TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Toddler dies in botched circumcision

Zinziberruderalis

December 8, 2021
472 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/toddler-dies-baby-fighting-for-life-after-allegedly-botched-circumcision-at-perth-medical-clinic/news-story/41628ee49bf89a56d1f244aca7ee13a7
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Toddler dies in botched circumcision
Author

Zinziberruderalis

Upvotes 472
Comments 120
Date December 8, 2021 11:07 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/rc3ifc/toddler_dies_in_botched_circumcision/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/toddler-dies-in-botched-circumcision.1087873
https://theredarchive.com/post/1087873
Top posts by Zinziberruderalis

Aussie dad facing 8000-year ‘prison sentence’

264 upvotes
December 24, 2021
/r/MensRights

Melbourne Uni barred from medical grants after it released photo of 'six white men' receiving honorary doctorates

140 upvotes
March 8, 2022
/r/MensRights

The data are clear: The boys are not all right

140 upvotes
February 11, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

A 17-year-old boy died by suicide hours after being scammed. The FBI says it's part of a troubling increase in 'sextortion' cases.

106 upvotes
May 21, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

YouTube’s algorithms recommending ‘incel’, ‘manosphere’ videos

48 upvotes
May 19, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

The Gender Gap Is Taking Us to Unexpected Places

42 upvotes
January 16, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Ghislaine Maxwell guilty in Epstein sex trafficking trial: What the case revealed about female sex offenders

25 upvotes
January 1, 2022
/r/MensRights

SJW training in the media -au

17 upvotes
March 7, 2019
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]BuddhasRoadTrip 123 points124 points125 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sexually mutilating children. No decent society would ever allow it.

[–]ShaidarHaran2 99 points100 points101 points 4 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

God. The surviving brother, if he pulls through, gets to live knowing he had a brother that died, all because his parents and doctors chose this 99.9% useless procedure.

Is this worth it parents? Is it worth it to inflict your cosmetic preference in the skin of a child and risk this?

Ban the fucking thing until direct medical need is shown, until they reach the age of majority and then they can do whatever.

[–]boxsterguy 54 points55 points56 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

100% useless for prepubescent males. After that, 99% useless.

[–]ScarAdvanced9562 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago [recovered] (6 children) | Copy Link

About 0.5% of uncircumcised men have phimosis, and about 4/5ths can be treated with steroidal cream.

[–]boxsterguy 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And most of the rest can be resolved with z-plasty rather than circumcision. But there's probably on in a million that actually medically needs a circumcision.

Also, the important part is that phimosis can't be diagnosed until puberty anyway.

[–]weirdest_memes_ 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Women most affected 😂

[–]aigars2 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Killed a child because of what? This has to stop.

[–]Sininenn 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Until after puberty, even.

[–]cplJimminy 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I had phimosis or so the doctors said. My mom quickly decided to get my cut at their recommendations when i was 12 or so. I'm always wondering if there was another alternative. I remember how awesome felt when i was touching my foreskin. Now it's like an empty shell...

[–]intactUS_throwaway 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm so sorry. 😢

[–]DraganTehPro 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Source? I wanna use that when someone tells me that circumcision is good.

[–]ScarAdvanced9562 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here it says 0.3% for Taiwanese pubescent males, it works to be about 0.4% for uncircumcised males

Phimosis can be completely solved with steroid cream in 80% of cases, and works with other non mutilation method in 95% of cases

Circumcision is only needed in 0.02% of cases. That’s 200 out of every million boys.

[–]intactUS_throwaway 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

99.998% useless, or something like that.

[–]needletothebar 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

100% useless except for prudes.

[–]ShaidarHaran2 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm allowing for some medical need, but it's rather rare to need it and ludicrous to cut up all newborn baby boys for what 0.1% of people will need later. Actually 1 in 3000 in the US is more like 0.03%, and it's an even lower 1 in 16,000 in Sweden which means most of that American stat is just societal pressure or lack of knowledge on care.

[–]needletothebar 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

circumcision is not a medical procedure. there's no such thing as medical need for a religious blood sacrifice.

[–]rabel111 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"Homicide detectives have been called in to investigate the horrific incident, however officials at the Western Australian Police Force have confirmed his death is no longer being treated as suspicious. It can be confirmed the boy underwent a medical procedure at a registered medical centre prior to his death, police said. The investigation has been handed to the coroner and a report will be prepared by police."

Both of these babes, brothers, were sexually mutilated by the same butcher at the same a medical centre, so there will be nothing done about it. Coroners in Australia will scream out when women are offended or inconvenienced, but have nothing to say about male babies murdered during an unnecessary cosmetic procedure. All that will be said is "too bad" "so sad". This will make a lot of feminist happy.

[–]MastermindX 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Imagine if a baby girl died in Australia while receiving genital mutilation. I doubt it would be treated the same, or that it would matter whether it was done by a registered medical professional or not.

[–]rabel111 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly.

[–]Throwawaydhxj 57 points58 points59 points 4 years ago* (17 children) | Copy Link

Why the fuck is circumcisising your kids so normal in the US(edit: and other places where it is normalized)? Idk but if my parents did that to me id be in court.

[–]Zinziberruderalis[S] 52 points53 points54 points 4 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

That was in Australia. The article's coyness about where the mutilations took place makes it likely it was associated with a religion.

[–]ShaidarHaran2 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sadly going to predict no jail time either, it's like you could kill a child with a rusty saw and get off with none so long as you claim you were trying to circumcise him

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-21374643#:~:text=Four%2Dweek%2Dold%20Goodluck%20Caubergs,jail%2C%20suspended%20for%2024%20months.

https://www.kilburntimes.co.uk/news/queen-s-park-baby-bled-to-death-two-days-after-3691580

[–]TekatoZikame 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It'd be more understandable for older generations who did it. Being misinformed, uneducated and just following the pattern of what was done to them too.

But when I hear 20-40 year olds today defending it and saying they'll do the same to their kid for no good reason... that's what baffles me.

It should only ever be done to kids for medical reasons. If they wanna do it for any other reasons, they should wait til they're 18 ffs.

[–]boxsterguy 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Addendum: there is no medical reason to circumcise an infant.

[–]needletothebar 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

there's no medical reason to circumcise anybody.

[–]needletothebar 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"MY PENIS WORKS JUST FINE".

denial is a hell of a drug.

[–]needletothebar 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

  • In cases of masturbation we must, I believe, break the habit by inducing such a condition of the parts as will cause too much local suffering to allow of the practice being continued. For this purpose, if the prepuce is long, we may circumcise the male patient with present and probably with future advantage; the operation, too, should not be performed under chloroform, so that the pain experienced may be associated with the habit we wish to eradicate. -Athol A. W. Johnson, On An Injurious Habit Occasionally Met with in Infancy and Early Childhood, The Lancet, vol. 1 (7 April 1860): pp. 344-345.

  • I refer to masturbation as one of the effects of a long prepuce; not that this vice is entirely absent in those who have undergone circumcision, though I never saw an instance in a Jewish child of very tender years, except as the result of association with children whose covered glans have naturally impelled them to the habit. M. J. Moses, The Value of Circumcision as a Hygienic and Therapeutic Measure, NY Medical Journal, vol. 14 (1871): pp. 368-374.

  • There can be no doubt of [masturbation's] injurious effect, and of the proneness to practice it on the part of children with defective brains. Circumcision should always be practiced. It may be necessary to make the genitals so sore by blistering fluids that pain results from attempts to rub the parts. Angel Money, Treatment of Disease in Children. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston. 1887, p. 421.

  • A remedy [for masturbation] which is almost always successful in small boys is circumcision. The operation should be performed by a surgeon without administering an anesthetic, as the pain attending the operation will have a salutary effect upon the mind, especially if it be connected with the idea of punishment. John Harvey Kellogg, Treatment for Self-Abuse and Its Effects, Plain Facts for Old and Young, Burlington, Iowa: P. Segner & Co. 1888, p. 295.

  • Measures more radical than circumcision would, if public opinion permitted their adoption, be a true kindness to many patients of both sexes. Jonathan Hutchinson, On Circumcision as Preventive of Masturbation, Archives of Surgery, vol. 2 (1891): pp. 267-268.

  • In all cases of masturbation circumcision is undoubtedly the physicians' closest friend and ally ... To obtain the best results one must cut away enough skin and mucous membrane to rather put it on the stretch when erections come later. There must be no play in the skin after the wound has thoroughly healed, but it must fit tightly over the penis, for should there be any play the patient will be found to readily resume his practice, not begrudging the time and extra energy required to produce the orgasm. It is true, however, that the longer it takes to have an orgasm, the less frequently it will be attempted, consequently the greater the benefit gained. E. J. Spratling, Masturbation in the Adult, Medical Record, vol. 24 (1895): pp. 442-443.

  • Clarence B. was addicted to the secret vise practiced among boys. I performed an orificial operation, consisting of circumcision ... He needed the rightful punishment of cutting pains after his illicit pleasures. N. Bergman, Report of a Few Cases of Circumcision, Journal of Orificial Surgery, vol. 7 (1898): pp. 249-251.

  • Not infrequently marital unhappiness would be better relieved by circumcising the husband than by suing for divorce. A. W. Taylor, Circumcision - Its Moral and Physical Necessities and Advantages, Medical Record, vol. 56 (1899): p. 174.

  • Finally, circumcision probably tends to increase the power of sexual control. The only physiological advantages which the prepuce can be supposed to confer is that of maintaining the penis in a condition susceptible to more acute sensation than would otherwise exist. It may increase the pleasure of coition and the impulse to it: but these are advantages which in the present state of society can well be spared. If in their loss, increase in sexual control should result, one should be thankful. Editor, Medical News. (A Plea for Circumcision) Medical News, vol. 77 (1900): pp. 707-708.

  • It has been urged as an argument against the universal adoption of circumcision that the removal of the protective covering of the glans tends to dull the sensitivity of that exquisitely sensitive structure and thereby diminishes sexual appetite and the pleasurable effects of coitus. Granted that this be true, my answer is that, whatever may have been the case in days gone by, sensuality in our time needs neither whip nor spur, but would be all the better for a little more judicious use of curb and bearing-rein. E. Harding Freeland, Circumcision as a Preventive of Syphilis and Other Disorders, The Lancet, vol. 2 (29 Dec. 1900): pp. 1869-1871.

  • Another advantage of circumcision ... is the lessened liability to masturbation. A long foreskin is irritating per se, as it necessitates more manipulation of the parts in bathing ... This leads the child to handle the parts, and as a rule, pleasurable sensations are elicited from the extremely sensitive mucous membrane, with resultant manipulation and masturbation. The exposure of the glans penis following circumcision ... lessens the sensitiveness of the organ ... It therefore lies with the physician, the family adviser in affairs hygienic and medical, to urge its acceptance. Ernest G. Mark, Circumcision, American Practitioner and News, vol. 31 (1901): pp. 121-126.

  • Boys ought to be circumcised -- the permanent and tempting invitation to masturbation in the form of the foreskin being removed in their early infancy, before sexual feelings are experienced, and the vicious counsel of other boys is received... There is some reason, then, and excuse as well, why boys should be boys, endowed as they are with anatomical conditions, as well as traits, calculated to lead them astray. Brandsford Lewis. A Plain Talk on Matters Pertaining to Genito-Urinary Anatomy, Physiology and Diseases (Part 1). American Journal of Dermatology and Genito-Urinary Diseases 1903;7:201-209.

  • Circumcision promotes cleanliness, prevents disease, and by reducing oversensitiveness of the parts tends to relieve sexual irritability, thus correcting any tendency which may exist to improper manipulations of the genital organs and the consequent acquirement of evil sexual habits, such as masturbation. Lydston G. Frank, Sex Hygiene for the Male. Chicago: Riverton Press, 1912.

  • The foreskin is a frequent factor in the causation of masturbation ... Circumcision offers a diminished tendency to masturbation ... It is the moral duty of every physician to encourage circumcision in the young. Abraham L. Wolbarst, Universal Circumcision, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 62 (1914): pp. 92-97.

  • Circumcision not only reduces the irritability of the child's penis, but also the so-called passion of which so many married men are so extremely proud, to the detriment of their wives and their married life. Many youthful rapes could be prevented, many separations, and divorces also, and many an unhappy marriage improved if this unnatural passion was cut down by a timely circumcision. L. W. Wuesthoff, Benefits of Circumcision, Medical World, vol. 33 (1915): p. 434.

  • The prepuce is one of the great factors in causing masturbation in boys. Here is the dilemma we are in: If we do not teach the growing boy to pull the prepuce back and cleanse the glans there is the danger of smegma collecting and of adhesions and ulcerations forming, which in their turn will cause irritation likely to lead to masturbation. If we do teach the boy to pull the prepuce back and cleanse his glans, that handling alone is sufficient gradually and almost without the boy's knowledge to initiate him into the habit of masturbation ... Therefore, off with the prepuce! William J. Robinson, Circumcision and Masturbation, Medical World, vol. 33 (1915): p. 390.

  • I suggest that all male children should be circumcised. This is 'against nature', but that is exactly the reason why it should be done. Nature intends that the adolescent male shall copulate as often and as promiscuously as possible, and to that end covers the sensitive glans so that it shall be ever ready to receive stimuli. Civilization, on the contrary, requires chastity, and the glans of the circumcised rapidly assumes a leathery texture less sensitive than skin. Thus the adolescent has his attention drawn to his penis much less often. I am convinced that masturbation is much less common in the circumcised. With these considerations in view it does not seem apt to argue that 'God knows best how to make little boys.' R. W. Cockshut, Circumcision, British Medical Journal, vol. 2 (1935): 764.

  • [Routine Circumcision] does not necessitate handling of the penis by the child himself and therefore does not focus the male's attention on his own genitals. Masturbation is considered less likely. Alan F. Guttmacher, Should the Baby Be Circumcised?, Parents Magazine, vol. 16 (1941): pp. 26, 76-78.

  • Parents readily recognize the importance of local cleanliness and genital hygiene in their children and are usually ready to adopt measures which may avert masturbation. Circumcision is usually advised on these grounds. Meredith F. Campbell. The Male Genital Tract and the Female Urethra. in: Campbell's Urology. vol. 2. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company. 1970:1836.

[–]ApprehensiveMail8 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's meant to prevent masturbation?

Well, in that case I can tell you from personal experience it does not work at all.

[–]needletothebar 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

yeah, studies show it actually backfired. making masturbation less pleasurable actually makes men do it more to try to get some satisfaction.

[–]CttCJim 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because J.G.Kellogg thought it would stop boys from masturbating.

He also thought bland food would prevent lustful thoughts, which is why we have corn flakes.

[–]BuddhasRoadTrip 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It's banned in most of the world. The US allows it because of threats from the jewish community.

[–]intactUS_throwaway 26 points27 points28 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It actually isn't banned anywhere.

It fucking well should be, but it isn't.

[–]justicedragon101 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It’s banned in iceland. As far as I know it’s the only place in the world where it’s banned

[–]intactUS_throwaway 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Iceland didn't ban it. They tried to, but the usual suspects raised a shitfit and they backed off.

[–]needletothebar 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

no it isn't. slovenia arguably holds that title.

[–]CttCJim 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Nope. You can blame J.G. Kellogg for non Jewish circumcision.

[–]needletothebar 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you can blame muhammad for the vast majority of non-jewish circumcision.

[–]Xavierkill22 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Karaitism and reform Judaism are the only forms of Judaism that don't require circumcision. I'm a Karaite Jewish and although we're the strictest form of Judaism, we leave that stuff to the person in question. No way I'm getting my skin removed, why force it on my son?

[–]y-EYE- 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Worst part is that Judaic circumcision is nowhere near as mutilating as what’s being practiced in the US.

[–]KINGCRAB715 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So glad I opted to end the cycle

[–]Brad_Breath 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If the coroner finds that the death is due to circumcision gone wrong, I wonder if there will be a push to finally ban this in Australia?

[–]coloradocaniac 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Please spread the word to everyone you know and try to talk people out of this barbarism.

[–]Nerfixion 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I feel more sorry for the one that survived. Who knows how deformed he will be growing up, and mind you there are 2 boys here so he fucked up 1 and went on to do the other!

[–]ApprehensiveMail8 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So tragic.

[–]rainbow_bro_bot 13 points14 points15 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm glad I'm British.

[–]Brad_Breath 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

There is no more protection in UK than Australia from this barbaric ritual

[–]boxsterguy 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Legally, no. Culturally, yes

[–]Brad_Breath 15 points16 points17 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As a Brit who now lives in Australia, I’d say it’s very similar. People don’t talk about it, most are against it, but some are in favour. Nobody has the balls to outright ban it. Too many people think they deserve the right to cut up their baby

[–]BuddhasRoadTrip 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Rabbis killing infants

[–]Mens-Advocate 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Your article says circumciser, not rabbi.

Such misrepresentation harms the intactivist cause by unnecessarily validating the accusation of anti-Semitism.

[–]TheEthnicityOfASpoon 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just remember there was no such thing as a “botched” circumcision — just as there is no such thing as a botched rape.

[–]Zinziberruderalis[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Seems likely due to drug reaction.

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/health/health-problems/likely-cause-of-wa-toddlers-death-after-circumcision-revealed/news-story/fe6e7119195b4da06c7b9a1b3a3c526d

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (66 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Brad_Breath 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

this is being investigated by the coroner, so rather than speculate on causes that support what we want to believe, let’s wait for the coroner’s report.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Brad_Breath 20 points21 points22 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Wow so no matter what the medical investigation finds, you already know better?

That’s incredible. How did you gain this unbelievable power?

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Brad_Breath 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Ok I think I understand now.

You’re telling me that surgery is risk free in the US.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Brad_Breath 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Ok well then let’s ban circumcision in Australia where it does cause deaths.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Brad_Breath 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not sure if you read the article, but the title of the article says the procedure was done at a medical clinic.

[–]needletothebar 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

you're lying.

[–]mikesteane 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A study you have not cited or even identified.

[–]Zinziberruderalis[S] 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

You seem a bit dismissive and closed minded. I think intactivism can be a little over-heated and, like many MRM trends, is derivative of feminism.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]needletothebar 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

right back at you, friend.

[–]Zinziberruderalis[S] 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I've looked at the literature and agree the overwhelming consensus is that circumcision is not a major harm, and may even reduce the risk of certain diseases. Intactivists will counter

  • specialists are mostly Jews
  • the medical profession doesn't value male sexual pleasure
  • argument from nature etc

The second I would give some credit.

[–]mikesteane 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

but the fact is that a large study over 10 years found ZERO CASES of death due to neonatal circumcision

and

I've looked at the literature and agree the overwhelming consensus is that circumcision is not a major harm

Perhaps you can cite the studies. The intention of circumcision is to cause harm, there's not much point in doing it otherwise.

Edit: I presume your studies are those of "Dr" Brian Morris.

[–]basefx 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would it be considered a major harm if you nonconsensually touched and severed the prepuce from a healthy 30 year old person's genitals?

[–]Frosty-Gate-8094 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The investigation is on. But they found out that the procedure was done in a 'registered medical facility'.

Considering that it happened in Austrailia, which has state-of-the-art medical facilities, there is no reason why it cant happened in USA.

This was not done by quacks or unqualified individuals.

[–]needletothebar 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

the AAP doesn't seem to agree:

https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/142/1_MeetingAbstract/224

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]needletothebar 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

a study of 5,000 male births is not a "large study" as you previously claimed. it's a 10 year study, so that's an average of 500 births per year. if circumcision had, say, a 10% mortality rate you might find it on a study that tiny, but there's no reason to expect mortality rates anywhere near that high.

the 200 babies a year number is equivalent to approximately 1 death per 50,000 circumcisions. i'm sure you see the problem with using a study of 5,000 circumcisions to find a 1-in-50,000 event.

we wouldn't expect any surgery to have a mortality rate with a percentage high enough to show up on a study that small.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]needletothebar 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

let's see them, then.

[–]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Neonatal Circumcision: A Ten-Year Overview: With Comparison of the Gomco Clamp and the Plastibell Device William F. Gee; Julian S. Ansell Pediatrics (1976) 58 (6): 824–827.

What recent study do you have?

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If you're making the claim that deaths from neonatal cutting are rare then the onus is on you to provide current peer reviewed literature, not wikipedia citations from 1976 of 5000 boys over a 10 year period.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

King reported a period when 500,000 consecutive circumcisions were performed in New York city without a single fatality [17].

A claim from a 1982 article with less than 4 citations since: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7176044/

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]needletothebar 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

no, i didn't skip it. the fact that the figure may include overcounting or undercounting does not mean that none of the deaths can be attributed to the surgery.

[–]MastermindX 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Does it matter? Mutilating babies for no medical reason would still be a horrible practice, even if all of them survived the procedure.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ihckmn52 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Even if you are an idiot that buys into the bullshit "benefits," there are more effective and less invasive ways to achieve the same things.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ihckmn52 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As long as you think that it shouldn't be routinely done to infants then I'm fine with that.

[–]basefx 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would a healthy 30 year old consider it a medical benefit if you nonconsensually touched and severed the prepuce from their genitals?

[–]TheEthnicityOfASpoon 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

u/MiddleReasonable647 — found the circumcision fetishist.

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TheEthnicityOfASpoon 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

u/MiddleReasonable647 is Brian J. Morris:

https://en.intactiwiki.org/index.php/Brian_J._Morris

[–]basefx 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

In a for profit healthcare system, what do you think is most likely to be true about one of the most common and lucrative procedures, that deaths from it are rare, or that they're underreported?

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link

How is an average of $2,000 per baby not lucrative?

https://www.mdsave.com/procedures/pediatric-circumcision/d78afeca

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

Why are you pretending as if I said the surgeon is the only one who makes money from cutting?

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

The hospital is a business, why would they go through the effort of purchasing multiple gomco clamps, plastibels and cirucmstraints for them not to be used regularly? Even if they're not being explicitly told to push for cutting, which surgeon is more valuable to their bottom line, the one who cuts 50 babies at $2000 each, or the one who cuts none?

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]basefx 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

But the surgeon has no interest in promoting the procedure! None. Zero.

The procedure is not advertised, it’s not pushed by anyone except the mothers.

Absolutely no interest:

https://www.pollockclinics.com/circumcision/fees/

https://gentleproceduresdallas.com/circumcision/

The $2000 is peanuts to the hospitals lol. It’s not a high volume thing, and the $2000 is not high profit either. Many are not reimbursed at that rate either. And the expenses the hospital incurs probably gobble up most of that $2000.

Think about Medicaid rates, which probably pay the hospital $200! Or private pay, where the ability to collect $2000 is nil.

You don’t know healthcare economics, sorry.

1.5 million males per year isn't high volume?

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/births.htm

[+] [deleted] 4 years ago   (13 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] basefx 0 points 1 point 2 points 4 years ago   (12 children) | Copy Link

Orthopedic and cardiac surgery are as common as male births and can be one by a single surgeon in 15-30 minutes or less?

https://myhealth.ucsd.edu/conditions/orthopedics/tools/90,P03080

There's no incentive in harvesting dermal fibroblasts from neonatal prepuce anatomy?

https://www.atcc.org/products/pcs-201-010

[+] [deleted] 4 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] basefx 0 points 1 point 2 points 4 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

Whether it's 1 surgeon doing 20 in a day or 5 doing 4 in a day what difference does it make in revenue?

[+] [deleted] 4 years ago   (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] basefx 0 points 1 point 2 points 4 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Who is incentivized to bring in this “revenue” that you claim is so lucrative in circumcision? It’s not the individual doctors doing them. So….why would the money be a consideration in doctors doing the procedure? Doctors really don’t care what the hospital revenues are. They get paid separately from the hospital and it’s not worth it to them to promote the procedure based on money.

Where does the hospital get its money to pay?

Professional organizations that decide that the risk/benefit is in favor of circumcision have no financial incentives to do so. The CDC doesn’t care, the AAP doesn’t care, financially speaking. These studies are done by epidemiologists and not by surgeons! Large data bases are culled by non surgeons who have no dog in the fight, and all kinds of data are sorted for analysis by pointy-headed academics who mostly don’t even practice real Medicine. Good grief. You don’t even know the system!

That guy BJ Morris that everyone here hates is an academic! He does studies, he didn’t even do circumcisions at all! Holy cow the level of suspicion on these discussions is beyond rational. He discovered the renin-angiotensin system, he’s not a “surgeon doctor”. He’s a biologist.

People only do things if there's a financial incentive? His association with pedophile Vernan Quaintance and the Gigal Society is just coincidental?

[+] [deleted] 4 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] basefx 0 points 1 point 2 points 4 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

None of my sons’ circumcisions involved anybody buying their foreskin. None of my nephews. None of my brothers. Zero persons I know were offered money for any tissue ever.

Why would they need your permission? You obviously saw no value in what was cut from your sons so what difference does would it make what they do with it afterwards?

[+] [deleted] 4 years ago *   (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] basefx 0 points 1 point 2 points 4 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

The donation is part of the consent to letting someone sever the prepuce from a healthy child's genitals.

[+] [deleted] 4 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] basefx 0 points 1 point 2 points 4 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

ortho, neurosurgery, interventional cardiology, radiology, ophthalmology, plastic surgery.

These are slightly more complicated procedures than genital cutting, people without a medical license can do 13 in a day.

https://www.latimes.com/la-oew-apple10jul10-story.html#:\~:text=The%20mohel%20said%20that%20he,as%2013%20in%20a%20day.

[+] [deleted] 4 years ago *   (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] basefx 0 points 1 point 2 points 4 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

Why would people become mohels or open genital cutting clinics if they couldn't make a living off of it? If it's such a stupid nuisance operation why are they forced to perform them during their med school residency?

[+] [deleted] 4 years ago   (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] basefx 0 points 1 point 2 points 4 years ago   (2 children) | Copy Link

The UK dropped coverage for non-therapeutic infant male genital cutting in their switch to the NHS, where was the deluge in male healthcare costs in the 70 years since?

[+] [deleted] 4 years ago *   (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–] basefx 0 points 1 point 2 points 4 years ago   (0 children) | Copy Link

The benefits claimed for prepuce avulsion and frenulum ablation are only applicable for individuals born with rare deformities that couldn't respond to normal preventative care or treatments. If it would be unethical to nonconsensually touch and sever the prepuce anatomy from a healthy 30 year old person's genitals, why should that change in any of the 29 years prior?

[–]NishimuraSchneiderp 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago [recovered] (0 children) | Copy Link

Religion and snake oil circumcision sales men.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter