Microexperiment in China

billybob_jr · 2019-06-06T09:55:32+00:00

Feminists : My feelings 😢😢😢

Everyone else: My evidence 😧

sparrowbelfast · 2019-06-06T11:35:08+00:00

Man, that's some solid insight, really makes you think. Strange that I can get more thoughtful social science through Reddit reposts than through the collective works of modern humanities academics.

anduxo · 2019-06-06T12:40:34+00:00

This experiment is just called life. Look at it this way:

Girls' day:

This represents when women are young. Women have the goods (snacks) and want the popular guys. They share their goods with the popular boys. During this period the not so popular guys are alone or getting crumbs of the stuff no one wants.

Boys' day:

This represents when a subset of people has reached a certain age, and all the boys are acquiring lots of snacks (money). At this point, women's goods are not that good anymore (wall approaching, biological clock, etc), and they don't care about the popular boys anymore, they just want someone that can provide them with snacks (money).

It's the old phrase grandma told you "don't worry about those girls not wanting you, they'll come running to you once you are 30 and successful". In this experiment it could have been rephrased as "Don't worry about those girls snapping on you, they'll come running to you once you have the good snacks".

Moral of the story: Disregard women, acquire lots of snacks.

Slixter99 · 2019-06-06T11:26:57+00:00

This is the 80/20 rule in practice. I've always wondered why we say women are more generous and nurturing then men, when clearly this isn't the case.

escalover · 2019-06-06T13:42:04+00:00

Women having power = miserable society.

Men having power = most people have a shot at happiness.

Is it any surprise?

pinewoodpine · 2019-06-06T10:57:31+00:00

Wait, so the Catholic Church was right all along?

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/TheExtremistWasRight

Santon24 · 2019-06-06T09:57:13+00:00

I would say the experiment results surprised me but id be lying 😂,Still,besides it being very interesting,its still a microexperiment,too little samples,you could argue that all the boys in the class were nice and the girls were mean,and if you tried with another class the results would be very different. However on a larger scale the experiment could be very revealing

Teflon08191 · 2019-06-06T15:26:40+00:00

What happens when women are left to express their natures completely unchecked? They disregard 80% of the male population and basically share the top 20%.

What happens when 80% of the male population becomes disenfranchised by a society that denies them the ability to pass on their genes? It doesn't last very long...

Human nature is antithetical to civilization. Female nature is particularly dangerous because as we've seen over the past ~50 years, women can actually manipulate men into dismantling all of the checks and balances placed on female nature because they're "oppressive and misogynistic".

Women don't have the same soft spot for the opposite gender that men do. Where women will strictly uphold their expectations of men, men tend to be far more lenient, allowing women to shirk their responsibilities towards society at large far more easily.

TexasMilitia · 2019-06-06T10:44:54+00:00

If I had gold for this I’d have given it. As it is ya got a nice silver coin. Well done 👍

CursingWhileNursing · 2019-06-06T16:39:06+00:00

Reminds me of the new "parity" laws leftist/green politicians are implementing right now for state governments as well as for the federal government. They give a fuck about active and passive voting rights and declare it a must that from now on, parties have to have the same number of male and female candidates and that their groups in the parliaments must have an equal number of male and female members. The only exception: feminist parties that only allow female members.

The fun part is that even the most leftist party comes to a number of female members that barely reaches 40%. Most parties have far less than 30% female members, because woman can't be bothered with all that petty work at the basis. So in the end, male candidates that have actually put in the work and the enthusiasm and that can provide the knowledge and the experience will be left out for the sake of women who are just here because vagina.

And even better, the parliamentary group of the Green Party in the Bundestag, the german federal parliament, consists of 68% females. Again, while the number of female party members is way below 40%. And they are already punting and huffing and screeching, because there is no fucking way they would reduce the number of female parlamentarians. And fuck that law we've just introduced, because that is only for men anyway.

And apart from that just one final thought: have you ever been with a group that mostly consists of females or with you even been the only male? They give a fuck about you. When they talk, they will immidiately form a circle that is excluding you. When they begin to walk, they will not wait for you. And they will only include you when the other women are occupied or when they need someone to carry their shopping bags.

When it is the other way around, one or two women in a group of men, the men will usually go out of their way to make the women feel included.

And that is what we can expect in politics as well. Women give a fuck about men, except they want something and they instinctively favour girls and women and can't even see something bad in this behaviour. "Oh sure, we've just introduced that parity law, but that should only apply when WOMEN are in the minority. In case women are already favoured, then this law should not apply. And yes, of course feminism also fights for equal rights for men and boys... why are you giving me that strange look?"

originaldutchcow · 2019-06-06T10:51:26+00:00

This is gold

JohnPerera · 2019-06-06T18:08:09+00:00

That is how women evolved. They want to have only the best alpha males to reproduce, and they will kill the rest of the males. That way is good to bring the best genetics generation, but its really bad for those who "mistakenly" born as men in such society.

TheZoidberg5766 · 2019-06-06T16:08:33+00:00

Long story short: Women are superficial and materialistic.

roflcopt0rz_returns · 2019-06-06T17:21:32+00:00

I remember reading this awhile ago and it was still great

OBviously this is a tiny sample size and the author admitted it's not a real experiment, but literally everything in that experiment makes sense if you're MGTOW

ON a morality basis, men are confirmed to be more moral than women, just look at Kohlberg's stuff where men can achieve a higher level of morality than women. The feminists got so butthurt about the truth that some salty feminist named Gilligan had to "create" her own model specifically for women, which was literally just repeating the same thing Kohlberg said except in a different way (basically instead of "men and women measured on the same scale and men are just better", she basically pulled them onto a "different" scale and said they were equal in their own ways or some bullshit).

In a practical and very simplistic way, because sure these are children and not adults and thus their morality is not really developed much, men/boys STILL are more caring instinctively. Men/boys at the very least want to fuck way more different girls than girls want to fuck boys (women follow the 80/20 rule, while men want to fuck more than just 20% of the girls around), and thus men/boys will take care of women in addition to other men (though more women in general), while women only care for themselves. In this small experiment we see that perfectly. The girls only cared about the top 20% (in this case in a very exaggerated way because the "bottom 80%" of boys got nothing at all) while the boys wanted all the girls to get close to them, even the least desirable girls.

frikabg · 2019-06-06T14:28:20+00:00

Saw that one before can confirm women are selfish cunts that only think about themselves.

some1arguewithme · 2019-06-06T12:26:01+00:00

This is great content. That experiment would be great to perform over and over again, taping each session.

angelojch · 2019-06-06T13:08:04+00:00

reddit needs some superupvote that counts as two

capodonca · 2019-06-06T17:15:39+00:00

In both cases women win and men lose.

Moral of the story: disregard females aquire currency or snacks.

Fantoche_Dreemurr · 2019-06-06T19:49:28+00:00

Wow scary read

Anyone who has seen women in positions of authority knows this shit happens every time

[deleted] · 2019-06-06T16:03:17+00:00

This microexperiment coincides with studies that show that when man became monogomous, production increased and civilization rose. It gave every man an incentive to produce.

Griever114 · 2019-06-06T13:34:16+00:00

This post is making me want a snack

Electronic_Record · 2019-06-06T14:14:43+00:00

Sounds like the simps gave into female charm - they didn't learn from getting scraps the first time.

mackshacku · 2019-06-06T15:17:38+00:00

what happens when 90% of the men in the west are disenfranchised by this system? I doubt they will sit idly by and do nothing.

[deleted] · 2019-06-06T16:05:36+00:00

My first red pill was either in 1st grade or Kindergarden

Similar type of situation this teacher is describing

NoCharism · 2019-06-06T16:50:20+00:00

Gynocentric societies will always lose against patriarchal societies,

because gynocentric societies dont have as many children, as patriarchal societies.

On the long run its always the patriarchal society, thats going to be dominating

So if the society collapses in the near future, go with the patriarchy

LikeHarambeMemes · 2019-06-06T17:56:12+00:00

Men are the pillars of society.

RogerStarbucks · 2019-06-06T18:33:32+00:00

Similar experiments such as OKcupid's all prove the same thing; women are hegemonic (and vicious in how they do it)

Chart: https://i.imgur.com/XPFYOPZ.png

Article: https://www.yourtango.com/2016285828/women-find-80-percent-men-unattractive-says-crazy-study

reaper555 · 2019-06-06T18:37:24+00:00

In the case where women had the power. Isn’t that what evolution is. Survival of the fittest. That only the best men get access to the goods and the lesser men are eked out of existence. Given that mate selection is predominantly female driven. Women do gravitate towards the popular guys. Life is unfair.

[deleted] · 2019-06-06T19:07:16+00:00

The empathetic gender in action.

MuleFool42 · 2019-06-06T19:19:01+00:00

Lesson: MGTOW. Enrich yourself, materially, emotionally, socially, mentally, physically, financially. Develop into the best possible and most successful version of yourself that you can, for your own purpose, happiness, and general well being.

If you attain most of that for yourself, there will always be someone around wanting to share in the spoils. Don't share, but give the appearance of sharing and leverage your situation to get what you want.

This is what people, especially women looking for a provider do, there's no shame in doing the same.

Have your fun if you want but never give away the store.

[deleted] · 2019-06-06T20:28:01+00:00

Women dont know what they want. They say they do but they really dont. What they crave is someone to make choices for them so they dont have to. They can then complain about the choices even if it was the right one.

baddogkelervra1 · 2019-06-07T03:07:27+00:00

Looks like this is from Vox Day's blog, although I can't find this exact source on the archive. Vox is a pretty awesome guy, not exactly MGTOW but he has a ton of insight and is definitely a voice of masculine reason.

Edit: found the source, it's from Alpha Game, it only references Vox.

[deleted] · 2019-06-07T05:05:01+00:00

Briffault's Law in all it's glory.

[deleted] · 2019-06-07T07:21:50+00:00

Without patriarchy humans society automatically reverts back to a state of nature society based on instinct instead of rational morality. Essentially this means humans reduce themselves to their baser animal instincts. Prior to the advent of agricultural civilization 8000 years ago, 17 women to every 1 man reproduced. That means only 5.9% of ALL men born every passed their genes on. This 3rd world mud hut violent shit hole existence where men's existence is a nightmare is the world we are reverting to by allowing women to vote and dictate civilizations course.

bfte2 · 2019-06-06T16:55:20+00:00

When ideas are out into practice.

ImmaculateDeity · 2019-06-06T16:58:24+00:00

Microcosm is the same as the macrocosm

lennygotplenty2025 · 2019-06-06T17:00:31+00:00

Very interesting!

Smiliey · 2019-06-06T18:23:03+00:00

Very good read.. Would love to see more of this in the future.

Kunaired15 · 2019-06-06T22:55:42+00:00

Templars already destroying Thots back in medieval age.

I_am_Groot69 · 2019-06-07T02:55:07+00:00

Man where did you find this shit? That is some good stuff.

eduardkoopman · 2019-06-07T09:24:47+00:00

NOT sharing, that is more common among women it appears to me.

On a micro-scale/personal relationship, you also see that. You see that women don't pay as much as their partner. And the womens money is her money, and his money is the money for both, and when he has financial dificult times and she basically pays more she will regularly leave him pretty soon thereafter because I assume she doesn't want to share her money.

Basically, getting equal reciprocation from a woman is very difficult (as a man). And only possible (to come out on top, seen on an input - return basis) as a man, if you are and behave like a total piece of shit.

2019-06-07T13:32:46+00:00

[deleted]

Phanekim · 2019-06-07T23:18:55+00:00

Being a school teacher in the states, i see the same thing.

Herban_Myth · 2019-09-22T09:23:58+00:00

Very interesting and insightful

ConArtist22 · 2019-10-09T22:09:26+00:00

Who wrote this?

Title	Microexperiment in China
Author	HierkommtdieSonne902
Upvotes	792
Comments	109
Date	June 6, 2019 9:45 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/bxetiq/microexperiment_in_china/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/microexperiment-in-china.452399 https://theredarchive.com/post/452399

Comments