothing to do with her.
Two can play that game.
It was my blue pill days. It gave her the tingles, she had a great rack, and could actually string two coherent sentences together. I gave her about two weeks of my time. LOL
[–]ProudBBCOwner2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
She ain't lying at least
[–]0signal045 points46 points47 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
The worst part is that women reject men over things that can't be changed due to them being the result of genes. A fat girl with a terrible attitude and bad breath can always lose weight, sort herself out and go to the dentist. That said, even a fat girl who suffers from halitosis and a terrible personality will get more attention on online dating than your average Joe. It's over.
[–]eduardkoopman16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
The worst part is that women reject men over things that can't be changed
I agree, rejection happening within seconds of seeing a man. happens on factors such as: his height and etnicity. Most men get rejected already based on their height (too short), or by etnicity (mainly happens for asian men and at 2nd place black men). Things that can't be changed.
A fat girl ... can always lose weight
I have read on a research/test. That a woman with an ugly face can compensate it with a good looking body (which is something she can do something about). Yet, a man with an ugly face, can't compensate that with a good looking body (much).
even a fat girl who suffers from halitosis and a terrible personality will get more attention on online dating than your average Joe
I once saw, that an top 20% man, get as much attention/messages as an way below average woman (aka a 3 orso). LOL.
Economically apporaching it. * In the sexual market place (ONS, hookup, Friendswith benifits, flings, etc.), women hold and have the power.
* In the relationship market place (LTR, commited relationships, cohabitation, marriage, etc.). The playing field is more even between men and women (because women want/need commitment and support/providings way more then men want that (or men want to givee that). But women have managed to invite the government/society/laws/etc. to get involved in (LTR, commited relationships, cohabitation, marriage) between men and women; in such a way that the man can (and regularly) will be financially raped during or after the relationship or ruined in other ways after the relationships.
[–]jrpark054 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
A woman can also compensate an ugly face with a good personality. In my BP days I dated women like this, because I enjoyed the conversation. One time it did lead to a romantic encounter.
What women don't realize is that the very best of men (those that could make the best mates and pass on the best genes) have left the dating market, one reason being their rating of men, shown above.
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In the sexual market place (ONS, hookup, Friendswith benifits, flings, etc.), women hold and have the power.
Because men gave that power to them. Since simps have no self-esteem and no standards, most of them hit on women far below their level. They were told that they have to "approach like crazy", which is exactly false. Women are much more interested in men who ignore them.
[–]Sid_Vichous0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, but at the end of the day men still have to propose. It's the only trump card we have left.
I wonder if they even realize the cruelty in all that.
[–]Marque0122 points23 points24 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Even the Gillette ad. No one mentioned it, but remember the 'ass grabbing pervert' that was groping his maid? The actor they chose was short. Another stereo-type they had to throw in. Short guys are creepy perverts. Get it?
Ignore them. Get a sex doll. It'll have a nicer ass anyways :)
[–]xerotolerance8798 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Men tend to be attracted to the majority of women they see. Women however, are only attracted to a small percentage of men. It’s just the way it is.
[–]Fivekickers0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
monogamy mariage from monotheists were the true regulator of society and the sexual marketplace now it's all fucked up. The only thing to do for men is to not marry except if it's a good girl who goes regularly to church/mosque or have known less than 4 sexuals partners in her life. In any case civil mariage is not worth anymore
Not really. Rather, most men are thirsty because of low sexual self-control and low self-esteem and because they are socially conditioned to chase pussy. This is why their perception of female beauty is warped. If you look with a cold eye (like an artist) then you will see that most women are in fact quite ugly.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I'm 5'4". But at 32, idgaf anymore. TBH, now. I'm actually kind of glad that I'm being pre-disqualified. Less hassle overall.
[–]eduardkoopman2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I'm actually kind of glad that I'm being pre-disqualified
Now you're not up for the following rewards/prizes: - getting financially milked (or raped at divorce court) by women; - false domestic abuse and/or rape charges (possibly with jail time or criminal record); - getting cheated on; - getting your children taken away.
How sad, that you will never be able to win one of the above "prizes". Luckily I have only myself encountered "prize" nr 1 (getting financially milked), by paying more then 75% of all things. My 20-something year old high libido made me put up with that, for the purpose of access to sex.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, that seems to be many women's primary motive. Getting someone to finance their life due to their terrible life decision's. That person can further enable that behavior through said financing.
I recall a South Park episode where they touch upon this. I think it's the one about Butters becoming a pimp and he essentially says that whether or not you pay a prostitute or pay by listening/building a relationship, you're paying for it one way or another. So why not cut out the BS and just get the end result and go on your way.
[–]bfte22 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Game over, man! It's Game over!
[–]ryzenisaslut1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yeah, if you notice, it tends to be women who drag other women. Honestly, if a man says "well I don't like heavy girls" then OMG FUCK HIM but it's... it's actually women who have made that the standard for beauty. Not men.
[–]DicamVeritatem0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And never forget - even if that shortish/averagefaced multi-millionaire snags a woman, she will soon treat him like shit. Show me a non-famous less physically attractive dude who has experienced long-term genuine lust from his bangable woman. I still ain't met the dude.
[–]danbitmanholograf0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Women have much harsher and harder standards for guys
It's our fault, honestly.
If you could have any car in the world, you'd drive the best ones. Men need higher standards. Like, let's not for a single moment say we wouldn't do the same.
The men that go out with chicks below their level are the reason why this can happen.
[–]eduardkoopman0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
yep.
If you could have any car in the world, you'd drive the best ones. Men need higher standards.
The problem. Men have higher want for sex, a higher libido. Like for example; there is want for 100 sex, while the supply is only 25 sex. Then the seller (aka women) hold the power when it comes to sex. The only real solution is (for the sexual market) if demand and want are alligned.
Now if there is only 25 cars for every 100 men that want a car. One can say to men, to only drive the best car. And should have high standards. Now if 10% of these men actually manage to do that; it still means little/shit looking at the whole marketplace from an economical standpoint. Now there are still 90 dudes trying to get 1 of the 25 cars. And the price will still be high; and the car sellers will still be able to sell crappy cars for top money.
[–]GottaGoMGTOW0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Facts hurt feminism's credibility
[–]Omnibrad170 points171 points172 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
"Put down the fork" is now an unrealistic standard of beauty.
[–]SuperMello119 points120 points121 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
"What should I eat to lose weight?"
Less
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
[–]buildthewallalready8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I know it’s satire but....
https://youtu.be/h-jy3OtZAss
😂😂😂
[–]boy_named_su26 points27 points28 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
just lift and hold frame bro
[–]jrpark052 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Meaning...just use a forklift and man up bro!
[–]toolate4redpill2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Put down the fork and MOVE............like walk........for 5 minutes
[–]NoThirst0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
...fork? What's that? Women prefer big macs, whoppers and pizza. No fork required.
I've seen people eat pizza with a fork. They were... special.
[–]Resident_Kiwi79 points80 points81 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Sure, I'll admit, your average man may have partial culpability in enabling this, but it's nothing compared to the cosmetic companies exploiting your gullibility, complaisance and in-group competition.
[–]Marque010 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Dominated primarily by women and gay men. But because a man invented the bra a hundred years ago, let's redirect all of our range on hetero white guys. Fembot "logic"
[–]XxInnerRagexX46 points47 points48 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Now let’s try WITHOUT fakeup
Correct, and there isn't enough fakeup in the world to paper over their low self-esteem and deep insecurities.
[–]Blackwomann46 points47 points48 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
The unrealistic beauty standards you speak of were created by WOMEN.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]jrpark052 points3 points4 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
Yep. Women in reality have very low self-esteem, which comes not from being cut down, but from being treated like princesses, and never having to develop a good personality and good set of skills when they were young.
They then compensate by being overly harsh on men (none best looking), choosing the one night stand over the long term relationship (being treated and discarded like a dirty slut, which they are), and having the appearance of being a "strong, independent woman". Trust me, this is just a front, because behind that arrogance is almost always self-loathing.
Women that have higher self-esteem are looking for the long term relationship; however, the number of those today is so low to make MGTOW a viable alternative. Women at their core probably always had low self-esteem (their nature hasn't changed), but they were more adept at doing what was necessary to survive. This means looking for the strong provider, and not the over roided meathead and momentary tingle (which ALWAYS passes), and someone steady to protect her and her babies.
She had an awareness that despite her nature she had to bring something to the equation to convince a man she was deserving of his time and resources. Now she doesn't, and at her core knows that she's done nothing to deserve such. The self-loathing and entitlement is so strong, however, she is unable to get out of this hole.
[–]shammylamby0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Well said sir
[–]TyrannicalWill2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
All women need to do is put down the cake. People who live life on easy mode complain about the most insignificant things.
[–]SoundSalad0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Tell me more about how women held top executive positions at leading advertising firms during the 19th and 20th centuries.
[–]sedstar45 points46 points47 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
regardless of how things "used to be WAYYYY back when"... and regardless of how things "were in the 50s"...
THIS is the way things are NOW. I always HATED the phrase "it is what it is" growing up? always sounded like a cop out... a non-sensical statement of the obvious?
But? I am 50? and... regardless of the far past or the near past? THIS is what it is NOW. Hate to say it, but... "it is what it is".
I've always been a little jaded about men and women and marriage and kids and divorce, and all that. I'm not MAD about the way it is? Because it serves no functional purpose to be mad. It accomplishes nothing.
I do know, that while things were never PERFECT between men and women? They were at least not completely screwed up, at least not for everyone... but? Over the last 20 years? Things HAVE gotten almost COMPLETELY screwed up.
Arguing whether its 60/40 or 70/30 or 80/20? accomplishes nothing. INside? We all KNOW we are up against a well entrenched, well oiled, long running "propaganda and media machine" that is a complete JUGGERNAUT in our society.
I swear to GOD? The only thing we can DO? that will have a big enough impact, that wont get twisted around to make our position even worse? Is what we are doing... more men are walking away from marriage. Almost as many are walking away from the long term commitments, from having women live with them. More and more? Are even going full MONK.
Its not perfect? But, its the best way to play the hand we hold. I have a minor in history from my university getting my STEM degrees?
We are basically doing what GHANDI did to the mighty and powerful BRITISH EMPIRE. The "sun never set on the british empire" back then? they were all powerful. He BEAT THEM? by simply spreading the word around... "hey? on THIS DAY, we're all going to just STAY HOME. Save up a little money, a little food... we all go on strike. No fighting, No rioting, No guns no shooting? Just... *nothing*
They THOUGHT it would take "3 months" for the british to lose enough money, they would have no choice but to give up and leave them alone? IT TOOK A COUPLE WEEKS.
Ghandi? Liberated a weak nation from the most POWERFUL nation? without firing a shot. Hell, there was no way to DO IT the normal fighting way!
THATS what WE are accomplishing, gentlemen. I just posted earlier today? a "pool" video where women are complaining "my boyfriend got redpilled on youtube! whats going on!"
...and i am LAUGHING... its starting to WORK.
The "AL-fucking-mighty" BRITISH empire? (women)... is just beginning to feel the first PINCH... Just sit back, crack a beer? and SMILE that little smirk Ghandi always had...
its working slowly...
[–]Sir_manalot12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Sadly, it will take far longer then two weeks due to how strong the pussy drug ism
But I chuckle at people who are still saying that men are not entitled to anything.
The truth is spreading as it always does and men will remember every ounce of disrespect society gave them.
I bet that in ten years society will be BEGGING for men to come back...with society and women being so worthless to most men that they will be just fine with it all crashing down.
I swear by god. I will not forget the shit society has put me through. All the lies and manipulation.
These bitches even pushed me out of a career. I was too blue pilled to understand any of it. And too frightened to stand up for myself. :/
I bet that in ten years society will be BEGGING for men to come back
That is beginning to happen in Japan with the 'herbivore men', though the cultural data are a bit different there. Not that Japanese women aren't total whores and status obsessed hypergamy machines (they are). However, they are not as overtly aggressive as Western women; they tend to be passive-aggressive instead.
[–]MillennialDan5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I can't read anything with this many pointless question marks.
[–]sedstar0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
IDK... FWIW mos peeple do it lik thiis, and IDK i hat that way...
[–]Dawnguards2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And thats why there is more and more surveillance, great speech people are getting banned by youtube, patreon and many many small platforms. The less people know the better, so their damage control is by silencing those who know what to speak.
Just doing nothing is not good anymore because media can create fake news.
[–]Sihas1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Amen!
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]qoning3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Jeez, I don't know if all these are questions or the author has found some new and clever use for question marks.
[–]sedstar0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Well, I am writing informally, so... its not like i am writing an article for a professional journal or anything...
[–]qoning2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It's just that when you put a ? at the end of your sentence, you expect the reader to ponder over the posited question. I'm 50? isn't really something that makes a lot of sense, but it's OK, buddy. :D
[–]sedstar1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
fuck it, BE OFFENSIVE !
i dont really care... we're not liberals sitting around hugging... we're MEN... we can fuck each other off a little? and we should be able to take it a good bit...
PS - to tell a family secret? I'm considered a little eccentric, ha ha. I mean i prefer the term eccentric and all? BUT... "bat shit crazy" has been tossed idly around a few times, lol... you wouldnt be the first person to ever call me half crazy or whatever... I got over that shit years ago...
[–]gigasimpdeluxe31 points32 points33 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I love how the rest of reddit will tell you women don't find looks very important, just because they find your status and money important too. And poor simps fall for these lies, partly because they want to believe.
Endless lies and lies and lies.
[–]Mad_King18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I love to see these image ratings over delusional bitches because it proves my thoughts. I always knew these bitch are delusional af. This approves the point.
[–]Staircase197812 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I would be considered a top 20% male in basically every category. Yet.....here I am in the MGTOW sub reddit.
[–]jrpark051 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
May I speculate as to why?
It is because the juice isn't worth the squeeze?
[–]datdude20140 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Same. I have a lot of interest from women, yet I've been on monk mode for the last 3 years. Absolutely liberating..
A good looking single man? He must be gay.. Lol
[–]ChadwickSlickdick-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You’re not alone. I tend to lean the Tom Leykis way, but I am way, way more intelligent about my interactions with women.
The dudes that will never be enamored by women are usually the angriest, but we keep telling them that they don’t know how lucky they actually are.
Stop being angry about shot you can’t change...
[–]Chief_Niggums7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I wanna see their pussies! Ya know....to check for damages....rusted side panels....what have ya, gotta make sure I ain't buying a lemon.
[–]reaper5559 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is why MGTOW is the only way. The game is loaded completely in there favour and they have made price of pussy just way to high. And even if surmount these odds you are still inheriting all of her problems and mental dysfunctions.
Never split the difference. Life is to short for that. Live life on your terms and give all women the middle finger.
[–]thecherry946 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The uncoordinated hivemind of men naturally forms a gaussian distribution.
[–]TruthfulHaploid2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
While women form a chi-squared distribution, THIS SHIT IS INSANE
[–]jrpark056 points7 points8 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
The problem isn't men....it's women and their crappy choices. They choose the meathead pillar of testosterone, hoping that they can change him or that he will be different. Then, when the guy turns out to be exactly what he represented himself as, and pumps and dumps, she says things like "society's expectations are too high".
Using the 20-80 principle (and I'd say it's more like 10-90 and getting smaller by the day), they dismiss the vast majority of men.
They are unwilling (or unable) to discern "the good men" (their words). It's as if they don't even operate on basic instinct any more, and with thirsty simps are lazy and go with the man that takes the least effort to attain.
Women really have VERY low self-esteem in general, and are always trying to fill that gap with "alphas", social status, having a score of men at beck and call etc etc, not thinking that if they actually took the time to work on themselves that a lot of their feelings of inadequacy (which are possibly the conscience telling her to improve) would go away. However, none of this has long-term potential for the man.
[–]misfit28725 points6 points7 points 7 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
The men that truly effected by the reality of "dating" are Chad's and incels,the polar opposites.Chads are the guys that are very sexually active, usually dealing with more than one woman at a time.Since women are drawn to Chads by instinct there's no need for putting on a genteel facade of the "nice girl". They're comfortable being their true selves. Chads get to see the darker side(infidelity,wild sexual behaviour, excessive partying,etc) that most men don't know about till it's too late.They like having sex with women,but are smart enough to not to commit to one women. Hard to trust women after what they see from women.Incels repel women by instinct.Women hardly ever hide their disgust(or do a poor job trying to hide) for "ugly" men.Incels notice how shallow,mean spirited most women are,they also see the "true" nature of most women.Not all sugar and spice after all.MGTOW are less effected because they chose not to deal with women unless necessary.
You make some good points. Another aspect is the huge amount of data being recorded about female behavior on the internet, which forms an excellent mass of empirical evidence.
[–]LJHova4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women are idiots
[–]MuleFool425 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
0% 'Most Attractive'
LOL. That says it all.
[–]Trelerium_Demons4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think THAT is the most telling aspect of the study; and it always gets over looked.
Not a single man was deemed as "most attractive" by a singe woman.
[–]Orbit-Man4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Can you imagine what a treasure trove of empirical information is out there? Okcupid posted their data, then quickly regretted it. If MGTOW was more organized we could do our own surveys and research thus generating data-backed findings instead of relying on theories.
We will soon have AI agents to do just that, and we will do it.
[–]DigitalScetis2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Interesting thing to think about, gentlemen.
Men, generally speaking, have an affinity for statistics and data. Sports stats (batting average, yards per carry, free point average), technical stats (horsepower, torque, amps, volts), economic stats (APR, GDP), and so on are things men love to figure out for a myriad of reasons.
This is, of course, with one exception: when it comes to women and dating. It's pure emotion here, and the proportion of men who will go into obvious mistakes because of a visceral urge is almost absolute.
Women are exactly the opposite. They aren't really fascinated by statistics, except when it comes to men and dating.
That's when she will apply all sorts of statistics with cold, calculative precision, without even realizing she's doing it. She'll intuitively sense things like "yes he's making $120,000 dollars a year, but at his age, and in his listed career on his profile, he ought to be making $30,000 more, so he's a hard swipe." Or "he's this high, and weighs this much, so his body fat % is very low, so I'll check him out." Or, "He's got so few friends and references, the probability he's hiding something is high."
[–]omaeissa1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link
Well, they’re rating pictures from okcupid and it’s pretty easy to manipulate and edit pics in order to better fit those beauty standards. Women are generally the ones who edit themselves.
So maybe if more men edited their pictures, more women would find them attractive. Kinda the way men find the edited pictures of women attractive.
[–]sw4nkert0n[S] 21 points22 points23 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link
I honestly doubt that edited pictures are behind this big of a change between genders. Ever heard of the 20/80% rule? 80% of women go after 20% of men on Tinder.
[–]UmbrellalikeWetness11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
This is literally the graph of the original data that lead to that rule.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_distribution it happens all over in nature.
[–]WikiTextBot0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Power law
In statistics, a power law is a functional relationship between two quantities, where a relative change in one quantity results in a proportional relative change in the other quantity, independent of the initial size of those quantities: one quantity varies as a power of another. For instance, considering the area of a square in terms of the length of its side, if the length is doubled, the area is multiplied by a factor of four.
[ PM | Exclude me | Exclude from subreddit | FAQ / Information | Source ] Downvote to remove | v0.28
[+]omaeissa-10 points-9 points-8 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
What’s your point? Pictures on tinder are also edited.
I’ve seen plenty of posts talking about women looking totally different in real life than online. I have no doubt if women posted their pictures unedited the numbers would be different.
[–]sw4nkert0n[S] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
I didn't say it wouldn't be any difference if women stopped editing the photos; however I doubt the change would be so much that the graphs would be equal. It's not black or white.
[+]omaeissa-6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
I don’t think they’d be equal either. I just don’t think there’d be this drastic of a difference.
My point is okcupid (or any app/website) is not reliable. I don’t think this proves your point very well.
[–]sw4nkert0n[S] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I think there would be a slight difference, but not drastic. Sure, it might not be reliable, all I said was "Interesting..", not trying to prove a point really.
[+]omaeissa-6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Fair enough. Just lessens the impact then. Not very interesting.
[–]sw4nkert0n[S] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
What lessens the impact? And yes, it's still very interesting since you can see how true this is, everywhere you go. And the funny thing with 80% of women going after the top tier of men is that they will later scream "All men are assholes that just fuck around!" - No, it's because you are ALL going for the same guy. He has tons of options. It's so obvious..
[–]omaeissa-2 points-1 points0 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
The fact that these graphs are using data collected from okcupid..... the titles should say “how men/women rate men’s/women’s pictures”. A lot of the pictures aren’t accurate representations of the people themselves. It really doesn’t mean anything.
[–]sw4nkert0n[S] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Yes, that's fair, but why I think this was interesting is because I was already seeing that there are many women going for the same men, instead of "spread out equally" if that makes sense. Just look around, you see it everywhere on social media, not just dating apps. Anyway, lets agree to disagree.
[–]UmbrellalikeWetness10 points11 points12 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Many (ok, not all) men put WAY more effort into their pictures than the women do. Because they have to.
[+]omaeissa-17 points-16 points-15 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
There are more women than men manipulating their pictures because they also feel like they have to. I mean this sub alone literally calls women “roasties” and talks about them “hitting the wall” and seems to base a lot of their worth on looks alone.
[–]TripOverNothing6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jnUU2c_i0w
[–]f-u-c-c-boi11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Genetic history of our development indicates that roughly 80% of women managed to pass on their genes, as opposed to roughly 20% of men. So yeah, no.
[–]DoorbellGnome1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Women use a lot more than just appearance to rate men, often most importantly status. These are things that aren't obvious on dating sites so the result is flawed. That's my theory at least.
Of course, the true result doesn't have to be a perfect bell curve but I find it hard to believe that it's this radical.
Men find attractive what men find attractive. Zero need for explanation, justification, or apology.
That said, women hold each other to much stricter standards.
[–]cyborg_type_darkness1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
80 20 rule again.
[–]ikin50501 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That’s a nice bell curve
[–]InformalCriticism1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
What's hypergamy again?
[–]sedstar1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
hypergamy is the universal trait of women to be constantly wanting to "get a better man".
they trade UP... like when you trade in a car for a more desireable (expensive) model...
we call it monkey branching... IE, the monkey wants to sit on a higher branch with a higher status monkey in the group...
a woman TRULY is "only as loyal as her options". THIS is why if your wife or girlfriend suddenly loses alot of weight? they are usually about to trade up...
itssimply in their basic nature... we USED to control or limit this behavior in most women? by religion, or, by society SHAMING divorce, by making it disadvantageous in other ways like money wise? to control that shit... we took all the checks and balances out when society did away with religion, and introduced feminism, then... we added an INCENTIVE with aklimony and child support...
the car was starting to roll down the hill? and we not only took the parking brake off? we hit the gas pedal on it too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3r6kKn5_hUc
[–]FlashFanBoy19901 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Females victimize men with their high standards, that's why you go MGTOW so that you don't have to bow down to females and let them change you into their own sick twisted image.
Men also allow themselves to be victimized in this manner since most of them remain slaves to pussy. Pussy is way overrated.
[–]Fantoche_Dreemurr1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hell yes. Unrealistic standards for men and add to that the herd mentality for women so they all have the same "ideal man" in mind.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Funny, because for me 100% of women are worse than the least attractive ugly bitch. Honestly, EVERY women including so-called "celebrities" and whatnot is just disgustingly ugly. Their face alone are enough to cause me vomit.
Yes, most women are quite ugly.
[–]TheGrokelives0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think what we are seeing in this day and age are the final throws of a decade long tantrum from women. We've all more than likely been in a heated argument with a woman and she starts throwing all sorts of crazy shit about that's really off topic just to be spiteful because she's losing the argument and I think that's what we are seeing today.
I think there are a lot of factors to this, over inflated sense of self worth probably brought on by all the thirsty betas on social media, increased hypergamey also brought on by over exposure to the larger world via increased media, TV, magazines etc etc.
They all seem to want what they can't have or won't work for. Their expectation is to be given everything on a silver platter regardless of their behaviour or looks. I can tell you from experience that when you tell a partner she's an embarrassment because of her behaviour, that is exactly the time you find out what sort of woman you're really with and it's usually one of the crazy, used up, wall hitting bitches.
[–]mgtowvic0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
IIRC OkCupid took down the original studies because it went against the narrative
I bet more studies on this would show the same results but sociology as a field is overrun by feminsts and virtually useless. Then liberals will say this isn't backed up by data but don't realize that the data is sequestered to keep the narrative alive. Same thing applies to male rape and abuse statistics.
People have and will never care about men, even when the problem affects us more. It's better to GYOW and ignore women. They seem to be the source of most of our problems.
[–]Elkubik0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Oh would you look at that! Standard distribution! Who'd have thought
[–]TyrannicalWill0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Projection. Young girls have high beauty standards so they're constantly anxious about not meeting them. The statistics show that men have realistic standards for women. Just another self inflicted feminist issue.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]eduardkoopman231 points232 points233 points (46 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 175 points176 points177 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lubomir199477 points78 points79 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]PubliusVirgilius40 points41 points42 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]BitcoinBoffin5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]laptopdragon0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]metallica112 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]metallica111 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]metallica111 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]StupidDebate22 points23 points24 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RoboMandrake6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]t353tfb1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DankoJones8487 points88 points89 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]carninja6835 points36 points37 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]eduardkoopman25 points26 points27 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Marque017 points8 points9 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]DankoJones8417 points18 points19 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Marque016 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]JJ33143 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CeleritySteam0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jrpark053 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ProudBBCOwner2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]0signal045 points46 points47 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]eduardkoopman16 points17 points18 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]jrpark054 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sid_Vichous0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Marque0122 points23 points24 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xerotolerance8798 points9 points10 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fivekickers0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]eduardkoopman2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bfte22 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ryzenisaslut1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DicamVeritatem0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]danbitmanholograf0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]eduardkoopman0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]GottaGoMGTOW0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Omnibrad170 points171 points172 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]SuperMello119 points120 points121 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]buildthewallalready8 points9 points10 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]boy_named_su26 points27 points28 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jrpark052 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]toolate4redpill2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoThirst0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CeleritySteam0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Resident_Kiwi79 points80 points81 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Marque010 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]XxInnerRagexX46 points47 points48 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jrpark054 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Blackwomann46 points47 points48 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]jrpark052 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]shammylamby0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TyrannicalWill2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SoundSalad0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sedstar45 points46 points47 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot12 points13 points14 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MillennialDan5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]sedstar0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Dawnguards2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sihas1 point2 points3 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (7 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]qoning3 points4 points5 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]sedstar0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]qoning2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]sedstar1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]gigasimpdeluxe31 points32 points33 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mad_King18 points19 points20 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Staircase197812 points13 points14 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]jrpark051 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]datdude20140 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ChadwickSlickdick-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Chief_Niggums7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]reaper5559 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thecherry946 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TruthfulHaploid2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jrpark056 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]misfit28725 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LJHova4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MuleFool425 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Trelerium_Demons4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Orbit-Man4 points5 points6 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DigitalScetis2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]omaeissa1 point2 points3 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]sw4nkert0n[S] 21 points22 points23 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[–]UmbrellalikeWetness11 points12 points13 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WikiTextBot0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]omaeissa-10 points-9 points-8 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]sw4nkert0n[S] 8 points9 points10 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[+]omaeissa-6 points-5 points-4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]sw4nkert0n[S] 5 points6 points7 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]omaeissa-6 points-5 points-4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]sw4nkert0n[S] 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]omaeissa-2 points-1 points0 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]sw4nkert0n[S] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]UmbrellalikeWetness10 points11 points12 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]omaeissa-17 points-16 points-15 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]TripOverNothing6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]f-u-c-c-boi11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DoorbellGnome1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]cyborg_type_darkness1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ikin50501 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]InformalCriticism1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]sedstar1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]FlashFanBoy19901 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fantoche_Dreemurr1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheGrokelives0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mgtowvic0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Elkubik0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TyrannicalWill0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link